Draft Seeds Bill 2025 – Key Provisions Explained

Seeds Bill 2025

Seeds Bill Latest News

  • The Union Agriculture Ministry has released the Draft Seeds Bill 2025, inviting public comments until December 11. 
  • The Bill aims to modernise seed regulation by amending the Seeds Act, 1966 and the Seeds (Control) Order 1983, ensuring quality seeds for farmers while reducing compliance burdens for the seed industry. 

Context and Rationale Behind the Seeds Bill 2025

  • India’s seed sector has undergone a massive transformation since the 1960s, through advances in biotechnology, hybridisation, commercial seed processing, and international trade.
  • According to the Agriculture Ministry, in 2023-24, the national requirement for seeds was 462.31 lakh quintals, while availability reached 508.60 lakh quintals, creating a surplus of 46.29 lakh quintals.
  • Industry associations have argued that the 1966 Act is outdated and ill-equipped to deal with new scientific and commercial realities. 

Regulatory Architecture Proposed Under the Bill

  • Clear Definition of Stakeholders
    • The Bill defines key actors, farmer, dealer, distributor, and producer, as separate entities engaged in seed use and trade. This creates regulatory clarity across the supply chain. 
  • Central and State Seed Committees
    • Two statutory bodies are proposed:
      • Central Seed Committee (27 members)
      • State Seed Committees (15 members)
  • The Central Committee will recommend standards such as:
    • Minimum germination levels,
    • Genetic and physical purity,
    • Traits and seed health norms,
    • Additional quality parameters.
  • The State Committees will advise on the registration of seed producers, dealers, nurseries, and processing units. 

Quality Control and Registration Systems

  • Mandatory Registration of Seed Processing Units
    • All processing units must register with the State government. This ensures quality control but may increase operational costs for small seed entrepreneurs.
    • To ease compliance for companies operating across multiple States, a Central Accreditation System may be introduced, merit-based, transparent, and uniform. 
  • National Seed Variety Register
    • The Bill creates the office of a Registrar responsible for maintaining a National Register of Seed Varieties under the Central Seed Committee. 
    • Field trials to determine the Value for Cultivation and Use (VCU) are also standardised in the Bill.
  • Seed Testing Laboratories
    • Central and State seed testing laboratories will be strengthened to:
      • Analyse genetic purity,
      • Assess germination and health parameters,
      • Assist in compliance monitoring. 
  • Role of Seed Inspectors

Offences and Penalties

  • The new draft significantly revises the penalty framework compared to the 2019 draft. 
  • The Bill classifies offences as: Trivial, Minor, Major, with corresponding penalties.
  • This stronger penal architecture reflects the government’s intent to curb seed fraud and maintain quality standards. 

Farmers’ Rights and New Safeguards

  • The Bill reiterates that farmers retain the right to save, use, exchange, and sell farm-saved seeds, except under a brand name. This aligns with long-standing protections under Indian law.
  • The draft also links seed regulation to the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights (PPV&FR) Act 2001, attempting to ensure that quality norms and intellectual property rights are harmonised. 

Concerns Raised by Farmers’ Organisations

  • Farmers’ unions, including the All India Kisan Sabha, have criticised the Bill for:
    • Potential increase in seed costs, enabling large companies to engage in “predatory pricing.”
    • Risk to seed sovereignty, as centralisation may favour multinational and domestic seed corporations.
    • Dilution of biodiversity protections, arguing that the Bill conflicts with global treaties such as the CBD and the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food & Agriculture.
    • Creating a “corporatised regulatory structure” that may overshadow the PPV&FR Act’s progressive farmer-centric provisions.
  • These groups demand that the Bill must complement, not undermine, India’s biodiversity and farmers’ rights legal architecture. 

Source: TH

Seeds Bill FAQs

Q1: What is the purpose of the Draft Seeds Bill 2025?

Ans: To modernise seed regulation, ensure quality standards, and streamline compliance.

Q2: Does the Bill restrict farmers’ rights to use or share seeds?

Ans: No farmers may save, exchange, or sell seeds, except under a brand name.

Q3: What penalties does the Bill impose for violations?

Ans: Fines range from Rs. 50,000 to Rs. 30 lakh, with imprisonment up to three years.

Q4: What new committees will be formed under the Bill?

Ans: Central and State Seed Committees for standard-setting and regulatory oversight.

Q5: Why are farmers’ groups opposing the Bill?

Ans: They fear corporatisation, loss of seed sovereignty, and higher cultivation costs.

India’s Q2 FY26 GDP Surpasses RBI Forecast, Driven by Consumption & Capex

India’s Q2 GDP

India’s Q2 GDP Latest News

  • Economists expect India’s Q2 FY26 GDP to surpass the RBI’s 7% forecast, potentially reaching 7.3%, slightly below the previous quarter’s 7.8% high. 
  • Growth remains robust despite 50% US tariffs introduced in late August. 
  • Broad-based rural recovery, supported by strong labour markets and good crop output, along with increased urban consumer durable spending following GST cuts, is driving the expansion. Q3 FY26 is also expected to benefit from the GST cuts.

Nominal GDP Growth Slows, Poses Risks to Budget Targets

  • April-June GDP data showed nominal growth at a three-quarter low of 8.8%, below the Finance Ministry’s 10.1% Budget assumption. 
    • Nominal growth refers to the growth of an economic variable without adjusting for inflation. 
    • In other words, it measures the increase in value at current prices, so it includes the effects of rising prices (inflation) along with the actual increase in output or income.
  • Economists expect July-September and FY26 nominal growth could fall below 8%, potentially impacting tax collections and raising fiscal deficit and debt-to-GDP ratios, despite strong real growth of 7.8%. 
    • Fiscal deficit is the gap between the government’s total expenditure and its total revenue (excluding borrowings) in a financial year.
    • Debt-to-GDP ratio measures a country’s total government debt relative to its GDP. It shows the government’s ability to repay debt. A higher ratio means debt is growing faster than the economy, which can strain public finances.
  • Monitoring nominal GDP is crucial for fiscal planning.

GDP Growth Likely Lags GVA Due to Slower Tax Collections

  • In Q2, GDP growth may trail GVA growth, projected at 7.5–8% versus 8% GVA growth. 
    • GDP (Gross Domestic Product): It measures total value of goods and services produced within a country in a given period. It is calculated as GVA + net indirect taxes (indirect taxes minus subsidies).
    • GVA (Gross Value Added) – It measures total value of goods and services produced by all sectors, excluding net indirect taxes. It indicates actual production and sectoral performance. 
      • GDP growth can differ from GVA growth if net indirect taxes rise or fall.
  • GDP includes net indirect taxes (GST minus subsidies), which fell year-on-year after a 10% rise in Q1. 
  • Slower growth in these taxes explains why GDP growth may be lower than GVA.

Q2 FY26 Sees Surge in Private Consumption 

  • Private consumption likely rose by 8% in Q2 FY26, the highest since Q3FY25.
  • It was boosted by the late-September GST rate cuts, low retail inflation (1.7%), rural wage growth (~6%), personal income tax cuts, and a 7.8% rise in employee costs of listed companies. 
  • Growth could have been higher if households had not delayed purchases ahead of the GST rollout. Q1FY26 consumption had risen to 7% from 6% in Q4FY25.

Q2 FY26 Sees Strong Corporate Profits Amid Low Inflation

  • Q2 FY26 was the best quarter for companies in two years, with sales up 6% YoY and profits rising 13%, aided by low retail inflation (1.7%) and zero wholesale inflation. 
  • Limited impact from US tariffs and subdued input costs boosted profitability, supporting value-added growth and likely contributing to GDP growth around 7% for FY26, above the RBI’s 6.8% forecast.

Government Capex Surges, Private Investment Shows Early Signs of Revival

  • In Q2 FY26, Central government capital expenditure rose 31% YoY to ₹3.06 lakh crore, supporting overall investment. 
  • Private sector interest also increased, accounting for 71% of fresh investments in H1 FY26 versus 61% last year. 
  • Q1FY26 gross fixed capital formation grew 7.8%, down from 9.4% in the previous quarter but above 6.7% in Q1FY25.

Source: IE | LM

India’s Q2 GDP FAQs

Q1: What is India’s expected Q2 FY26 GDP growth rate compared to the RBI's forecast?

Ans: India's Q2 FY26 GDP is expected to reach 7.3%, surpassing the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) 7% forecast for the quarter.

Q2: What factors primarily drove the surge in private consumption in Q2 FY26?

Ans: Private consumption was boosted by low retail inflation, rural wage growth, personal income tax cuts, and late-September GST rate cuts.

Q3: Why might GDP growth lag GVA growth in Q2 FY26?

Ans: GDP growth may lag GVA growth because net indirect taxes, which are included in GDP but not GVA, fell year-on-year in Q2.

Q4: What is nominal GDP growth, and why is its current slowdown a concern?

Ans: Nominal GDP growth is the growth at current prices, including inflation; its slowdown poses a risk to tax collections and Budget deficit targets.

Q5: How did corporate performance in Q2 FY26 contribute to economic growth?

Ans: Corporate profits rose 13% YoY, aided by low retail and zero wholesale inflation and limited tariff impact, supporting value-added growth.

Supreme Court Slams Centre on Custodial Torture & Failure to Install CCTVs

Custodial Torture

Custodial Torture Latest News

  • The Supreme Court criticised the Union government for not responding to its five-year-old directive to install CCTV cameras in all police stations and central agency offices such as the CBI, ED and NIA. Only 11 States/UTs submitted compliance reports; the Centre did not.
  • The Bench expressed shock that custodial torture continues unabated, citing 11 custodial deaths in Rajasthan within eight months. 
  • The judges observed that custodial brutality persists despite earlier judicial orders.

Custodial Torture in India: A Persisting Human Rights Crisis

  • Custodial torture in India is a widespread and systemic human rights violation involving physical and psychological abuse of individuals in police or judicial custody. 
  • Despite the high number of custodial deaths each year, conviction rates remain extremely low, reflecting deep-rooted impunity and weak accountability mechanisms within the system.
  • Prisoners’ dignity and fundamental rights are protected under international law. 
  • The UN Charter (1945) emphasizes humane treatment, and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) safeguards individuals from torture, cruel treatment, and enforced disappearances, ensuring security and dignity.

Scale of the Problem

  • Custodial torture—both physical and psychological—remains widespread and systemic.
  • NHRC reported 2,739 custodial deaths in 2024, up from 2,400 in 2023.
  • Marginalised groups—Dalits, Adivasis, Muslims, daily-wage earners—are disproportionately targeted.
  • Accountability is abysmal: Zero convictions in 345 judicial inquiries (2017–2022) despite arrests and charge sheets.

Why Custodial Torture Persists

  • Absence of Specific Anti-Torture Law - India lacks a dedicated legislation criminalising torture as per global standards. Although India signed UN Convention Against Torture (UNCAT, 1997), it has not ratified it.
  • Culture of Impunity - Police personnel often shield each other, discouraging accountability. Systemic misuse of coercive interrogation methods remains widespread.
  • Systemic and Institutional Failures - Overworked police forces, inadequate training in non-coercive techniques. Weak prison infrastructure and insufficient oversight mechanisms.
  • Weak Legal Protection for Victims - Fear of retaliation and lack of legal aid prevent victims from reporting abuse.

Legal & Judicial Safeguards

  • Article 14: Ensures that all individuals are treated equally, reinforcing that law enforcement agencies are not above the law.
  • Article 21: Right to life includes protection from torture.
  • Article 20(1): Prohibits conviction for acts that were not offences when committed and guards against excessive or arbitrary punitive actions.
  • Article 20(3): Protection against self-incrimination.
  • D.K. Basu Guidelines (1997): Mandate arrest memo, medical exam, identification of police officers, etc.

New Criminal Laws

  • Section 120, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) - Criminalises causing hurt or grievous hurt to extract confessions or information through violence or coercion.
  • Section 35, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) - Requires that all arrests and detentions follow legally valid, clearly documented procedures.
  • Section 22, Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) - Declares confessions obtained under inducement, threat, coercion, or promise as legally inadmissible.

Supreme Court Pulls Up Centre for Ignoring CCTV Directions

  • The Supreme Court expressed displeasure that only 11 States/UTs had filed compliance affidavits regarding the installation of functional CCTVs in police stations. 
  • The Union government had not filed its response either.

Background: The 2020 Nariman Judgment

  • In Paramvir Singh Saini vs Baljit Singh (2020), the Supreme Court mandated CCTV installation in police stations and offices of all agencies with arrest and interrogation powers — including the NIA, CBI, ED, NCB, DRI, and SFIO.
  • This was ordered to safeguard fundamental rights and deter custodial torture.

Debate on CCTVs and Security Concerns

  • The Centre argued that CCTV installation outside police stations could be counter-productive, citing security concerns. 
  • The court disagreed, referring to live-streamed police stations in the U.S. and the need for more open correctional facilities to reduce overcrowding.

Source: TH | IE | SCCO

Custodial Torture FAQs

Q1: Why did the Supreme Court criticize the Union government recently?

Ans: The Supreme Court criticized the government for failing to respond to its five-year-old directive to install CCTV cameras in all police stations and central agency offices.

Q2: What specific judicial order did the Centre fail to comply with regarding CCTVs?

Ans: The Centre failed to comply with the 2020 Paramvir Singh Saini vs Baljit Singh (Nariman Judgment) that mandated CCTV installation in all police and agency offices.

Q3: Which central agencies were included in the Supreme Court's 2020 CCTV directive?

Ans: The directive covered offices of all agencies with arrest/interrogation powers, including the CBI, ED, NIA, NCB, DRI, and SFIO.

Q4: What is the scale of the custodial torture problem in India, according to recent reports?

Ans: Custodial torture remains widespread; the NHRC reported 2,739 custodial deaths in 2024, an increase from 2,400 in 2023.

Q5: Which new criminal law section criminalizes causing hurt to extract confessions?

Ans: Section 120 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) criminalizes causing hurt or grievous hurt to extract confessions or information through coercion or violence.

Enquire Now