{"id":130769,"date":"2026-10-27T10:51:10","date_gmt":"2026-10-27T05:21:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/?p=130769"},"modified":"2026-10-27T12:20:59","modified_gmt":"2026-10-27T06:50:59","slug":"daily-editorial-analysis-27-october-2026","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/daily-editorial-analysis-27-october-2026\/","title":{"rendered":"Daily Editorial Analysis 27 October 2026"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2><strong>Beyond Kudankulam\u2019s Fence, A Cybersecurity Challenge <\/strong><\/h2>\n<h3><strong>Context<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>The <strong>data breach<\/strong> involving files related to the Kudankulam Nuclear Power Project in Tamil Nadu, reported on July 15, 2026, has exposed weaknesses in <strong>India&#8217;s cybersecurity framework. <\/strong><\/li>\n<li>Protecting critical infrastructure requires securing not only physical facilities but also the sensitive information held by contractors, subcontractors, and commercial data centres.<\/li>\n<li>As India expands its digital infrastructure and private-sector participation, <strong>a comprehensive cybersecurity framework has become essential <\/strong>for national security.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>The Perimeter Beyond the Plant<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>In July 2026, the ransomware group World Leaks began publishing portions of an alleged breach involving nearly 19,000 files totalling 14.3 GB related to<\/li>\n<li>The documents, covering 2016\u20132025, reportedly included engineering drawings, supplier information, inspection records, meeting minutes, and insurance documents.<\/li>\n<li>Reliance Infrastructure, the contractor for Kudankulam Units 3 and 4, confirmed that the data was stored on a server operated by third-party data centre provider Yotta.<\/li>\n<li>Yotta reported ransomware activity on May 29 and stated that it had contained the incident.<\/li>\n<li><strong>The Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL)<\/strong> clarified that the documents concerned non-nuclear infrastructure and were unrelated to nuclear safety systems.<\/li>\n<li>No publicly available evidence establishes that the reactors or critical control systems were compromised.<\/li>\n<li>The incident recalls the <strong>2019 discovery of Dtrack malware<\/strong> on a computer connected to Kudankulam&#8217;s Internet-facing administrative network.<\/li>\n<li>Although the critical internal network reportedly remained unaffected, both incidents demonstrate <strong>vulnerabilities beyond the plant&#8217;s core systems.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>A Cyber Blind Spot<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<h4><strong>Vulnerabilities Across the Supply Chain<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>Modern nuclear plants, electricity grids, and defence establishments depend on networks of private engineering firms, equipment suppliers, software providers, cloud platforms, and subcontractors.<\/li>\n<li>These organisations often possess sensitive documents that may not receive the same protection as systems inside the main facility.<\/li>\n<li>Consequently, supply-chain cybersecurity has become essential. Attackers can exploit stolen information to identify contractors, conduct phishing attacks, and discover potential entry points into larger systems.<\/li>\n<li>Even without direct access to operational controls, sensitive documents can create significant strategic security risks.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<h4><strong>Gaps in Cybersecurity Governance<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>The <strong>Indian Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT-In) <\/strong>coordinates incident responses, while the National Critical Information Infrastructure Protection Centre (NCIIPC) protects critical information infrastructure under Section 70A of the <strong>Information Technology Act.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>CERT-In&#8217;s 2022 directions also require the reporting of specified cybersecurity incidents.<\/li>\n<li>However, protection across the supply chain remains uneven. Legal obligations may focus on infrastructure operators, while contractors and data centres depend heavily on contractual arrangements.<\/li>\n<li>The <strong>Digital Personal Data Protection Act<\/strong> does not generally cover technical documents without personal data.<\/li>\n<li>This creates an <strong>accountability gap:<\/strong> operators, contractors, and service providers may each disclaim responsibility while sensitive information remains exposed.<\/li>\n<li>India needs clear rules defining responsibility for protecting critical infrastructure information wherever it is stored.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Expansion and Risks<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>India is <strong>expanding Kudankulam towards 6,000 MW<\/strong>, developing smart grids, strengthening digital public infrastructure, and encouraging private participation in defence and space under Atmanirbhar Bharat.<\/li>\n<li>Government services are also increasingly moving to <strong>commercial cloud platforms.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>Although these developments promote investment and efficiency, they increase the number of organisations handling sensitive information.<\/li>\n<li>A cybersecurity model designed primarily for government-controlled systems is inadequate for an environment dependent on private contractors and commercial infrastructure.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Measures for Strengthening Cybersecurity<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Enforceable security obligations:<\/strong> Contractors, subcontractors, and cloud providers handling sensitive information must follow defined cybersecurity standards, contractual liability provisions, and independent audit requirements.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Data classification:<\/strong> External agencies should receive only essential information, retain it for limited periods, and provide access exclusively to authorised personnel.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Independent risk assessments:<\/strong> Regular audits, penetration testing, and red-team exercises should evaluate the entire vendor ecosystem rather than only the main operator&#8217;s network.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Zero-trust architecture:<\/strong> Every user, device, and access request must be verified, with permissions restricted according to operational requirements.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Unified national framework:<\/strong> CERT-In, NCIIPC, sectoral regulators, and infrastructure operators should establish clear responsibilities and coordinated standards for critical-infrastructure supply-chain security.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Conclusion<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>The <strong>Kudankulam breach<\/strong> demonstrates that securing a facility is not equivalent to securing its information.<\/li>\n<li>Although no public evidence establishes that nuclear control systems were compromised, <strong>exposed documents can create serious strategic risks.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>India must integrate cybersecurity into procurement, project management, and regulatory oversight.<\/li>\n<li>Data classification, zero-trust security, independent audits, and vendor accountability are <strong>essential to protecting critical infrastructure.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Beyond Kudankulam\u2019s Fence, A Cybersecurity Challenge FAQs<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><strong>Q1.<\/strong> What was the Kudankulam data breach?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans. <\/strong>The breach involved the alleged leak of nearly 19,000 files related to the Kudankulam nuclear power project.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q2. <\/strong>Which group claimed responsibility for the breach?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans. <\/strong>The ransomware group World Leaks claimed responsibility for the breach.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q3.<\/strong> What is supply-chain cybersecurity?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans. <\/strong>Supply-chain cybersecurity protects sensitive information handled by contractors, subcontractors, and service providers.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q4.<\/strong> What are CERT-In and NCIIPC responsible for?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans. <\/strong>CERT-In coordinates cybersecurity incident responses, while NCIIPC protects critical information infrastructure.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q5.<\/strong> How can India strengthen critical infrastructure cybersecurity?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans. <\/strong>India can strengthen cybersecurity through zero-trust architecture, independent audits, data classification, and vendor accountability.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Source: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thehindu.com\/opinion\/lead\/beyond-kudankulams-fence-a-cybersecurity-challenge\/article71628279.ece\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">The Hindu<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><strong>A Ready Solution to Tackle Anaemia<\/strong><\/h2>\n<h3><strong>Context<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Despite economic progress and sustained public health efforts, <strong>anaemia remains a major public health challenge in India. <\/strong><\/li>\n<li>Affecting over half of Indian women and nearly three-fourths of children, it contributes to maternal mortality, intergenerational malnutrition, impaired cognitive development and economic losses.<\/li>\n<li>The <strong>revised 7X7X7 Anaemia Mukt Bharat (AMB)<\/strong> strategy addresses prevention, screening, treatment, dietary diversification and behavioural change.<\/li>\n<li>However, Double Fortified Salt (DFS), containing both iron and iodine, remains underutilised despite its potential to reduce iron deficiency and advance Viksit Bharat 2047.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>The Promise of Fortification<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<h4><strong>Double Fortified Salt as a Population-Level Intervention<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Double Fortified Salt (DFS)<\/strong> combines iron and iodine in an everyday food consumed by households across income groups and geographical regions.<\/li>\n<li>It offers a convenient way to deliver essential nutrients without relying entirely on regular supplementation or dietary changes.<\/li>\n<li>India&#8217;s <strong>Universal Salt Iodisation programme<\/strong> provides an established foundation, with approximately 95% of households consuming iodised salt.<\/li>\n<li>Building on this infrastructure, DFS already reaches an estimated 76 million people across four States through government safety-net programmes.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<h4><strong>Scientific Evidence and Public Health Benefits<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>Research supports DFS as an effective intervention against iron deficiency. A global review indicates that it can reduce anaemia by up to 21%.<\/li>\n<li>Trials in Bengaluru, Darjeeling and Punjab, alongside implementation in Uttar Pradesh, have demonstrated improvements in iron status.<\/li>\n<li>When manufactured according to validated specifications, DFS is acceptable to consumers and can help reduce iron deficiency.<\/li>\n<li>The <strong>Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI)<\/strong> has established standards for DFS, while its inclusion is mandated under PM POSHAN and the Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) programme.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Economic Viability and Manufacturing Capacity<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>DFS is highly affordable, costing an estimated \u20b914\u2013\u20b920 per person annually. Its estimated benefit-<strong>cost ratio of 4.2:1<\/strong> reflects potential gains from improved health and labour productivity.<\/li>\n<li>India possesses the manufacturing capacity, established fortification technologies and <strong>laboratory infrastructure<\/strong> necessary for large-scale production and quality assurance.<\/li>\n<li>DFS therefore combines affordability, scientific effectiveness and scalability, making it a promising <strong>public health investment.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>What the Barriers Are<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<h4><strong>Institutional Challenges and Uneven Implementation<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>DFS adoption remains uneven, primarily because of institutional and administrative barriers, rather than technological limitations.<\/li>\n<li>Although recommended under <strong>PM POSHAN and ICDS<\/strong>, its integration into the Public Distribution System (PDS) varies across States.<\/li>\n<li>The PDS reaches approximately <strong>800 million beneficiaries<\/strong>, offering an extensive channel for distributing fortified salt to vulnerable households.<\/li>\n<li>Nationwide adoption requires dedicated financing, stronger Centre-State coordination, political commitment, wider commercial availability and consumer awareness.<\/li>\n<li>A central flagship scheme could promote <strong>uniform implementation<\/strong>, strengthen distribution networks and ensure equitable access across States.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<h4><strong>Regulatory Safeguards and Integration with Existing Policies<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>DFS must complement, rather than replace, existing interventions under Anaemia Mukt Bharat.<\/li>\n<li>It should operate within <strong>a robust regulatory framework<\/strong> that ensures product quality, appropriate monitoring and nutritional safety.<\/li>\n<li>Implementation must align with sodium reduction goals. Fortification should improve the nutritional quality of salt already consumed without encouraging increased salt intake.<\/li>\n<li>Moreover, anaemia has multiple causes. Thalassaemia and sickle cell disease require appropriate screening and clinical management.<\/li>\n<li>Iron supplementation is not universally suitable, particularly when iron deficiency has not been established.<\/li>\n<li><strong>DFS must therefore complement medical screening<\/strong>, dietary diversification and targeted treatment.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Potential to Be a Global Model<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<h4><strong>Building on the Success of Universal Salt Iodisation<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>India&#8217;s success with Universal Salt Iodisation demonstrates how scientific evidence, government policy, distribution infrastructure and <strong>public awareness<\/strong> can address widespread nutritional deficiencies.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Nationwide DFS adoption<\/strong> could build on this experience by using existing distribution systems to reach vulnerable populations efficiently.<\/li>\n<li>India&#8217;s approach could provide a <strong>valuable model for low- and middle-income countries<\/strong> seeking affordable solutions to iron deficiency.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<h4><strong>Advancing Anaemia Mukt Bharat and Viksit Bharat 2047<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>The revised AMB strategy offers an opportunity to strengthen preventive nutrition.<\/li>\n<li>DFS can support this objective by improving iron intake while <strong>complementing supplementation<\/strong>, screening and treatment.<\/li>\n<li>Effective implementation will require reliable quality control, adequate funding, public awareness and regular monitoring.<\/li>\n<li>These measures can help <strong>maximise benefits<\/strong> while safeguarding public health.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Conclusion<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Anaemia remains <strong>a serious health and economic challenge<\/strong> in India, particularly for women and children.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Double Fortified Salt <\/strong>offers an affordable, evidence-based and scalable preventive intervention.<\/li>\n<li>The priority is to overcome implementation barriers by integrating DFS into the PDS, strengthening quality assurance and ensuring equitable access.<\/li>\n<li>With appropriate safeguards and sustained government commitment, <strong>DFS can advance Anaemia Mukt Bharat,<\/strong> improve productivity and support Viksit Bharat 2047, while establishing India as a global model for combating nutritional deficiencies.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>A Ready Solution to Tackle Anaemia FAQs<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><strong>Q1.<\/strong> What is Double Fortified Salt (DFS)?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans.<\/strong> Double Fortified Salt contains both iron and iodine.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q2.<\/strong> How does DFS help combat anaemia?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans.<\/strong> DFS helps reduce iron deficiency and improve iron status.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q3.<\/strong> What is the annual cost of DFS per person?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans.<\/strong> DFS costs approximately \u20b914\u2013\u20b920 per person annually.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q4.<\/strong> What is the major barrier to nationwide DFS adoption?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans.<\/strong> Institutional and administrative barriers limit its nationwide adoption.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q5.<\/strong> How can India expand DFS distribution?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans.<\/strong> India can expand DFS distribution by integrating it into the Public Distribution System (PDS).<\/p>\n<p><strong>Source: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thehindu.com\/opinion\/op-ed\/a-ready-solution-to-tackle-anaemia\/article71628316.ece\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">The Hindu<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><strong>India\u2019s Civil Justice Crisis &#8211; When Judicial Delay Creates Parallel Justice<\/strong><\/h2>\n<h3><strong>Context<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>India\u2019s civil justice system suffers from <strong>prolonged delays<\/strong>, procedural hurdles and inadequate judicial capacity.<\/li>\n<li>A striking example is a civil suit filed in the Bombay High Court in 1947 that was settled out of court only in 2026, after 79 years.<\/li>\n<li>While exceptional, legal practitioners estimate that many civil suits in the Bombay High Court take over two decades to conclude.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Judicial Overload and Shortage of Judges<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>A major reason for judicial delay is too many cases for <strong>too few judges<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li><strong>For example<\/strong>, Maharashtra had a population of about 112 million according to the 2011 Census, yet has only around 15 judges per million people.<\/li>\n<li>The Bombay High Court has approximately 1.9 judges per million people, compared with around 157 judges per million in New York State.<\/li>\n<li>The National Judicial Data Grid shows 648,725 cases pending before the Bombay High Court, including about 9,454 civil suits.<\/li>\n<li>With only a small number of judges handling original civil jurisdiction, clearing the existing backlog while dealing with fresh filings becomes extremely difficult.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>When Civil Disputes Become Criminal Cases<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Judicial delay can encourage litigants with money and influence to seek <strong>alternative ways<\/strong> of enforcing claims.<\/li>\n<li>A growing concern is the criminalisation of civil disputes, particularly monetary and contractual disagreements.<\/li>\n<li>A mere failure to honour a contractual obligation does not ordinarily constitute offences such as cheating or criminal breach of trust.<\/li>\n<li>Yet, some complainants approach the police alleging criminal conduct against debtors or business opponents.<\/li>\n<li>In certain cases, financial incentives and informal arrangements may encourage <strong>police intervention<\/strong> even when the dispute is essentially civil.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>The Police as a \u2018Parallel\u2019 Justice System<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Once the police become involved, the process can be much <strong>faster <\/strong>and more <strong>intimidating <\/strong>than civil litigation.<\/li>\n<li>The alleged debtor may be summoned to the police station at short notice and subjected to prolonged questioning and pressure to settle.<\/li>\n<li>The <strong>threat of arrest<\/strong>, reputational damage and poor prison conditions can become powerful tools for extracting settlements.<\/li>\n<li><strong>For example<\/strong>, nearly 50% of such cases may end at the preliminary-inquiry stage, without even an FIR being registered.<\/li>\n<li>Thus, a litigant who may otherwise have to wait years for a civil decree can obtain a quick settlement through police pressure.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Law on the Books vs Law in Action<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>This phenomenon highlights the distinction between formal law and its actual implementation.<\/li>\n<li>The Supreme Court has repeatedly cautioned against using criminal proceedings to settle essentially civil disputes and has regarded such criminalisation as an <strong>abuse of process.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>Yet, the gap between \u201claw on the books\u201d and \u201claw in action\u201d allows <strong>coercive practices <\/strong>to continue.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Structural Problems in Civil Justice<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>The problem cannot be attributed solely to an inadequate number of judges.<\/li>\n<li>India\u2019s civil justice system also rests on <strong>archaic and cumbersome<\/strong> procedural structures that allow defendants considerable scope to delay proceedings.<\/li>\n<li>The famous observation of the Privy Council in 1872 remains relevant: \u201cThe difficulties of a litigant in India begin when he has obtained a decree.\u201d<\/li>\n<li>Even after winning a case,<strong> execution and enforcement<\/strong> of decrees can remain lengthy and difficult.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Way Forward<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>India needs a <strong>comprehensive <\/strong>civil justice reform strategy involving &#8211;\n<ul>\n<li>Increasing judicial <strong>capacity <\/strong>and filling vacancies.<\/li>\n<li>Simplifying and <strong>modernising <\/strong>civil procedures to reduce unnecessary adjournments and delays.<\/li>\n<li>Strengthening case management and court administration.<\/li>\n<li>Ensuring faster execution of decrees.<\/li>\n<li>Preventing the criminalisation of purely civil disputes.<\/li>\n<li>Strengthening police accountability and ensuring that criminal law is not used as a tool of coercion.<\/li>\n<li>Expanding mediation, arbitration and other <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/alternative-dispute-resolution\/\" target=\"_blank\">Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)<\/a><\/strong> mechanisms for suitable disputes.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>Therefore, judicial reform must address not only pendency but also procedural complexity, case management, enforcement of decrees and accountability across institutions.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Conclusion<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Judicial delay does more than undermine access to justice; it can create incentives for litigants to <strong>bypass <\/strong>formal institutions.<\/li>\n<li>When courts become excessively slow, informal and coercive mechanisms can emerge as a parallel civil justice delivery system.<\/li>\n<li>Restoring faith in the formal justice system therefore requires not merely more judges, but structural, procedural and institutional reforms that make civil justice timely, accessible and enforceable.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>India\u2019s Civil Justice Crisis FAQs<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><strong>Q1<\/strong>. What are the major causes of delay in India\u2019s civil justice system?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans<\/strong>. Judicial vacancies, high case load, archaic procedures, repeated adjournments and difficulties in executing decrees.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q2<\/strong>. What is meant by the \u2018criminalisation of civil disputes\u2019?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans<\/strong>. It refers to using criminal complaints and police action to pressure parties into settling essentially civil or contractual disputes.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q3<\/strong>. How does judicial delay encourage parallel justice mechanisms?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans<\/strong>. Prolonged litigation pushes frustrated and influential litigants towards informal or coercive mechanisms.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q4<\/strong>. What is the significance of the phrase \u2018law on the books versus law in action\u2019?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans<\/strong>. It highlights the gap between formally prescribed legal rules and their actual implementation.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q5<\/strong>. What reforms are needed to improve India\u2019s civil justice delivery?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans<\/strong>. India needs more judges, simpler procedures, effective case management, faster decree execution, etc.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Source: <\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/indianexpress.com\/article\/opinion\/columns\/slow-courts-swift-coercion-when-the-police-replace-judges-10937616\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\"><strong>IE<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Daily Editorial Analysis 27 October by Vajiram &#038; Ravi covers key editorials from The Hindu &#038; Indian Express with UPSC-focused insights and relevance.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":34,"featured_media":86373,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[138],"tags":[141,882,909],"class_list":["post-130769","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-daily-editorial-analysis","tag-daily-editorial-analysis","tag-the-hindu-editorial-analysis","tag-the-indian-express-analysis","no-featured-image-padding"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/130769","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/34"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=130769"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/130769\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":130815,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/130769\/revisions\/130815"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/86373"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=130769"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=130769"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=130769"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}