


{"id":83328,"date":"2026-01-20T11:24:10","date_gmt":"2026-01-20T05:54:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/?p=83328"},"modified":"2026-01-20T11:24:10","modified_gmt":"2026-01-20T05:54:10","slug":"celebrity-endorsement-liability","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/celebrity-endorsement-liability\/","title":{"rendered":"Celebrity Endorsement Liability: Kerala HC Sets Clear Limits"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2><b>Celebrity Endorsement Liability Latest News<\/b><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The <\/span><b>Kerala High Court<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> has set aside consumer proceedings against actor <\/span><b>Mohanlal<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, holding that a brand ambassador cannot be held liable for a company\u2019s alleged unfair trade practices unless there is a clear, direct link between the endorsement and the consumer\u2019s transaction.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The ruling arose from complaints against <\/span><b>Manappuram Finance<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, where borrowers claimed they were charged higher interest rates than advertised.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The court clarified the boundary between promotional activity and transactional responsibility, emphasizing that mere appearance in advertisements does not create consumer liability for endorsers.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><b>Background: The Gold Loan Dispute<\/b><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The case arose from gold loans taken by two borrowers in Thiruvananthapuram. They had initially pledged gold with Catholic Syrian Bank at 15% interest.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In 2018, Manappuram Finance took over the loans after a bank manager allegedly promised a lower interest rate.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The borrowers claimed they were influenced by advertisements featuring actor Mohanlal, who was Manappuram Finance\u2019s brand ambassador at the time.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">They alleged that the advertised interest rate was lower than what was eventually charged.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><b>Consumer Complaint and Claims<\/b><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">When the borrowers tried to close the loan and retrieve their gold, Manappuram allegedly demanded a higher interest rate.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">They approached the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practices.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">They sought a refund of excess interest and compensation of \u20b925 lakh.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><b>Mohanlal Made a Party to the Case<\/b><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Along with Manappuram Finance and its manager, Mohanlal was named as an opposite party solely because of his appearance in the advertisements.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Mohanlal raised a preliminary objection, arguing that he had no role in the loan transaction, no interaction with the borrowers, and no control over interest rates.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><b>Consumer Fora\u2019s Initial View<\/b><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Mohanlal contended that being a brand ambassador did not make him a service provider.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">However, relying on the definition of \u201cendorsement\u201d under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, the District Commission rejected his objection and held the complaint maintainable.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The State Consumer Commission later declined to rule on this issue at the revision stage.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><b>Legal Provisions on Endorsements Examined by the Court<\/b><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The court examined <\/span><b>Section 2(18<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">) of the Consumer Protection Act, which gives a broad meaning to \u201cendorsement\u201d.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It covers any message or depiction that may lead consumers to believe an advertisement reflects the opinion or experience of the person featured.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Section 2(47)<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> similarly defines \u201cunfair trade practice\u201d widely, including false representations about price or quality.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><b>Where Endorsers Are Specifically Mentioned<\/b><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The term \u201c<\/span><b>endorser<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201d appears explicitly only in <\/span><b>Section 21<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> of the Act.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This provision deals with false or misleading advertisements and empowers the Central Consumer Protection Authority to impose penalties on manufacturers and endorsers, including fines and temporary bans on endorsements.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Section 21(5)<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> provides a <\/span><b>safeguard<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> for endorsers.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It protects them from liability if they have exercised due diligence to verify the truthfulness of the claims made in the advertisement.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><b>Limits of Endorser Liability in Consumer Disputes<\/b><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Crucially, the Act does not refer to endorsers in provisions dealing with consumer complaints on deficiency of service or unfair trade practices before consumer commissions.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Kerala High Court held that this omission was deliberate, noting that endorser liability is confined to proceedings under Section 21 alone.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><b>Role of the 2022 Misleading Advertisement Guidelines<\/b><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The court also considered the 2022 guidelines issued by the Central Consumer Protection Authority.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">While these define endorsers and require due diligence, the court clarified that they operate within the scope of Section 21 and do not expand endorser liability to all consumer disputes.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><b>What the Kerala High Court Held<\/b><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Kerala HC noted that Mohanlal\u2019s role was confined to appearing in advertisements as a brand ambassador.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><b>No Direct Link to the Transaction<\/b><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The court examined the consumer complaint to identify any direct connection between the actor and the borrowers\u2019 gold loan transaction.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It found only two references to Mohanlal: his status as brand ambassador and an assurance allegedly given by the company\u2019s manager referring to advertisements featuring him. This, the court held, was insufficient.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><b>Liability Cannot Be Presumed<\/b><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The pleadings did not show that Mohanlal persuaded the borrowers, participated in the loan transaction, or made any assurance to them.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The assurance, as pleaded, came solely from the company\u2019s manager.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Therefore, the court ruled that no liability for unfair trade practice or deficiency of service could be fixed on the actor.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The court clarified that <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">merely falling within the definition of an \u201cendorser\u201d does not attract liability<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A direct and specific link between the endorser and the consumer transaction must be established to fasten responsibility.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><b>Company, Not Endorser, Answerable<\/b><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Even if advertisements formed part of the background facts, an unfair trade practice arises when the service provider fails to deliver what was advertised.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">On the pleadings, that failure could only be attributed to Manappuram Finance, not the endorser.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><b>Source:<\/b> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/indianexpress.com\/article\/explained\/explained-law\/kerala-hc-mohanlal-brand-endorsement-liability-10478191\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">IE<\/a> | <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/14\/ker-hc-brand-ambassador-liability-consumer-protection-act-actor-mohanlal\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">SCCO<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Celebrity endorsement liability was clarified by Kerala HC, ruling that endorsers are not liable for unfair trade practices without a direct link to consumer transactions.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":83337,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[18],"tags":[4833,60,22,59],"class_list":{"0":"post-83328","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-upsc-mains-current-affairs","8":"tag-celebrity-endorsement-liability","9":"tag-mains-articles","10":"tag-upsc-current-affairs","11":"tag-upsc-mains-current-affairs","12":"no-featured-image-padding"},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83328","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=83328"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83328\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/83337"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=83328"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=83328"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=83328"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}