{"id":94026,"date":"2026-03-21T10:38:57","date_gmt":"2026-03-21T05:08:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/?p=94026"},"modified":"2026-03-21T12:19:28","modified_gmt":"2026-03-21T06:49:28","slug":"daily-editorial-analysis-21-march-2026","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/daily-editorial-analysis-21-march-2026\/","title":{"rendered":"Daily Editorial Analysis 21 March 2026"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2><strong>India\u2019s Iran Stance Does Fuel a Foreign Policy Debate<\/strong><\/h2>\n<h3><strong>Context<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>A largely civilised debate in India over its response to the Israeli-American war on Iran reveals deeper tensions within foreign policy: between <strong>pragmatism<\/strong>, <strong>morality<\/strong>, <strong>ideology<\/strong>, and <strong>national interest<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li>The issue goes beyond a single conflict and reflects how India positions itself in an increasingly globalised and interdependent world.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Democratising Foreign Policy Discourse<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Foreign policy is no longer the exclusive domain of professional diplomats.<\/li>\n<li>While expertise is built through <strong>experience<\/strong>, <strong>research<\/strong>, and the ability to interpret complex developments, it is not an innate skill.<\/li>\n<li>Public engagement is both valid and necessary in a <strong>democracy<\/strong>, as citizens are directly affected by global decisions.<\/li>\n<li>Diverse opinions, even if not formally trained, contribute meaningfully to national debate and ensure that policy remains accountable.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>The Centrality of National Interest<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Foreign policy fundamentally serves to protect and promote national interest, which includes <strong>sovereignty<\/strong>, <strong>territorial integrity<\/strong>, and <strong>economic development<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li>The responsibility to define and pursue these interests lies with the government in power, making foreign policy inherently dynamic.<\/li>\n<li>Political actors often shift positions depending on whether they are in power or opposition, demonstrating the <strong>pragmatic<\/strong> <strong>and adaptive nature<\/strong> of international decision-making.<\/li>\n<li>Jawaharlal Nehru described foreign policy as essentially selfish, governed primarily by national priorities rather than universal moral principles.<\/li>\n<li>This realist perspective emphasises survival and growth over idealism.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Ideology vs Pragmatism<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Although ideological orientation can influence foreign policy, it should not dominate it.<\/li>\n<li>Effective policy requires objective decision-making, even when choices conflict with public sentiment or ethical considerations.<\/li>\n<li>Governments must sometimes act in ways that appear uncomfortable but are necessary for long-term national benefit.<\/li>\n<li>At the same time, <strong>transparency<\/strong> and <strong>public accountability<\/strong> remain essential. In a democracy, governments must explain their decisions clearly, allowing citizens to understand, evaluate, and respond to foreign policy actions.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Critique of Strategic Autonomy<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>The term <strong>strategic autonomy<\/strong> is often used to describe India\u2019s foreign policy but lacks clarity.<\/li>\n<li>The concept appears unnecessarily complex, raising questions about why simpler terms like <strong>independence<\/strong> are not preferred.<\/li>\n<li>Labels can obscure rather than clarify policy, creating distance between decision-makers and the public.<\/li>\n<li>Ultimately, the effectiveness of foreign policy lies in its outcomes, not in the terminology used to describe it.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>India\u2019s Calculated Response to the Iran Conflict<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>India\u2019s response to the Iran conflict reflects a careful calculation of its strategic and economic priorities.<\/li>\n<li>Strong ties with the United States, its largest trading partner, are crucial for <strong>technology<\/strong>, <strong>defence capabilities<\/strong>, and broader cooperation.<\/li>\n<li>Similarly, the Gulf states play a vital role due to the presence of millions of Indian workers, whose remittances significantly contribute to the economy, and as key suppliers of energy security.<\/li>\n<li>These considerations justify a cautious approach, avoiding direct confrontation or strong alignment with Iran.<\/li>\n<li>The government\u2019s stance reflects a prioritisation of tangible interests over symbolic gestures.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>The Limits of Pragmatism and Ideological Signals and Diplomatic Timing<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<h4><strong>The Limits of Pragmatism<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>Despite these constraints, a purely calculated approach can overlook the value of diplomatic sensitivity.<\/li>\n<li>Expressing condolences for the assassination of Ali Khamenei could have demonstrated goodwill without undermining strategic interests.<\/li>\n<li>Such gestures carry symbolic importance and help sustain long-standing relationships.<\/li>\n<li>Foreign policy need not be devoid of nuance; even within a realist framework, there is room for balance between interests and relationships. Small diplomatic actions can reinforce trust and preserve historical ties.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<h4><strong>Ideological Signals and Diplomatic Timing<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>The timing of Narendra Modi\u2019s visit to Israel raised concerns about perception and alignment.<\/li>\n<li>While the visit itself reflects growing bilateral relations, its proximity to the conflict created an impression of <strong>ideological affinity<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li>In international relations, timing can significantly influence how actions are interpreted, sometimes overshadowing their intent.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Conclusion<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>India\u2019s foreign policy demonstrates the strengths and limits of a <strong>realist approach<\/strong> rooted in national interest.<\/li>\n<li>While <strong>strategic priorities<\/strong>, <strong>economic ties<\/strong>, and <strong>security concerns<\/strong> justify cautious decision-making, effective diplomacy also requires attention to perception, history, and symbolism.<\/li>\n<li>A successful foreign policy balances calculation with sensitivity, ensuring that immediate interests do not undermine long-term relationships.<\/li>\n<li>In a complex global environment, the challenge lies in maintaining independence, exercising <strong>strategic judgment<\/strong>, and communicating decisions clearly to both domestic and international audiences.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>India\u2019s Iran Stance Does Fuel a Foreign Policy Debate FAQs<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><strong>Q1. <\/strong>What is the main purpose of foreign policy?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans.<\/strong> The main purpose of foreign policy is to protect and promote a country\u2019s national interest.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q2.<\/strong> Why is public participation important in foreign policy debates?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans.<\/strong> Public participation is important because foreign policy decisions affect citizens and ensure democratic accountability.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q3.<\/strong> What does Jawaharlal Nehru mean by calling foreign policy \u201cselfish\u201d?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans.<\/strong> He means that foreign policy is primarily driven by national interest rather than moral principles.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q4.<\/strong> Why did India take a cautious stance in the Iran conflict?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans.<\/strong> India took a cautious stance to protect its strategic, economic, and energy interests with the United States and Gulf countries.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q5.<\/strong> What criticism is made about the term \u201cstrategic autonomy\u201d?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans.<\/strong> The term is criticised for being unclear and unnecessarily complex compared to simpler ideas like independence.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Source: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thehindu.com\/opinion\/lead\/indias-iran-stance-does-fuel-a-foreign-policy-debate\/article70766711.ece\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">The Hindu<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><strong>NCERT Book Ban, A Chapter on Judicial Transparency<\/strong><\/h2>\n<h3><strong>Context<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>The integrity of the judiciary is fundamental to democracy, yet it is not immune to <strong>arrogance<\/strong>, <strong>corruption<\/strong>, and <strong>inefficiency<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li>Meaningful reform must extend beyond moral reflection to include <strong>structural reform<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li>These concerns gain urgency in light of recent actions by the Supreme Court of India, where tensions between <strong>judicial authority<\/strong> and <strong>democratic freedoms<\/strong> have become increasingly visible.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Judicial Sensitivity and the Question of Censorship<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>The ban on an NCERT Class VIII textbook raises serious concerns about censorship, procedural fairness, and natural justice.<\/li>\n<li>A <strong>complete blanket ban<\/strong> was imposed, and those responsible for the content were penalised without a <strong>hearing<\/strong>, undermining due process.<\/li>\n<li>The passages addressed issues such as judicial delay, case backlog, and judicial corruption, all widely acknowledged realities.<\/li>\n<li>References to ethical standards like the Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct and accountability mechanisms indicate informed critique rather than <strong>malicious intent<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li>However, the Court viewed such discussion as an attack on its dignity, highlighting growing <strong>institutional sensitivity<\/strong> to criticism.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Freedom of Speech and Constitutional Boundaries<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>The ban directly impacts the freedom of speech guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a).<\/li>\n<li>Restrictions are permissible only under Article 19(2) on specific grounds such as <strong>public order<\/strong>, <strong>defamation<\/strong>, or <strong>contempt of court<\/strong>, and must be imposed through <strong>law made by the state<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li>Judicial orders do not fall within this definition, as clarified in Naresh Shridhar Mirajkar vs State of Maharashtra.<\/li>\n<li>Under the <strong>Contempt of Courts Act, 1971<\/strong>, contempt requires material that scandalises the court or obstructs justice.<\/li>\n<li>General references to systemic issues fail to meet this threshold. The absence of a rigorous <strong>constitutional scrutiny<\/strong> in determining contempt raises concerns about the misuse of judicial power.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>The Paradox of Judicial Power<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Courts serve as the ultimate protectors of <strong>fundamental rights<\/strong>, yet when they impose restrictions such as book bans, citizens are left without effective remedy.<\/li>\n<li>This creates a paradox where the guardian of rights becomes the source of <strong>rights limitation<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li>Such actions risk weakening <strong>judicial legitimacy<\/strong> and public confidence in democratic institutions.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Global Lessons on Judicial Reform<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Across democracies, judicial credibility is strengthened through <strong>transparency<\/strong> and <strong>accountability<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li>Organisations like Transparency International have highlighted concerns about judicial corruption.<\/li>\n<li>In Kenya, reforms under Willy Mutunga introduced judicial ombudspersons, performance committees, and participatory mechanisms.<\/li>\n<li>These reforms significantly improved public trust, demonstrating that acknowledging problems, rather than suppressing criticism, leads to stronger institutions. <strong>Institutional reform<\/strong> thrives on openness, not silence.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Acknowledgment Within the Indian Context<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Indian courts have themselves recognized internal challenges. In K. Veeraswami vs Union of India, judges were held to fall within the scope of anti-corruption law, emphasising <strong>judicial integrity<\/strong> and <strong>accountability<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li>The judgment stressed that even a single act of corruption can damage the entire system.<\/li>\n<li>The existence of in-house procedures for addressing misconduct reflects awareness of potential <strong>ethical breaches<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li>Such mechanisms affirm that maintaining public trust requires continuous vigilance and accountability.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>The Imperative of Introspection and Reform<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>The argument that criticism must present a balanced view cannot justify censorship.<\/li>\n<li>Enforcing such a standard risk making <strong>free expression<\/strong> conditional and ineffective.<\/li>\n<li>Democracy depends on dissent, critical voices, and informed debate.<\/li>\n<li>Addressing issues like systemic corruption and judicial delay requires honest acknowledgment. Suppressing criticism obstructs reform and weakens institutional credibility.<\/li>\n<li>A judiciary open to scrutiny strengthens its own foundation and reinforces democratic values.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Conclusion<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>The textbook ban reflects a deeper tension between <strong>institutional authority<\/strong> and <strong>constitutional freedoms<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li>Protecting judicial dignity cannot come at the cost of civil liberties. Reform must be structural, intellectual, and moral, supported by transparency and accountability.<\/li>\n<li>A judiciary committed to <strong>self-correction<\/strong>, <strong>openness<\/strong>, and <strong>democratic principles<\/strong> becomes the true guardian of justice.<\/li>\n<li>By embracing criticism rather than silencing it, it reinforces the rule of law and sustains the vitality of democracy.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>NCERT Book Ban, A Chapter on Judicial Transparency FAQs<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><strong>Q1. <\/strong>Why is the textbook ban considered problematic?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans. <\/strong>The ban is problematic because it restricts freedom of speech and violates principles of natural justice.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q2. <\/strong>What constitutional right is affected by the ban?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans.<\/strong> The ban affects the fundamental right to freedom of speech under Article 19(1)(a).<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q3.<\/strong> Why do general references to judicial issues not amount to contempt?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans.<\/strong> General references do not amount to contempt because they do not scandalise the court or obstruct justice.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q4.<\/strong> What lesson does Kenya\u2019s judicial reform provide?<br \/>\n<strong>Ans.<\/strong> Kenya\u2019s reforms show that acknowledging problems improves public trust in the judiciary.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q5.<\/strong> Why is introspection important for the judiciary?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans. <\/strong>Introspection is important because it helps address systemic issues and strengthens democratic institutions.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Source: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thehindu.com\/opinion\/lead\/ncert-book-ban-a-chapter-on-judicial-transparency\/article70759034.ece\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">The Hindu<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2><strong>Water Paradox in India &#8211; From Sacred Resource to Strategic Asset<\/strong><\/h2>\n<h3><strong>Context<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>On the occasion of World Water Day (22 March), there is the need to highlight the <strong>deep contradiction <\/strong>in India\u2019s relationship with water\u2014culturally revered yet economically undervalued and environmentally mismanaged.<\/li>\n<li>With rising population pressure, urbanisation, and climate change, India faces a looming <strong>water crisis<\/strong> that threatens growth, sustainability, and human well-being.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>The Water Stress Reality<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Shrinking availability:<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li>India has <strong>18%<\/strong> of the global population but only <strong>4%<\/strong> of freshwater resources.<\/li>\n<li>Per capita water availability declined from 1,816 cubic metres (2001) to 1,486 cubic metres (2021).<\/li>\n<li>It is expected to approach the water scarcity threshold (1,000 cubic metres) by 2050.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Demand-supply imbalance:<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li>Rapid urbanisation and industrialisation are pushing demand beyond sustainable supply.<\/li>\n<li>Water scarcity is emerging as a binding constraint on economic growth and investment.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Climate Change and Hydrological Uncertainty<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Erratic monsoon patterns:<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li>For example, rainfall increased in 55% of tehsils, but in the form of intense short-duration events causing floods.<\/li>\n<li>11% of tehsils, especially in the Indo-Gangetic Plains, face declining rainfall during critical sowing periods.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Rising disaster vulnerability:<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>80%<\/strong> of India\u2019s population lives in districts vulnerable to hydro-meteorological disasters.<\/li>\n<li>Extreme climate events (2019\u20132023) caused losses of around \u20b95 lakh crore.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Reframing Water as a Strategic Resource<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Recognising green water &#8211; The invisible asset:<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li>Focus has been on blue water (rivers, lakes, groundwater), neglecting green water (<strong>soil moisture<\/strong>).<\/li>\n<li>Around 60% of rainfall is stored in soil globally. Soil organic carbon enhances water retention.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Policy imperatives: <\/strong>Promote regenerative agriculture (mulching, no-till farming, cover cropping), protect forest ecosystems for watershed stability, and need for a <strong>National Green Water Mission<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Agricultural water use &#8211; Addressing structural distortions:<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Current issues: <\/strong>Agriculture consumes ~<strong>90<\/strong>% of India\u2019s water. Low water productivity ($0.52 per cubic metre, far below global standards). Policy bias toward water-intensive crops (rice) due to MSP and subsidies.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Reform strategy: <\/strong>Shift 3.6 million hectares from rice to millets and pulses. This will potentially save ~29 billion cubic metres of water annually.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Triple dividend: <\/strong>Nutritional security, environmental sustainability, and fiscal savings.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Circular water economy &#8211; From waste to wealth:<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Current status: <\/strong>Only 28% of urban wastewater is treated. This means reuse remains minimal.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Potential gains:<\/strong> A treated used-water economy could unlock a market worth Rs 3.2 lakh crore by 2047, recover biogas and fertilisers, and create over 1 lakh new jobs.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Key measures: <\/strong>City-level reuse targets, public-private partnerships (PPP), and behavioural shift &#8211; \u201cwastewater as resource\u201d.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Urban water management &#8211; Sponge cities approach:<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Challenges<\/strong>: Expansion of built-up areas (increased by ~33% since 2005) reduces groundwater recharge. Urban flooding due to impermeable surfaces. Loss of water bodies (e.g., over half in Delhi).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Solutions: <\/strong>Develop blue-green infrastructure (wetlands, urban forests, permeable surfaces). <strong>For example<\/strong>, Yamuna Biodiversity Park restoration.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Additional measure<\/strong>: Proposal for Swachh Bharat Mission <strong>0<\/strong> focusing on peri-urban waste management.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Water governance reforms:<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Key issues<\/strong>: Inefficient pricing and distorted tariffs. Poor regulation and fragmented institutional framework. Inequity &#8211; poor pay more via informal water markets (tankers).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Reform agenda: <\/strong>Transparent water accounting using digital public infrastructure. Bulk water trading mechanisms. <strong>Rational pricing<\/strong> &#8211; cost-reflective tariffs for capable users, targeted subsidies for vulnerable groups.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Key Challenges and Way Forward<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Policy inertia<\/strong>: In agriculture and subsidies. Integrate water-energy-food nexus into policymaking.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Fragmented governance<\/strong>: Across states and sectors. Leverage technology for real-time monitoring and efficiency.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Climate variability:<\/strong> Increasing unpredictability. Align economic incentives toward water conservation and efficiency<\/li>\n<li><strong>Urban mismanagement:<\/strong> Encroachment of water bodies. Promote nature-based solutions and ecosystem restoration.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Low public awareness<\/strong>: Behavioural issues. Encourage community participation and decentralised governance.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Conclusion<\/strong><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>India stands at a <strong>critical juncture<\/strong> where water can either become a constraint or a catalyst.<\/li>\n<li>Moving from viewing water as a free and infinite resource to recognising it as a finite strategic national asset is imperative.<\/li>\n<li><strong>A holistic approach<\/strong>\u2014combining ecological wisdom, economic rationality, and institutional reform\u2014can transform India\u2019s water crisis into an opportunity for sustainable and inclusive growth.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><strong>Water Paradox in India FAQs<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><strong>Q1<\/strong>. What is the paradox in India\u2019s relationship with water?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans<\/strong>. India reveres water culturally but mismanages it economically, leading to scarcity, pollution, and inefficient utilisation.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q2<\/strong>. What is the impact of climate change on India\u2019s water resources and agricultural patterns?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans<\/strong>. Climate change has made monsoons erratic, causing floods, droughts, and disruptions in critical agricultural cycles.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q3<\/strong>. Why is the concept of \u201cgreen water\u201d crucial for India\u2019s water security?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans<\/strong>. Green water, stored as soil moisture, sustains rainfed agriculture and enhances resilience through improved soil management.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q4<\/strong>. What is the need for crop diversification in addressing India\u2019s water crisis?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans<\/strong>. Shifting from water-intensive crops like rice to millets and pulses can conserve water, improve nutrition, and reduce subsidy burden.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q5<\/strong>. How can a circular water economy contribute to sustainable urban water management in India?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ans<\/strong>. By treating and reusing wastewater, it reduces freshwater demand, generates economic value, and enhances urban sustainability.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Source: <\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/indianexpress.com\/article\/opinion\/columns\/our-water-challenge-is-stark-here-are-four-ways-to-reimagine-the-solution-10593116\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\"><strong>IE<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Daily Editorial Analysis 21 March 2026 by Vajiram &#038; Ravi covers key editorials from The Hindu &#038; Indian Express with UPSC-focused insights and relevance.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":20,"featured_media":86373,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[138],"tags":[141,882,909],"class_list":{"0":"post-94026","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-daily-editorial-analysis","8":"tag-daily-editorial-analysis","9":"tag-the-hindu-editorial-analysis","10":"tag-the-indian-express-analysis","11":"no-featured-image-padding"},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/94026","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/20"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=94026"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/94026\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":94079,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/94026\/revisions\/94079"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/86373"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=94026"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=94026"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=94026"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}