Daily Editorial Analysis 10 September 2026

India Has to Act on Its ‘Sugar’ Problem 

Context

• India is facing a growing public-health crisis involving childhood obesity, diabetes and hypertension.
• Changing lifestyles contribute to this problem, but the increasing availability, affordability and aggressive marketing of foods high in fat, salt and sugar (HFSS) are equally important.
• Children are particularly vulnerable because their food choices are influenced by advertising, school environments, pricing and parental perceptions.
• The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has proposed bold red front-of-pack warning labels for unhealthy packaged foods.
• This is a welcome step, but labelling alone cannot address the wider food environment

Rising Burden of Childhood Obesity and Diabetes

• The World Obesity Atlas 2026 estimates that around 41 million Indian children and adolescents aged 5–19 are overweight or obese.
• The rise in childhood obesity and diabetes demonstrates that unhealthy diets have become a structural health concern rather than merely an issue of individual choice.
• Breakfast cereals, sweetened yoghurt and health drinks are often promoted as nutritious sources of energy and vitamins while their high sugar content receives inadequate attention.
• Such marketing creates an information imbalance, making products appear healthier than they actually are.
• The addition of sugar to infant food sold in India and other lower-income markets, while comparable European products reportedly contained no added sugar, also raises concerns about unequal food standards across markets.
• Public pressure has similarly been required in some cases to encourage manufacturers to reduce excessive sugar.

Front-of-Pack Warning Labels: A Necessary Beginning

• A prominent red warning label can make nutritional risks immediately visible at the point of purchase.
• Unlike information hidden in fine print, front-of-pack warnings can help consumers identify products containing excessive sugar, salt or fat.
• However, awareness does not automatically change behaviour. Consumers may continue purchasing unhealthy products because they are cheap, convenient and heavily marketed.
• Labelling must therefore be part of a comprehensive regulatory framework.

The Enforcement Gap in Schools

• Schools and colleges provide an important opportunity to influence children’s dietary habits.
• Existing recommendations concerning unhealthy food sales have limited impact when compliance remains voluntary.
• School canteens frequently sell inexpensive products that are commercially popular.
• An energy drink costing ₹20 and containing substantial sugar and caffeine illustrates how unhealthy products are priced within children’s purchasing capacity.
• Restrictions should therefore be mandatory, supported by inspections and penalties.
• Regulation should also cover vendors operating immediately outside educational institutions.

The Unorganised Food Sector: The Missing Half

• Packaged-food regulation has limited reach because a large share of Indians’ consumption occurs through street vendors, dhabas, sweet shops and other unorganised businesses.
• A warning label on packaged food cannot address the nutritional risks of loose jalebi, samosas or sugary drinks.
• India consequently needs a phased regulatory framework for the unorganised sector, combining nutritional standards, vendor training, public awareness and practical enforcement.

The Way Forward

• Sugar Tax as an Economic Instrument

  • The United Kingdom’s experience demonstrates that taxation can encourage manufacturers to reformulate products and reduce sugar.
  • India’s taxation structure provides limited incentives for such reformulation when sugary and sugar-free beverages receive similar treatment.
  • A tiered sugar tax could encourage companies to lower sugar content to reduce their tax liability.
  • Such taxation would therefore influence both consumer demand and industry behaviour.

• Protecting the Poor Through Better Policy Design

  • The concern that a sugar tax could disproportionately affect poorer households is legitimate. However, low-income families already bear a disproportionate burden of diabetes, hypertension and obesity-related healthcare costs.
  • Doing nothing is not cost-free; it shifts the burden from consumers at the point of purchase to families and the healthcare system.
  • A better approach would be to calibrate taxation to sugar content, use part of the revenue to subsidise healthier foods and strengthen nutrition programmes.

• Towards a Comprehensive Food Policy

  • India needs an integrated food-policy framework based on:
    • Mandatory front-of-pack warning labels for HFSS foods.
    • Nutritional standards for school and college canteens.
    • Restrictions on advertising unhealthy foods to children.
    • Regulation of food sales around educational institutions.
    • Gradual regulation of the unorganised food sector.
    • Sugar-content-based taxation encouraging reformulation.
    • Affordable access to healthier foods through targeted subsidies.
    • Stronger inspections and penalties.
    • Nutrition education for parents, children and teachers.
    • Uniform and transparent food standards across markets.

Conclusion

• India’s obesity and diabetes crisis requires a shift from viewing unhealthy eating solely as an individual responsibility to recognising it as a structural public-health challenge.
• Consumers cannot make informed choices when nutritional risks are obscured and unhealthy products are aggressively marketed and widely available.
• The FSSAI’s proposed warning label is an important beginning, but its effectiveness will depend on stronger enforcement and complementary policies.
• The ultimate objective should be to create a food environment where healthy choices are visible, affordable and accessible.
• India’s response must therefore move beyond informing consumers towards reshaping the incentives and environments that influence what people eat.

India Has to Act on Its ‘Sugar’ Problem FAQs

Q1. What is the major food-related health crisis in India?
Ans. India is facing rising childhood obesity, diabetes and hypertension.

Q2. What has FSSAI proposed for unhealthy packaged foods?
Ans. FSSAI has proposed red front-of-pack warning labels for foods high in fat, salt and sugar.

Q3. Why are school canteens important?
Ans. School canteens influence children’s daily food choices and eating habits.

Q4. Why is a sugar tax being suggested?
Ans. A sugar tax can encourage manufacturers to reduce sugar and reformulate products.

Q5. What should India do beyond food labelling?
Ans. India should strengthen enforcement, child-focused advertising restrictions, school standards and sugar taxation.

Source: The Hindu

Turning Economic Cooperation into Shared Prosperity

Context

• Ahead of the 18th BRICS Summit in New Delhi on September 12–13, 2026, Saeed bin Mubarak Al Hajeri, Minister of State at the UAE Ministry of Foreign Affairs, outlines how the UAE approaches BRICS.
• The UAE became a full member of BRICS in January 2024. Its engagement rests on one simple principle: economic cooperation must create tangible opportunities for countries, businesses and people.
• In a world of growing complexity and uncertainty, the value of international cooperation must be measured by its ability to deliver stability, resilience and shared prosperity.

Diversity as the Strength of BRICS

• BRICS draws strength from its diversity. Its members have different economic structures, resources, capabilities and development experiences. They include:
  • Major producers and consumers
  • Sources of capital and investment destinations
  • Energy exporters
  • Manufacturing centres
• These differences create room for complementarity. Markets, capital, capabilities and ideas can be connected in ways that benefit members and, by extension, the wider Global South.

The UAE’s Approach to BRICS

• The UAE’s participation in BRICS flows from its broader commitment to multilateralism, constructive dialogue and diversified international partnerships.
• It seeks to build bridges between economies and regions. It supports an open international system that promotes peace, stability, sustainable development and shared prosperity.
• For the UAE, the real value of BRICS lies in implementation. Dialogue must translate into easier trade, stronger investment flows, more resilient supply chains, better connectivity and greater opportunities for businesses.

Relevance of India’s 2026 Chairship

• India’s BRICS Chairship is centred on four pillars: resilience, innovation, cooperation and sustainability. Analysts see this as a timely framework.
• Trade restrictions, supply-chain disruptions and uncertainty are raising costs for businesses and consumers.
• The right response, as per the experts, is not to retreat from global economic integration but to make it more resilient and inclusive.
• BRICS can deliver tangible benefits in five areas:
  • Strengthening the multilateral trading system
  • Facilitating trade and investment
  • Improving connectivity
  • Supporting resilient global value chains
  • Promoting sustainable development

Development Finance and the New Development Bank

• Development finance is a key part of this agenda. The New Development Bank (NDB) has approved more than $40 billion in financing since its establishment.
• This has supported infrastructure and sustainable development across member countries.
• The UAE engaged actively with the NDB long before joining BRICS, reflecting its commitment to mobilising capital for productive investment and long-term growth.

UAE-India Partnership as a Model

• The UAE-India relationship shows what practical connectivity can achieve.
• The UAE-India Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) has created a more enabling environment for trade and investment between two highly complementary economies.
• Key figures:
  • Non-oil bilateral trade grew by 17 per cent in 2025 to exceed $76 billion.
  • The two countries aim to raise bilateral trade to $200 billion by 2032.
• The relationship goes beyond trade. It is reinforced by investment, innovation, education, tourism and long-standing links between businesses, institutions and people.

The Broader Lesson: Connectivity Across Societies

• The UAE-India experience offers a lesson for BRICS. The strongest economic partnerships are built not only through agreements between governments but through lasting connections across societies.
• These create trust, opportunity and resilience, allowing commercial ties to deepen over time.
• Economic connectivity grows when businesses, entrepreneurs, investors and institutions become familiar with one another.
• It is strengthened through education, research, tourism, cultural exchange and engagement of younger generations.
• The opportunity for BRICS is to deepen the quality of connectivity among members, linking not just economies but also institutions, ideas and people.

The UAE’s Advantages as a Connector

• The UAE is well placed to contribute because connectivity lies at the heart of its own economic model. Its strengths include:
  • Non-oil sectors accounted for almost 79 per cent of GDP in 2025.
  • World-class infrastructure, trusted financial institutions, advanced logistics and energy capabilities.
  • An open investment environment that helps businesses scale up and expand outward.
  • Ports, airports and logistics networks connecting markets across Asia, Africa, Europe and beyond.
  • Financial centres linking international capital with regional opportunities.
  • Universities, research institutions and an innovation ecosystem connecting talent and ideas.
  • Sovereign wealth assets exceeding $2.9 trillion.
  • 38 concluded Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreements.
• For the UAE, connectivity is not merely about moving goods between markets. It is about creating conditions in which capital, knowledge, technology, talent and people can interact and generate new opportunities.
• Its approach builds cooperation around connectivity, not division.

The Path Ahead

• As India leads BRICS through 2026, experts see an opportunity to move towards delivery: building resilience without closing markets, supporting innovation while widening opportunity, and strengthening ties among businesses, institutions and people.
• The UAE also looks forward to China’s BRICS Chairship in 2027, hoping to carry forward the same spirit of openness, connectivity and practical cooperation.
• Ultimately, the success of BRICS will be measured by the opportunities it creates.

Conclusion

• The UAE presents BRICS as a platform for practical economic cooperation rather than geopolitical division.
• Its emphasis on connectivity, implementation and people-to-people ties aligns well with India’s 2026 chairship agenda.
• The UAE-India partnership, driven by CEPA and ambitious trade targets, offers a working model of how BRICS members can convert dialogue into shared prosperity.

Turning Economic Cooperation into Shared Prosperity FAQs

Q1. What is the UAE’s approach to BRICS?

Ans. The UAE views BRICS as a platform for practical economic cooperation, focusing on connectivity, investment, trade, resilience and opportunities for businesses and people.

Q2. What are the four pillars of India’s 2026 BRICS Chairship?

Ans. India’s 2026 BRICS Chairship focuses on four pillars: resilience, innovation, cooperation and sustainability, providing a framework for inclusive and resilient economic integration.

Q3. How does the UAE-India CEPA strengthen economic cooperation?

Ans. The UAE-India CEPA creates a more enabling environment for trade and investment, with non-oil bilateral trade exceeding $76 billion in 2025.

Q4. What role does the New Development Bank play in BRICS?

Ans. The New Development Bank supports infrastructure and sustainable development, approving more than $40 billion in financing since its establishment across member countries.

Q5. Why is connectivity important for BRICS cooperation?

Ans. Connectivity links markets, capital, technology, institutions and people, helping BRICS members build trust, resilient supply chains, investment opportunities and sustainable economic partnerships.

Source: TH

‹ ›

Judicial Appointments – Transparency as the Foundation of Judicial Independence

Context

• The debate over judicial appointments has been revived by the Supreme Court’s judgment in Arvind Malhotra v. High Court of Himachal Pradesh, concerning the elevation of a High Court judge to the Supreme Court.
• The case raised concerns over whether judicial appointments should remain confidential, particularly when questions of merit, seniority and perceived political proximity arise.
• The central issue is a larger constitutional question: Can judicial independence and institutional integrity be strengthened through a more transparent and representative appointment process?

India’s Collegium System – Confidentiality vs Transparency

• In Arvind Malhotra, the applicant, an experienced Himachal Pradesh High Court judge, challenged the elevation of a junior judge over him, alleging that the latter was perceived as supportive of the government of the day.
• The Supreme Court did not accept the challenge. It noted that the High Court Collegium had recommended the appointment and the Supreme Court Collegium had subsequently approved it.
• The Court also emphasised that confidentiality is necessary to preserve the integrity of judicial appointments.
• This raises an important dilemma. While confidentiality may protect candidates and prevent undue external pressure, excessive secrecy can also generate doubts about the objectivity, accountability and legitimacy of appointments.

The South African Alternative

• South Africa offers a contrasting model. Judicial appointments are handled through the Judicial Service Commission (JSC), a constitutional body comprising senior judges, lawyers, legal academics and limited political representation.
• Unlike India’s largely confidential collegium deliberations, the South African process is substantially open –
  • Vacancies are publicly advertised and nominations invited.
  • A shortlist is prepared and public comments are sought.
  • Candidates undergo public interviews to assess their suitability.
  • Where consensus is absent, members may vote.
  • The identities of individual voters and their choices remain confidential.
• The system therefore combines institutional participation with public scrutiny, while retaining limited confidentiality where necessary.

Transparency as a Safeguard for Integrity

• The comparison raises the fundamental question of whether judicial appointments should be conducted behind closed doors or through an open process.
• Transparency can enhance –
  • Public confidence in the judiciary;
  • Professional credibility of appointments;
  • Accountability of the appointing authority;
  • Perception of merit, impartiality and independence.
• For an institution exercising enormous public power, legitimacy depends not only on actual independence but also on public perception of independence.

Scrutiny of Judicial Conduct

• South Africa also provides for greater openness in disciplinary proceedings against judges.
• Allegations of improper conduct can trigger investigation by the JSC and, where appropriate, a public inquiry.
• The example of a senior High Court judge facing a public inquiry following a sexual-harassment complaint illustrates the principle that the judicial office does not place judges beyond institutional scrutiny.
• A finding of gross misconduct can ultimately lead to a recommendation for impeachment.
• Such mechanisms seek to balance judicial independence with judicial accountability.

Who Should Appoint Judges?

• The comparison also raises a deeper institutional question: should judges be appointed primarily through a collegium of judges, or through a more representative constitutional body?
• Since judges exercise a public constitutional function, the appointment mechanism must command broad societal confidence.
• At the same time, political participation must not become political control, as that could compromise judicial independence.
• The challenge is therefore to design a mechanism that reconciles independence, accountability, merit, diversity and transparency.

Way Forward

• Reforms cannot emerge from silence. Lawyers, judges, politicians and legal academics must engage in an open and fearless constitutional debate on judicial appointments and disciplinary mechanisms.
• India need not mechanically replicate the South African model. However, greater transparency—while protecting genuinely sensitive information—could strengthen confidence in the judiciary.

Conclusion

• Judicial independence does not necessarily require institutional secrecy. Indeed, carefully designed transparency can reinforce independence by making the appointment process more credible and publicly legitimate.
• A democratic judiciary must therefore balance confidentiality with accountability and ensure that judicial elevation is based on competence, integrity and independence rather than perceived political alignment.
• The ultimate objective should be a judicial appointment system that is not merely independent, but is seen to be independent by citizens.

Judicial Appointments FAQs

Q1. How can transparency in judicial appointments strengthen judicial independence?

Ans. Transparency enhances public confidence, accountability and institutional legitimacy.

Q2. What are the major features of South Africa’s Judicial Service Commission model?

Ans. It combines judicial, legal and academic representation, public nominations, public comments and televised interviews.

Q3. Should judicial appointments be exclusively controlled by the judiciary?

Ans. A broader constitutional body involving the judiciary, legal profession, academia and limited political representation is the need of the hour.

Q4. How can judicial accountability be reconciled with judicial independence?

Ans. Independent judges should remain subject to credible, impartial and transparent disciplinary mechanisms.

Q5. What reforms are needed to improve India’s judicial appointment process?

Ans. India should promote greater transparency, objective criteria, reasoned disclosures and wider institutional participation.

Source: IE