NTA Under Scrutiny: House Panel Flags Major Exam Lapses and Calls for Reform

NTA

NTA Latest News

  • A Parliamentary Standing Committee has sharply criticised the National Testing Agency (NTA), stating that it “has not inspired much confidence” and must urgently improve its functioning.
  • The panel highlighted repeated delays in exam results, especially CUET, and noted that despite collecting a surplus of ₹448 crore over six years, the NTA has not built adequate in-house capacity to conduct tests independently. 
  • The committee urged the agency to strengthen its systems, infrastructure, and accountability mechanisms to ensure reliable and timely examinations.

About National Testing Agency

  • The National Testing Agency (NTA) was established in 2017 as an autonomous, self-sustaining organisation under the Education Ministry (formerly HRD Ministry).
  • It is registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and comes under the RTI Act.
  • Before its creation, UGC, CBSE, and central universities like DU and JNU conducted their own entrance exams.

Origins: When Was NTA First Envisioned

  • The idea for a national exam-conducting body dates back to the 1992 Programme of Action under NEP 1986.
  • In 2010, a committee of IIT directors recommended establishing such an agency through legislation, inspired by the Educational Testing Service (ETS), USA.
  • The government formally announced NTA in 2017, and the Cabinet approved its creation soon after.

Exams Conducted by NTA

  • NTA conducts India’s major entrance examinations, including:
    • Top Undergraduate Entrance Exams
      • JEE Main – Engineering admissions
      • NEET-UG – Medical admissions
      • CUET-UG – Admissions to undergraduate programmes in central universities
      • Over 50 lakh candidates appear for these three exams annually.
    • Other Major Exams
      • CUET-PG – Postgraduate admissions
      • UGC-NET – Eligibility for assistant professor, JRF, and PhD
      • CSIR UGC-NET – PhD admission in science disciplines
      • CMAT, Hotel Management JEE, GPATEntrance exams for DU, JNU, IIFT, ICAR, and others

House Panel Flags Serious Concerns Over NTA’s Functioning

  • The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Education has sharply criticised the National Testing Agency (NTA), stating that it has “not inspired much confidence” and must urgently improve its performance. 
  • The panel noted chronic delays, errors, and administrative lapses in major national examinations.

Repeated Delays and Exam Irregularities

  • The committee observed that NTA delayed CUET results for multiple years, disrupting university admissions and academic calendars.
  • Out of 14 exams conducted in 2024, at least five faced major issues:
    • UGC-NET, CSIR-NET, NEET-PG were postponed
    • NEET-UG faced paper leaks
    • CUET results were delayed
    • JEE Main 2025 had 12 incorrect questions withdrawn after answer key errors
  • The panel warned that such incidents erode students’ trust in the testing system.

NTA’s Financial Surplus Should Be Used for Capacity Building

  • NTA collected ₹3,512.98 crore in six years and spent ₹3,064.77 crore, leaving a surplus of ₹448 crore.
  • The committee recommended that this money be used to:
    • Build in-house capability to conduct exams independently
    • Strengthen regulatory oversight of outsourced vendors

Preference for Pen-and-Paper Exams

  • Citing CBSE and UPSC’s decades-long track record, the panel expressed support for pen-and-paper exams, noting they have been “leak-proof for several years” — implying computer-based testing may be more vulnerable.

Recommendation to Recognise Sonam Wangchuk’s Institute

  • The committee encouraged the UGC to evaluate Sonam Wangchuk’s Himalayan Institute of Alternatives, Ladakh, noting its innovative model and potential for replication across India.

Observation Regarding UGC

  • Draft UGC Regulations 2025 
    • Opposition fears they increase the Chancellor/Visitor’s control over Vice-Chancellor appointments.
    • Committee recommended detailed discussions with CABE (Central Advisory Board of Education) before finalising rules.
  • UGC Leadership Vacuum
    • The UGC Chairperson post has remained vacant since April 2025
    • Committee urges urgent appointment
  • UGC Equity Regulations 2025
    • Panel noted delays and recommended:
    • Inclusion of OBC harassment under caste-based discrimination
    • Addition of disability as a discrimination axis
    • Clear categorisation of discriminatory acts to avoid subjective interpretation

Source: IE | TH | ToI

NTA FAQs

Q1: Why did the House Committee criticise the NTA?

Ans: The committee cited repeated exam delays, paper leaks, answer key errors, and mismanagement, concluding that NTA has “not inspired much confidence” in recent years.

Q2: What financial recommendation did the panel make to NTA?

Ans: It urged the NTA to use its ₹448-crore surplus to build in-house testing capability and improve vendor oversight for more reliable exam administration.

Q3: Which major exams faced issues under NTA recently?

Ans: UGC-NET, CSIR-NET and NEET-PG were postponed, NEET-UG saw paper leaks, and CUET results were delayed; JEE Main had errors needing question withdrawal.

Q4: What reforms were suggested regarding UGC regulations?

Ans: The panel advised wider consultations via CABE, urgent appointment of a UGC Chairperson, and clearer anti-discrimination provisions including OBC and disability inclusion.

Q5: Why did the committee highlight pen-and-paper exams?

Ans: It argued that CBSE and UPSC paper-based exams have remained leak-proof for years, suggesting greater reliability compared to computer-based testing vulnerabilities.

Enquire Now