Stubble Burning in India: Causes, Laws and Policy Solutions

Stubble Burning in India

Stubble Burning Latest News

  • Every year around this time, air pollution in North India, particularly Delhi, dominates public discourse. Stubble burning by farmers is one of the most cited reasons for the worsening Air Quality Index (AQI). 
  • Experts argue that the practice is not simply a farmer’s bad choice — it is the result of legal, technological and economic factors interacting together.

What Is Stubble Burning?

  • Stubble burning means setting fire to crop residue — the lower parts of plants left after harvesting. 
  • It is prevalent from early October to late November across northwest India, especially Punjab, Haryana, and parts of Uttar Pradesh. 
  • It is mainly associated with paddy straw, and Punjab and Haryana together produce around 29 million metric tons of it.

Why It Matters for Health and Soil

  • Releases large amounts of particulate matter, carbon monoxide, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and other carcinogenic substances, forming a thick smog.
  • Causes loss of soil fertility by depleting nitrogen, sulphur, potash, phosphorus and other micronutrients.
  • The heat generated causes loss of soil moisture and organic content, which in turn increases fertiliser use in the next crop cycle.

Not A New Practice

  • Stubble burning has existed in Punjab since the late 1970s and early 1980s, following the introduction of combine harvesters, which leave plant residue behind. 
  • What has changed is its timing — now coinciding with winter months, following the enactment of the Punjab Preservation of Sub-Soil Water Act, 2009 (PPSSWA 2009).

The Water Crisis That Triggered a Law

  • In 2012, nearly 73% of Punjab’s cropped area was irrigated using groundwater. There was a deficit of 14.31 billion cubic metres, met through excessive groundwater withdrawal.
  • Groundwater levels in Punjab declined at an alarming 0.36 metres annually between 1999 and 2009.
  • A landmark NASA GRACE satellite study (2009) found the Punjab-Haryana-Rajasthan region lost 109 cubic kilometres of groundwater between 2002 and 2008 alone — then considered the largest groundwater depletion event in the world.

How PPSSWA 2009 Unintentionally Caused the Timing Shift

  • The Act aimed to prevent rapid groundwater depletion by prohibiting early paddy sowing and transplantation before the monsoon arrived.
  • Farmers were barred from sowing paddy before May 10 and transplanting before June 10. Stringent punishments were prescribed for this.
  • These sowing restrictions pushed the paddy harvest to late October/early November, leaving farmers just a 10–15-day window to prepare fields for wheat. 
  • The high-yielding PUSA-44 variety, which takes 150–160 days to harvest, narrowed this window further. Combine harvesters leave about a foot of stubble behind, and manual clearing is time-consuming and expensive. 
  • Together, these factors made stubble burning almost a necessity.

Why Farmers Keep Growing Paddy and Wheat Anyway

  • The deeper question: why do farmers persist with these crops despite strict laws and falling groundwater? The answer lies in the incentive structure.
    • Paddy procurement (2012–2024 average): 37% nationally, but 87% in Punjab and 74% in Haryana — more than double the national average.
    • Wheat procurement: 30% nationally, versus 70% in Punjab and 63% in Haryana.
      • These national averages already include Punjab and Haryana — excluding them would make the gap even starker.
  • This assured procurement provides guaranteed income, discouraging diversification. 
  • Additionally, power is free in Punjab and almost free in Haryana, further encouraging water-intensive paddy and wheat cultivation via groundwater extraction.

Technical Solutions and Their Limits

  • In-Situ Measures: Crop Residue Management (CRM) machines — Happy Seeders, Super Seeders, Rotavators; Short-duration rice varieties and direct seeding of rice.
  • Ex-situ Measures: Converting residue into bio-ethanol and compressed biogas.
  • The problem with both:
    • Happy Seeders/Super Seeders need an expensive 60-HP tractor, often idle for most of the year. Even hiring one costs ₹10,000 with a long waiting period.
    • Ex-situ measures cost ₹1,500–₹2,500 per acre — a significant expense for many farmers.

Policy Responses: Punjab vs Haryana

  • National Green Tribunal (2018): Ruled that farmers who burn stubble could be excluded from MSP policy. The Supreme Court upheld this in 2023.
  • In 2025, CPCB deployed 31 flying squads across 18 districts of Punjab and 13 of Haryana, involving 10,500 field functionaries in Punjab and 10,000 in Haryana.
  • CAQM has directed complaints to be filed against officials for inadequate monitoring.
  • However, the Parliamentary Committee on air quality recommended that penalising farmers should be a last resort, instead suggesting a minimum price covering all costs for selling stubble for ex-situ use.

Punjab’s Approach

  • Relied mostly on in-situ CRM-based measures, with limited ex-situ initiatives. 
  • CAQM noted in 2025 that Punjab still needs improvement in timely CRM machinery availability, support for CBG (compressed biogas) plants, and better enforcement.

Haryana’s Approach

  • Adopted an incentive-based model, aligned with the Parliamentary Panel’s recommendations:
    • ₹1,000/acre for CRM use.
    • ₹4,000/acre for direct seeding of rice.
    • ₹7,000/acre for diversification to alternate crops.
    • Additional incentives to panchayats for good performance.

The Measurement Problem

  • Punjab and Haryana reportedly achieved a 90% reduction in stubble-burning incidents during 2025 paddy harvesting compared to 2022. But this figure needs caution.

Why The Data May Be Misleading

  • The CREAMS protocol (Consortium for Research on Agroecosystem Monitoring and Modeling from Space) relies on NASA’s MODIS and VIIRS satellites — polar satellites observing India only between 10:30 am and 1:30 pm, capturing only active fires at that moment, not total fires over 24 hours.
  • A 2025 report, using multiple satellites, found the actual reduction was more gradual — around 30%, not 90%.
  • A November 2025 study, led by ISRO scientists, found farmers have shifted to burning stubble in the evening specifically to avoid polar satellite detection windows.

Conclusion

  • Stubble burning survives not because farmers lack alternatives, but because the system rewards exactly the behaviour it then punishes — assured procurement and free power push farmers toward paddy, while a water-conservation law compresses their harvest window to days. 
  • Haryana’s incentive-based model shows a more promising direction than Punjab’s penalty-heavy approach, but even the headline “90% reduction” may be a measurement artifact, not a real one. 
  • A lasting fix needs genuine crop diversification, better residue economics, and satellite monitoring that farmers can’t simply outrun by burning after dark.

Source: TH | CEEW

Stubble Burning FAQs

Q1: Why does stubble burning continue despite government restrictions?

Ans: Stubble burning persists because assured paddy procurement, subsidised electricity, expensive residue-management machinery and limited time between paddy harvesting and wheat sowing reinforce the practice.

Q2: How did the Punjab Preservation of Sub-Soil Water Act affect stubble burning?

Ans: The 2009 Act delayed paddy sowing to conserve groundwater, pushing harvesting into late October and narrowing the window for wheat preparation, increasing stubble burning.

Q3: How does stubble burning affect human health and soil fertility?

Ans: Stubble burning releases particulate matter, carbon monoxide and other harmful substances, while depleting soil nutrients, moisture and organic content, potentially increasing fertiliser requirements.

Q4: How do Punjab and Haryana differ in addressing stubble burning?

Ans: Punjab has relied mainly on in-situ residue-management machinery, whereas Haryana offers financial incentives for machinery use, direct rice seeding and diversification into alternative crops.

Q5: Why might reported reductions in stubble burning be misleading?

Ans: Satellite monitoring captures active fires during limited daytime observation windows, potentially missing evening burning and overstating reductions in actual stubble-burning incidents.

PERM Suspension: Why the US Targeted Indian IT Firms

PERM Suspension

PERM Suspension Latest News

  • The US government has suspended several large Indian IT firms (Cognizant, Infosys, Tata, Wipro, HCL, and Capgemini) from a key programme that lets skilled foreign workers gain permanent residency, citing alleged fraud and claiming foreign workers took jobs at the cost of American workers.
  • This is a major blow for Indian professionals looking to work at these companies in the US. Last month, the US had already announced Cognizant’s suspension, without specifying the allegations, the number of applications affected, or the duration.

Part of a Broader Crackdown

  • This action represents a clear broadening of the crackdown on foreign workers that has become central policy under President Donald Trump. 
  • Technology and IT services companies face particularly heightened scrutiny over their reliance on foreign workers.
  • US authorities have stepped up investigations into alleged misuse of both the H-1B and PERM programmes, including claims of:
    • Wage undercutting
    • Fraudulent filings
    • Displacement of American workers
  • This scrutiny matters enormously for Indian professionals, who account for a large share of H-1B beneficiaries and employment-based Green Card applicants.
  • The US administration’s core justification is that foreign workers hired by these companies reduced job opportunities for Americans.
    • As per a report, since 2009, the impacted companies have requested permanent residency for almost 3 million foreign workers, receiving over 230,000 H-1B visa approvals and over 100,000 permanent labour certifications.
    • The US administration characterised this as hundreds of thousands of jobs that were taken from American workers.

Understanding PERM: The Programme at the Centre of This

  • PERM (Program Electronic Review Management) is the system through which employers generally obtain labour certification before sponsoring a foreign employee for an employment-based Green Card.

Key Features

  • Unlike a visa application (made primarily by an individual), PERM filing is done by the employer on behalf of the worker.
  • Before filing, the employer must obtain a prevailing wage determination for the position and carry out prescribed recruitment.
  • The process is meant to establish that permanently hiring a foreign worker will not adversely affect job opportunities, wages, or working conditions of US workers.
  • Once the Labour Department certifies the application, the employer can proceed to the next stage of the Green Card process.

PERM vs H-1B — An Important Distinction

  • H-1B is a temporary, non-immigrant work visa allowing US employers to employ foreign professionals in specialty occupations.
  • PERM is part of the process for obtaining permanent residency — a fundamentally different track.

How This Affects Indian Workers

  • For employees whose Green Card process hasn’t yet reached the PERM filing stage: The immediate consequence is delay. 
    • They cannot make fresh PERM filings while the suspension is in place.
    • This means they cannot secure a priority date or begin moving through the employer-sponsored Green Card process.
  • Why This Hits Indians Especially Hard: India already faces a severe backlog.
    • In the US State Department’s September 2026 Visa Bulletin, the EB-2 category (Employment-Based Second Preference) for India was listed as “unavailable” for final action.
    • The EB-3 final-action date was January 1, 2014 — meaning applicants from over a decade ago are still being processed.
    • The system also imposes per-country limits on employment-based Green Cards, disproportionately affecting high-demand countries like India.

An Additional H-1B Complication

  • US rules allow certain H-1B holders to extend their stay beyond the normal six-year limit if a labour certification was filed sufficiently early. 
  • For workers approaching this six-year deadline, being unable to start the PERM process could become a serious problem.
  • Workers who already have approved petitions and are merely waiting because a Green Card number is unavailable are in a different position — they can, subject to rules, still qualify for H-1B extensions of up to three years at a time.

Conclusion

  • The PERM suspension doesn’t cancel existing Green Card queues, but it freezes new entries into them — and for Indian applicants already facing a decade-plus backlog, a freeze functions much like a setback. 
  • Framed by Washington as closing a fraud loophole, the move lands squarely on the companies and workers most dependent on this pathway: Indian IT professionals, for whom the priority date is often the only thing standing between temporary status and permanent residency.

Source: IE | FP

PERM suspension FAQs

Q1: What is the PERM suspension affecting Indian IT firms?

Ans: The PERM suspension prevents affected companies from filing new labour-certification applications, delaying the employer-sponsored Green Card process for eligible foreign employees.

Q2: What is PERM, and how does it differ from an H-1B visa?

Ans: PERM is an employer-led labour-certification process for permanent residency, whereas H-1B is a temporary work visa for foreign professionals in specialty occupations.

Q3: Why does the PERM suspension particularly affect Indian professionals?

Ans: The PERM suspension compounds India's existing Green Card backlog, with the article reporting unavailable EB-2 final action and an EB-3 date of January 1, 2014.

Q4: How does the PERM suspension affect workers approaching the H-1B six-year limit?

Ans: Workers nearing the six-year H-1B limit may face difficulties because delayed labour certification can prevent them from qualifying for certain extensions beyond the normal limit.

Q5: Does the PERM suspension cancel existing Green Card applications?

Ans: No, the PERM suspension does not cancel existing Green Card queues; it freezes new entries into the affected process, delaying progress for prospective applicants.

GST Reforms 2026 – Easier Compliance, Faster Refunds and Reduced Prosecution Risks

GST Reforms 2026

GST Reforms 2026 Latest News

  • The 57th meeting of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) Council recommended major process reforms to simplify compliance, accelerate refunds, reduce litigation-related burdens and improve certainty for businesses.

Background: From Rate Rationalisation to Process Reforms

  • The GST Council’s September 2025 exercise focused on rationalising tax rates on goods and services. 
  • Its latest meeting, held in October 2026, shifted attention towards simplifying procedures, improving taxpayer experience and reducing compliance-related friction.
  • Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman stated that most GST-related issues concerning rates and processes had been addressed, while leaving the possibility of further reforms open.
  • No GST rate changes were made at this meeting. The Council indicated that rate decisions would generally be considered annually and implemented from the beginning of the subsequent financial year.

Faster Refunds and Improved Working Capital

  • One of the most significant reforms concerns the processing of GST refunds and accumulated Input Tax Credit (ITC).
  • System-based refund processing
    • The Council recommended a system under which 90% of eligible refund claims would be sanctioned automatically within three working days of acknowledgement, compared with the earlier seven-day timeline for most refunds.
    • Refund acknowledgement is also proposed within 10 days, compared with the existing 15 days.
  • Refunds under the inverted duty structure
    • An inverted duty structure arises when the tax rate on inputs is higher than the tax rate on the final output, resulting in accumulated ITC.
    • The Council recommended widening refund eligibility to include:
      • Input services: The change can be availed from November 1, 2026.
      • Capital goods: Refunds relating to eligible capital goods, such as plant and machinery, will be spread over 60 months, with the change scheduled to take effect from April 1, 2027.
    • These measures are expected to benefit sectors such as FMCG, pharmaceuticals and food processing, where accumulated tax credits can constrain working capital.

Simplified GST Registration and Returns

  • The Council recommended improvements to registration procedures, including greater certainty about the documents required.
  • According to the government, 61% of taxpayers already receive automatic registration within three working days. The upgraded system is intended to simplify the process for remaining low-risk applicants by reducing unnecessary queries and rejections.
  • Other proposed measures include:
    • Simplified registration for small suppliers selling through e-commerce platforms.
    • Easier amendments and cancellations of registrations.
    • An option for small e-commerce sellers to register in a single State rather than in every State where they sell goods.
    • An optional annual return-filing scheme for businesses with turnover up to Rs. 5 crore that supply directly to consumers.
  • The annual return-filing scheme has received in-principle approval, but the Council will consider the final decision at a subsequent meeting.

Changes to Arrest and Prosecution Provisions

  • The Council recommended removing the arrest powers of GST officers and increasing the prosecution threshold from Rs. 1 crore to Rs. 5 crore.
  • The stated objective is to distinguish more clearly between tax-related disputes and conduct involving criminality.
  • The Finance Minister emphasised that prosecution should follow the establishment of a prima facie criminal case rather than an officer making an arrest merely in anticipation of possible wrongdoing.
  • The Council also recommended reducing the maximum general penalty from Rs. 25,000 to Rs. 10,000.
  • For non-fraud cases, it recommended a lower penalty of 5% and removal of the minimum penalty requirement of Rs. 10,000.

Greater Safeguards for Inter-State Goods Movement

  • The Council recommended restrictions on the interception and inspection of goods moving between States.
  • Under the proposed framework, vehicles carrying goods may be stopped only by tax officers of the supplier State or recipient State, and not by officers of an intermediate State. 
  • Interception would require:
    • Specific intelligence
    • Due authorisation by an officer at Joint Commissioner level
    • The objective is to prevent arbitrary checks and detention of goods during inter-State transportation
  • Such safeguards can improve logistics efficiency, reduce delays and strengthen the predictability of supply chains.

Faceless Assessment and Digital Tax Administration

  • Separately, the Union government announced plans to introduce faceless assessment for Central GST taxpayers registered in multiple States.
  • A framework is to be issued for public consultation before Budget 2027, with implementation planned during 2027-28.
  • Faceless assessment can reduce direct interactions between taxpayers and assessing officers, potentially improving consistency and limiting opportunities for discretionary action.

Relief for Service Exports and E-Commerce

  • Export of services
    • The Council recommended aligning GST treatment with established business practices for services supplied through overseas branches. 
    • The changes are intended to enable qualifying transactions to receive export treatment where the relevant conditions are met.
    • This is significant because services exports are an important source of foreign exchange for India.
  • E-commerce delivery services
    • The Council clarified that delivery services provided by unregistered riders through e-commerce platforms would attract GST at 5%.
    • The clarification seeks to reduce differences in tax treatment arising from different contractual arrangements, so that the tax treatment reflects the service actually delivered.

Source: TH | IE

GST Reforms 2026 FAQs

Q1: What was the main focus of the GST Council’s 57th meeting?

Ans: The meeting focused on process reforms, including easier compliance, faster refunds, reduced litigation-related burdens and improved certainty for businesses.

Q2: What change was recommended in the GST prosecution threshold?

Ans: The Council recommended increasing the prosecution threshold from Rs. 1 crore to Rs. 5 crore.

Q3: How will the proposed GST refund reforms help businesses?

Ans: Faster refund processing and wider ITC refund eligibility can release working capital that would otherwise remain locked in accumulated tax credits.

Q4: What is an inverted duty structure?

Ans: An inverted duty structure occurs when the GST rate on inputs is higher than the rate on the final output, leading to accumulated input tax credit.

Q5: What is faceless GST assessment?

Ans: Faceless GST assessment is a proposed system for conducting assessments digitally with reduced direct interaction between taxpayers and assessing officers.

Legal Provisions Related to Surrogacy in India

Legal Provisions Related to Surrogacy in India

What’s in Today’s Article?

  • Why in News?
  • Salient Provisions of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act 2021
  • What was the Recent Case, and Why did the Woman Approach the SC?
  • The Petitioner’s Arguments
  • The Government's Argument
  • The SC’s Verdict

Why in News?

  • The Supreme Court has protected the right of parenthood of a woman, suffering from a rare medical condition, by staying the operation of a law which threatened to wreck her hopes to become a mother through surrogacy.
  • In this context, this article analyses the legal provisions with respect to surrogacy in India.

Salient Provisions of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act 2021

  • What is surrogacy?
    • The Act defines surrogacy as a practice where a woman gives birth to a child for an intending couple with the intention to hand it over to them after the birth.
    • It is permitted only for altruistic purposes or for couples who suffer proven infertility or disease.
    • Surrogacy is prohibited for commercial purposes including for sale, prostitution or any other forms of exploitation.
  • Status of child born:
    • Once the child is born, it will be deemed to be the biological child of the couple for all intents and purposes.
    • Abortion of such a foetus is allowed only with the consent of the surrogate mother and the authorities and must adhere to the provisions of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act.
  • Who can avail of surrogacy?
    • Under the Act, a couple should procure certificates of eligibility and essentiality in order to have a child via surrogacy.
    • The couple is deemed ‘eligible’ if they have been married for five years, the wife is aged between 25-50 years and the husband is between 26-55 years.
    • The couple must not have any living child (biological, adopted or surrogate.) A child with mental or physical disabilities or one suffering from a life-threatening disorder or illness has been exempted from the above criterion.
  • Who can issue an ‘essential’ certificate?
    • The couple can get an ‘essential’ certificate if suffering from proven infertility of either partner certified by a District Medical Board, and an order of parentage and custody of the surrogate child, passed by a Magistrate’s court.
    • They must also have insurance coverage for 16 months for the surrogate mother, covering any postpartum complications.
  • Who can be a surrogate?
    • A surrogate mother has to be a close relative of the couple, a married woman with a child of her own, aged between 25-35 years, who has been a surrogate only once in her life.
    • She must also possess a certificate of medical and psychological fitness for surrogacy.
  • Who regulates surrogacy?
    • The Centre and State governments are expected to constitute a National Surrogacy Board (NSB) and State Surrogacy Boards (SSB) respectively, within 90 days of the passing of the Act.
    • This body is tasked with enforcing standards for surrogacy clinics, investigating breaches and recommending modifications.
    • Further, surrogacy clinics need to apply for registration within 60 days of the appointment of the appropriate authority.
  • Offences under the Act: Include commercial surrogacy, selling of embryos, exploiting, abandoning a surrogate child, etc. These may invite up to 10 years of imprisonment and a fine of up to Rs. 10 lakhs.

What was the Recent Case, and Why did the Woman Approach the SC?

  • The woman has the Mayer Rokitansky Kuster Hauser (MRKH) syndrome. Medical board records showed she has absent ovaries and absent uterus, hence she cannot produce her own eggs/oocytes.
  • The couple had begun the process of gestational surrogacy, through a donor, last year.
  • However, a government notification (on March 14 this year) amended the law, banning the use of donor gametes.
    • It said “intending couples” must use their own gametes for surrogacy.
      • Gametes are reproductive cells that are used during sexual reproduction to produce a new organism. They are also known as sex cells.
      • In animals, female gametes are called ova or egg cells, and male gametes are called sperm.
    • The petition was filed in the SC challenging the amendment as a violation of a woman’s right to parenthood.

The Petitioner’s Arguments

  • She had begun the surrogacy process months before the amendment, which cannot be implemented retrospectively.
  • The amendment to the Surrogacy (Regulation) Rules 2022 ruled out the use of donor eggs and made it impossible for her and her husband to continue with the process of surrogacy in order to achieve parenthood.
  • The amendment contradicts the Surrogacy Act 2021 which recognised the situation when a medical condition would require a couple to opt for gestational surrogacy in order to become parents.
  • The Surrogacy Rules listed the medical or congenital conditions owing to which a woman could choose to become a mother through gestational surrogacy.
    • They included having no uterus or missing uterus or abnormal uterus or if the uterus is surgically removed due to any medical condition such as gynaecological cancer.
    • The Surrogacy Rules made it clear that the choice was solely that of the woman.

The Government's Argument

The process of surrogacy cannot be availed under the law unless the child was “genetically related” to the intending couple. This exempted the use of donor eggs.

The SC’s Verdict

  • The amendment is prima facie contrary to what is intended under the main provisions of the Surrogacy Act both in form as well as in substance.
  • The law permitting gestational surrogacy was “woman-centric”.
    • The decision to have a surrogate child was entirely based on the woman’s inability to become a mother owing to her medical or congenital condition.
    • Such a condition included the absence of a uterus or repeatedly failed pregnancies, multiple pregnancies or an illness which makes it impossible for her to carry a pregnancy or would make the pregnancy life-threatening.
  • The amendment cannot contradict Rules which specifically recognises the absence of a uterus or any allied condition as a medical indication necessitating gestational surrogacy.
  • Addressing the government’s contention that the surrogate child should be “genetically related” to the couple, the court pointed out that the child would be related to the husband
    • In this regard, it may be noted that the expression ‘genetically’ related to the intending couple has to be read as being related to the husband.

Q1) What was the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act 2021 enacted?

The Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act 2021 was enacted to regulate the functioning of assisted reproductive technology (ART) clinics and ART banks in the country. 

Q2) What is the Mayer Rokitansky Kuster Hauser (MRKH) syndrome?

MRKH syndrome is a rare congenital disorder that affects the female reproductive system. This condition is characterised by an underdeveloped vagina and uterus. The uterus may be small or absent and the vagina is typically shortened.


Source: Supreme Court allows surrogacy, strikes down rule banning use of donor gametes

Smart Cities Mission: Deadline pushed to 2024, Smart Cities working hard to showcase achievements

Smart Cities Mission: Deadline pushed to 2024, Smart Cities working hard to showcase achievements

What’s in today’s article?

  • Why in News?
  • What is the Smart Cities Mission (SCM)?
  • Objective of SCM
  • Achievements of SCM (as of June 2023)
  • About the “Labelling Strategy”

 

Why in News?

  • With the Government pushing the deadline of its Smart Cities Mission (to next June), the 100 cities that are part of it are marking their completed projects with logos.
  • The cities have been asked to implement the “labelling strategy” - a strategy aimed at displaying the accomplishments so far - by August 31 (2023).

 

What is the Smart Cities Mission (SCM)?

  • It was launched on 25 June, 2015, with the objective to promote cities that provide core infrastructure, clean and sustainable environment.
  • 100 cities have been selected to be developed as Smart Cities (through a two-stage competition) in various rounds from 2016 to 2018, with each getting five years from their selection to complete the projects.
  • It is a Centrally Sponsored Scheme under the Union Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (MoHUA).
    • The Central Government will give financial support to the extent of Rs. 48,000 crores over 5 years i.e., on an average Rs.100 crore per city per year. 
    • An equal amount on a matching basis is to be provided by the State/ULB.
  • The six fundamental principles on which the concept of Smart Cities is based are:

 

 

Objective of SCM:

  • It will ensure a decent quality of life to their citizens through the application of ‘smart solutions’.
  • It aims to drive economic growth and improve quality of life through comprehensive work on social, economic, physical and institutional pillars of the city.
  • The focus is on sustainable and inclusive development by creation of replicable models which act as lighthouses to other aspiring cities.

 

Achievements of SCM (as of June 2023):

  • According to the MoHUA, 74% of the nearly 8,000 projects for which work orders have been issued, have been completed.
  • A total of Rs.73,454 crore had been released to the cities, which have utilised 90% of the amount. The total cost of the projects is estimated to be Rs.1,79,204 crore.

 

About the “Labelling Strategy”:

  • The “labelling strategy” was first rolled out as a pilot in 15 cities and expanded to all 100 cities recently.
  • It laid out options for using bespoke logos as well as common imagery such as the Mission logo.
    • Stickers, boards, signage and other such material were also designed for installation on completed projects, including smart roads, lights, preserved heritage sites, etc.
  • The labelling exercise was “not marketing”, but rather a method for creating awareness and providing information to the stakeholders of the projects. For example,
    • In Udaipur, visitors are given additional information through a QR code that leads to a city app developed under the Mission.
    • In Agartala, the boards that have been put up have left space for advertisements, for generating revenue.
  • Hence, the strategy provides a link to build trust with the community and strengthen the loop between citizen feedback and project implementation.

 


Q1) What is Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation (AMRUT) mission?

Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission was renamed to AMRUT and then relaunched in 2015 with the focus to establish infrastructure that could ensure adequate robust sewage networks and water supply for urban transformation by implementing urban revival projects.

 

Q2) What is the Rurban mission?

The Ministry of Rural Development launched the Shyama Prasad Mukherji Rurban Mission in 2016. The Mission aims at development of 300 Rurban clusters, that are not stand-alone settlements but part of a cluster of settlements, in relative proximity to each other.

 


Source: Deadline pushed to 2024, Smart Cities working hard to showcase achievements

75th anniversary of Operation Polo

75th anniversary of Operation Polo

What’s in today’s article?

  • Why in news?
  • Operation Polo
  • What was the background against which Operation Polo was launched?
  • Why was Operation Polo launched?
  • Operation Polo on the ground

 

Why in news?

  • India celebrated the 75thanniversary of Operation Polo on September 13, 2023.
  • On this day in 1948, Indian Army launched military action to integrate the princely state of Hyderabad.

 

What was the background against which Operation Polo was launched?

  • Intentions of Nizam of Hyderabad state
    • The Nizam of Hyderabad state, Mir Osman Ali Shah, had the intention of keeping his state as an independent entity and did not join India or Pakistan after Independence.
    • The Nizam took advantage of the fact that the Indian government got preoccupied with the Kashmir war soon after Independence.
  • Standstill agreement with India
    • The Nizam signed a standstill agreement with India in November 1947.
    • This essentially meant that a status quo would be maintained between the Indian dominion and the Hyderabad state till a solution was found.
    • The agreement was signed for a period of one year during which the Indian government would not exercise any authority over Hyderabad.

 

Why was Operation Polo launched?

  • Location of Hyderabad
    • Situated in the Deccan, Hyderabad was one of the most populous and richest states.
    • It had 17 districts including Aurangabad (now in Maharashtra) and Gulbarga (now in Karnataka).
  • Intention to have fraternal relations with Pakistan
    • The landlocked state had a majority Hindu population with the state administration almost entirely run by its Muslim rulers.
    • There was no common border with Pakistan but the Nizam had every intention to have fraternal relations with that country.
  • Excesses of the Razakars
    • During this period, the Nizam’s administration had taken advantage of the standstill agreement signed with India.
    • It started to increase the number of its irregular force called Razakars which was led by Maj Gen SA El Edroos, the Arab commander in chief of the Hyderabad state forces.
      • The Razakars were a paramilitary force in the Hyderabad State. It was created to support the Nizam's rule.
      • It also resisted the integration of Hyderabad into the newly independent India.
      • The Razakars primarily consisted of local radical Muslim volunteers who were loyal to the Nizam's regime.
    • The Razakars persecuted Hindus and forced them to become Muslims.
    • They killed many Hindus and Hindu sympathizers, forcing them to flee the state. They also raped women.

 

Operation Polo on the ground

  • The Indian forces were led by Maj Gen Jayanto Nath Chaudhuri, the General Officer Commanding of 1 Armoured Division.
  • The Nizam of Hyderabad announced a ceasefire on September 17.
  • On September 18, Maj Gen Chaudhuri entered Hyderabad city with his forces and Maj Gen El Edroos surrendered to him.
  • Maj Gen Chaudhuri was later appointed the Military Governor of Hyderabad.

 


Q1) Who were Razakars?

Razakars were a private militia in Hyderabad, India, during the Nizam's rule, known for supporting the Nizam's regime and opposing integration with India.

 

Q2) Who was Maj Gen SA El Edroos?

Major General Syed Ahmed El Edroos was a notable military figure during the Indian annexation of Hyderabad in 1948. He led the Indian Army's Operation Polo, which resulted in the integration of Hyderabad into the newly independent India.

 


Source: Explained: 75th anniversary of Operation Polo and ‘Police Action’ in Hyderabad

Enquire Now