{"id":5925,"date":"2026-08-20T17:07:17","date_gmt":"2026-08-20T11:37:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/upsc-exam\/?p=5925"},"modified":"2026-08-20T18:09:27","modified_gmt":"2026-08-20T12:39:27","slug":"simon-commission","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/upsc-exam\/simon-commission\/","title":{"rendered":"Simon Commission 1927, Purpose, Impacts, UPSC Notes"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Simon Commission (Indian Statutory Commission), formed by the British in 1927 to review the <\/span><b>Government of India Act 1919<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">, sparked widespread protests due to its all-British composition. Arriving in India in 1928, it was met with protests, including the iconic <\/span><b>\"Simon Go Back\"<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> demonstrations. The commission aimed to evaluate the Act, recommend reforms, and address communal representation and law and order.<\/span><\/p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">However, the lack of Indian representation in the Simon Commission led to its boycott, driving nationalist sentiment. The protests influenced key developments like the <\/span><b>Nehru Report<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> and intensified demands for Indian self-governance, fostering new leaders and strengthening the independence movement.<\/span><\/p>\r\n<h2><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Simon Commission 1927 About<\/span><\/h2>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The <\/span><b>Simon Commission<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">, officially known as the <\/span><b>Indian Statutory Commission<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">, was established by the British government in 1927 to review the <\/span><b>Government of India Act 1919<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> and recommend constitutional reforms.<\/span><\/p>\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><b>Simon Commission Chairman:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> The commission was chaired by <\/span><b>Sir John Simon<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> and included seven British members, sparking controversy and anger in India due to the lack of Indian representation.<\/span><\/li>\r\n\t<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><b>Simon Commission Members:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Sir John Simon (Chairman), Clement Attlee, Harry Levy-Lawson, Edward Cadogan, George Lane-Fox, Vernon Hartshorn, and Donald Howard.<\/span><\/li>\r\n\t<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><b>Simon Commission Date and Year: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Commission was constituted on November 8, 1927; arrived in India on February 3, 1928; and presented its final report on May 27, 1930.<\/span><\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<h3><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Simon Commission Arrival<\/span><\/h3>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Simon Commission arrived in Bombay, India, on <\/span><b>3rd February 1928<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">, triggering widespread protests and public outrage. Demonstrations were organised by various political factions, including the <\/span><b>Indian National Congress<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> and a faction of the <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/upsc-exam\/muslim-league\/\" target=\"_blank\"><b>Muslim League<\/b><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> led by <\/span><b>Mohammed Ali Jinnah<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">, both of which decided to boycott the commission. Reception in India took place with the following:<\/span><\/p>\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><b>Nationwide Protests: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The commission's arrival was met with massive protests across India, with Indians expressing their opposition through strikes and demonstrations.<\/span><\/li>\r\n\t<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><b>Black Flag Demonstrations: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Protesters carried black flags and shouted <\/span><b>\"Simon Go Back\",<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> symbolising their rejection of the commission and its exclusionary practices.<\/span>\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The slogan <\/span><b>\u201cSimon Go Back\u201d<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> was coined by freedom fighter <\/span><b>Yusuf Meherally.<\/b><\/li>\r\n\t<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Students and youth were at the forefront of the protests, demonstrating their commitment to the cause of Indian independence.<\/span><\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<h2><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Simon Commission Purpose<\/span><\/h2>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The purpose of the Commission was to evaluate the <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/upsc-exam\/government-of-india-act-1919\/\" target=\"_blank\"><b>Government of India Act 1919<\/b><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">, recommend constitutional reforms, address communal representation, and assess law and order amidst rising nationalist movements.<\/span><\/p>\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><b>Evaluate the Government of India Act 1919: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The commission aimed to assess the functioning of the <\/span><b>diarchy<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">, where certain provincial responsibilities were divided between Indian ministers and British officials.<\/span><\/li>\r\n\t<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><b>Recommend Constitutional Reforms: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">It sought to propose constitutional changes that could address governance issues and Indian demands while maintaining British control.<\/span><\/li>\r\n\t<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><b>Address Communal Representation: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The commission aimed to evaluate and propose solutions for communal representation, a contentious issue in British India.<\/span><\/li>\r\n\t<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><b>Assess Law and Order: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The commission was tasked with reviewing the law and order situation in light of growing nationalist movements.<\/span><\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<h2><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Simon Commission Criticism<\/span><\/h2>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Commission faced criticism for lacking Indian representation, leading to a limited understanding of India's needs, and for prioritising colonial authority over genuine reforms. The absence of Indian members meant the commission lacked a genuine understanding of India's political climate and needs. Critics argued that the commission's purpose was more about preserving colonial authority than offering meaningful reforms.<\/span><\/p>\r\n<h2><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Simon Commission Boycott<\/span><\/h2>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The boycott of the Commission was driven by several factors, such as the absence of Indian representation, lack of genuine reforms, and a boycott call by leaders, including the INC, at the 1927 Madras session chaired by M.A. Ansari.<\/span><\/p>\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><b>Absence of Indian Representation: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The commission did not include any Indian members, which was perceived as a clear disregard for Indian political aspirations and a sign of British indifference to Indian demands for self-governance.<\/span><\/li>\r\n\t<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><b>Lack of Genuine Reforms: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Many Indians viewed the commission as a tactic to delay substantial constitutional reforms and maintain British control over India, especially after the limited changes introduced by the <\/span><b>Government of India Act 1919<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">.<\/span><\/li>\r\n\t<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><b>Call for Boycott by Leaders: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Indian political leaders, including members of the <\/span><b>Indian National Congress (INC)<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">, called for a nationwide boycott, mobilizing the public to protest against the commission. The decision was made in 1927 during the <\/span><b>Madras <\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/upsc-exam\/inc-sessions\/\" target=\"_blank\"><b>INC session<\/b><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">, which was chaired by <\/span><b>M.A. Ansari<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">.<\/span><\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<h3><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Major Protest Events<\/span><\/h3>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Lahore Protest, led by Lala Lajpat Rai, saw brutal police action and his death, intensifying resistance and nationalist sentiment among students and the youth.<\/span><\/p>\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><b>Lahore Protest (30th October 1928): <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">In Lahore, a significant protest led by <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/upsc-exam\/lala-lajpat-rai\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Lala Lajpat Rai<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> resulted in brutal police action, leading to Rai's death on <\/span><b>17th November 1928 <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">and intensifying resistance against the commission.<\/span><\/li>\r\n\t<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><b>Student and Youth Protests: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The involvement of students and youth highlighted the growing nationalist sentiment and the widespread demand for change.<\/span><\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<h2><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Simon Commission Impacts<\/span><\/h2>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Simon Commission significantly impacted India's independence movement, leading to the Nehru Report advocating dominion status and secular democracy, influencing the <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/upsc-exam\/government-of-india-act-1935\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Government of India Act 1935<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">, uniting the opposition, fostering new leaders, and intensifying demands for self-governance.<\/span><\/p>\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/upsc-exam\/nehru-report\/\" target=\"_blank\"><b>Nehru Report<\/b><\/a><b>:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> The Nehru Report (1928), formulated in response to the Simon Commission, proposed a new constitutional framework emphasising self-governance and democratic principles.<\/span>\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The report called for dominion status within the British Commonwealth, marking a shift in political demands.<\/span><\/li>\r\n\t<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">It advocated for a secular and democratic framework, rejecting communal representation.<\/span><\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/li>\r\n\t<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><b>Influence on Future Reforms: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Simon Commission's impact extended to future constitutional reforms, including the <\/span><b>Government of India Act 1935<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">.<\/span>\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><b>Provincial Autonomy:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> The Act of 1935 abolished dyarchy, introduced provincial autonomy, and instituted bicameralism in six of the eleven provinces, granting more powers to Indian ministers and legislatures.<\/span><\/li>\r\n\t<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><b>Criticism:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Despite reforms, the Act was criticised for not granting full self-governance, leading to continued demands for independence.<\/span><\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/li>\r\n\t<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><b>Emergence of New Leaders: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The opposition to the Simon Commission provided a platform for new leaders and movements to emerge, contributing to the broader struggle for independence.<\/span>\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><b>Prominent Leaders:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Figures like <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/upsc-exam\/bhagat-singh\/\" target=\"_blank\"><b>Bhagat Singh<\/b><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> gained prominence for their activism and resistance against colonial rule.<\/span><\/li>\r\n\t<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><b>Legacy of Resistance:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> The opposition inspired a new generation of leaders and activists to continue the fight for independence.<\/span><\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/li>\r\n\t<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><b>Strengthening of Independence Movement: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Simon Commission played a crucial role in strengthening the Indian independence movement, uniting diverse groups in their demand for self-rule.<\/span>\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><b>Unified Opposition:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> The boycott united various Indian political parties, including the <\/span><b>Indian National Congress<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> and the <\/span><b>All India Muslim League<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">, fostering a sense of national solidarity against colonial rule.<\/span><\/li>\r\n\t<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><b>Catalyst for Change:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> The commission acted as a catalyst for change, intensifying demands for independence and self-governance.<\/span><\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<h2><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Simon Commission Outcome<\/span><\/h2>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Simon Commission Report, published in 1930, advocated removing dyarchy in the provinces and establishing provincial autonomy while preserving considerable discretionary powers for Governors.<\/span><\/p>\r\n<ul>\r\n\t<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">It envisioned a future federal form but did not endorse responsible government at the centre or explicitly commit to Dominion Status. The study was generally rejected by Indian political organisations, fuelling nationalist hostility.<\/span><\/li>\r\n\t<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Its proposals, however, served as a solid foundation for following constitutional deliberations, including the <a href=\"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/upsc-exam\/round-table-conference\/\" target=\"_blank\">Round Table Conferences<\/a>, and eventually influenced numerous parts of the Government of India Act of 1935.<\/span><\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<h2><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Simon Commission UPSC PYQs<\/span><\/h2>\r\n<p><b>Q1: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Evaluate the circumstances that led to the appointment of the Simon Commission. Why did its arrival trigger widespread protest across India? <\/span><b>(UPSC Mains 2011)<\/b><\/p>\r\n<p><b>Q2: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">With reference to Rowlatt Satyagraha, which of the following statements is\/are correct? <\/span><b>(UPSC Prelims 2013)<\/b><\/p>\r\n<ol>\r\n\t<li><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> The Rowlatt Act was based on the recommendations of the 'Sedition Committee'.<\/span><\/li>\r\n\t<li><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> In Rowlatt Satyagraha, Gandhiji tried to utilize the Home Rule League.<\/span><\/li>\r\n\t<li><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Demonstrations against the arrival of Simon Commission coincided with Rowlatt Satyagraha.<\/span><\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Select the correct answer using the code given below:<\/span><\/p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">(a) 1 only<\/span><\/p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">(b) 1 and 2 only<\/span><\/p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">(c) 2 and 3 only<\/span><\/p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">(d) 1, 2 and 3<\/span><\/p>\r\n<p><b>Ans: (b)<\/b><\/p>\r\n<p><b>Q3<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">: The people of India agitated against the arrival of Simon Commission because <\/span><b>(UPSC Prelims 2013)<\/b><\/p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">(a) Indians never wanted the review of the working of the Act of 1919.<\/span><\/p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">(b) Simon Commission recommended the abolition of Dyarchy (Diarchy) in the provinces.<\/span><\/p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">(c) There was no Indian member in the Simon Commission.<\/span><\/p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">(d) The Simon Commission suggested the partition of the country.<\/span><\/p>\r\n<p><b>Ans: (c)<\/b><\/p>\r\n<p><b>Q4: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">With reference to Simon Commission\u2019s recommendations, which one of the following statement is correct?<\/span><b> (UPSC Prelims 2010)<\/b><\/p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">(a) It recommended the replacement of diarchy with responsible government in the provinces.<\/span><\/p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">(b) It proposed the setting up of interprovincial council under the Home Department.<\/span><\/p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">(c) It suggested the abolition of bicameral legislature at the centre.<\/span><\/p>\r\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">(d) It recommended the creation of Indian Police Service with a provision for increased pay and allowances for British recruits as compared to Indian recruits.<\/span><\/p>\r\n<p><b>Ans: (a)<\/b><\/p>\r\n<table style=\"border-collapse: collapse;width: 98.6767%;height: 195px\">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 25px\">\r\n<td class=\"tb-color\" style=\"width: 50%;height: 25px;text-align: center\" colspan=\"2\"><strong>Other Related Posts<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 25px\">\r\n<td style=\"width: 50%;height: 25px;text-align: center\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/upsc-exam\/home-rule-movement\/\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Home Rule Movement<\/strong><\/a><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 50%;height: 25px;text-align: center\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/upsc-exam\/swaraj-party\/\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Swaraj Party<\/strong><\/a><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 25px\">\r\n<td style=\"width: 50%;height: 25px;text-align: center\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/upsc-exam\/annie-besant\/\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Annie Besant<\/strong><\/a><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 50%;height: 25px;text-align: center\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/upsc-exam\/swarajists-and-no-changers\/\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Swarajists vs No Changers<\/strong><\/a><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 25px\">\r\n<td style=\"width: 50%;height: 25px;text-align: center\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/upsc-exam\/lucknow-pact\/\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Lucknow Pact<\/strong><\/a><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 50%;height: 25px;text-align: center\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/upsc-exam\/simon-commission\/\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Simon Commission<\/strong><\/a><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 25px\">\r\n<td style=\"width: 50%;height: 25px;text-align: center\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/upsc-exam\/non-cooperation-movement\/\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Non Cooperation Movement<\/strong><\/a><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 50%;height: 25px;text-align: center\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/upsc-exam\/nehru-report\/\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Nehru Report<\/strong><\/a><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 25px\">\r\n<td style=\"width: 50%;height: 25px;text-align: center\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/upsc-exam\/khilafat-movement\/\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Khilafat Movement<\/strong><\/a><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 50%;height: 25px;text-align: center\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/upsc-exam\/jinnahs-14-points\/\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Jinnah's 14 Points<\/strong><\/a><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 25px\">\r\n<td style=\"width: 50%;height: 25px;text-align: center\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/upsc-exam\/rowlatt-act\/\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Rowlatt Act<\/strong><\/a><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 50%;height: 25px;text-align: center\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/upsc-exam\/jallianwala-bagh-massacre\/\" target=\"_blank\">Jallianwala Bagh Massacre<\/a><\/strong><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Simon Commission (1927) was appointed to study constitutional reform in British India. Check more Simon Commission, Purpose, Impacts<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":14074,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[38,20],"tags":[40,805,1067],"class_list":["post-5925","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-upsc-notes","category-upsc-modern-history-notes","tag-quest","tag-simon-commission","tag-upsc-modern-history-notes"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/upsc-exam\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5925","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/upsc-exam\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/upsc-exam\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/upsc-exam\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/upsc-exam\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5925"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/upsc-exam\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5925\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":27831,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/upsc-exam\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5925\/revisions\/27831"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/upsc-exam\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/14074"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/upsc-exam\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5925"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/upsc-exam\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5925"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vajiramandravi.com\/upsc-exam\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5925"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}