


{"id":113727,"date":"2026-07-18T10:08:03","date_gmt":"2026-07-18T04:38:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/?p=113727"},"modified":"2026-07-18T11:06:29","modified_gmt":"2026-07-18T05:36:29","slug":"daily-editorial-analysis-18-july-2026","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/daily-editorial-analysis-18-july-2026\/","title":{"rendered":"Daily Editorial Analysis 18 July 2026"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2><strong>India\u2019s Parliament Must Not Stage Its Cadaver Synod<\/strong><\/h2>\n<h3><strong>Conclusion<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>The trial of Pope Formosus during the <strong>Cadaver Synod<\/strong> of 897 CE remains one of history&#8217;s most extraordinary examples of institutional excess.<\/li>\n<li>Although the pope had been dead for months, his body was exhumed, dressed in papal robes, placed on trial, declared guilty, and symbolically punished.<\/li>\n<li>Instead of restoring justice, the proceedings damaged the credibility of the Church and became a lasting reminder that legal authority loses legitimacy when exercised without a meaningful constitutional purpose.<\/li>\n<li>This historical episode provides <strong>an apt analogy for the constitutional debate<\/strong> surrounding the impeachment proceedings initiated against former Justice Yashwant Varma after his resignation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Constitutional Purpose of Impeachment<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>The Indian Constitution envisages <strong>impeachment<\/strong> solely as a mechanism to <strong>remove<\/strong><strong> an unfit <\/strong><strong>judge<\/strong> from constitutional office.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Article 121<\/strong> permits Parliament to discuss the conduct of judges only during proceedings seeking their removal.<\/li>\n<li>Similarly, <strong>Articles 124(4)<\/strong> and <strong>217<\/strong>, read with the <a href=\"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/procedure-for-removal-of-a-judge\/\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968<\/strong><\/a>, establish that removal from office is the only constitutional consequence of impeachment.<\/li>\n<li>Once a judge resigns, the constitutional office ceases to exist. As a result, the machinery created for removal loses its legal purpose because there is no office left to vacate.<\/li>\n<li>Continuing the process after resignation would therefore extend constitutional authority beyond its intended limits.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Resignation as a Constitutional Act<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>A judge occupies a constitutional office rather than an ordinary government post.<\/li>\n<li>The Supreme Court, in <strong>Union of India v. Gopal Chandra Misra (1978)<\/strong>, held that a judge&#8217;s resignation is a unilateral constitutional act requiring no acceptance from the President or any executive authority.<\/li>\n<li>The constitutional relationship ends immediately upon resignation.<\/li>\n<li>This principle has also been reflected in constitutional practice.<\/li>\n<li>The impeachment proceedings against <strong>Justice P.D. Dinakaran<\/strong> ended after his resignation, while the proceedings against <strong>Justice Soumitra Sen<\/strong> also came to a close once he resigned despite the Rajya Sabha having already adopted the removal motion.<\/li>\n<li>These precedents affirm that resignation extinguishes Parliament&#8217;s jurisdiction to continue removal proceedings.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Implications for Judicial Independence<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Allowing impeachment proceedings to continue after resignation would create a dangerous constitutional precedent.<\/li>\n<li>If Parliament retains authority over a resigned judge, there would be little constitutional basis to distinguish such cases from those involving <strong>retired<\/strong> or even <strong>deceased judges<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li>Future legislatures could revisit judicial decisions delivered years earlier and initiate proceedings motivated by changing political circumstances.<\/li>\n<li>Such a practice would weaken <strong>judicial independence<\/strong>, disturb the <strong>separation of powers<\/strong>, and expose judges to the fear of post-retirement political retaliation.<\/li>\n<li>Constitutional democracies depend not only upon independent judges but also upon institutions that respect the constitutional limits of their own authority.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Institutional Dignity and Constitutional Morality<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Every constitutional institution derives its legitimacy from acting within the limits prescribed by the Constitution.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Constitutional morality<\/strong> requires Parliament to exercise restraint even where political considerations encourage further action.<\/li>\n<li>Symbolic proceedings incapable of producing any constitutional consequence risk transforming legal processes into political theatre.<\/li>\n<li>The lesson of the Cadaver Synod demonstrates that institutions often suffer greater damage than the individuals they seek to condemn when authority is exercised without purpose.<\/li>\n<li>Respect for the <strong>rule of law<\/strong> requires adherence not only to constitutional text but also to the principles underlying constitutional governance.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Accountability Beyond Impeachment<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Ending impeachment proceedings does not imply the absence of accountability.<\/li>\n<li>Allegations involving criminal misconduct remain subject to <strong>criminal investigation<\/strong>, prosecution, and trial under the ordinary legal process.<\/li>\n<li>Likewise, questions relating to pension, retirement benefits, or other statutory entitlements may be examined in accordance with applicable law.<\/li>\n<li>The constitutional limitation applies only to impeachment because its exclusive function is the removal of a sitting constitutional functionary.<\/li>\n<li>Once that office has already been vacated, ordinary legal institutions, not Parliament, become the appropriate forum for determining liability.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Conclusion<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>The enduring significance of the <strong>Cadaver Synod<\/strong> lies in its warning against institutions exercising power after its constitutional purpose has disappeared.<\/li>\n<li>Justice is not strengthened by symbolic proceedings that cannot produce meaningful legal consequences.<\/li>\n<li>Respect for <strong>constitutional morality<\/strong>, <strong>judicial independence<\/strong>, the <strong>rule of law<\/strong>, and the <strong>separation of powers<\/strong> requires Parliament to recognise that impeachment ends with resignation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>India\u2019s Parliament Must Not Stage Its Cadaver Synod FAQs<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><strong>Q1. <\/strong>Why is the Cadaver Synod used as an analogy?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans. <\/strong>The Cadaver Synod illustrates the futility of conducting legal proceedings against someone who no longer holds the office in question.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q2. <\/strong>What is the constitutional purpose of impeachment?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans. <\/strong>The constitutional purpose of impeachment is to remove an unfit judge from office and not to punish a former judge.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q3.<\/strong> Which constitutional provisions govern the removal of judges?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans. <\/strong>Articles 121, 124(4), and 217, along with the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968, govern the removal of judges.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q4. <\/strong>How does resignation affect impeachment proceedings?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans. <\/strong>A judge&#8217;s resignation immediately ends the constitutional relationship, making further impeachment proceedings ineffective.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q5. <\/strong>How can a former judge still be held accountable?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans. <\/strong>A former judge can still be held accountable through criminal investigation, prosecution, and other legal proceedings under ordinary law.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Source: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thehindu.com\/opinion\/lead\/indias-parliament-must-not-stage-its-cadaver-synod\/article71235194.ece\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">The Hindu<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><strong>A Trade Deal That Tests India\u2019s Competitive Confidence<\/strong><\/h2>\n<h3><strong>Context<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>The <strong>Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA)<\/strong> between <strong>India<\/strong> and the <strong>United Kingdom<\/strong> marks a significant step in strengthening bilateral economic relations.<\/li>\n<li>While trade agreements are often judged by their ability to increase <strong>exports<\/strong>, their greater value lies in encouraging competition, improving productivity, and promoting long-term economic growth.<\/li>\n<li>By combining export expansion with gradual market opening, the agreement seeks to build a more competitive Indian economy.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Major Features of India-UK Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA)<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Export Promotion and Employment Generation<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li>Nearly 99% of Indian exports now enjoy duty-free access to the U.K. market.<\/li>\n<li>Major beneficiaries include labour-intensive sectors such as textiles, garments, leather, footwear, marine products, processed food, engineering goods, and auto components.<\/li>\n<li>Lower tariffs improve price competitiveness, expand export opportunities, and create formal employment, particularly in manufacturing centres like Tiruppur and Agra.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Creating a Level Playing Field<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li>Indian exporters previously faced higher tariffs than competitors from Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Cambodia.<\/li>\n<li>Equal market access removes this disadvantage and enables Indian businesses to compete fairly in the British market, strengthening India&#8217;s export potential.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Strengthening the Pharmaceutical Sector<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li>India, the world&#8217;s leading producer of generic medicines, gains improved access to one of the U.K.&#8217;s largest pharmaceutical markets. Duty-free exports enhance price competitiveness, increase market share, and promote growth through economies of scale, benefiting a globally competitive industry.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Protection of Indian Professionals<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li>The Double Contribution Convention exempts Indian professionals temporarily working in Britain from paying social security contributions in both countries for up to five years.<\/li>\n<li>More than 75,000 workers and around 900 companies are expected to save nearly $600 million annually, reducing financial burdens and improving labour mobility.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Competition over Protectionism<\/strong><\/li>\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul>\n<li>India will gradually reduce tariffs on British automobiles and Scotch whisky through phased implementation and quota-based safeguards.<\/li>\n<li>Controlled exposure to foreign competition encourages domestic industries to improve quality, innovation, and efficiency.<\/li>\n<li>Long-term protection often weakens industries, whereas healthy competition promotes continuous improvement and greater consumer choice.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Effective Implementation Economic Perspective<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Economic Perspective<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li>The agreement&#8217;s success depends on effective execution.<\/li>\n<li>Exporters must understand available opportunities, government procedures should become more efficient, and industry associations should educate small enterprises.<\/li>\n<li>Better utilisation of <strong>Free Trade Agreements (FTAs)<\/strong> is essential for translating policy into measurable economic gains.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Economic Perspective<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li>The agreement reflects important economic principles such as <strong>comparative advantage<\/strong>, <strong>trade liberalization<\/strong>, <strong>consumer welfare<\/strong>, and higher <strong>productivity<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li>Export expansion generates employment, while carefully managed imports encourage domestic industries to innovate and become internationally competitive.<\/li>\n<li>Together, these measures support sustainable economic development.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Conclusion<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>The India-U.K. CETA<\/strong> is more than a conventional trade agreement. It promotes <strong>exports<\/strong>, creates <strong>employment<\/strong>, strengthens key industries, protects Indian professionals abroad, and encourages domestic industries to become globally competitive.<\/li>\n<li>By balancing market access with gradual liberalization, the agreement supports long-term economic progress.<\/li>\n<li>Its ultimate success will depend on effective implementation, greater awareness among businesses, and India&#8217;s confidence in embracing global competition.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>A Trade Deal That Tests India\u2019s Competitive Confidence FAQs<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><strong>Q1. <\/strong>What is the main objective of the India\u2013U.K. CETA?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans.<\/strong> The main objective of the agreement is to promote trade, employment, and long-term economic growth through greater market access and competition.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q2.<\/strong> Which sectors benefit the most from duty-free access to the U.K. market?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans.<\/strong> Labour-intensive sectors such as textiles, garments, leather, footwear, and engineering goods benefit the most.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q3.<\/strong> How does the Double Contribution Convention help Indian professionals?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans.<\/strong> It exempts eligible Indian professionals from paying social security contributions in both India and the U.K. for up to five years.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q4.<\/strong> Why is competition considered better than long-term protectionism?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans.<\/strong> Competition encourages industries to improve quality, innovation, and efficiency, making them globally competitive.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q5.<\/strong> What is necessary for the successful implementation of the agreement?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans.<\/strong> Effective implementation requires informed exporters, simpler government procedures, and better awareness of Free Trade Agreements among businesses.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Source: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thehindu.com\/opinion\/op-ed\/a-trade-deal-that-tests-indias-competitive-confidence\/article71235258.ece#:~:text=The%20Comprehensive%20Economic%20and%20Trade,better%20one%20on%20the%20second.\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">The Hindu<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><strong>From Supply-Chain Vulnerability to Technological Self-Reliance<\/strong><\/h2>\n<h3><strong>Context<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>The disruption around the <strong>Strait of Hormuz<\/strong> highlighted India\u2019s vulnerability as a major oil-importing nation.<\/li>\n<li>Although oil supplies could eventually be rerouted, the episode exposed a broader reality &#8211; <strong>critical supply chains<\/strong> are increasingly instruments of geopolitical power.<\/li>\n<li>For a country aspiring to become <strong>Atmanirbhar <\/strong>in critical technologies, dependence on foreign-controlled capabilities is far more consequential than dependence on a reroutable commodity such as oil.<\/li>\n<li>The strategic objective must therefore shift from merely securing supplies to building domestic <strong>technological capabilities<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>India\u2019s R&amp;D Deficit<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Case of China:<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li>China\u2019s rise illustrates the importance of sustained investment in R&amp;D. It spends<strong>43%<\/strong> of GDP on R&amp;D, with around three-fourths financed by domestic companies.<\/li>\n<li>This enables it to <strong>reduce dependence<\/strong> on foreign technologies while increasing global dependence on Chinese capabilities.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>India\u2019s position: <\/strong><\/li>\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul>\n<li>As of 2023, India spends only<strong>64%<\/strong> of GDP on R&amp;D, significantly below the global average, and the private sector finances barely two-fifths of this expenditure.<\/li>\n<li>In contrast, private enterprise contributes around three-fourths or more of R&amp;D spending in China, South Korea and the US.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>How Government is Addressing this Structural Weakness<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>ANRF &#8211; A catalyst for deep-tech innovation: <\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li>The Anusandhan National Research Foundation (ANRF), notified in <strong>2024<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li>It seeks to transform India\u2019s innovation ecosystem by bringing together academia, industry, start-ups, philanthropy and the diaspora.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Key financial instruments of ANRF:<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Research, Development and Innovation Fund:<\/strong> \u20b91 lakh crore over six years for the private sector.<\/li>\n<li><strong>ANRF core: <\/strong>\u20b950,000 crore over five years for foundational scientific research.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Significance:<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li>The model is designed to be <strong>catalytic <\/strong>rather than substitutive.<\/li>\n<li>Public funding is intended to reduce risks and attract much larger private investment in commercialisation and scale-up.<\/li>\n<li>Government procurement and regulatory policies are also expected to align with the emerging technology ecosystem.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Multiple channels of industry participation: <\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li>Investment alongside anchor capital,<\/li>\n<li>Direct participation as eligible technology entities,<\/li>\n<li>Joint ventures with start-ups and Global Capability Centres (GCCs),<\/li>\n<li>National missions,<\/li>\n<li>Pre-competitive research challenges and CSR-supported innovation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>The broad objective:<\/strong><\/li>\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul>\n<li>To ensure that lack of access to capital or institutional mechanisms does not prevent willing firms from participating in research and innovation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Industry Must Assume Greater Responsibility<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Mobilise private capital<\/strong>:\n<ul>\n<li>Companies must invest their own resources behind public catalytic funding instead of relying solely on government support.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Choose strategic technologies:<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li>Industry must prioritise sectors where technological dependence poses the greatest strategic risk.<\/li>\n<li>Domestic capability can create long-term value, rather than focusing only on short-term gains from protected markets.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Build long-term R&amp;D institutions:<\/strong><\/li>\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul>\n<li>Firms need dedicated research units, corporate venture arms and strategic planning mechanisms insulated from short-term quarterly pressures.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Long-horizon innovation<\/strong> requires institutional capacity, not merely funding.<\/li>\n<li>Such an ecosystem can also retain India\u2019s highly trained doctoral talent, which often migrates abroad due to inadequate research opportunities and institutional support.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Lessons from India\u2019s Pharmaceutical Industry<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>India\u2019s pharmaceutical sector demonstrates that the domestic industry can successfully respond to technological and regulatory disruption.<\/li>\n<li>After India accepted the WTO intellectual property regime and product patents in pharmaceuticals in the 1990s, many expected domestic firms to be overwhelmed by multinational corporations.<\/li>\n<li>Instead, Indian companies developed expertise in process chemistry, regulatory compliance and large-scale manufacturing, eventually making India the \u201c<strong>pharmacy of the world<\/strong>\u201d.<\/li>\n<li>The emerging challenge in advanced technologies is broader, but the <strong>underlying lesson<\/strong> remains the same: strategic capability is built by investing, adapting and innovating rather than retreating in the face of competition.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>A Narrow Window of Opportunity<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>India today possesses several <strong>favourable conditions<\/strong>:\n<ul>\n<li>A demographic dividend, though it is time-bound;<\/li>\n<li>Robust digital public infrastructure;<\/li>\n<li>Emerging public funding and institutional architecture for innovation;<\/li>\n<li>A global search for alternatives to dependence on a single dominant supplier.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>These factors provide India with an opportunity not merely to catch up but to <strong>leapfrog<\/strong>\u2014from being primarily a consumer of intellectual property to becoming a major generator of it.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Conclusion<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>The central lesson of the Hormuz crisis is that <strong>dependence creates vulnerability<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li>While the state has initiated the institutional and financial framework for technological self-reliance, technological independence cannot be achieved through government action alone.<\/li>\n<li>The ultimate goal is not merely resilience against supply disruptions, but the creation of capabilities that make India globally indispensable.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Achieving Technological Self-Reliance<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><strong>Q1<\/strong>. How do geopolitical chokepoints challenge India\u2019s pursuit of strategic autonomy?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans<\/strong>. They expose India to supply disruptions, making domestic capabilities in critical technologies essential for resilience.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q2<\/strong>. What is the significance of the Anusandhan National Research Foundation (ANRF)?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans<\/strong>. It seeks to catalyse private investment, strengthen academia-industry collaboration and promote deep-tech innovation.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q3<\/strong>. Why is greater private-sector participation crucial for improving India\u2019s R&amp;D ecosystem? <strong>Ans<\/strong>. Because India spends only 0.64% of GDP on R&amp;D and private-sector contribution remains limited.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q4<\/strong>. What lessons does India\u2019s pharmaceutical industry offer?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans<\/strong>. Its success shows that investment in process innovation can transform a potential vulnerability into global competitiveness.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q5<\/strong>. Why does technological self-reliance require an all-of-society approach?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans<\/strong>. The state can provide finance and institutional support, but industry, academia, and start-ups must collectively build long-term capabilities.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Source: <\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/indianexpress.com\/article\/opinion\/columns\/india-has-funds-talent-opening-for-a-research-leap-10791318\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\"><strong>IE<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Daily Editorial Analysis 18 July 2026 by Vajiram &#038; Ravi covers key editorials from The Hindu &#038; Indian Express with UPSC-focused insights and relevance.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":34,"featured_media":86373,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[138],"tags":[141,882,909],"class_list":["post-113727","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-daily-editorial-analysis","tag-daily-editorial-analysis","tag-the-hindu-editorial-analysis","tag-the-indian-express-analysis","no-featured-image-padding"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/113727","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/34"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=113727"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/113727\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":113731,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/113727\/revisions\/113731"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/86373"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=113727"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=113727"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=113727"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}