Daily Editorial Analysis 10 November 2026

The Next Test for Renewable Energy

Context:

• India recently hosted the Bharat Renewable Energy Summit, showcasing its progress in near-universal household electricity access and building the world’s third-largest renewable energy capacity.
• After that, COP31 opened in Türkiye with Australia holding the presidency of the climate negotiations.
• COP31 hosts have proposed a “35 by 35” global electrification target — raising electricity’s share in final energy consumption to 35% by 2035.
• Against this backdrop, this article examines whether the global and Indian energy transition is truly on track, or merely celebrating capacity numbers while deeper structural challenges remain unresolved.

The Global Picture: Progress with Gaps

• Global renewable capacity reached 5,149 GW in 2025, with 692 GW added last year alone — nearly 97% from solar and wind.
• Yet the 2023 G20/COP28 goal of tripling renewable capacity by 2030 remains distant: over 1,000 GW must be added annually for the remaining four years.
• Deployment is highly uneven: China accounted for nearly two-thirds of last year’s additions; Africa contributed just 1.6%, with 560 million people in Sub-Saharan Africa still lacking electricity.
• Since 2020, renewable capacity has grown by 80%, making renewables the “default expectation” — but the real question has shifted from whether renewables make economic sense to whether energy systems can absorb them at scale.

Three Core Challenges

• Grid and Market Design: Systems built for centralised fossil-fuel plants cannot efficiently move cheap renewable power to where it’s needed — inflexibility, not capacity addition, is now the binding constraint.
• Concentrated Supply Chains: Intellectual property and cleantech manufacturing are concentrated in a few countries, raising energy security concerns.
• AI-Driven Demand Surge: Rising power consumption from data centres is colliding with limits on energy, water, and climate resilience.
• Hence, experts propose a new mantra: make renewables reliable, secure, and digital.

‹ ›

Making Renewables Reliable

• India’s battery storage capacity stood at just ~9 GWh (mid-2026), with most of it added only in the first half of the year.
• Most power contracts still pay for energy delivered, not for flexibility or dispatchability — risking cheap capacity that cannot be fully utilised, with costs passed to distribution companies and consumers.
• Suggested fixes: time-of-day pricing, shifting from rigid 25-year contracts to real-time trading and contracts-for-difference, technology-agnostic auctions, and faster permitting/grid-connection processes.
• Grid investment must double globally — from ~$0.5 trillion/year to ~$1 trillion (IRENA estimate).
• India has approved $19 billion (₹1.86 lakh crore) for state transmission and 50 GWh of battery storage, enabling evacuation of up to 135 GW by 2032-33.
• Regional interconnections matter too — the ASEAN Power Grid has built 9 of 18 planned links (10.22 GW), targeting 25 GW by 2030.

Making Renewables Secure

• Energy security is the strongest argument for renewables — but risks being undermined if clean energy simply creates new dependencies.
• China Dominates: ~80% of global solar module production, over 90% of battery-grade graphite, and refines ~70% of lithium and 75% of cobalt; it also holds 70% of global cleantech manufacturing investment (IEA).
• India’s Response: solar module capacity has reached ~262 GW; solar cell capacity has risen to ~37 GW. The National Critical Minerals Mission and Green Hydrogen Mission aim to boost mineral processing and electrolyser manufacturing.
• No single model fits all countries — multilateral institutions should offer tailored options based on each nation’s starting point, fostering green comparative advantage and interdependent value chains.

Making Renewables Digital

• Smart meters act as the “nervous system” of a digital grid — India has deployed ~54 million so far, enabling grid-edge technologies and energy-flow optimisation software.
• AI can forecast renewable output and unlock flexibility markets, but AI itself is a growing power consumer: data-centre electricity use is projected to rise from ~485 TWh to 950 TWh by 2030 (1.5% to 3% of global demand), with water consumption potentially doubling.
• Concerningly, half of India’s data centres already face over 90 days a year above 30°C — beyond optimal operating temperatures.
• Analysts call for siting new data centres using heat and water-stress data, and mandating disclosure of power, water, and carbon intensity.

Where India Stands

• India has installed about 308 GW of non-fossil capacity. Crossing 500 GW will be a milestone, not the finish line.
• The true test lies in whether every unit generated is dispatched efficiently, every consumer benefits, and every worker and manufacturer finds a place in the evolving energy system.
• Cheap renewables made the energy transition possible; only reliable, secure, and digital systems will make it real.
• India’s challenge now is converting installed capacity into dependable, equitable, and future-ready power for all.

The Next Test for Renewable Energy FAQs

Q1. What is the major challenge facing the global renewable energy transition?

Ans. Global renewable capacity reached 5,149 GW in 2025, but annual additions must exceed 1,000 GW to meet the goal of tripling capacity by 2030.

Q2. What are the three core challenges confronting the renewable energy transition?

Ans. Grid inflexibility, concentrated clean-technology supply chains and rising electricity demand from data centres are three major challenges confronting the global energy transition.

Q3. What is India’s current non-fossil energy capacity?

Ans. India has installed about 308 GW of non-fossil capacity, while its battery storage capacity stood at approximately 9 GWh by mid-2026.

Q4. What steps has India taken to strengthen its renewable energy infrastructure?

Ans. India’s $19 billion approval supports state transmission projects and 50 GWh of battery storage, enabling evacuation of up to 135 GW by 2032-33.

Q5. How is India addressing vulnerabilities in clean-technology supply chains?

Ans. India is expanding solar module and cell capacity while the National Critical Minerals Mission and Green Hydrogen Mission target supply-chain and manufacturing gaps.

Source: TH

Agnipath Scheme – Balancing Military Modernisation with Technical Expertise and Operational Readiness

Context

• The Union Cabinet approved a second engagement of two years for 75% of Agniveers who would otherwise leave the armed forces after their initial four-year tenure.
• The decision provides additional opportunities to serving Agniveers but also raises fundamental questions about the Agnipath scheme’s original objectives, military effectiveness, technical expertise and long-term career progression.
• The argument is that military capability depends not merely on recruitment numbers but also on the experience and specialised skills developed over years of service.

Agnipath Scheme

• Original objectives:
  • Reduced average age: Rapid turnover of personnel to create a younger armed force.
  • Lower pension expenditure: Only 25% of Agniveers would be absorbed into regular service, thereby limiting long-term pension liabilities.
  • Civilian reintegration: The remaining 75% would enter civilian life with savings, skills and preferential employment opportunities.
• Recent modification:
  • The Cabinet has approved an additional two-year engagement for 75% of Agniveers after their initial four-year tenure.
  • This means a substantial proportion may now serve for six years before leaving or entering regular service.
• Concerns:
  • The extension may require recalculating the scheme’s impact on the average age profile and pension expenditure.
  • Agniveers leaving after six years may face greater difficulties in civilian employment, particularly if promised employment preferences and support remain inadequate.
  • The Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) has suggested that wider opportunities within the armed forces reduce the need for reserved vacancies in police and paramilitary forces. However, regular absorption remains uncertain.

Impact on Military Professionalism and Career Progression

• Military effectiveness:
  • It requires personnel to evolve from basic operators into skilled supervisors and junior leaders.
  • Progression from positions such as Seaman, Rifleman and Aircraftsman involves increasing technical competence, responsibility and authority.
  • Under the initial four-year engagement, Agniveers cannot progress through the established career structure in the same manner as regular personnel.
  • Those absorbed into regular service after four years will have a two-year advantage over 2nd-engagement Agniveers in professional courses, promotions and pay progression.
• Unresolved issues:
  • The Cabinet has promised unspecified seniority benefits to Agniveers undertaking a second engagement.
  • However, the CDS has indicated that they will rank below the 25% initially selected for regular absorption.
  • Clarity is required regarding their access to professional training, promotions, remuneration and career advancement.

Technical Expertise – A Major Challenge

• Importance of specialised technical cadres:
  • The Navy’s former Artificer system illustrates the importance of long-term skill development.
  • Artificers underwent four years of apprenticeship before developing into highly experienced technical specialists.
  • Their expertise enabled them to diagnose and repair complex machinery under challenging operational conditions, often without immediate manufacturer support.
  • The Agnipath system has brought technical recruitment under the same 4-year engagement framework.
• Concerns regarding technical trades:
  • Earlier, Artificer Apprentices entered after Class XII and underwent four years of specialised naval apprenticeship before progressing through an established technical career.
  • The new Agniveer (Apprentice) enters with a three-year civilian engineering diploma, receives naval training and must subsequently qualify for regular service.
  • An engineering diploma provides theoretical foundations, but mastery of sophisticated military equipment (avionics, radar) requires sustained training, practical experience and operational responsibility.
  • Shorter career pathways may affect the development and retention of technical expertise, with implications for equipment reliability, safety and operational readiness.

Legal and Pension-Related Concerns

• In Ex Navy Direct Entry Artificers Association v. Union of India (2018), the Supreme Court noted that the four-year apprenticeship of Apprentice Entry Artificers had been counted towards pension eligibility.
• Although the judgment does not directly govern Agnipath, it highlights the distinction between training, engagement and pensionable government service.
• An important question remains: Will the years served by Agniveers before regular enrolment count towards qualifying service, or will their pension clock begin only after absorption?
• Clear legal and administrative provisions are necessary to prevent uncertainty regarding pension eligibility and service benefits.

Military Reform Must Be Evidence-Based

• Sophisticated military equipment requires specialised knowledge that cannot be easily replaced. Developing such expertise demands sustained institutional investment.
• Hence, there is the need of evaluating military reforms through evidence and their actual consequences rather than merely their stated objectives.
• The experience of former naval artificers, some of whom have served in Oman’s Royal Yacht Fleet and Air Force, also demonstrates the value of India’s military technical expertise.

Way Forward

• Independent assessment: Submit a comprehensive evaluation of Agnipath’s impact on force structure, military competence and financial savings to Parliament’s Standing Committee on Defence.
• Trade-specific retention: Determine retention requirements according to the operational and technical needs of individual services and trades.
• Transparent selection: Publish six-year engagement and regular absorption criteria well in advance.
• Career progression: Ensure 2nd-engagement Agniveers have access to professional courses, training, promotion opportunities and appropriate remuneration.
• Pension clarity: Clearly define how initial engagement and subsequent regular service will count towards qualifying service and pension benefits.
• Technical capacity building: Provide specialised training and adequate service duration to retain critical technical expertise.

Conclusion

• Agnipath was conceived as a military reform, not merely a recruitment arrangement.
• Its success must therefore be evaluated against its ability to strengthen institutional capabilities, operational readiness and professional expertise.

Agnipath Scheme FAQs

Q1. What were the key objectives of the Agnipath Scheme?

Ans. To reduce the average age of armed forces, rationalise pension expenditure and create a skilled pool.

Q2. How can the Agnipath Scheme affect military professionalism?

Ans. Short service tenures may restrict institutional experience, career progression and the development of skilled supervisors.

Q3. Why is long-term retention of technical personnel important for military effectiveness?

Ans. Because sophisticated military equipment requires specialised knowledge, practical experience, etc.

Q4. What are the major pension-related concerns associated with Agnipath?

Ans. Uncertainty over whether the initial engagement period will count towards qualifying service may create ambiguity.

Q5. What measures are needed to improve the effectiveness of the Agnipath Scheme?

Ans. Introduce trade-specific retention, transparent selection criteria, assured career progression, etc.

Source: IE