{"id":57215,"date":"2025-07-29T11:50:10","date_gmt":"2025-07-29T06:20:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/?p=57215"},"modified":"2025-10-08T12:57:39","modified_gmt":"2025-10-08T07:27:39","slug":"daily-editorial-analysis-29-july-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/daily-editorial-analysis-29-july-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Daily Editorial Analysis 29 July 2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2><strong>The Medical Boundaries for AYUSH Practitioners<\/strong><\/h2>\n<h3><strong>Context<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>There has been a recent online debate between a hepatologist and an Indian chess Grand Master regarding <strong>whether practitioners of traditional medicine can call themselves doctors.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>It has <strong>reignited a longstanding and multifaceted discourse on the status, legal boundaries<\/strong>, and societal role of practitioners of India\u2019s traditional medical systems, particularly Ayurveda and Unani.<\/li>\n<li>The <strong>controversy goes well beyond titles, touching the very core of public health<\/strong>, legislative policy, and cultural identity in modern India.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Historical Framing: Committees and Government Policy<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>The genesis of this debate can be traced back nearly 80 years.<\/li>\n<li>The\u00a0<strong>Bhore Committee <\/strong>in 1946 advocated firmly for modern, evidence-based medicine, citing global trends where countries were moving away from traditional medical practices in favour of scientific medicine.<\/li>\n<li>Nevertheless, <strong>this stance met significant resistance among traditional medicine practitioners, who framed the issue in terms of cultural identity<\/strong>, arguing for the preservation of systems such as Ayurveda on the grounds of their ancient Indian roots.<\/li>\n<li>In response to public outcry, the government established the\u00a0<strong>Committee on Indigenous Systems of Medicine<\/strong>, whose 1948 report wrapped the legitimacy of traditional medicine in a narrative of Hindu nationalism.<\/li>\n<li>While <strong>India\u2019s first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru refrained from granting official recognition to these systems<\/strong>, the political tide shifted under Indira Gandhi in 1970.<\/li>\n<li>It to the creation of the\u00a0<strong>Indian Medicine Central Council Act<\/strong>, which <strong>formally recognised and regulated practitioners of Ayurveda, Siddha, and Unani. <\/strong><\/li>\n<li>This legislative framework was updated in 2020 by the\u00a0<strong>National Commission for Indian System of Medicine Act<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Divergent Philosophies and the Challenge of Integrative Medicine<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>A crucial point of contention is the <strong>fundamental incompatibility between the underlying philosophies<\/strong> of traditional and modern medicine.<\/li>\n<li>The <strong>curriculum for Ayurvedic practitioners merges ancient concepts like doshas, prakriti, and metaphysical ideas<\/strong> about the soul with select subjects from modern biomedicine, such as anatomy and cell physiology.<\/li>\n<li>These <strong>frameworks are inherently irreconcilable: Ayurveda attributes illness to imbalances of doshas,<\/strong> while modern medicine explains diseases such as infections through germ theory and pathophysiology.<\/li>\n<li>This <strong>makes the concept of integrative medicine, a blending of the two approaches<\/strong>, highly problematic at a conceptual and scientific level.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Legal Scope and the Right to Prescribe<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<h4><strong>Rule 2(ee) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>It\u00a0<strong>allows State governments to declare certain practitioners eligible<\/strong> to prescribe modern medicine, even if they are not MBBS graduates.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Many states have used this provision to empower traditional medicine practitioners<\/strong>, resulting in friction with the allopathic community and periodic judicial challenge.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<h4><strong> Mukhtiar Chand vs The State of Punjab<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>The Supreme Court, in the case of\u00a0<strong> Mukhtiar Chand vs The State of Punjab &amp; Ors<\/strong>(1998), clarified that the right to prescribe a system\u2019s drugs is inseparable from the claim to practice that system, effectively barring Ayurvedic practitioners from dispensing allopathic medicines.<\/li>\n<li>Despite this, <strong>state governments have continued issuing orders under Rule 2(ee), occasionally in defiance of judicial rulings<\/strong>, leading to repeated litigation, spearheaded by bodies like the Indian Medical Association.<\/li>\n<li>At the same time, <strong>patients themselves often sue for being misled about the practitioners\u2019 qualifications,<\/strong> especially where the prescription or treatment involved modern medications.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Procedural Boundaries and Recent Developments<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>The <strong>boundaries extend beyond writing prescriptions<\/strong> to procedural rights.<\/li>\n<li>Notably, a\u00a0<strong>2020 government notification<\/strong>permitted post-graduate <strong>Ayurvedic doctors to perform 58 types of surgeries, including operations like gallbladder<\/strong> or appendix removal.<\/li>\n<li>This <strong>policy is currently under judicial scrutiny.<\/strong> If upheld, it opens unresolved questions, can Ayurvedic practitioners then also use modern anaesthesia and antibiotics for such surgeries?<\/li>\n<li><strong>The tension is heightened by the fact that, to cut costs, many hospitals reportedly staff Ayurvedic graduates<\/strong> in positions traditionally held by MBBS doctors.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Conclusion<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>At its core, this <strong>controversy is not simply about professional titles, but about the standard of care<\/strong> delivered to the public and the integrity of India\u2019s health system.<\/li>\n<li>The <strong>blurred boundaries, inconsistent legal interpretations, and political appropriations risk undermining evidence-based medicine<\/strong> and patient trust, diverting taxpayer resources into avenues with questionable benefits for public health.<\/li>\n<li><strong>As debates ranging from social media to the Supreme Court play out,<\/strong> the most important consideration remains the safety, well-being, and <strong>informed consent of Indian citizens, issues that transcend the headlines and demand ongoing scrutiny.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>The Medical Boundaries for AYUSH Practitioners FAQs<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><strong>Q1. <\/strong>What sparked the recent debate about traditional medicine practitioners in India?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans.<\/strong> The debate was sparked by an online controversy between a hepatologist and an Indian chess Grand Master over whether practitioners of traditional medicine can call themselves doctors.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q2. <\/strong>What is a key philosophical difference between Ayurveda and modern medicine?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans. <\/strong>Ayurveda attributes disease to imbalances of doshas, while modern medicine explains disease through scientific concepts like germ theory.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q3. <\/strong>What did the Supreme Court decide in the Dr. Mukhtiar Chand case?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans. <\/strong>The Supreme Court ruled that Ayurvedic practitioners do not have the right to prescribe modern (allopathic) medicines.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q4. <\/strong>How has politics influenced the status of traditional medicine in India?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans. <\/strong>Political parties have promoted traditional medicine as a matter of cultural pride, supporting it regardless of its scientific basis.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q5.<\/strong> What is a public health concern raised by the current status of traditional medicine practitioners?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans.<\/strong> The main concern is that allowing traditional medicine practitioners to perform modern medical procedures or prescribe modern drugs could compromise patient safety and public health.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Source: <\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thehindu.com\/opinion\/lead\/the-medical-boundaries-for-ayush-practitioners\/article69866270.ece\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">The Hindu<\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><strong>Why Antitrust Regulations Are Pertinent<\/strong><\/h2>\n<h3><strong>Context<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>In 1890, Senator John Sherman famously declared, \u2018<strong>If we will not endure a king as a political power, we should not endure a king over the production, transportation, and sale of any of the necessaries of life.\u2019 <\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>With these words, the<\/strong> <strong>Sherman Antitrust Act was born<\/strong>, laying the foundation for modern competition law in the United States and inspiring similar legislative frameworks across the globe, including in India.<\/li>\n<li>Although <strong>the nature of what constitutes a necessity of life has evolved, <\/strong>Sherman&#8217;s warning against monopolistic dominance remains chillingly relevant in the 21st-century digital economy.<\/li>\n<li><strong>India, with its booming tech landscape and ambitious economic goals, now finds itself grappling with monopolistic practices<\/strong> by global digital giants, especially in how they shape access, discovery, and monetization for domestic start-ups.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>The Digital Economy and India\u2019s Ambitions<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>India&#8217;s digital economy contributed <strong>74% to the nation&#8217;s GDP in 2022\u201323<\/strong>, marking it as a central pillar of national development.<\/li>\n<li>The <strong>explosion of start-ups, from 2,000 in 2014 to over 31,000 in 2023<\/strong>, signals a thriving entrepreneurial spirit.<\/li>\n<li>The government envisions these start-ups as <strong>engines of growth for its ambitious $35 trillion \u2018Viksit Bharat\u2019 vision by 2047. <\/strong><\/li>\n<li>However, <strong>while technological infrastructure enables innovation, the pathways of digital commerce and discovery are often dominated by foreign tech giants<\/strong>, resulting in distorted market dynamics that can stifle homegrown potential.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Gatekeeping and Market Power in the Digital Age<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>One of the most glaring manifestations of this <strong>gatekeeping is Google\u2019s overwhelming dominance in the digital distribution ecosystem. <\/strong><\/li>\n<li>With Android capturing around 95% of India\u2019s mobile OS market, <strong>Google essentially controls how Indian consumers discover and interact with digital products. <\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Indian start-ups are therefore compelled to operate within Google\u2019s ecosystem<\/strong>, paying high commissions on in-app transactions and competing under discriminatory terms that tilt the market in favour of select players.<\/li>\n<li><strong>A recent complaint to the Competition Commission of India (CCI)<\/strong> by a major Indian gaming start-up <strong>underscores this imbalance.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>The <strong>complaint centres on Google&#8217;s Real Money Gaming (RMG) Pilot Program,<\/strong> which selectively allowed only two gaming formats, Daily Fantasy Sports (DFS) and rummy, on its Play Store, effectively excluding other legitimate gaming formats.<\/li>\n<li>This <strong>discriminatory policy granted unfair advantages to a handful of operators,<\/strong> with one DFS company reportedly acquiring 55 million users in just one year through the program.<\/li>\n<li>Meanwhile, <strong>advertising policy changes cut off vital promotional avenues for other gaming businesses,<\/strong> despite their prior reliance on Google\u2019s ad network for over two-thirds of app downloads.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Antitrust and the Broader Economic Impact<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Such market distortions have <strong>far-reaching economic implications. <\/strong><\/li>\n<li>When dominant players favour select partners, <strong>it reduces competition, which in turn limits innovation, consumer choice, and product quality.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>Over-reliance on a few digital gatekeepers <strong>weakens the resilience of the digital ecosystem and jeopardizes long-term economic goals. <\/strong><\/li>\n<li>This <strong>is particularly dangerous for a developing economy like India<\/strong>, which depends heavily on inclusive growth driven by new ideas and start-ups.<\/li>\n<li>The <strong>United States offers a cautionary tale: <\/strong>the unchecked rise of monopolies has led to a significant decline in Initial Public Offerings and increased entry barriers for new businesses.<\/li>\n<li><strong>If similar monopolistic trends continue unchecked in India, the cost will be borne not just by start-ups<\/strong>, but also by consumers and the economy at large.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>The Way Forward: Towards a Fairer Digital Market<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>It is clear that global tech giants like Google play a foundational role in the digital ecosystem.<\/li>\n<li>However, <strong>their responsibilities must match their power.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>The <strong>Indian government and institutions like the CCI must work to ensure that the digital economy is a level playing field,<\/strong> where innovation is not stifled by exclusionary practices or market manipulation.<\/li>\n<li><strong>The case filed by the Indian gaming company is more than a corporate dispute<\/strong>, it is emblematic of a broader push for fair competition and market access.<\/li>\n<li><strong>It echoes Sherman\u2019s call to resist economic kingship and promotes a digital future<\/strong> where distribution and monetization are democratized, not monopolised.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Conclusion<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Senator Sherman\u2019s 19th-century concerns<\/strong> find startling <strong>resonance in 21st-century India.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>As the country charges ahead in its digital revolution, <strong>it must remain vigilant against monopolistic forces that can derail its aspirations. <\/strong><\/li>\n<li>With the right regulatory interventions, <strong>India can ensure that its start-up ecosystem remains dynamic, competitive, and fair, delivering on the promise of Viksit Bharat <\/strong>and carrying forward Sherman\u2019s legacy into the digital age.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Why Antitrust Regulations Are Pertinent FAQs<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><strong>Q1. <\/strong>What did Senator Sherman warn against in 1890?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans.<\/strong> Senator Sherman warned against allowing monopolies to control essential aspects of the economy, comparing such economic power to the rule of a king.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q2. <\/strong>Why is Google\u2019s dominance in India\u2019s digital space a concern?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans.<\/strong> Google\u2019s dominance is a concern because it limits fair access for Indian start-ups, allowing it to set discriminatory terms that hinder competition and innovation.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q3. <\/strong>What issue did the Indian gaming company raise against Google?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans.<\/strong> The Indian gaming company accused Google of unfairly excluding certain gaming formats from its Play Store and restricting advertising opportunities, which hurt their business.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q4. <\/strong>How can monopolies harm India\u2019s digital economy?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans. <\/strong>Monopolies can harm India\u2019s digital economy by reducing competition, stifling innovation, and limiting choices for consumers and entrepreneurs.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q5. <\/strong>What role should regulators like the CCI play?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans.<\/strong> Regulators like the CCI should ensure a level playing field by preventing monopolistic practices and promoting fair competition in the digital marketplace.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Source: <\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thehindu.com\/opinion\/op-ed\/why-antitrust-regulations-are-pertinent\/article69865143.ece#:~:text=Costs%20to%20India,reliance%20on%20few%20powerful%20players.\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">The Hindu<\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><strong>The Yarlung Tsangpo Project &#8211; Strategic, Ecological, and Geopolitical Implications for India<\/strong><\/h2>\n<h3><strong>Context:<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Recently, Chinese Premier Li Qiang <strong>launched construction of a massive hydropower project <\/strong>on the <strong>Yarlung Tsangpo River in Tibet<\/strong>, close to the <strong>Indian border<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li>The Yarlung Tsangpo project&#8217;s scale, lack of transparency, ecological threats, and strategic ramifications have <strong>raised serious concerns for India<\/strong>, especially as no prior consultation was conducted with lower riparian states like India and Bangladesh.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Project Overview and Strategic Location:<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<h4><strong>Project cost and scale:<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>Estimated at 1.2 trillion yuan (US$167.8 billion), it involves five cascade hydropower plants in Medog County, approximately 30 km from India&#8217;s Arunachal Pradesh border.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Expected annual generation<\/strong> will be 300 billion kWh, more than thrice the designed capacity (88.2 billion kWh) of the Three Gorges Dam in China, currently the largest in the world.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<h4><strong>Engineering features:<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>It would involve drilling 4-6 tunnels of 20 km each, diverting up to 50% of the river\u2019s flow.<\/li>\n<li>It is located in a <strong>high seismic zone<\/strong> (Zone V) \u2013 Eastern Himalayan Syntaxis.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Environmental and Hydrological Concerns:<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<h4><strong>Disruption of Brahmaputra flow:<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>The project would <strong>alter natural hydrology and seasonal flow,<\/strong> especially in the lean season.<\/li>\n<li>It will <strong>impact aquatic biodiversity<\/strong>, fisheries, sediment load, and ecosystem services.<\/li>\n<li>The construction of five massive hydropower plants in cascade is likely to involve <strong>reservoir-like structures<\/strong>, even though it is claimed to be a run-of-the-river project.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Flood risk: <\/strong>Sudden or unannounced water release during heavy rainfall or earthquakes could lead to catastrophic downstream flooding.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Seismic vulnerability:<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li>Project area prone to earthquakes due to Himalayan Frontal Thrust and Medog Fault.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Past Chinese engineering failures<\/strong> (e.g., Neelum-Jhelum in PoK) raise safety concerns.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Diplomatic and Legal Dimensions:<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<h4><strong>Lack of riparian cooperation:<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>China has consistently <strong>withheld data and transparency<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Past behavior <\/strong>on the Mekong River affected Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, setting a worrying precedent.<\/li>\n<li>No operationalization of three MoUs signed with India in 2013.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<h4><strong>International water laws:<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>Neither India nor China are signatories to the <strong>UN Convention (1997) on international watercourses.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>However, principles like \u201c<strong>equitable utilization<\/strong>\u201d and \u201c<strong>no significant harm<\/strong>\u201d are part of customary international law.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<h4><strong>Geopolitical double standards:<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>China likely would not tolerate similar behavior from upstream states.<\/li>\n<li><strong>India\u2019s quiet diplomacy<\/strong> is seen as ineffective; stronger public and diplomatic messaging is needed.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Strategic and Policy Recommendations for India:<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<h4><strong>Diplomatic pushback:<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Demand full project disclosure<\/strong>, seismic safety reports, and environmental impact assessments.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Seek project suspension<\/strong> until legitimate Indian concerns are addressed.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<h4><strong>Domestic response:<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Build flood moderation infrastructure <\/strong>in Arunachal and Assam.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Use remote sensing<\/strong> and geospatial tools for independent hydrological assessments.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Reduce dependence on China for hydrological data.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<h4><strong>Internationalizing the issue:<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Promote NGO engagement <\/strong>and international discourse.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Elevate the issue in bilateral talks <\/strong>and in multilateral platforms to signal assertiveness.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Conclusion:<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>The Yarlung Tsangpo project is not just an ecological and hydrological threat but a strategic challenge.<\/li>\n<li>India must <strong>shift from passive diplomacy to proactive engagement,<\/strong> emphasizing transboundary water governance, sovereign rights, and ecological security.<\/li>\n<li>The time has come for India to <strong>build pressure<\/strong> through diplomatic, technical, and international legal instruments while enhancing domestic preparedness.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>The Yarlung Tsangpo Project FAQs<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><strong>Q1.<\/strong> What are the environmental impacts of China\u2019s Yarlung project on India?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans.<\/strong> It may disrupt Brahmaputra\u2019s flow, harm ecosystems, and reduce lean-season water availability.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q2.<\/strong> How does China behave as an upper riparian state?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans.<\/strong> China often acts unilaterally, withholding data and neglecting downstream concerns of neighbors like India.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q3.<\/strong> Is India\u2019s current diplomatic response effective?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans.<\/strong> No, India\u2019s quiet diplomacy has failed to ensure transparency or safeguard its riparian interests.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q4.<\/strong> What can India do to counter China\u2019s actions?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans.<\/strong> India can invoke international law, demand project transparency, build domestic safeguards, and raise global awareness.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q5.<\/strong> Why is the Yarlung project geopolitically sensitive?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans.<\/strong> It increases seismic and ecological risks while intensifying strategic tensions in the Himalayan region.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Source: <\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/indianexpress.com\/article\/opinion\/columns\/delhi-must-talk-tough-with-beijing-over-chinas-construction-of-a-dam-on-brahmaputra-10155813\/?ref=top_opinion\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\"><strong>IE<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Daily Editorial Analysis 29 July 2025 by Vajiram &#038; Ravi covers key editorials from The Hindu &#038; Indian Express with UPSC-focused insights and relevance.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":20,"featured_media":50653,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[138],"tags":[141,882,909],"class_list":{"0":"post-57215","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-daily-editorial-analysis","8":"tag-daily-editorial-analysis","9":"tag-the-hindu-editorial-analysis","10":"tag-the-indian-express-analysis","11":"no-featured-image-padding"},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57215","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/20"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=57215"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57215\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/50653"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=57215"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=57215"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=57215"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}