Tex-RAMPS Scheme – Boosting Innovation in the Textile Sector

Tex-RAMPS Scheme

Textile Sector Latest News

  • The Union Government has approved the Textiles Focused Research, Assessment, Monitoring, Planning and Start-up (Tex-RAMPS) Scheme.

Textile Sector: A Pillar of Manufacturing and Employment

  • India’s textile and apparel sector is one of the country’s oldest and most significant industries, deeply embedded in its cultural and economic landscape. 
  • It contributes over 2% to India’s GDP, nearly 11% to industrial output, and around 13% to total export earnings. 
  • With more than 45 million workers, it is the second-largest employer after agriculture.
  • The sector’s strength lies in its integrated value chain, from fibre, spinning, weaving, knitting, processing, to apparel and home textiles. 
  • India is among the world’s largest producers of cotton, jute, silk, polyester, and technical textiles, and is globally competitive in home furnishings and garment manufacturing.

Challenges Faced by the Textile Sector

  • Slow adoption of advanced technologies,
  • Limited R&D capacity,
  • Absence of an integrated data and analytics ecosystem,
  • Fragmented supply chains,
  • Rising global competition from technologically agile economies like China, Vietnam, and Bangladesh.

News Summary

  • The Union Government has approved the Textiles Focused Research, Assessment, Monitoring, Planning and Start-up (Tex-RAMPS) Scheme, with an outlay of Rs. 305 crore, to be implemented between 2025-26 and 2030-31. 
  • The initiative aims to strengthen innovation capacity, improve data systems, and enhance the global competitiveness of India’s textile and apparel sector. 

Aims and Vision of Tex-RAMPS

  • Tex-RAMPS is designed as a future-oriented intervention to address critical structural gaps that limit India’s competitiveness in the global textile value chain.
  • According to the Textiles Ministry, the scheme will integrate research, data, and innovation to position India as a global leader in sustainability, technology, and competitiveness.  The scheme aims to:
    • Build a strong national ecosystem for textile research and innovation,
    • Strengthen evidence-based policymaking through advanced data systems,
    • Promote sustainability and efficiency across the value chain,
    • Develop high-value textile start-ups and entrepreneurship,
    • Enhance collaboration between States, academia, industry, and government bodies. 

Key Components of the Tex-RAMPS Scheme

  • Research and Innovation Development
    • The scheme promotes advanced research in Smart textiles, Sustainability and circularity, Process efficiency, Emerging and frontier technologies.
    • This is expected to significantly boost India’s innovation capabilities and enhance global value chain integration. 
  • Data, Analytics, and Diagnostic Systems
    • Tex-RAMPS places strong emphasis on building a robust, real-time textile data ecosystem, including employment assessments, supply chain mapping, across-India study,  and standardized analytics for strategic planning.
    • The idea is to enable “evidence-based decision making” across the sector. 
  • Integrated Textiles Statistical System (ITSS)
    • A major innovation is the establishment of the ITSS, a centralised data and analytics platform enabling Continuous monitoring, Centralised diagnostics, and Strategic policy planning. 
    • This system will support State governments as well as industry bodies in aligning strategies with national goals.
  • Capacity Development and Knowledge Ecosystem
    • Tex-RAMPS proposes to Strengthen State-level planning units, Share best practices across textile clusters, Organise workshops, training programmes, and sectoral events.
    • These efforts aim to enhance human resource development and cultivate a strong “quality culture” within the textile value chain. 
  • Start-up and Innovation Support
    • The scheme actively encourages entrepreneurship through Support for textile incubators, Hackathons, academia-industry collaboration, Innovation challenges and early-stage funding support.
    • This is intended to nurture high-value textile start-ups and foster innovations in technical textiles, smart fabrics, and sustainable materials. 

Expected Outcomes of Tex-RAMPS

  • The scheme is expected to deliver significant long-term gains:
    • Enhanced global competitiveness of India’s textile and apparel industries,
    • A stronger research and innovation ecosystem,
    • Improved quality, productivity, and supply-chain resilience,
    • More accurate, data-driven policies and workforce assessments,
    • Generation of employment opportunities,
    • Deeper collaborations between States, academia, and industry.
  • Industry leaders note that the scheme will “strengthen the innovation ecosystem, promote promising start-ups, and deepen the quality culture” in the textile sector. 

Source: TH | PIB

Textile Sector FAQs

Q1: What is the total outlay of the Tex-RAMPS Scheme?

Ans: The scheme has an outlay of ₹305 crore for 2025-26 to 2030-31.

Q2: What are the key focus areas of Tex-RAMPS?

Ans: Research, innovation, data systems, capacity development, and start-up support.

Q3: What is ITSS under Tex-RAMPS?

Ans: A real-time Integrated Textiles Statistical System for monitoring and analytics.

Q4: Does the scheme support start-ups?

Ans: Yes, through incubators, hackathons, and academia–industry collaborations.

Q5: What outcome is expected from Tex-RAMPS?

Ans: Enhanced competitiveness, better policymaking, and stronger innovation ecosystems.

Why India’s Air Pollution Crisis Persists: Fragmented Governance and Flawed Policy Approaches

Air Pollution

Air Pollution Latest News

  • Every winter, Delhi sinks into its usual toxic smog, and India reaches for the same short-term fixes — cloud seeding, smog towers, water sprinkling, odd-even rules, and festival crackdowns. 
  • These highly visible measures create an impression of action but barely change actual air quality.
  • Public discourse deteriorates just as fast: scientists are accused of weak solutions, politicians of lacking resolve, and administrators of copying Western models without local adaptation. 
  • While each criticism holds some truth, none captures the full systemic failure.
  • This year, frustration spilled into small but peaceful public protests near India Gate. 
  • Around 50–60 people gathered on November 24, only to face heavy police presence, and five protesters were detained — reflecting both civic desperation and administrative defensiveness.

Fragmented Governance Fuels India’s Pollution Crisis

  • India’s repeated reliance on short-term pollution fixes stems from a deeper structural flaw: air-quality management is fragmented across numerous agencies.
  • Responsibilities are split among the Environment Ministry, CPCB, SPCBs, CAQM, DPCC, municipal bodies, and sectoral departments such as agriculture, transport, industry, and energy. 
  • With each institution overseeing only a slice of the problem, no agency has full authority or accountability for clean air.

Governance Constraints and Institutional Weaknesses

  • Environmental powers are constitutionally shared, budgets and manpower vary widely, and judicial pressure prioritises quick actions over long-term planning. 
  • With many actors involved but none empowered to lead, sustained progress becomes difficult.

Short-Term Measures Dominate

  • The dominance of quick fixes is also rooted in political incentives. 
  • High-visibility measures — cloud seeding, smog towers, anti-smog guns, odd-even rules — allow governments to show immediate action without challenging powerful polluting sectors like construction, transport, and agriculture. 
  • They cost little, fit easily into annual budgets, and avoid political backlash.
  • These interventions respond to headlines rather than the science of pollution control, providing momentary relief while doing little to improve public health.

Political Optics Over Public Health

  • Short-term measures help officials signal responsiveness during pollution spikes but fail to address structural issues such as waste burning, fuel quality, industrial emissions, and crop residue management. 
  • As a result, the air remains hazardous, and winter pollution keeps returning, exposing systemic gaps that require long-term, coordinated reform rather than symbolic actions.

Why India’s Pollution Policies Fail: The Intellectual and Western Traps

  • India’s pollution strategies are often shaped by elite institutions, think tanks, and top scientific bodies. 
  • While analytically strong, these actors are frequently removed from the lived realities of municipal governance — understaffing, limited budgets, informal economies, and political constraints.
  • As a result:
    • Policies look good on paper but falter in execution.
    • Strategies underestimate enforcement challenges and administrative gaps.
    • Many remain pilots, unable to scale due to lack of institutional support.
  • This trap prioritises what should work in theory over what can work in practice.

The Western Trap: Copying Global Models Without Local Adaptation

  • India routinely imports “best practices” from Europe, East Asia, and the West, assuming they can function the same way here.
  • However, India’s conditions differ sharply:
    • High-density neighbourhoods
    • Informal construction and transport sectors
    • Weak regulatory credibility
    • Limited institutional trust and administrative coordination
  • When applied without contextual redesign, global models collapse under India’s resource constraints and socio-political complexities. 
  • The issue isn’t foreign ideas — it’s the lack of localisation.

Building India-Specific Clean-Air Solutions

  • To overcome the intellectual and Western traps, India must adapt global ideas to its own administrative, political, and social realities. 
  • Even strong solutions need redesign to fit local constraints.

Need for Clear Leadership and Accountability

  • India’s air-quality governance lacks clarity on:
    • Who leads,
    • Who coordinates, and
    • Who is accountable across national, State, and municipal levels.
  • A modern clean-air law with explicit mandates could streamline roles, reduce jurisdictional overlaps, and ensure steady implementation.

Strengthening Institutions Through Stable Systems

  • Effective air-quality management requires:
    • Multi-year funding to build staff and maintain equipment
    • Public access to compliance data to build credibility
    • Visible enforcement to ensure rules matter
    • Consistency across election cycles, avoiding policy resets
  • These foundation blocks enable long-term progress rather than episodic, crisis-driven interventions.

The Missing Link: Science Managers

  • India needs a professional cadre of science managers who can:
    • Understand both science and governance
    • Translate expert knowledge into workable policies
    • Help ministries navigate complex transitions
    • Maintain coherence despite bureaucratic turnover
  • Without them, India’s scientific tools and models remain disconnected from actual policymaking.

Aligning Ambition with Capacity

  • India’s main gap is not ideas but alignment:
    • Policies often assume levels of staffing, coordination and public compliance that vary widely across cities and States.
    • Solutions must start from Indian constraints—informal economies, uneven urban capacity, budget limits, and diverse regional priorities.
    • Policies should be implementation-first, built around what agencies can realistically enforce and what communities will accept.

Source: TH

Air Pollution FAQs

Q1: Why does India rely on short-term pollution measures every winter?

Ans: Fragmented authority, political incentives, and weak long-term planning push governments toward quick fixes like smog towers and odd-even schemes instead of structural emission control.

Q2: What structural flaw lies at the heart of India’s pollution crisis?

Ans: Air-quality duties are split across ministries, regulators, municipal bodies, and sectoral agencies, leaving no single accountable leader for clean-air outcomes.

Q3: What is the “intellectual trap” in India’s pollution policymaking?

Ans: Elite-designed solutions often ignore the realities of municipal capacity, enforcement limits, informal economies, and political constraints—resulting in policies that fail in implementation.

Q4: How does the “Western trap” affect India’s clean air strategies?

Ans: India imports global best practices without adapting them to local density, informality, weak enforcement, and resource constraints, causing such models to collapse in real-world application.

Q5: What India-specific reforms are needed for lasting clean air?

Ans: Clear leadership mandates, multi-year funding, science-manager cadres, public compliance data, and policies designed for Indian administrative and social constraints—not Western templates—are crucial.

India’s Shift to Genome-Edited Crops: Faster Approvals, New Traits, and Fresh Policy Push

Genome-edited crops

Genome-Edited Crops Latest News

  • India’s genetically modified (GM) crop adoption has stalled since the approval of Bt cotton in 2006. 
  • However, genome-edited (GE) crops are progressing rapidly. In May, two GE rice lines—improved versions of Samba Mahsuri and MTU-1010—were cleared after multi-location trials in 2023 and 2024.
  • The enhanced Samba Mahsuri line showed a 19% average yield increase, while the GE MTU-1010 variant demonstrated tolerance to saline and alkaline soils. 
  • A third GE crop, a canola-quality mustard variety resistant to major fungal diseases and pests, is currently in its second year of trials across 16 locations. 
  • If successful, it may be released by August 2026, signalling a new phase in India’s agricultural biotechnology.

How GE Differs from GM: The Science Behind India’s New Crop Breeding

  • Genetically modified (GM) crops introduce foreign genes from unrelated species, such as Bt genes from Bacillus thuringiensis used in cotton to produce insect-killing proteins.
  • Genome editing (GE), however, modifies only the plant’s own native genes. 
    • Using protein enzymes that act as “molecular scissors,” GE alters specific DNA sequences to change how a gene functions—without adding foreign DNA. 
    • A custom-designed guide RNA directs these scissors to the exact spot in the genome.
  • For India’s new GE rice and mustard lines, scientists used CRISPR-Cas technologies:
    • Cas9 edited the drought-and-salt tolerance gene in MTU-1010 rice and 10 glucosinolate transporter genes in mustard.
    • Cas12a edited the cytokinin oxidase 2 (Gn1a) gene in Samba Mahsuri rice to increase cytokinin levels, boosting the number of spikelets and grain yield.
  • Importantly, Cas proteins—sourced from bacteria—appear only in the first-generation GE plants and are removed in subsequent breeding. 
  • The final GE plants are transgene-free, unlike GM crops that retain permanently inserted foreign genes.

Policy Push for Genome-Edited (GE) Crops in India

  • GE plants that contain no foreign DNA are exempt from the stringent biosafety regulations applied to GM crops.
  • Under a March 2022 MoEFCC memorandum, GE crops require only approval from an Institutional Biosafety Committee, which must certify that no exogenous DNA is present.
  • This bypasses the earlier requirement of clearance from the Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC) for field trials, seed production, or environmental release.
  • Because GE crops are considered similar to normal plant varieties, they face minimal regulatory hurdles, enabling faster research, trials, and eventual deployment compared to GM crops.

Strong Government Funding Support

  • The government has backed GE crop development through major funding allocations.
  • Research on improved GE rice varieties began in 2018 through the National Agricultural Science Fund.
  • The 2023–24 Union Budget allocated ₹500 crore specifically for genome editing.

Large Pipeline of GE Targets Identified

  • ICAR scientists have mapped and prioritised key genes across major crops for targeted editing:
    • 178 target genes identified in 24 field crops (cereals, pulses, oilseeds, cotton, sugarcane, jute, tobacco).
    • 43 genes identified in 16 horticultural crops (vegetables, fruits, spices).
  • Most of these crops now have full genome sequences available, allowing researchers to locate each gene precisely on its chromosome. 
  • Once a gene’s role in a trait is known, it can be specifically edited to improve yield, stress tolerance, nutrition, disease resistance, and more.

A Clear Signal of Policy Shift

  • Together, relaxed regulations and major funding underscore the government’s intent to make genome editing a mainstream tool in India’s crop-breeding strategy — a shift from the stalled GM crop pathway.

Building Human Resource Capacity for India’s GE Revolution

  • Training Scientists in Advanced Genome Editing
    • Developing GE crops requires specialised skills.
    • So far, nine ICAR scientists have undergone advanced training in the US, Europe, Australia, and CIMMYT (Mexico), with 12 more scheduled for upcoming international training.
  • Collaboration with Global Leaders in GE
    • In February 2025, the Innovative Genomics Institute (IGI) — founded by Nobel laureate Jennifer Doudna, co-inventor of CRISPR-Cas9 — conducted intensive training sessions for IARI scientists and students.
    • IGI also supplied advanced GE tools such as GeoCas9 and CasLambda, expanding India’s editing toolkit beyond Cas9 and Cas12a.
  • Indigenous Breakthrough: India’s Miniature GE Tool
    • A team led by Kutubuddin Ali Molla at the Central Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, has patented a homegrown genome-editing system based on TnpB proteins (Transposon-associated proteins).
    • Key advantages:
      • Much smaller proteins than Cas9/Cas12a → easier delivery into plant cells
      • Cheaper due to indigenous IP, avoiding costly foreign licensing
      • Highly effective for precision gene editing
  • India Positioned to Lead in GE Crops
    • With global collaborations, domestic innovation, and robust capacity-building, India is on track to advance its genome-editing ecosystem. 
    • Unlike GM crops — stalled for years — the GE pathway appears poised for sustained growth and adoption.

Source: IE | FDA

Genome-Edited Crops FAQs

Q1: What marks the major shift from GM to genome-edited crops in India?

Ans: Genome-edited crops progress faster due to CRISPR-based precision editing, transgene-free plants, and simplified regulations—unlike GM crops that faced long biosafety approvals and public resistance.

Q2: How do GE crops differ scientifically from GM crops?

Ans: GE crops modify native genes through CRISPR “molecular scissors,” while GM crops insert foreign genes. GE plants eventually become transgene-free, making them comparable to conventional varieties.

Q3: Why are GE crops exempt from strict biosafety approvals?

Ans: The 2022 MoEFCC memorandum exempts GE plants without foreign DNA from GEAC oversight, requiring only Institutional Biosafety Committee clearance, significantly speeding up trials and release.

Q4: What funding and institutional support backs India’s GE revolution?

Ans: The government allocated ₹500 crore for GE research in 2023-24 and identified over 200 target genes across crop types, accelerating large-scale breeding programmes.

Q5: How is India building scientific capacity for GE technologies?

Ans: ICAR researchers receive advanced global training, collaborate with the Innovative Genomics Institute, and even develop indigenous tools like the TnpB-based miniature editing system.

Enquire Now