Electoral Roll Revision Latest News
- The Supreme Court of India declined to stay the Election Commission of India’s (ECI) Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar, which is scheduled ahead of the upcoming Assembly elections.
- Amid concerns raised by petitioners over the timing and process of the electoral roll revision, the Court urged the ECI to consider Aadhaar, voter ID, and ration cards for verification purposes and scheduled a detailed hearing for July 28.
Background - Electoral Roll Revision in Bihar
- Special Intensive Revision (SIR): SIR involves a de novo/ afresh preparation of electoral rolls through house-to-house verification by electoral registration officers.
- Applicability in Bihar:
- Those listed on the 2003 electoral rolls need only submit an extract from that roll.
- Those enrolled after 2003 must submit one or more of 11 prescribed documents and a pre-filled enumeration form to establish birthplace and date, indirectly serving as a citizenship determination process.
Supreme Court Proceedings and Key Observations
- Major concerns raised:
- Timing of revision:
- Petitioners argued that the electoral roll revision is timed too close to the November 2025 Bihar Assembly elections.
- Demanded delinking of the revision exercise from the election process.
- Document exclusion:
- Objection to exclusion of Aadhaar from the accepted list of identity/citizenship documents.
- Concerns of citizenship screening under the guise of voter verification.
- Risk of voter disenfranchisement:
- Petitioners warned that lack of accepted documentation could exclude genuine voters (particularly marginalized groups like EBCs, Dalits, minorities, and women).
- A Bihar government survey reportedly revealed most voters did not possess the required certificates sought by ECI.
- Timing of revision:
- Supreme Court’s stand and directions:
- No interim stay: Court allowed ECI to proceed with SIR but reserved right to intervene if violations are proven.
- Document suggestion: SC urged ECI to consider Aadhaar, voter ID, and ration cards—though left the final decision to the Commission.
- Rationale for transparency: ECI was directed to provide reasons if it chooses to exclude these documents.
- Three key legal questions identified by SC:
- Powers of the Election Commission under the Constitution.
- Procedure and methodology of SIR being adopted.
- Timing of the revision vis-à-vis the upcoming election.
Accessibility of Suggested Documents in Bihar
- Aadhaar card:
- Aadhaar is available to over 88% of Bihar’s population (approx. 11.48 crore people).
- Saturation level (eligible people with Aadhaar) stands at 94% across the state.
- Some districts like Kishanganj and Katihar show saturation above 120%, indicating coverage exceeding projections.
- Adult coverage (18+ years): 70.29% of total Aadhaar holders.
- Voter ID (EPIC card):
- Issued compulsorily to all enrolled electors.
- Bihar has 7.89 crore registered voters, almost all of whom hold a Voter ID.
- Used presently only for identification, not for eligibility verification.
- Ration cards:
- Cover about two-thirds of Bihar’s population.
- 1.79 crore ration cards cover around 8.71 crore beneficiaries (as of July 10, 2025).
- Easily accessible to low-income and marginalized groups, including EBCs and minorities.
Election Commission’s Position and Defence
- Key submissions by ECI:
- The list of 11 documents is not exhaustive, and room for additions exists.
- Aadhaar is not conclusive for citizenship, hence not mandatory.
- Extensive public outreach ongoing via:
- Mobile notifications to over 7.89 crore electors.
- House-to-house verification and real-time monitoring via ECINET.
- Rebuttal to citizenship allegations:
- ECI claimed that it has no intent to remove voters arbitrarily.
- Exclusion will happen only if required by law and supported by evidence.
Conclusion
- The Supreme Court has upheld the ECI’s constitutional autonomy in revising electoral rolls but emphasized accountability and transparency.
- The July 28 hearing is expected to address the legal validity, procedural fairness, and timing concerns of the SIR process ahead of Bihar’s crucial elections.
- It will also try to balance documentary rigor with universal suffrage, underlining the importance of institutional accountability and voter inclusion in India’s electoral democracy.
Electoral Roll Revision
Q1: Examine the constitutional mandate and autonomy of the Election Commission of India (ECI) in the context of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar.
Ans: The ECI, as a constitutional body under Article 324, enjoys autonomy in conducting elections and revising electoral rolls, but its actions remain subject to judicial scrutiny to ensure fairness, legality, and protection of voter rights.
Q2: Discuss the implications of excluding widely held documents like Aadhaar, Voter ID, and ration cards from the eligibility criteria for electoral roll inclusion.
Ans: Excluding commonly held documents risks disenfranchising millions, particularly marginalized communities, and raises concerns over accessibility, inclusiveness, and the democratic integrity of the electoral process.
Q3: Analyze how the timing and procedure of the SIR exercise in Bihar may affect the credibility and inclusiveness of the upcoming Assembly elections.
Ans: The SIR’s proximity to the Bihar Assembly elections, coupled with limited timelines and burdensome documentation, may compromise procedural fairness and voter inclusivity, thereby affecting electoral credibility.
Q4: Do you agree with the view that the current SIR process resembles a citizenship verification exercise?
Ans: The requirement for post-2003 voters to submit specific documents proving birth and residence, while excluding Aadhaar or Voter ID, has led to perceptions that the process mirrors a de facto citizenship screening.
Q5: Critically evaluate the Supreme Court's approach in balancing the ECI’s constitutional independence with the need to ensure voter inclusion and transparency.
Ans: The SC allowed the ECI to continue the SIR while suggesting inclusion of accessible documents and demanding reasoned justification for their exclusion, thereby preserving institutional autonomy and democratic accountability.