{"id":58772,"date":"2025-08-09T14:32:21","date_gmt":"2025-08-09T09:02:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/?p=58772"},"modified":"2025-10-07T15:55:20","modified_gmt":"2025-10-07T10:25:20","slug":"daily-editorial-analysis-9-august-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/daily-editorial-analysis-9-august-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Daily Editorial Analysis 9 August 2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2><strong>With Tariffs, India\u2019s Growth Rate Needs a Careful Watch<\/strong><\/h2>\n<h3><strong>Context<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Recent trade measures<\/strong> by the United States have <strong>created significant headwinds for India\u2019s economic growth<\/strong> and external account stability.<\/li>\n<li>Effective August 7, the U.S. <strong>imposed a 25% reciprocal tariff on Indian exports.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>This was <strong>followed by a penal levy, an additional 25% tariff, announced on August 6,<\/strong> to take effect from August 29, 2025, in response to India\u2019s continued crude oil imports from Russia.<\/li>\n<li>These <strong>developments carry far-reaching consequences for India\u2019s trade balance<\/strong>, current account deficit (CAD), GDP growth, and strategic trade positioning.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>India\u2013U.S. Trade Dynamics<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>India <strong>enjoys a merchandise trade surplus with the United States<\/strong>, amounting to <strong>$41.18 billion in 2024\u201325<\/strong>, a figure that has been growing steadily.<\/li>\n<li>The <strong>S. appears to be targeting both sides of the trade equation,<\/strong> India\u2019s exports and its crude oil import sources.<\/li>\n<li>The <strong>reciprocal tariff directly challenges India\u2019s export competitiveness<\/strong>, while the penal levy operates not only as an export deterrent but also as a <strong>non-tariff barrier<\/strong>, <strong>designed to push India away from Russian crude<\/strong> towards higher-cost imports, possibly from the U.S. itself.<\/li>\n<li>Such unilateral measures <strong>undermine the principles of<\/strong> <strong>free and fair trade<\/strong>, introducing strategic pressure that extends beyond economics into geopolitical alignment.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Impact of the Reciprocal Tariffs<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Export Decline Estimate:<\/strong> Assuming an import elasticity of <strong>\u20131<\/strong>, India\u2019s exports to the U.S. could decline by <strong>25%<\/strong>, a substantial contraction.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Trade Deficit Effect:<\/strong> In 2024\u201325 terms, this would widen the trade deficit by <strong>56% of GDP<\/strong>, pushing it to <strong>7.84%<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li><strong>GDP Growth Impact:<\/strong> The growth rate could drop by <strong>6 percentage points<\/strong>, from <strong>6.5%<\/strong> to <strong>5.9%<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Current Account Deficit:<\/strong> CAD could rise from <strong>6%<\/strong> to <strong>1.15%<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li>For 2025\u201326, given that four months have already elapsed before implementation, the GDP impact might be <strong>\u20130.4%<\/strong>, with a correspondingly smaller CAD increase.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Mitigating Factors and Caveats<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>New Trade Agreements:<\/strong> India\u2019s trade deal with the United Kingdom, along with ongoing negotiations with the European Union and other partners, may partially offset export losses.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Competitor Tariffs:<\/strong>S. tariff hikes on other exporting nations could shift some demand back to Indian products.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Exchange Rate Adjustment:<\/strong> The rupee\u2019s depreciation to around \u20b987.5 per U.S. dollar could enhance export competitiveness.<\/li>\n<li>However, even after considering these buffers, India\u2019s GDP growth in 2025\u201326 is expected to be <strong>5% lower than the base forecast<\/strong>, and the CAD could widen by a similar margin.<\/li>\n<li>A <strong>forced shift from Russian to U.S. crude imports could further strain the CAD,<\/strong> weaken the rupee, and fuel inflation, especially if global oil prices rise.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Policy Options for India<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Negotiation with the U.S.:<\/strong> The current trade deal is not finalised, providing an opportunity to seek compromise while safeguarding sensitive sectors such as agriculture, allied industries, and MSMEs.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Export Market Diversification:<\/strong> While challenging in the short term, expanding into alternative markets remains a long-term necessity.<\/li>\n<li>Additionally, <strong>domestic tariff reform<\/strong> could boost export competitiveness. Empirical evidence shows that India\u2019s own import tariffs negatively affect exports, with <strong>an estimated elasticity worse than \u20131. <\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Reducing tariffs on inputs<\/strong> that feed into export production <strong>could strengthen manufacturing and trade resilience.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Impact of the Penal Levy<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>The penal levy, <strong>another 25% tariff, mirrors the economic impact of the reciprocal tariff<\/strong> but is partially softened by commodity exemptions.<\/li>\n<li>Combined, the two measures could cut over <strong>6 percentage points<\/strong> from the current year\u2019s projected growth.<\/li>\n<li>India views the penalty as <strong>discriminatory<\/strong>, noting that many other countries import more from Russia without facing such sanctions.<\/li>\n<li>The <strong>three-week window<\/strong> before the levy takes effect represents a critical period for diplomatic engagement.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Conclusion<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>The <strong>imposition of reciprocal tariffs and penal levies reflects the use of trade policy<\/strong> as a coercive geopolitical tool.<\/li>\n<li><strong>While India may manage the immediate growth slowdown through negotiations<\/strong>, currency adjustment, and new trade partnerships, the <strong>persistence of such measures threatens the stability of the global trade system.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>A coordinated effort with other nations to restore a <strong>rules-based, non-discriminatory trading environment<\/strong> is essential.<\/li>\n<li>In the meantime, <strong>India must act decisively to defend its trade interests, strengthen its export base, and minimise dependency on any single market<\/strong> or energy source.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>With Tariffs, India\u2019s Growth Rate Needs a Careful Watch FAQs<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><strong>Q1.<\/strong> Why did the United States impose a 25% reciprocal tariff on Indian exports?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans.<\/strong> The United States imposed the tariff to address the growing trade surplus India has with it and to pressure India on its trade policies.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q2.<\/strong> What additional penalty did the U.S. announce on August 6, 2025?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans.<\/strong> The U.S. announced a penal levy of an additional 25% on Indian exports because India continued importing oil from Russia.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q3.<\/strong> How could the reciprocal tariff affect India\u2019s GDP growth in 2024\u201325?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans. <\/strong>It could reduce GDP growth by about 0.6 percentage points, from 6.5% to 5.9%.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q4.<\/strong> What strategy could India use to offset the impact of these tariffs?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans.<\/strong> India could diversify its export markets and lower certain domestic import tariffs to boost export competitiveness.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q5.<\/strong> Why does India consider the penal levy discriminatory?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans.<\/strong> India considers it discriminatory because many other countries import more from Russia without facing similar penalties.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Source: <\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thehindu.com\/opinion\/lead\/with-tariffs-indias-growth-rate-needs-a-careful-watch\/article69910733.ece#:~:text=Taken%20together%2C%20the%20total%20impact%20on%20India&#039;s%20growth%20rate%20can,the%20inequity%20of%20the%20decision.\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">The Hindu<\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><strong>Industrial Accidents, the Human Cost of Indifference<\/strong><\/h2>\n<h3><strong>Context<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>India\u2019s industrial landscape<\/strong>, spanning oil refineries, chemical plants, factories, and construction sites, powers the <strong>nation\u2019s economic growth.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>Yet behind this progress lies an <strong>underreported and persistent human tragedy<\/strong>, the needless deaths of thousands of workers due to preventable accidents.<\/li>\n<li>These <strong>incidents are not inevitable acts of fate but the outcome of systemic negligence<\/strong>, regulatory inertia, and a societal undervaluing of workers\u2019 lives.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>The Scale of the Problem<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Government data, Right to Information findings, and independent studies <strong>reveal the alarming scope of India\u2019s industrial safety crisis<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>In the last five years, at least <strong>6,500 workers<\/strong> have died in factories, construction sites, and mines, averaging nearly three deaths every single day.<\/li>\n<li>States like <strong>Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu alone account for over<\/strong> <strong>200 fatalities<\/strong> from major industrial mishaps in the past decade, with the unregistered and informal sector likely pushing the real toll far higher.<\/li>\n<li>A 2022 <strong>Centre for Science and Environment (CSE)<\/strong> study recorded over <strong>130 major chemical accidents<\/strong> in just 30 months after 2020, causing 218 deaths and more than 300 injuries.<\/li>\n<li>These are not abstract statistics<strong>. Each figure represents a family shattered, a breadwinner lost, <\/strong>and a community pushed into grief and economic hardship.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Common and Preventable Causes<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>What makes these fatalities especially unacceptable is the simplicity of their prevention. Most tragedies stem from basic, easily addressable lapses:<\/li>\n<li><strong>Lack of Fire No-Objection Certificates (NOC):<\/strong> Many factories operate without clearance from the Fire Department.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Non-existent or faulty firefighting systems:<\/strong> Missing alarms, extinguishers, or sensors.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Absence of permit-to-work systems:<\/strong> Hazardous jobs undertaken without formal risk assessment.<\/li>\n<li><strong>No training for workers:<\/strong> Especially among migrant or contract labourers, language barriers leave safety protocols unread and unheeded.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Inaccessible fire exits:<\/strong> Often locked, blocked, or hidden by stored materials.<\/li>\n<li><strong>No real accountability:<\/strong> Safety audits become box-ticking rituals, prosecutions are rare, and penalties are negligible.<\/li>\n<li>Such failures, while common in small and medium enterprises, are not confined to them.<\/li>\n<li>Even <strong>large corporations often prioritise operational efficiency<\/strong> over a deep-rooted safety culture.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Comparative Perspective and Geographic Spread and Repetition<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<h4><strong>Comparative Perspective<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>In nations such as <strong>Germany and Japan, safety is not merely a compliance issue but a<\/strong> <strong>core industrial value<\/strong> embedded into workplace design, training, and management.<\/li>\n<li>By contrast, <strong>India\u2019s approach remains largely reactive<\/strong>, strengthening measures only after disasters occur.<\/li>\n<li>This <strong>reactive culture ensures that accidents are not isolated aberrations<\/strong> but recurring features of the industrial environment.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<h4><strong>Geographic Spread and Repetition<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>Gujarat reported over <strong>60 major industrial fires and gas leaks in 2021 alone<\/strong>. Maharashtra, Chhattisgarh, and Uttar Pradesh show equally grim records.<\/li>\n<li>According to the Directorate General Factory Advice Service and Labour Institutes (DGFASLI), India experiences <strong>one serious industrial accident every two days in registered factories<\/strong>, and the scale in unregistered units remains unknown.<\/li>\n<li>The sequence is <strong>depressingly predictable:<\/strong> tragedy, public outrage, token compensation, a committee inquiry, and then silence, until the next avoidable catastrophe.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Underlying Causes: Indifference and Class Bias<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>At the heart of this cycle is <strong>national indifference<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li>Regulators are often <strong>under-resourced or complicit.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Companies cut safety costs<\/strong>, viewing them as overheads rather than obligations.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Society at large remains apathetic,<\/strong> especially when <strong>victims are economically marginalised<\/strong> migrant or contract workers.<\/li>\n<li>A troubling class bias permeates the system: safety failures in a corporate office or technology park would provoke outrage, <strong>yet similar lapses in a factory employing low-income workers barely register in public consciousness.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Rejecting the Act of God Defence and Pathways to Change<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<h4><strong>Rejecting the Act of God<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>Industrial accidents are often <strong>mischaracterised as acts of God,<\/strong> language that shifts responsibility away from human decision-makers.<\/li>\n<li>In reality, these <strong>tragedies are man-made, the product of inadequate safety systems<\/strong> and regulatory failure.<\/li>\n<li>Countries such as South Korea and Singapore have moved towards <strong>corporate manslaughter laws<\/strong>, <strong>holding senior executives criminally liable for gross safety negligence<\/strong>. India has yet to take such a decisive step.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<h4><strong>Pathways to Change<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Strengthening labour safety boards<\/strong> with resources, training, and independence.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Digitising risk reporting<\/strong> and ensuring transparent accident databases.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Protecting whistle-blowers<\/strong> who expose unsafe practices.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Embedding safety culture<\/strong> in both SMEs and large corporations through rigorous training and design standards.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Legislating executive accountability<\/strong> for preventable workplace deaths.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Conclusion<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>The <strong>means to prevent these tragedies already exist<\/strong>. What is lacking is the will, from policymakers, industry leaders, and society, to act decisively.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Industrial safety is not a privilege granted by employers<\/strong>; it is a fundamental right of every worker.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Until India replaces its culture of post-tragedy response<\/strong> with one of prevention and accountability, <strong>it will continue to silently affirm the most damning question of all: Who cares?<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Industrial Accidents, the Human Cost of Indifference FAQs<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><strong>Q1.<\/strong> How many industrial workers have died in India in the last five years according to official data?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans.<\/strong> At least 6,500 industrial workers have died in India in the last five years.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q2.<\/strong> What is a common cause of industrial accidents mentioned in the analysis?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans.<\/strong> A common cause is the lack of basic fire safety measures such as alarms, extinguishers, and fire exits.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q3.<\/strong> Which countries are cited as having deeply embedded safety cultures?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans.<\/strong> Germany and Japan are cited as countries with deeply embedded safety cultures.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q4.<\/strong> What is the main cultural problem behind recurring industrial disasters in India?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans.<\/strong> The main problem is national indifference and a lack of value placed on the lives of low-income workers.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q5.<\/strong> What legal measure do countries like South Korea and Singapore have that India does not?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans.<\/strong> They have corporate manslaughter laws holding senior executives criminally accountable for safety failures.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Source: <\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thehindu.com\/opinion\/op-ed\/industrial-accidents-the-human-cost-of-indifference\/article69910773.ece#:~:text=In%20the%20last%20five%20years,Right%20to%20Information%2Dbased%20reports.\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">The Hindu<\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><strong>Age of Consent Debate in India and its Socio-Legal Implications<\/strong><\/h2>\n<h3><strong>Context:<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>The Supreme Court of India is currently hearing <strong>Nipun Saxena and Anr vs Union of India<\/strong>, a PIL examining whether the age of \u201cconsensual\u201d sexual relationships under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 should be reduced from 18 years.<\/li>\n<li>The debate <strong>raises critical questions about child protection<\/strong>, sexual autonomy, societal norms, and the vulnerabilities of marginalised girls.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Current Legal Framework:<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>POCSO Act, 2012: <\/strong>Criminalises any sexual activity with persons under 18, regardless of consent.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Legal position:<\/strong> \u201cConsensual\u201d sexual activity with a minor is still classified as sexual exploitation.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Impact:<\/strong> Many cases involve romantic relationships rather than abuse, yet attract the same legal penalties.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Key Issues in the Debate:<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<h4><strong>Vulnerability of marginalised girls:<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>Many girls engage in sexual relationships to escape domestic violence, sexual abuse, or discrimination.<\/li>\n<li>Arrest and prosecution of partners under POCSO often result in forced pregnancies, shelter home confinement, or return to abusive families.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<h4><strong>Judicial and social responses:<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Calcutta High Court case:<\/strong> Acquitted man accused of non-exploitative consensual relationship with 16-year-old, but highlighted legal contradictions.<\/li>\n<li><strong>NCRB data: <\/strong>As a result of mandatory reporting under the POSCO Act, cases of child sexual abuse rose from <strong>8541 in 2012 <\/strong>to <strong>53874 in 2021.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Praja Foundation report:<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li>54% of POCSO cases involved partners, friends, or known persons.<\/li>\n<li>Many were linked to elopement, refusing marriage and deserting the victim.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Child marriage and socio-cultural factors:<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>2022 data<\/strong>: 1.6 million child marriages recorded in India, with barely 900 cases registered (India Child Protection report).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Drivers<\/strong>: Brahminical patriarchy, poverty, lack of education, and fear of premarital sex. Parents often marry off daughters early to \u201c<strong>protect honour<\/strong>,\u201d not out of tradition but due to desperation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>The Consent Dilemma:<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<h4><strong>Defining consent:<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>Consent may be enthusiastic, reluctant, manipulated, revoked, or misunderstood.<\/li>\n<li>Courts face difficulties in <strong>uniformly interpreting consent<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li>POCSO treats all under-18 sexual activity as abuse, making no distinction between coercion and mutual consent in minors.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<h4><strong>The elopement paradox:<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>Girls eloping face isolation, threats, and legal battles, along with pregnancy and stigma.<\/li>\n<li>Extending the logic of consent in cases involving abuse by guardians is rare due to dependency and fear of retaliation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Implications of Blanket Age Reduction:<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Risks<\/strong>: Could increase invisibility of vulnerable girls, reduce legal safeguards, and normalise exploitation.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Need for nuanced approach<\/strong>: A uniform lowering of age without considering socio-economic context could harm rather than help.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Policy challenge<\/strong>: Lawmakers must balance protection from exploitation with respect for adolescent autonomy while considering India\u2019s socio-cultural realities.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Way Forward:<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>India must move towards <strong>a context-sensitive reform<\/strong> of the POCSO Act that distinguishes between exploitative and non-exploitative adolescent relationships, backed by comprehensive sex education and community awareness programmes.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Leveraging technology-enabled reporting systems<\/strong>, survivor-centric legal aid, and rehabilitative support can ensure both protection from abuse and preservation of adolescent agency.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Conclusion:<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>A balanced approach<\/strong> to the age of consent is vital to safeguard vulnerable children without criminalising consensual adolescent relationships.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Lawmakers must integrate legal reform<\/strong> with socio-economic interventions, ensuring justice systems reflect India\u2019s evolving social realities while upholding the dignity and rights of its youth.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Age of Consent Debate in India FAQs<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><strong>Q1<\/strong>. What challenges arise from the current age of consent under POCSO?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans<\/strong>. It criminalises non-exploitative adolescent relationships, causing legal harassment and loss of agency.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q2<\/strong>. What socio-cultural factors drive early marriages in India?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans<\/strong>. Patriarchy, poverty, lack of education, fear of premarital relationships, and honour concerns.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q3<\/strong>. Why is defining consent for minors legally complex?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans<\/strong>. POCSO treats all under-18 sexual activity as abuse, ignoring consent nuances.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q4<\/strong>. What are the risks of reducing the age of consent uniformly?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans<\/strong>. It may increase exploitation and weaken child protection safeguards.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q5<\/strong>. How can law balance child protection with adolescent autonomy?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans<\/strong>. By distinguishing exploitative from consensual cases, adding sex education, and raising awareness.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Daily Editorial Analysis 9 August 2025 by Vajiram &#038; Ravi covers key editorials from The Hindu &#038; Indian Express with UPSC-focused insights and relevance.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":20,"featured_media":50653,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[138],"tags":[141,882,909],"class_list":{"0":"post-58772","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-daily-editorial-analysis","8":"tag-daily-editorial-analysis","9":"tag-the-hindu-editorial-analysis","10":"tag-the-indian-express-analysis","11":"no-featured-image-padding"},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58772","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/20"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=58772"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58772\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/50653"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=58772"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=58772"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=58772"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}