{"id":59108,"date":"2025-08-12T11:24:09","date_gmt":"2025-08-12T05:54:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/?p=59108"},"modified":"2025-10-08T12:05:02","modified_gmt":"2025-10-08T06:35:02","slug":"daily-editorial-analysis-12-august-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/daily-editorial-analysis-12-august-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Daily Editorial Analysis 12 August 2025"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2><strong>Reviving Civic Engagement in Health Governance<\/strong><\/h2>\n<h3><strong>Context<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>In recent years, Indian states have experimented with <strong>ambitious initiatives aimed at bringing health care directly to people\u2019s doorsteps. <\/strong><\/li>\n<li>Tamil Nadu\u2019s <strong>Makkalai Thedi Maruthuvam scheme<\/strong>, launched in August 2021, and Karnataka\u2019s <strong>Gruha Arogya scheme<\/strong>, introduced in October 2024 and expanded statewide in June 2025, are notable examples.<\/li>\n<li>These <strong>programmes focus on delivering services<\/strong>, particularly for non-communicable diseases, directly to citizens\u2019 homes.<\/li>\n<li>While such measures mark significant progress toward proactive health care delivery, <strong>they raise an equally important question:<\/strong> as health systems strive to reach citizens physically, <strong>to what extent can citizens themselves reach into, engage with, and influence health governance?<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>The Imperative of Citizen Engagement and Its Benefits<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<h4><strong>The Imperative of Citizen Engagement<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>Health governance in India has <strong>evolved from a government-led domain into a more complex ecosystem <\/strong>involving civil society organisations, professional bodies, hospital associations, and trade unions.<\/li>\n<li>It <strong>functions through both formal and informal processes,<\/strong> where power dynamics influence whose voices are heard.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Meaningful public engagement is not just a procedural nicety<\/strong>, it affirms dignity, counters epistemic injustice, and upholds democratic principles by enabling citizens to shape decisions affecting their health.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<h4><strong>Tangible Benefits of Inclusive participation<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>It <strong>strengthens accountability<\/strong> and transparency.<\/li>\n<li>It <strong>challenges elite dominance<\/strong> and reduces the scope for corruption.<\/li>\n<li>It <strong>develops collaboration with frontline workers<\/strong>, improving service uptake and health outcomes.<\/li>\n<li>It <strong>builds mutual trust<\/strong> between communities and providers.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Without such engagement, health governance risks becoming exclusionary,<\/strong> oppressive, and disconnected from community realities.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Existing Frameworks for Participation and Persistent Challenges<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>The <strong>National Rural Health Mission (NRHM),<\/strong> launched in 2005, <strong>institutionalised community participation through platforms like the Village Health Sanitation<\/strong> and Nutrition Committees (VHSNCs) and Rogi Kalyan Samitis.<\/li>\n<li>Designed to be inclusive, especially of women and marginalised groups, <strong>these bodies were supported by untied funds<\/strong> for local health initiatives.<\/li>\n<li>Urban parallels include Mahila Arogya Samitis, Ward Committees, and NGO-led committees.<\/li>\n<li>However, <strong>despite their promise, these platforms face persistent challenges<\/strong>; In some areas, they have never been established.<\/li>\n<li>Where they do exist, <strong>meetings are irregular and roles are poorly defined<\/strong> and funds are underutilised.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Intersectoral coordination is weak<\/strong> and deep social hierarchies undermine inclusivity.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Structural and Mindset Barriers<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>A fundamental obstacle lies in <strong>how policymakers, administrators, and providers perceive communities. <\/strong><\/li>\n<li>Too often, <strong>citizens are viewed as passive beneficiaries<\/strong> rather than active co-creators of health systems.<\/li>\n<li>This <strong>language signals an underlying paternalism<\/strong>: citizens are framed as objects of intervention rather than rights-holders.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Performance metrics typically prioritise the number of people reached r<\/strong>ather than the quality of engagement or the lived experience of service delivery.<\/li>\n<li>Health governance structures <strong>remain dominated by medical professionals<\/strong>, mostly trained in western biomedical models, who often acquire administrative responsibilities without formal public health training.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Promotions are seniority-based rather than expertise-driven<\/strong>, entrenching a hierarchical and medicalised culture.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>The Way Forward<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<h4><strong>The Need for a Mindset Shift<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>Addressing these challenges requires a fundamental shift in mindset. <strong>Community engagement should not be reduced to an instrumental strategy<\/strong> for achieving programme targets.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Treating people merely as a means to better health statistics diminishes their agency<\/strong> and dignity.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Participatory processes should be valued in their own right<\/strong>, not only for the outcomes they produce.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<h4><strong>Empowering Communities<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Disseminate accessible information<\/strong> on health rights and governance structures.<\/li>\n<li>Develop <strong>civic awareness<\/strong> from an early stage.<\/li>\n<li>Intentionally reach marginalised groups.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Equip citizens with the tools, skills,<\/strong> and resources to participate meaningfully.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<h4><strong>Sensitising Health System Actors<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>Move beyond the narrative that low health service utilisation is simply due to poor awareness.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Avoid individualising blame<\/strong> for systemic issues.<\/li>\n<li>Recognise and <strong>address structural determinants<\/strong> of health inequities.<\/li>\n<li>Develop collaborative relationships where communities are treated as equal partners.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Conclusion<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Doorstep health delivery programmes<\/strong> such as those in Tamil Nadu and Karnataka <strong>demonstrate the capacity of the Indian health system to innovate<\/strong> in service provision.<\/li>\n<li>Yet, <strong>without corresponding progress<\/strong> in citizen engagement, <strong>such initiatives risk reinforcing a top-down model of care. <\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>True transformation demands that communities are not only reached by services<\/strong> but are also empowered to shape them.<\/li>\n<li><strong>By investing in inclusive, functional, and participatory governance platforms<\/strong>, and by shifting the attitudes of health system actors, <strong>India can move from a model of medicine at people\u2019s doorsteps to one of democracy<\/strong> in health governance.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Reviving Civic Engagement in Health Governance FAQs<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><strong>Q1.<\/strong> What is the main goal of schemes like Makkalai Thedi Maruthuvam and Gruha Arogya?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans.<\/strong> Their main goal is to deliver health care services directly to people\u2019s homes, especially for non-communicable diseases.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q2.<\/strong> Why is citizen engagement important in health governance?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans.<\/strong> Citizen engagement ensures accountability, upholds democratic values, and allows people to shape decisions that affect their health.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q3.<\/strong> What common problem affects community participation platforms like VHSNCs?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans.<\/strong> Many face issues such as irregular meetings, unclear roles, underused funds, and the influence of social hierarchies.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q4.<\/strong> How are communities often perceived by policymakers and health providers?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans.<\/strong> They are often seen as passive beneficiaries rather than active partners in health system decision-making.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q5.<\/strong> What two-pronged approach is suggested to improve engagement?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans.<\/strong> The approach involves empowering communities with knowledge and tools, and sensitising health system actors to treat communities as equal partners.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Source: <\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thehindu.com\/opinion\/op-ed\/reviving-civic-engagement-in-health-governance\/article69921178.ece\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">The Hindu<\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><strong>A Court Ruling With No Room for Gender Justice<\/strong><\/h2>\n<h3><strong>Context:<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>In July 2025, the Supreme Court of India delivered its judgment in <strong><em>Shivangi Bansal vs Sahib Bansal<\/em><\/strong>, effectively endorsing the suspension of arrests or coercive action under <strong>Section 498-A<\/strong> of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code (IPC).<\/li>\n<li>Critics argue that this decision rests on false premises and poses a serious risk to both criminal justice and gender equality.<\/li>\n<li>This article examines the law\u2019s socio-legal context, the Court\u2019s reliance on the \u201cmisuse\u201d narrative without empirical backing, and the potential erosion of protections for women facing domestic cruelty.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Section 498-A<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Section 498-A IPC (now <strong>Section 85 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita<\/strong>) penalises cruelty against a woman by her husband or his relatives, prescribing imprisonment of up to three years and a fine.<\/li>\n<li>Cruelty includes dowry harassment, acts driving the woman to suicide, or causing injury to life or health.<\/li>\n<li>The law was introduced in 1983 to address widespread domestic violence and dowry-related harassment.<\/li>\n<li>Parliament expanded its scope to cover all forms of cruelty within marriage, following a surge in dowry deaths and recognising that extreme cases like suicides and murders represented only a small fraction of the problem.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Supreme Court Endorses Blanket Protection from Arrest in 498-A Cases<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>The Allahabad High Court had earlier directed that in cases under Section 498-A, <u>no arrest or coercive action be taken against accused persons for a two-month \u201ccool-off\u201d period from the filing of the complaint<\/u>.<\/li>\n<li>It also directed that such cases be referred to district-level family welfare committees.<\/li>\n<li>The Supreme Court has now endorsed these directions, effectively granting temporary blanket protection from arrest even when criminal law permits it.<\/li>\n<li>This decision, made in an individual dispute without detailed examination of its socio-political impact or hearing the State government extensively.<\/li>\n<li>This means that <u>even with strong evidence of serious crimes, the police cannot make arrests for at least two months<\/u>.<\/li>\n<li>Critics argue this risks the safety of complainants, deters victims from lodging complaints, and legitimises police inaction in investigating marital violence.<\/li>\n<li>While <strong>mediation and alternative dispute resolution <\/strong>may be beneficial in <strong>sensitive family matters like divorce or child custody<\/strong>, such approaches are unsuitable when serious allegations of violence, falling under penal law, are involved.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>The Debate on \u2018Misuse\u2019 of the Anti-Cruelty Law<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>The perception that Section 498-A is often \u201cmisused\u201d has found resonance even in Supreme Court judgments.<\/li>\n<li>In <em>Preeti Gupta vs State of Jharkhand<\/em> (2010), the Court noted many non-bona fide cases, while in <em>Sushil Kumar Sharma vs Union of India<\/em> (2005), it warned of \u201c<strong>legal terrorism<\/strong>\u201d through misuse.<\/li>\n<li>In <em>Arnesh Kumar vs State of Bihar<\/em> (2014), the Court issued strict guidelines against automatic arrests, directing police to assess necessity under Section 41 of the then Criminal Procedure Code.<\/li>\n<li>These rulings have already made police action in such cases more cautious.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Lack of Empirical Evidence<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Despite frequent references to misuse, courts have not relied on concrete empirical data to substantiate such claims.<\/li>\n<li>Most cases before the Court involve specific disputes with conflicting narratives, making it difficult to generalise.<\/li>\n<li>Given the complex social nature of marital cruelty, courts have limited institutional capacity to question the legislative wisdom that enacted such protections.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Conviction Rates and Misinterpretations<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Arguments citing low conviction rates \u2014 around <strong>18% as per NCRB 2022 data<\/strong> \u2014 are misleading. This rate is still higher than that for many other offences.<\/li>\n<li>Moreover, low convictions do not inherently prove misuse; they often reflect challenges in investigation, systemic bias, familial pressure on victims to compromise, and the difficulty of proving offences occurring in private spaces.<\/li>\n<li>High evidentiary standards in criminal law, combined with the reluctance of family members to testify, further explain lower conviction rates without undermining the law\u2019s necessity.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Survey Evidence Counters Misuse Narrative<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>NCRB data shows 1,34,506 cases registered under Section 498-A in 2022.<\/li>\n<li>However, the National Family Health Survey-5 reveals significant under-reporting of violence against women in many states.<\/li>\n<li>According to the <strong>women\u2019s centre <em>Humsafar<\/em><\/strong>, the rise in reported cases is likely due to greater legal awareness among women, not necessarily an increase in incidents.<\/li>\n<li>Even if some false cases exist, the possibility of misuse is inherent in any legislation. The truth of allegations can only be established through proper investigation.<\/li>\n<li>By suspending the anti-cruelty law\u2019s immediate applicability, the Court has heightened the vulnerability of victims and weakened their access to justice.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Conclusion<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Placing certain criminal provisions under stricter scrutiny than others undermines the uniformity and consistency of the criminal justice system. This selective approach risks creating systemic imbalances.<\/li>\n<li>In <em>Sushil Kumar Sharma<\/em> (2005), the Supreme Court upheld the law\u2019s constitutional validity, emphasising that misuse is no reason to strike down legislation.<\/li>\n<li>The current stance effectively contradicts that principle, restricting victims\u2019 chances of obtaining meaningful justice.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>A Court Ruling With No Room for Gender Justice FAQs<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><strong>Q1.<\/strong> What was the Supreme Court\u2019s decision in Shivangi Bansal vs Sahib Bansal?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans.<\/strong> The Court upheld a two-month \u201ccool-off\u201d period in Section 498-A cases, barring arrests and referring matters to family welfare committees.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q2. <\/strong>Why was Section 498-A enacted in 1983?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans. <\/strong>To address rising dowry deaths and domestic violence, offering women legal recourse against cruelty by husbands or their relatives.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q3. <\/strong>What concerns arise from the Court\u2019s suspension of arrests?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans. <\/strong>It risks victim safety, deters complaints, legitimises police inaction, and undermines the urgency needed in serious violence cases.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q4. <\/strong>Is there empirical evidence supporting the \u2018misuse\u2019 narrative of Section 498-A?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans. <\/strong>No substantial empirical data exists; most cases involve specific disputes, making generalised conclusions unreliable.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q5. <\/strong>How does the ruling affect the consistency of criminal law?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans. <\/strong>It subjects Section 498-A to stricter scrutiny than other criminal provisions, creating systemic imbalance and weakening uniform justice standards.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Source: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thehindu.com\/opinion\/lead\/a-court-ruling-with-no-room-for-gender-justice\/article69921099.ece#:~:text=It%20directed%20%E2%80%9Cthe%20State%20Governments,Code%20which%20deals%20with%20appearance\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">TH<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><strong>Recurring Monsoon Disasters in the Himalaya &#8211; Beyond Climate Change Narratives<\/strong><\/h2>\n<h3><strong>Context:<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>The lower Himalayan states of <strong>Uttarakhand and Himachal Pradesh<\/strong> have witnessed severe <strong>erosion and flash floods <\/strong>during the current monsoon season.<\/li>\n<li>Public perception often attributes such events directly to climate change, overlooking <strong>historical recurrence and local anthropogenic triggers<\/strong>\u2014especially unplanned construction and poor land use, which are key drivers of disaster vulnerability.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Historical Precedence of Himalayan Disasters:<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>2013 Kedarnath floods<\/strong>: When Kedarnath and the Mandakini Valley were inundated by an unstoppable surge of water and debris caused by a glacial outburst that was triggered by excessive rain.<\/li>\n<li><strong>2011 Assi Ganga floods near Uttarkashi:<\/strong> Washed away a hydropower project and labour camps.<\/li>\n<li><strong>1970 and 1978 floods: <\/strong>When minor tributaries of the Alakananda and Bhagirathi were blocked by landslides, forming temporary dams that finally burst and carried a huge volume of water and rubble downstream.<\/li>\n<li><strong>1880 Harsil flood<\/strong>: A major flash flood occurred near the site of this week\u2019s disaster.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Structural and Environmental Vulnerabilities:<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<h4><strong>Natural vulnerability of the Himalaya:<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>Geologically young and unstable mountains.<\/li>\n<li>Susceptibility to hydrological extremes, erosion, and seismic activity.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<h4><strong>Human-induced risks:<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Unplanned and illegal construction:<\/strong> Homes, hotels, ashrams, eateries built on riverbanks and flood-prone zones.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<h4><strong>Tourism pressure:<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Char Dham Yatra<\/strong> expansion via widened roads and helicopter services.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Rising pilgrim influx<\/strong> leading to mushrooming of hotels and dhabas in hazard zones.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<h4><strong>Urban encroachment:<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>Dehradun and Mussoorie seeing construction in streambeds and landslide-prone areas despite earlier restrictions.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Political and Administrative Factors:<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Bureaucratic <strong>complacency <\/strong>and political <strong>opportunism <\/strong>enabling unsafe development.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Ineffective enforcement <\/strong>of land use and building norms in ecologically sensitive zones.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Misplaced Attribution to Climate Change:<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>While climate change impacts (melting glaciers, altered precipitation) are real, attributing every disaster to it oversimplifies causation.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Avoidable, immediate triggers<\/strong> such as poor planning, deforestation, and encroachment play a more decisive role in disaster severity.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Way Forward:<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Strengthen land-use planning<\/strong>: Enforce zoning laws and hazard mapping.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Regulate religious and adventure tourism<\/strong>: Introduce visitor caps in ecologically sensitive areas.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Eco-sensitive infrastructure<\/strong>: Prioritise resilient construction, away from flood plains.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Public awareness<\/strong>: Shift discourse from fatalism to accountability for unsafe practices.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Conclusion:<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>In the coming decades, safeguarding the fragile Himalayan ecosystem will require <strong>shifting from reactive disaster relief to proactive<\/strong>, science-based land-use planning that prioritises <strong>ecological security<\/strong> over unchecked development.<\/li>\n<li>By integrating resilient infrastructure, regulated tourism, and community participation, the region can transform from a disaster-prone zone into <strong>a model for sustainable mountain governance.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Recurring Monsoon Disasters in the Himalaya FAQs<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><strong>Q1<\/strong>. How have monsoon disasters historically recurred in the Himalaya?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans<\/strong>: Flash floods and landslides from 1880 to 2013 show a recurring hazard pattern requiring long-term resilience planning.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q2<\/strong>. How does unplanned construction raise flood risks in Himalayan towns?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans<\/strong>: Riverbank encroachment and weak zoning enforcement increase vulnerability to floods.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q3<\/strong>. How does religious tourism add to disaster risk in Uttarakhand?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans<\/strong>: Unregulated pilgrim influx drives unsafe construction in hazard-prone valleys.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q4<\/strong>. Why is attributing all extreme events to climate change problematic?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans<\/strong>: It diverts focus from avoidable human-induced causes like deforestation and poor land use.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q5<\/strong>. What steps can balance development and ecology in Himalayan states?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans<\/strong>: Eco-zoning, tourist caps, resilient infrastructure, and strict land-use laws.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Source: <\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/indianexpress.com\/article\/opinion\/columns\/global-warming-alone-is-not-behind-uttarkashi-flash-floods-greed-is-10183574\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\"><strong>IE<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Daily Editorial Analysis 12 August 2025 by Vajiram &#038; Ravi covers key editorials from The Hindu &#038; Indian Express with UPSC-focused insights and relevance.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":20,"featured_media":50653,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[138],"tags":[141,882,909],"class_list":{"0":"post-59108","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-daily-editorial-analysis","8":"tag-daily-editorial-analysis","9":"tag-the-hindu-editorial-analysis","10":"tag-the-indian-express-analysis","11":"no-featured-image-padding"},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59108","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/20"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=59108"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59108\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/50653"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=59108"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=59108"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=59108"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}