Nachiket Mor Committee, History, Recommendations, Financial Inclusion

The Nachiket Mor Committee was set up by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to examine the challenges of financial inclusion in India. It focused on improving access to banking, credit, insurance, payments and other financial services, especially for low-income households and small businesses. The Committee’s recommendations aimed to make financial services more accessible, affordable and useful for people across the country. 

Nachiket Mor Committee History, Objectives

The Nachiket Mor Committee, officially known as the Committee on Comprehensive Financial Services for Small Businesses and Low-Income Households, was constituted by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) in September 2013 under the chairmanship of Dr. Nachiket Mor.

• Background: The committee was formed when India had expanded its banking network, but many rural households, migrant workers, small businesses, informal workers and low-income groups still had limited access to formal financial services such as banking, affordable credit, insurance and safe payment facilities.
• Need for the Committee: The committee aimed to address gaps in the existing financial inclusion system and ensure that individuals and small businesses could access a wider range of formal financial services.
• Core Vision: It proposed a financial system where every individual and small business could access affordable, convenient and reliable financial services.
• Access and Usage: The committee stressed that financial inclusion should not be limited to simply opening bank accounts. People should also be able to use financial services such as savings, credit, insurance, pensions and payments effectively.
• Economic Empowerment: It viewed financial inclusion as more than a banking issue, linking it with poverty reduction, economic participation and inclusive growth.

Nachiket Mor Committee Recommendations on Financial Inclusion

The committee proposed a broad approach to financial inclusion that covered bank accounts, payments, credit, insurance, pensions and consumer protection. Its recommendations focused on making financial services accessible and useful for underserved sections.

• Universal Electronic Bank Account: The committee recommended that every adult Indian should have a Universal Electronic Bank Account (UEBA). It was intended to serve as a basic financial account through which people could save money, receive government benefits, make payments and become part of the formal financial system.
• Easy Access to Payment Points: The committee proposed that residents should have access to payment services within a reasonable distance. It supported the use of banking correspondents, mobile banking, digital channels and local service points to reduce the difficulty faced by people in rural and remote areas.
• Payments Banks: It recommended Payments Banks to provide basic savings and payment services to people who were not adequately served by traditional banks. These institutions were intended to support migrant workers, low-income households, small businesses and rural or semi-urban populations.
• Payments Bank Services: Payments Banks were designed to provide services such as small savings accounts, remittances, digital payments, debit cards and mobile-based banking. However, they were not permitted to provide loans, keeping their focus on payments and deposit-related services.
• Wholesale Banks: The committee also proposed Wholesale Banks to provide liquidity and credit support to financial institutions serving priority sectors and underserved regions. The aim was to improve the flow of funds to areas such as small businesses, agriculture and low-income groups.
• Priority Sector Lending: It recommended reforms in Priority Sector Lending (PSL) so that credit would reach genuinely underserved sectors rather than merely helping banks meet fixed targets. The focus was on making PSL more flexible, better monitored and more effective.
• Complete Range of Financial Products: The committee stressed that financial inclusion should go beyond bank accounts. Low-income households may also need affordable credit, insurance, pension products, safe remittance services, emergency savings and financial advice to manage different financial risks.

Also Read : Banking System in India

‹ ›

Key Recommendations of the Nachiket Mor Committee

The Nachiket Mor Committee recommendations covered both the structure of the banking system and the way financial services should be delivered and regulated.

• Differentiated Banking: The committee supported a banking structure in which institutions could have different roles based on their functions. This included specialised institutions such as Payments Banks and Wholesale Banks to meet the needs of different sections of the economy.
• Small Finance Banks: The committee recommended the idea of Small Finance Banks to improve credit access for small businesses and low-income households. This became an important part of the differentiated banking approach in India.
• Greater Competition: It supported wider participation of non-bank players in financial services to encourage competition, innovation and better service delivery.
• Digital Payment Infrastructure: The committee highlighted the importance of affordable, reliable and widely available payment systems. It supported the development of interoperable digital payment infrastructure to reduce transaction costs and make formal financial services easier to use.
• Credit for Small Businesses: The committee recognised that small businesses often struggle to obtain formal loans because of limited collateral and documentation. It therefore supported measures such as cash-flow-based lending and improved credit information systems to improve access to formal credit.
• Customer-Centric Regulation: The committee proposed moving towards a customer-centric regulatory approach instead of focusing only on banks and institutions. It emphasised proportional regulation, where rules would reflect the nature and risk profile of different financial institutions.
• Consumer Protection: The committee stressed that financial inclusion should be supported by strong consumer protection. It highlighted the need for responsible lending, transparent products, simple communication, effective grievance redressal and suitable financial products for low-income households.

Also Read : Financial Institutions in India

Significance of the Nachiket Mor Committee for Indian Banking

The Nachiket Mor Committee played an important role in changing the way financial inclusion was viewed in India. Instead of measuring inclusion only through the number of bank branches or accounts, it placed greater emphasis on access, usage, financial security and a wider range of financial products.

• Expansion of Financial Inclusion: Its recommendations influenced later developments such as Jan Dhan accounts, Aadhaar-enabled financial services, Direct Benefit Transfer, banking correspondents and digital payments.
• Growth of Differentiated Banking: The committee’s ideas contributed to the development of specialised banking models, particularly Payments Banks, which expanded the range of institutions serving underserved customers.
• Better Government Benefit Delivery: Wider access to bank accounts and digital payment systems helped strengthen the delivery of government benefits and transfers through formal financial channels.
• Greater Savings and Formalisation: Bringing more households and small businesses into the formal financial system can encourage savings mobilisation, formal payments and reduced dependence on informal sources of finance.
• Support for Small Businesses: By focusing on better credit access and improved financial services, the committee aimed to help small businesses participate more effectively in the formal economy.
• Focus on Financial Security: The committee recognised that inclusion must also provide protection against financial risks through insurance, pensions, emergency savings and responsible credit.
• Long-Term Impact: The committee’s approach helped shape India’s broader financial inclusion framework and supported the movement towards the JAM Trinity – Jan Dhan, Aadhaar and Mobile.

Nachiket Mor Committee Challenges

• Uneven Access and Usage: Despite wider banking coverage, some rural households, low-income groups, migrant workers and small businesses still face difficulties in accessing and regularly using formal financial services.
• Limited Access to Formal Credit: Small businesses and low-income borrowers continue to face challenges related to collateral, documentation and credit assessment, making it difficult to obtain affordable formal loans.
• Digital Divide: Differences in digital literacy, internet connectivity and access to digital devices can limit the effective use of digital banking and payment services, particularly in underserved areas.
• Fraud and Consumer Risks: The growing use of digital financial services has increased concerns related to fraud, mis-selling, over-indebtedness and unsuitable financial products, making strong consumer protection important.
• Challenges for Payments Banks: Payments Banks have faced difficulties in developing sustainable business models while serving low-income customers and providing affordable payment and savings services.
• Need for Greater Financial Security: Financial inclusion needs to go beyond bank accounts and payments by ensuring wider access to credit, insurance, pensions, emergency savings and financial advice.

Recent Developments based on Nachiket Mor Committee

• Wider Financial Inclusion: The approach suggested by the Nachiket Mor Committee has influenced the expansion of financial inclusion in India by shifting the focus from merely opening accounts to ensuring meaningful access and regular usage.
• Growth of Basic Bank Accounts: Initiatives such as Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana (PMJDY) have significantly expanded access to basic bank accounts, particularly among previously underserved sections.
• Expansion of Digital Payments: UPI, Aadhaar-enabled payment systems, mobile banking and Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) have strengthened the digital financial ecosystem and improved access to formal financial services.
• Greater Role of Differentiated Banks: The Committee’s recommendation for differentiated banking models contributed to the introduction of Payments Banks and Small Finance Banks, aimed at serving specific customer groups and financial needs.
• Continuing Inclusion Gaps: While access has improved considerably, challenges remain in ensuring affordable credit, regular usage, financial literacy, digital connectivity and consumer protection, especially for vulnerable and underserved groups.

Nachiket Mor Committee Way Forward

• Focus on Meaningful Usage: Financial inclusion should move beyond account opening and focus on regular and useful access to savings, credit, payments, insurance and pension services.
• Improve Affordable Credit: Better credit assessment, cash-flow-based lending and stronger credit information systems can help small businesses and low-income borrowers obtain formal credit more easily.
• Strengthen Digital Infrastructure: Improving rural connectivity, digital access and financial literacy can help more people use digital financial services safely and effectively.
• Enhance Consumer Protection: Financial institutions should ensure transparent products, responsible lending, simple communication and effective grievance redressal to protect customers from fraud and mis-selling.
• Expand Insurance and Pension Coverage: Financial inclusion should provide low-income households with access to suitable insurance, pension and emergency savings products to improve their overall financial security.
• Strengthen Digital Safety: Greater attention should be given to data privacy, cybersecurity and protection against digital fraud as financial services become increasingly technology-driven.