Government School Closures in India – Implications for Equity, Access and the Right to Education

Government School Closures in India

Government School Closures in India Latest News

  • A recent NITI Aayog report highlights that around 94,000 government schools have been closed over the last decade—an average of 25 schools per day.Ā 
  • During the same period, government school enrolment declined by 2.26 crore students, with their share in total enrolment falling from 71% (2005) to 49.24% (2024-25).
  • The trend has raised concerns over educational access, social equity and compliance with the Right to Education (RTE) Act, 2009.

Key Initiatives Related to Education in India

  • NEP 2020:
    • It replaces the older 1986 policy with a comprehensive framework for education from age 3 to higher education.
    • It introduces the 5+3+3+4 curricular and pedagogical school structure, and extends the focus to early childhood care and education (ECCE).
  • Right to Education (RTE) Act, 2009:
    • Enacted on August 4, 2009, it guarantees free and compulsory elementary education for children aged 6 to 14 under Article 21A.
    • It mandates 25% reservation for disadvantaged groups in private schools.
    • Prohibits physical punishment, detention, and screening procedures during admission.
  • UDISE+ (Unified District Information System for Education Plus):
    • Launched in 2018-2019 by the Ministry of Education as a real-time online management information system.
    • It collects comprehensive data on school infrastructure, teacher profiles, and student enrollment.
    • Tracks parameters across government and private schools to measure progress and policy execution.

Extent and Reasons for School Closures

  • Rationalisation under NEP 2020:
    • Most closures are justified by States as school rationalisation, aimed at consolidating institutions with low enrolment.
    • While the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 supports rationalisation, it explicitly states that the principle of neighbourhood schools should not be compromised.
    • The scale of closures suggests an administrative policy decision rather than merely demographic changes or urban migration.
  • National trend:
    • According to UDISE+, government schools declined from 11.07 lakh (2014-15) to 10.17 lakh (2023-24).
    • During the same period, private schools increased from 2.88 lakh to 3.31 lakh, indicating a gradual shift towards private schooling.

States Most Affected

  • Madhya Pradesh:
    • Identified 7.37 lakh children without school records.
    • 11.38 lakh children are classified under the "Drop Box" category (at risk of dropping out).Ā 
    • 1.23 lakh children are already dropouts.
    • 1.55 lakh children discontinued education due to migration or displacement.
    • Over 3,500 government schools reported zero new admissions, while 6,500 schools admitted fewer than ten students.
    • Government outreach initiatives such as School Chalen Hum and the Home Contact Campaign failed to reach nearly 7.5 lakh children, according to the State's own audit.
  • Uttar Pradesh: Government schools declined from 1.63 lakh to 1.38 lakh within a year (2018-19 to 2019-20), reflecting one of the largest reductions.
  • Jammu & Kashmir:
    • More than 4,300 schools were merged or closed under rationalisation.
    • School numbers reduced from 23,167 (2020-21) to 18,785 (2022-23).
    • Many children now travel 4–6 km daily, undermining the neighbourhood school principle under the RTE Act.
    • Around 13,000 teaching posts remain vacant, aggravating learning deficits.

Impact of Government School Closures

  • Educational inequality:
    • Government schools primarily serve economically weaker sections, including Scheduled Castes (SCs), Scheduled Tribes (STs), Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and other disadvantaged communities.
    • Closure of nearby schools disproportionately affects children who lack access to private education or transportation.
  • Rise in dropouts:
    • Increased travel distances and reduced accessibility contribute to higher dropout rates, especially in rural and tribal regions.
    • Migration, displacement and poverty further weaken educational continuity.
  • Gender impact: Girls are more vulnerable, as families are more likely to withdraw them from education when schools become distant due to safety and mobility concerns.
  • Decline in educational quality:
    • Consolidated schools often face teacher shortages, with single teachers handling multiple classes simultaneously.
    • Such arrangements violate RTE norms on pupil-teacher ratio and compromise personalised learning.
  • Marginalisation of vulnerable communities: Earlier National Sample Survey (2019) analyses indicate declining access to free education for Muslim, SC and ST households, widening existing educational inequalities.

Governance and Accountability Issues

  • Role of States: Since education is in the Concurrent List, States administer schools and implement rationalisation policies.
  • Role of the Union Government:
    • The RTE Act, 2009 is a Central legislation guaranteeing free and compulsory education for children aged 6–14 years.
    • The Centre also influences State education through the -
      • Conditional funding linked to NEP implementation.Ā 
      • National policy directives, including language-related reforms.
    • Therefore, responsibility for ensuring equitable school access is shared by both the Centre and States.

Limitations of the Right to Education (RTE) Framework

  • RTE guarantees access but provides limited enforceable provisions regarding quality of education.
  • Poor and rural parents often lack the legal or institutional capacity to enforce their children's educational rights.
  • School Management Committees (SMCs), intended to ensure community participation and accountability, remain weak and often inactive.
  • Consequently, the effective implementation of RTE remains limited despite statutory guarantees.

Way Forward

  • School rationalisation should prioritise educational access, equity and learning outcomes rather than administrative efficiency alone.Ā 
  • Strengthening neighbourhood schools, filling teacher vacancies, revitalising SMCs, improving monitoring of out-of-school children and ensuring cooperative Centre-State action.
  • These steps are essential to uphold the constitutional vision of universal, inclusive and quality education.

Source: TH

Government School Closures in India FAQs

Q1: How has large-scale government school rationalisation affected educational equity in India?

Ans: It has reduced access to neighbourhood schools, disproportionately affecting poor, rural, SC/ST, OBC and girl students.

Q2: Why is the closure of government schools considered inconsistent with the objectives of the RTE Act?

Ans: It undermines the guarantee of accessible neighbourhood schools and weakens universal access to free and compulsory education.

Q3: What are the major limitations of the RTE Act in ensuring quality education?

Ans: The Act focuses primarily on access, and has weak enforceability regarding quality standards.

Q4: What are the respective roles of the Centre and States in addressing the decline of government schools?

Ans: While States administer school education under the Concurrent List, the Centre shares responsibility through the RTE Act, etc.

Q5: What measures are needed to balance school rationalisation with inclusive education objectives?

Ans: Preserve neighbourhood schools, fill teacher vacancies, strengthen SMCs, track out-of-school children, etc.

Nasha Mukt Yuva Campaign – PM Modi’s Vision for a Drug-Free India

Nasha Mukt Yuva Campaign

Nasha Mukt Yuva Campaign Latest News

  • Prime Minister Narendra Modi has launched the nationwide "Nasha Mukt Yuva for Viksit Bharat Sankalp Abhiyan" campaign, calling for a drug-free youth population essential for building a developed India by 2047.

The Drug Menace in India

  • Drug abuse has emerged as one of India's most serious social and public health challenges, affecting individuals, families, and national security.Ā 
  • The problem is particularly acute among the youth, who are the most vulnerable to substance abuse and also the demographic most critical to India's future.
  • Scale of the Problem
    • India has a large youth population, making it a major target for drug traffickers.
    • Commonly abused substances include cannabis, opioids, heroin, and increasingly, synthetic drugs.
    • Border states are particularly vulnerable due to proximity to drug production regions.
    • The "Golden Crescent" (Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran) and "Golden Triangle" (Myanmar, Laos, Thailand) are major sources of drugs entering India.
  • Impact of Drug Abuse
    • Individual level: Physical and mental health deterioration, loss of productivity, and diminished career prospects.
    • Family level: Emotional distress, financial burden, and often family breakdown.
    • Society level: Rising crime, loss of human capital, and weakening of social fabric.
    • National security: Drug trafficking is often linked to terror financing and cross-border conspiracies to weaken the country.

Steps Taken by the Government

  • Legal and Institutional Framework
    • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985: The principal law governing drug control, prohibiting production, sale, and consumption of narcotics.
    • Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB): The apex agency for coordinating anti-drug efforts and enforcement.
    • Prevention of Illicit Trafficking in NDPS Act, 1988: Provides for preventive detention of drug traffickers.
    • Exclusive Courts for Narcotic-related Cases: With about 3.96 lakh cases under the NDPS Act pending across the country,Ā the Ministry of Home Affairs has asked all states and Union Territories to set up exclusive courts for narcotics-related cases.
  • Key Programmes and Campaigns
    • Nasha Mukt Bharat Abhiyaan (NMBA): Launched in 2020, focusing on awareness generation, community outreach, and rehabilitation in vulnerable districts.
    • National Action Plan for Drug Demand Reduction (NAPDDR): Aimed at reducing both demand and supply through education, treatment, and rehabilitation.
    • De-addiction and rehabilitation centres: Set up across the country to help those struggling with addiction recover.
    • Awareness campaigns: In schools, colleges, and communities to educate youth about the dangers of drugs.
  • Enforcement Measures
    • Increased seizures of drugs worth thousands of crores of rupees.
    • Significant rise in arrests of traffickers and dealers.
    • Strengthened border surveillance and coordination among agencies.
    • Use of technology and intelligence to track drug networks.

News Summary

  • Prime Minister Narendra Modi launched the "Nasha Mukt Yuva for Viksit Bharat Sankalp Abhiyan" (Drug-Free Youth for Developed India Pledge Campaign), laying out a national vision for building a drug-free youth population as the foundation of "Viksit Bharat" (developed India).
  • Scale of the Launch
    • The programme was conducted at over 28,000 locations across the country.
    • It saw participation from over one crore youth, along with several Chief Ministers and Governors.
    • It was supported by more than 125 spiritual and public organisations, educational institutions, and industrial associations.
    • Participating youth took a pledge to make India drug-free before the PM's address.

Key Highlights of the PM's Speech

  • Youth as Foundation of Viksit Bharat
    • PM Modi emphasised that as India aims to become a developed country by 2047, it is essential for the youth to remain physically and mentally fit and stay away from drug abuse.Ā 
    • He noted that today's youth would eventually lead India to developed nation status and enjoy the fruits of that achievement.
  • Cost of Addiction
    • The PM stated that when a young person falls into drug addiction:
      • It is not only the individual who loses.
      • A dream dies before it can be fulfilled.
      • An entire family suffers and often falls apart.
      • The strength of the country is weakened.
    • He said, "Drugs give a temporary high, but they cause a long-term low in your career and family life."
  • National Security Dimension
    • PM Modi warned that hostile countries conspire to lure Indian youth into drug addiction as part of their malicious agenda, profiting from drug trafficking while weakening the country.Ā 
    • He described this as part of a terror conspiracy, since enemy countries know that "youth are the future of our country."
  • Second Chances for Those Recovering
    • The PM urged people not to hide cases of addiction and to seek professional help. He appealed to parents to:
      • Maintain open communication with their children to detect early signs of addiction.
      • Not hide addiction under the guise of social prestige.
      • Enlist the help of experts and medical assistance.
    • He described those who overcome addiction as "real warriors" whose courage is their true identity, urging society to respect them, embrace them, and give them a second chance.
  • 100-Week Roadmap
    • PM Modi outlined that the pledge would continue over the next 100 weeks. Every Sunday, activities related to art, culture, sports, meditation, spirituality, and service would be organised to spread the message of a drug-free life.Ā 
    • He said, "The coming 100 Sundays will absolutely become 100 strong steps in the direction of a completely drug-free India."
  • Government's Commitment
    • The PM noted that the government has been taking stringent action against drug traffickers and dealers:
    • Arrests have increased significantly compared to previous years.
    • Drugs worth thousands of crores of rupees have been seized.
    • This reflects how seriously the government is tackling the issue.

Significance of the Campaign

  • Youth-centric approach: Recognises the youth as both the most vulnerable group and the key to India's future.
  • Community participation: Involves spiritual organisations, educational institutions, and industry for a whole-of-society effort.
  • Sustained engagement: The 100-week roadmap ensures continuous action rather than a one-time event.
  • Rehabilitation focus: Emphasises treatment and second chances alongside prevention and enforcement.
  • National security link: Connects the fight against drugs to protecting the country from hostile external conspiracies.

Source: TH | IE

Nasha Mukt Yuva Campaign FAQs

Q1: What is the Nasha Mukt Yuva for Viksit Bharat Sankalp Abhiyan?

Ans: It is a nationwide pledge campaign launched by PM Modi to build a drug-free youth population as the foundation of a developed India by 2047.

Q2: How many people participated in the campaign launch?

Ans: Over one crore youth participated from more than 28,000 locations across the country.

Q3: What is the duration of the campaign roadmap?

Ans: The campaign has a 100-week roadmap, with activities organised every Sunday spanning art, culture, sports, meditation, and service.

Q4: Which law is the principal legislation against drugs in India?

Ans: The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985 is the principal law governing drug control in India.

Q5: How did PM Modi describe those who overcome addiction?

Ans: He described them as "real warriors" whose courage is their true identity, urging society to respect them and give them a second chance.

Brewing Trouble: Why India’s Tea Giants Face Rising Competition from Cheaper Alternatives and Imports

Brewing Trouble

Brewing Trouble Latest News

  • India's tea market has been in a deflationary phase for the past four to five quarters, driven by adverse weather, cheap imports, and a consumer shift toward lower-priced sub-brands and the unorganised sector — squeezing revenues of major listed players and forcing them to rethink strategy.

India's Tea Sector: Production, Regional Concentration and Trade Performance

  • India's tea production has shown resilience with fluctuations, reflecting exposure to weather shocks, pest pressure, ageing tea bushes, and labour constraints.
  • Production trajectory: 1,267.36 million kg (2016) → 1,390.08 million kg (2019) → dipped to 1,257.53 million kg (2020), the pandemic year → recovered to 1,393.66 million kg (2023) → moderated to 1,303.53 million kg (2024) → rose to 1,369.98 million kg (2025).

Regional Concentration of Production

  • Tea production in India remains sharply concentrated in a handful of states, making national output highly sensitive to state-specific climatic and logistical conditions.
  • Assam and West Bengal together account for over 80% of national production — underscoring why disruptions in these two states (heatwaves, erratic monsoons, landslides) have an outsized impact on overall supply and prices.

Trade Performance: Exports

  • Tea exports have shown an upward trajectory in both volume and value.
    • 2024-25: India exported 262.98 million kg of tea, worth Rs 7,817.58 crore (US$ 923.89 million).
    • April-December 2025-26: Exports reached 223.53 million kg, worth Rs 6,880.53 crore.
  • Rising export value reflects both quantity growth and improvements in product mix and pricing.
  • Global standing (2024): India's share in world tea exports was 13.13%, while its share in world tea production was 18.43% — indicating India produces more than its export share, pointing to scope for improving export competitiveness.
  • Key Export Destinations (April-December 2025-26) - Leading markets included the UAE, Iraq, Russia, China, the US, Iran, the UK, Germany, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey.
    • The top 20 markets accounted for 88.21% of total exports — highlighting significant market concentration and the importance of targeted trade diplomacy.

Trade Performance: Imports

  • Tea imports remain limited, typically 2-3% of domestic production, used mainly for value addition and specific domestic requirements.
  • Import trend: 29.97 million kg (2022-23) → 25.21 million kg (2023-24) → 50.14 million kg (2024-25) → 30.47 million kg (April-December 2025-26).
  • The sharp rise in 2024-25 makes import management a matter of both market balance and quality protection for the domestic industry.

Why the Tea Market Is Slowing Down

  • Adverse Weather
    • Summer heatwaves led to prolonged dry spells, causing higher pest infestations and affecting crop quality, while extreme heat also dampened consumer demand.
    • Erratic monsoon rainfall over recent years caused both shortages and landslides in hilly tea-growing regions, lowering yields of high-quality tea and affecting auction prices where companies like HUL and Tata Consumer source leaf.
  • Cheaper Imports and Commodity Nature of Tea
    • A rise in cheaper tea imports from countries like Nepal and Kenya has pushed down domestic prices.
    • Since tea is largely a commodity business with relatively low brand loyalty, falling prices have fuelled growth in the unorganised sector, forcing larger companies to cut prices and accept lower realisations.
  • LPG Shortage Impact
    • A temporary LPG (liquefied petroleum gas) shortage, linked to the West Asia conflict, led households to cut back on fuel use — and consequently, tea purchases, according to Tata Consumer's management.
  • Ā 
  • Ā 

Strategic Response: Premiumisation

  • Companies like Tata Consumer and HUL are struggling because regular, everyday tea sales are weak.Ā 
  • So instead of just competing on price, they're pushing their fancier, more expensive tea products — like Tetley Premium, Tata Tea Gold, and premium versions of Brooke Bond.Ā 
  • The idea is: if cheap tea isn't making much money, sell more expensive tea instead.
  • Challenge: Tea consumers have rigid taste habits, making it far easier for them to trade down to cheaper, unorganised alternatives than to trade up. Experts believe premiumisation may unlock value, but results could take considerable time.
  • With limited scope in a commodity-linked segment, major players are diversifying:
    • Tata Consumer: revenue from "growth businesses" (Tata Sampann, Soulful, cold beverages) surpassed tea/coffee revenue for the first time in Q1, making it the fastest-growing segment.
    • Goodricke: expanding into dairy, alternative crops, solar energy, and select hospitality ventures.

Conclusion

  • India's tea industry is navigating a difficult phase shaped by climate volatility, rising cheap imports, and a structurally price-sensitive consumer base.Ā 
  • While premiumisation and diversification offer partial relief for major players, the commodity nature of tea and consumers' resistance to trading up mean recovery is likely to be gradual, with future shocks like El NiƱo posing continued risk to price stability.

Source: IE | PIB

Brewing Trouble FAQs

Q1: What is Brewing Trouble and why is India's tea industry under pressure?

Ans: Brewing Trouble explains that India's tea industry faces pressure from adverse weather, cheaper imports, weak consumer demand, and rising competition from the unorganised tea sector.

Q2: How do imports contribute to Brewing Trouble in India's tea market?

Ans: Brewing Trouble highlights that low-priced tea imports from Nepal and Kenya have reduced domestic prices, forcing major tea brands to compete with cheaper alternatives.

Q3: Why are leading tea companies adopting premiumisation in Brewing Trouble?

Ans: Brewing Trouble shows that companies like Tata Consumer and HUL are promoting premium tea brands to improve margins as sales of regular tea remain sluggish.

Q4: How does climate change influence Brewing Trouble in the tea sector?

Ans: Brewing Trouble explains that heatwaves, erratic monsoons, pest infestations, and landslides reduce tea quality, lower production, and create uncertainty in tea prices.

Q5: What is the long-term outlook presented in Brewing Trouble?

Ans: Brewing Trouble suggests gradual recovery through premiumisation, diversification, improved export competitiveness, and better climate resilience, though commodity pricing will remain a major challenge.

Doxxing at Jantar Mantar: The Legal Grey Zone Facing Protest Victims in India Explained

Doxxing at Jantar Mantar

Doxxing at Jantar Mantar Latest News

  • Women who participated in protests at New Delhi's Jantar Mantar have faced an online backlash — with social media accounts sharing their videos, photographs, and personal details like phone numbers and home addresses, resulting in harassment including rape and death threats.Ā 
  • This has spotlighted a critical legal gap: doxxing is not explicitly defined or criminalised under Indian law.

What is Doxxing?

  • Doxxing refers to the act of publicly revealing someone's private personal information to intimidate or shame them.
  • Despite severe real-world consequences, victims must navigate a patchwork of existing laws under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and the Information Technology (IT) Act, since no dedicated law addresses doxxing directly.
  • Two Dimensions of the Problem
    • Dissemination of personal information — legally uncertain and hard to prosecute.
    • Subsequent threats or harassment based on that information — easier to prosecute under existing criminal law.

Applicable Legal Provisions

  • Under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)
    • Section 78 (Stalking): Applies if doxxing leads to monitoring a woman's internet use or repeated unwanted contact.
    • Section 351 (Criminal Intimidation): Covers rape and death threats.
    • Section 79: Punishes acts "intended to insult the modesty of a woman" and those that "intrude upon... privacy" — applicable when doxxing involves publishing humiliating images.
    • Criminal defamation provisions: Can be invoked if published content damages reputation.
    • Section 12, POCSO Act: Applies additionally if the victim is a minor, penalising sexual harassment of minors.
  • Under the Information Technology Act
    • Section 66E: Criminalises capturing or publishing images of private body parts without consent.
    • Section 72A: The main recourse for unauthorised disclosure of general personal data — but this only provides for a financial penalty of up to Rs 5 lakh, making it a civil wrong rather than a criminal offence.
    • Legal experts note that mere publication of personal data is treated as a civil matter under the IT Act, "unless intimate images are shared."

Platform Accountability

  • Under the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, social media platforms must make reasonable efforts to prevent hosting content that is "invasive of another's privacy... insulting or harassing on the basis of gender."
  • Timelines for platforms: Acknowledge complaints within 24 hours; resolve general complaints within 7 days; resolve severe cases (privacy invasion, harassment) within 36 hours.
  • Non-compliance risks a platform losing its "safe harbour" protection — the legal immunity shielding tech companies from prosecution over user-posted content.
  • In practice, responsiveness varies significantly across platforms.

Recourse for Victims

  • Preserve all evidence — screenshots and URLs of abusive posts.
  • Report content using platform-internal tools.
  • File a formal complaint on the government's National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal.
  • Reach out to digital security helplines run by non-profits for preventive and remedial assistance.

Conclusion

  • The Jantar Mantar doxxing cases reveal a stark legal vacuum — while threats and harassment stemming from doxxing can be prosecuted under existing criminal law, the act of publishing private information itself remains largely a civil offence carrying only monetary penalties.Ā 
  • This patchwork approach, combined with inconsistent platform accountability, leaves victims — particularly women protesters — inadequately protected, underscoring the need for a dedicated legal framework explicitly recognising and criminalising doxxing.

Source: IE

Doxxing at Jantar Mantar FAQs

Q1: What does Doxxing at Jantar Mantar reveal about Indian law?

Ans: Doxxing at Jantar Mantar reveals that India has no dedicated law criminalising doxxing, leaving victims to rely on scattered provisions under the BNS and IT Act.

Q2: Which legal provisions are discussed in Doxxing at Jantar Mantar?

Ans: Doxxing at Jantar Mantar highlights BNS provisions on stalking, criminal intimidation, privacy, defamation, along with Sections 66E and 72A of the Information Technology Act.

Q3: Which legal provisions are discussed in Doxxing at Jantar Mantar?

Ans: Doxxing at Jantar Mantar highlights BNS provisions on stalking, criminal intimidation, privacy, defamation, along with Sections 66E and 72A of the Information Technology Act.

Q4: What remedies are available to victims according to Doxxing at Jantar Mantar?

Ans: Doxxing at Jantar Mantar advises victims to preserve evidence, report abusive content to platforms, file complaints through the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal, and seek digital security assistance.

Q5: Why is Doxxing at Jantar Mantar significant for digital rights in India?

Ans: Doxxing at Jantar Mantar highlights the urgent need for a dedicated legal framework that criminalises doxxing and strengthens protection against online harassment and privacy violations.

VB-G RAM G to Replace MGNREGS: Key Changes in Rural Employment Scheme

VB-G RAM G

VB-G RAM G Latest News

  • The Viksit Bharat-Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) Act, 2025 — popularly known as VB-G RAM G — is set to come into force from July 1, 2026, replacing the two-decade-old Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).Ā 
  • The Ministry of Rural Development had recently released eight draft rules governing the new scheme's implementation. Public objections and suggestions have been invited within a month, after which the rules will be formally notified.

What is MGNREGA — Brief Background

  • MGNREGA (enacted 2005) was India's flagship rural employment guarantee scheme — providing 100 days of guaranteed wage employment per year to rural households willing to do unskilled manual work.Ā 
  • It benefited over five crore rural families in 2025-26 and was entirely Centre-funded for wages.Ā 

Key Features of VB-G RAM G

  • VB-G RAM G now replaces MGNREGA with significant structural changes.

Increased Work Days — With a Seasonal Pause

  • The guaranteed employment has been increased from 100 to 125 days per year — a 25% increase in the employment guarantee.Ā 
  • However, a 60-day pause during peak agricultural sowing and harvesting seasons has been built in — to ensure adequate availability of farm labour during critical agricultural periods.

Shift in Funding — States Bear More Burden

  • This is the most significant and controversial change. Under MGNREGA, the Centre bore 100% of the wage bill.Ā 
  • Under VB-G RAM G, states must now bear 40% of the funding burden — a major fiscal shift that will strain state exchequers, particularly those with high rural employment demand.Ā 
  • The only exceptions are northeastern and Himalayan states and UTs with a legislature (where the Centre bears 90%) and UTs without legislature (where the Centre bears 100%).

Top-Down Allocation — Centre Determines Devolutions

  • VB-G RAM G reverses the MGNREGA model where Central allocations were based on state-submitted labour budgets (demand-driven).Ā 
  • Now, the Centre determines the normative allocation to each state — making the resource allocation process top-down rather than demand-driven.Ā 
  • This gives the Centre greater control over fund flows but reduces states' ability to respond to fluctuating local demand.

16th Finance Commission Formula for Allocation

  • The Centre will use the Sixteenth Finance Commission's horizontal devolution formula to determine normative allocations to states. This will result in winners and losers among states:
    • States likely to receive lower allocations — Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Rajasthan, Maharashtra.
    • States likely to receive higher allocations — Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, Assam, Haryana, Punjab, Bihar.

Performance-Based Withheld Allocation

  • A new provision allows the Centre to keep aside a portion of the normative allocation and distribute it among states based on performance parameters — including timely payment of wages, compliance with social audit requirements, percentage of work completion in a financial year, and other Centre-specified indicators.Ā 
  • The proportion to be withheld has not yet been decided. This provision takes effect from the next financial year.

States Bear Excess Expenditure

  • If a state's demand for employment exceeds its normative allocation and expenditure goes beyond the Centre's share, the state must bear all additional expenditure — creating a significant fiscal risk for high-demand states.

DBT Wage Payments

  • All wage and unemployment allowance payments under VB-G RAM G will be made through Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) into bank or post office accounts — improving transparency and reducing leakages.Ā 
  • However, the wage rate under VB-G RAM G is yet to be declared by the Union government.

What Happens to Existing MGNREGS Workers

  • The existing MGNREGS job cards — once renewed and verified through e-KYC — will remain valid for seeking employment under VB-G RAM G.Ā 
  • This arrangement continues until state governments issue Gramin Rozgar Guarantee Cards under the new law. No worker will be left without access to work during the transition period.

The Eight Draft Rules Released

  • The Ministry has released eight draft rules covering all key aspects of the new scheme:
    • National Level Steering Committee Rules
    • Grievance Redressal Rules
    • Administrative Expenses Rules
    • Transitional Provisions under VB-G RAM G Rules
    • Objective Parameters for Normative Allocation Rules
    • Central Gramin Rozgar Guarantee Council Rules
    • Manner of Payment of Wages and Unemployment Allowance Rules
    • Manner and Procedure of Expenditure incurred by States in excess of Normative Allocation Rules
  • The Union government has allocated ₹95,692.31 crore for the VB-G RAM G scheme for 2026-27.

Key Concerns and Implications

  • For States — The shift of 40% wage burden to states is a major fiscal challenge, particularly for high-demand states like Rajasthan, Andhra Pradesh, and Tamil Nadu — which may also receive lower allocations under the new formula. States with weak fiscal positions may struggle to fund demand surges.
  • For Workers — The 25 additional days of guaranteed work is positive. However, the 60-day agricultural pause and the yet-to-be-declared wage rate create uncertainty. The performance-based withheld allocation could also indirectly affect workers if states under-invest in compliance.
  • For Centre-State Relations — The shift from demand-driven to top-down allocation and the imposition of performance conditions on fund release represents a significant centralisation of control over a flagship rural welfare programme — raising federalism concerns.

Source: IE

VB-G RAM G FAQs

Q1: Why is VB-G RAM G to Replace MGNREGS considered a major policy shift?

Ans: VB-G RAM G to Replace MGNREGS represents a major rural employment transition affecting job guarantees, implementation mechanisms, and welfare delivery across rural India.

Q2: What changes are expected under VB-G RAM G to Replace MGNREGS?

Ans: VB-G RAM G to Replace MGNREGS may introduce revised eligibility rules, digital monitoring systems, altered wage structures, and new implementation guidelines for rural employment.

Q3: How could VB-G RAM G to Replace MGNREGS affect rural workers?

Ans: VB-G RAM G to Replace MGNREGS could influence employment access, wage security, transparency, and rural livelihood opportunities depending on implementation effectiveness.

Q4: Why is VB-G RAM G to Replace MGNREGS politically significant?

Ans: VB-G RAM G to Replace MGNREGS is politically significant because MGNREGS has long been a major rural welfare and employment support programme in India.

Q5: What challenges may arise when VB-G RAM G to Replace MGNREGS is implemented?

Ans: Implementing VB-G RAM G to Replace MGNREGS may face challenges related to funding, administrative coordination, digital access, worker registration, and accountability mechanisms.

Enquire Now