The Atomic Energy Bill 2025 – Opening Up India’s Nuclear Power Sector

The Atomic Energy Bill 2025

The Atomic Energy Amendment Bill 2025 Latest News

  • Recently, the Indian government cleared the Atomic Energy Bill 2025 — rebadged as the Sustainable Harnessing and Advancement of Nuclear Energy for Transforming India (SHANTI) Bill. 
  • The proposed amendments aim to overhaul India’s highly closed atomic energy framework by modifying the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 and aligning it with global practices to enable private and foreign participation in civil nuclear power. 
  • This move is crucial for India’s long-term energy security, climate commitments, and grid stability.

Reforming India’s Nuclear Sector

  • Energy transition and baseload needs:
    • Rapid renewable expansion without adequate energy storage has increased grid instability.
    • Thermal capacity expansion is slowing, and coal is environmentally and politically constrained.
    • Nuclear energy offers reliable baseload power and a low-carbon alternative.
  • Capital constraints, not technology deficit:
    • India’s push for global nuclear collaboration is driven more by capital requirements than technology.
    • Interest from foreign sovereign wealth funds, especially from West Asia, has been expressed.
  • Leveraging the Indo-US Civil Nuclear Deal:
    • Nearly two decades after being signed, the deal’s commercial potential remains underutilised.
    • The reforms are being packaged as part of India–US trade and investment negotiations.

Key Provisions of the Atomic Energy Bill 2025 (SHANTI Bill)

  • Opening up to private and foreign players: Private companies allowed up to 49% minority equity in nuclear power projects. Potential entry of foreign companies in partnership with global sovereign funds.
  • Expanded scope of private participation:
    • Exploration of atomic minerals
    • Fuel fabrication
    • Equipment manufacturing
    • Select aspects of plant operations
    • Research & Development (R&D) of civil nuclear technologies, especially Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) - under 300 MW nuclear fission reactors built in factories and shipped to sites.

Scaling Up Nuclear Capacity - India’s Ambition

  • Target: 100 GWe nuclear capacity by 2047, up from about 8 GWe currently.
  • Global comparison: USA (approx. 100 GWe); France (~65 GWe); China (58 GWe).
  • Nuclear Energy Mission:
    • Outlay: ₹20,000 crore for R&D in Small Modular Reactors (SMRs).
    • Goal: At least 5 indigenously developed SMRs operational by 2033.

SMRs - The New Pillar of India’s Nuclear Strategy

  • Why SMRs:
    • Smaller size, modular construction, quicker deployment.
    • Suitable for industrial decarbonisation and captive power (e.g., data centres, steel, cement).
    • Provide carbon-neutral baseload power, complementing renewables.
  • Indian SMR designs under development: 
    • Developed by Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) - 
      • Bharat Small Reactor (BSR – 220 MWe) – Pressurised Heavy Water Reactor (PHWR)-based
      • Bharat Small Modular Reactor (BSMR – 200 MWe) – Light Water Reactor (LWR)
      • SMR-55 (55 MWe) – LWR-based
    • Designs are at an advanced stage; no foreign collaboration envisaged initially.

Private Sector Interest in SMRs

  • Companies expressing interest: Reliance Industries, Tata Power, Adani Power, Hindalco, JSW Energy, Jindal Steel & Power.
  • 16 potential sites: Across Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Andhra Pradesh, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh.
  • Operational model:
    • The  state-owned Nuclear Power Corp of India Ltd (NPCIL) retains ownership and operational control.
    • Private players will fund the entire project lifecycle (including decommissioning), and get assured long-term captive power.
    • Concerns raised over ownership structure, charges and cost recovery, long-term project viability.

Nuclear Liability Law - The Key Bottleneck

  • Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act, 2010 (CLNDA):
    • Includes “right of recourse”, allowing operators to seek compensation from suppliers.
    • Foreign vendors (Westinghouse, EDF/Areva) see this as a major investment deterrent.
  • Proposed workarounds:
    • Capping supplier liability beyond a threshold.
    • Creation of a state-backed insurance or fund pool.
    • Aligning Indian law with global nuclear liability conventions.

Challenges and Way Forward

  • Political and public concerns over nuclear safety: Strengthen independent nuclear safety oversight. Promote SMRs for industrial decarbonisation and grid stability.
  • Private sector worries: Commercial viability and risk-sharing. Leverage reforms to deepen strategic partnerships (US, France, Russia).
  • Scalability issues: India’s PHWR-dominated reactor fleet. Gradually move towards globally dominant LWR technologies while preserving indigenous capability.
  • Need to balance: Sovereignty, safety, and openness. Integrate nuclear energy within India’s climate and energy transition strategy.
  • Managing liability reforms: Without diluting victim compensation. Ensure clear regulatory frameworks and predictable liability regimes.

Conclusion

  • The Atomic Energy Bill 2025 marks a paradigm shift in India’s nuclear energy policy, transitioning from a state-dominated, closed model to a strategic, investment-friendly and climate-aligned framework. 
  • If implemented carefully, the SHANTI Bill could become a cornerstone of India’s energy security and net-zero pathway.

Source: IE

The Atomic Energy Bill 2025 FAQs

Q1: How does the Atomic Energy Bill, 2025 seek to reform India’s civil nuclear sector?

Ans: It amends the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 to allow up to 49% private participation, ease liability norms, etc.

Q2: Why is nuclear energy being emphasised as a baseload power source in India’s energy transition?

Ans: Nuclear provides reliable, low-carbon baseload power to stabilise the grid amid renewable intermittency and constrained thermal expansion.

Q3: What is the strategic significance of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) in India’s nuclear policy?

Ans: SMRs enable scalable, cost-effective and carbon-neutral baseload power, especially for industrial decarbonisation and captive use.

Q4: How do the proposed nuclear reforms help leverage the Indo-US Civil Nuclear Deal?

Ans: By easing liability and opening equity participation, the reforms unlock foreign capital and revive stalled commercial nuclear cooperation.

Q5: Why is reform of the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act, 2010 crucial for nuclear investment in India?

Ans: The “right of recourse” provision deters suppliers, and aligning liability norms with global standards can attract foreign and private investment.

The Netflix–Warner Alliance and the Future of Cinema Explained

Netflix-Warner Alliance

Netflix-Warner Alliance Latest News

  • Recently, Netflix announced that it will acquire Warner Bros. for about $82.7 billion, including its film and television studios and premium assets like HBO. 
  • The deal signals a major shift in the entertainment industry, with a streaming platform absorbing a traditional Hollywood studio to become a fully integrated production and distribution powerhouse.

What the Netflix–Warner Deal Means for Netflix

  • The deal gives Netflix unprecedented control over content creation, ownership, distribution, and exhibition. 
  • While it strengthens Netflix’s library, cuts costs, and delivers economies of scale through vertical integration, it also raises concerns for creative independence, consumer choice, and the future of the cinematic experience.

How Streaming Platforms Have Reshaped Viewing Habits

  • Streaming services have transformed how audiences discover and consume content by enabling on-demand, home-based viewing and global access to vast libraries. 
  • This shift has weakened theatrical dominance and favoured binge-worthy, serialised content suited to subscription models over standalone films. 
  • The Netflix–Warner merger is likely to deepen this transformation by consolidating control over what content is produced, promoted, and ultimately watched.

Streaming as a Medium That Redefines Cinema

  • Streaming is not just a new way to deliver films but a distinct medium that reshapes how stories are produced, distributed, and consumed. 
  • As Marshall McLuhan’s idea that “the medium is the message” suggests, streaming has altered the nature of cinema itself—shifting films from collective, immersive theatrical events to fragmented, individual viewing experiences. 
  • The Netflix–Warner merger intensifies this shift by centralising creative and distributive power, favouring high-volume, metric-driven content over bold, experimental filmmaking, and further homogenising what audiences see and how cinema is experienced.

Threats to Creative Freedom and Audience Choice

  • The Netflix–Warner deal risks tightening corporate and algorithmic control over creative decisions, favouring scale, predictability, and data-driven content over innovation. 
  • Independent and experimental filmmakers may be sidelined as slower-paced or niche projects lose priority. 
  • Consumer choice could narrow as recommendation algorithms push heavily promoted, formulaic content, while films are increasingly shaped for short attention spans, further weakening the immersive cinematic experience.

End of an Era for Legacy Cinema

  • Warner Bros., a studio that shaped Hollywood with classics like Casablanca and Gone with the Wind, symbolised the golden age of cinema. 
  • Its acquisition by Netflix is widely seen as confirmation that streaming has overtaken traditional cinema as the industry’s dominant force.

Fears Over the Future of Theatres

  • Although Netflix has pledged to continue theatrical releases, scepticism remains. 
  • Past statements by Netflix leadership calling movie-going “outdated” and the lack of clarity on theatrical release windows raise concerns that films may move quickly from cinemas to streaming, hurting theatre owners.

How Rivals May Rethink Their Strategies

  • The Netflix–Warner merger reshapes the competitive landscape, pressuring rivals like Disney+ and Amazon Prime Video to reconsider their strategies. 
  • Faced with a vertically integrated super-studio, competitors may pursue consolidation, alliances, or mergers, triggering a new wave of industry shake-ups. 
  • Others may turn to niche, regional, or art-house content to differentiate themselves, but such approaches could struggle against Netflix’s scale, reach, and marketing power.

Political and Regulatory Pushback

  • The proposed Netflix–Warner deal has drawn sharp reactions from U.S. lawmakers. 
  • President Donald Trump cautioned that the merger “could be a problem,” while Senator Elizabeth Warren called it an “anti-monopoly nightmare” that could raise prices and reduce content diversity. 
  • Senator Roger Marshall warned that excessive content concentration would harm consumers, workers, and competition.
  • Although the deal will not require Federal Communications Commission approval—since neither company owns broadcast stations—it is likely to face scrutiny from the U.S. Department of Justice, making antitrust review a key hurdle.

Source: TH | IE

Netflix-Warner Alliance FAQs

Q1: Why is the Netflix–Warner deal considered a turning point for cinema?

Ans: The merger marks the first time a streaming platform absorbs a major Hollywood studio, creating a vertically integrated content creation and distribution powerhouse.

Q2: How does the deal change Netflix’s control over content?

Ans: Netflix gains end-to-end control over production, ownership, distribution, and promotion, strengthening scale efficiencies but raising concerns over creative independence and diversity.

Q3: How has streaming already reshaped viewing habits?

Ans: Streaming has shifted audiences toward on-demand, home-based, binge viewing, weakening theatrical releases and favouring serialised, algorithm-friendly content over standalone films.

Q4: Why are filmmakers and regulators worried about the merger?

Ans: Critics fear reduced consumer choice, higher prices, sidelining of experimental cinema, and excessive market concentration that could harm competition and creative freedom.

Q5: How might competitors respond to the Netflix–Warner alliance?

Ans: Rivals may pursue mergers, alliances, or niche strategies such as regional or art-house content, though competing with Netflix’s scale and reach will be difficult.

How Airlines Are Countering the Surge in GPS Disruptions and GNSS Interference

GNSS Disruptions

GNSS Disruptions Latest News

  • Incidents of GPS/GNSS interference—mainly signal jamming and spoofing—have increased sharply in recent years, posing growing risks to safe and efficient flight operations worldwide. 
  • Once largely confined to conflict zones and tense borders, such disruptions are now being reported in a wider range of regions, raising serious aviation safety concerns.
  • GPS jamming and spoofing can disrupt navigation, cause aircraft misrouting, reduce separation between planes, and increase the workload of pilots and air traffic controllers, heightening operational risks.

GPS Interference Reported at Major Indian Airports

  • India has seen a rise in GPS/GNSS interference incidents near key airports. 
  • The Ministry of Civil Aviation informed Parliament that such events were reported around Delhi airport and other major hubs including Mumbai, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Chennai, Kolkata, and Amritsar. 
  • Except for border-adjacent Amritsar, incidents at these airports are a growing concern, with Delhi emerging as a significant hotspot, especially in November.

Global Nature of the Threat

  • India is not alone. GNSS interference has become a key global aviation challenge. 
  • Europe’s aviation regulator, EASA, has flagged it as a significant safety risk, particularly around conflict zones and regions such as the eastern Mediterranean, West Asia, the Baltic Sea, and the Arctic.
  • According to IATA, GPS signal loss events surged by 220% between 2021 and 2024.
  • With ongoing geopolitical tensions, industry bodies warn that GNSS interference is unlikely to decline soon, underscoring the need for sustained vigilance, technological upgrades, and international coordination.

Role of GNSS in Modern Aviation

  • Aircraft rely heavily on Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) for position, navigation, and timing (PNT) information, which is essential for safe flight operations and air traffic management. 
  • American Global Positioning System (GPS) is the most widely used system, alongside Galileo, GLONASS, and BeiDou.
  • GNSS works through satellite constellations and ground infrastructure that transmit weak signals to onboard receivers in aircraft. 
  • Although highly accurate, these signals are susceptible to interference due to their low power.

Jamming: Disrupting Navigation Signals

  • GNSS jamming occurs when strong radio interference overwhelms satellite signals, temporarily disabling GNSS-based navigation. 
  • While sometimes accidental or natural, most aviation-related jamming incidents are deliberate.

Spoofing: A More Dangerous Threat

  • Spoofing involves transmitting fake GNSS signals to mislead aircraft systems about their actual position or time. 
  • This can trigger abnormal system behaviour and false cockpit warnings, creating serious operational confusion.

Safety Implications for Aircraft Systems

  • Critical avionics such as Flight Management Systems, Terrain Avoidance Warning Systems, and Ground Proximity Warning Systems depend on accurate GNSS data. 
  • As IATA notes, interference-free GNSS services are essential to ensure flight safety and prevent system malfunctions.

Pilots’ Preparedness Against GNSS Interference

  • Although GNSS jamming and spoofing can pose risks to flight safety, pilots are trained to recognise such interference and respond methodically. 
  • They cross-check GNSS data with independent aircraft systems, ground-based aids, and air traffic control inputs, switching to alternative navigation systems when needed.

Identifying Jamming and Spoofing

  • Common signs of spoofing include inconsistent aircraft positions, mismatches between ground speed and airspeed, sudden time shifts, and false terrain or altitude warnings. 
  • Jamming is easier to detect, as GPS signals are typically overwhelmed or lost entirely.

Use of Redundant Navigation Systems

  • Modern aircraft are equipped with multiple sensors and navigation tools, allowing pilots to verify position, speed, and altitude. 
  • When GNSS data is unreliable, crews can rely on systems like the Inertial Reference System (IRS), which independently calculates position using onboard gyroscopes, accelerometers, and pre-flight inputs.
  • In rare cases, severe interference has led to rerouting or flight diversions.
  • However, because aircraft systems continuously cross-reference data, even sophisticated spoofing requires significant effort to disrupt operations meaningfully.

Layered Navigation Safeguards

  • GNSS in commercial aviation is typically used alongside augmentation systems such as Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) for navigation and Ground Based Augmentation System (GBAS) for precision approaches. 
  • These layers, combined with inertial navigation, ensure that pilots can maintain safe operations despite GPS interference.

Ground-Based Navigation Systems as Critical Back-Up

  • With GNSS increasingly vulnerable to jamming and spoofing, airlines and aviation authorities are turning back to conventional ground-based navigation aids (GBNAs) as essential backups. 
  • These systems form part of Minimum Operating Networks (MONs) to ensure flight safety when satellite navigation becomes unreliable.

India’s Preparedness and Global Alignment

  • India has retained MONs in line with global best practices. 
  • The government has confirmed continued reliance on conventional navigation and surveillance infrastructure and active participation in international platforms to adopt emerging technologies and methodologies.
  • The DGCA has made GNSS interference reporting mandatory in 2023.
  • As a result, regular reports have been received from airports including Delhi, Kolkata, Amritsar, Mumbai, Hyderabad, Bengaluru, and Chennai, highlighting the expanding scope of the threat.

Source: IE

GNSS Disruptions FAQs

Q1: Why are GPS and GNSS disruptions a growing concern for aviation?

Ans: GPS jamming and spoofing disrupt navigation and timing, increase pilot workload, risk misrouting, and threaten safe separation between aircraft, making them a serious aviation safety challenge.

Q2: Which Indian airports have reported GPS interference incidents?

Ans: India has reported GNSS interference near major airports including Delhi, Mumbai, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Chennai, Kolkata, and Amritsar, with Delhi emerging as a major hotspot.

Q3: How do pilots detect GPS jamming or spoofing during flight?

Ans: Pilots identify inconsistencies in position, airspeed and ground speed mismatches, sudden time shifts, and false terrain alerts, while jamming is detected through complete signal loss.

Q4: What backup systems do aircraft use when GNSS fails?

Ans: Aircraft rely on inertial reference systems, ground-based navigation aids, and augmentation systems like WAAS and GBAS to maintain accurate navigation without satellite signals.

Q5: Why are ground-based navigation systems gaining importance again?

Ans: As GNSS interference rises, Minimum Operating Networks using conventional navigation aids provide essential backups, ensuring flight safety when satellite navigation becomes unreliable.

ICMR Adopts Demow Model for National Snakebite Prevention Strategy

Snakebite Prevention

Snakebite Prevention Latest News

  • The Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) has approved a Rs. 13.5 crore, four-year multi-state implementation research project to develop a comprehensive national model to reduce snakebite deaths. 
  • The initiative recognises the Assam-based Demow Model as a successful community-led framework and aims to scientifically validate and scale it nationwide. 

India’s High Burden of Snakebite Deaths

  • Snakebite envenoming (SBE) remains a major yet under-addressed public health issue in India. 
  • The country accounts for nearly 58,000 deaths annually, the highest in the world. 
  • Snakebites primarily affect rural communities, agricultural workers, and tribal populations, especially in states such as Assam, West Bengal, Odisha, Maharashtra, and Jharkhand.
  • Despite being a preventable cause of death, India faces persistent challenges:
    • Delayed access to treatment
    • Lack of community awareness
    • Inadequate referral systems
    • Limited use of digital monitoring tools
    • Insufficient pre-hospital care
  • ICMR’s latest national initiative seeks to bridge these systemic gaps.

Overview of the ICMR National Snakebite Research Project

  • The new ICMR-backed project, titled “Zero Snakebite Death Initiative: Community Empowerment & Engagement for Mitigation of Snakebite Envenoming,” aims to formulate a replicable community-based model for reducing mortality. 
  • It will be implemented across seven states: Assam, West Bengal, Odisha, Kerala, Himachal Pradesh, Maharashtra, and Jharkhand. 
  • The research will be coordinated under SARPA (Snakebite Awareness, Response, Prevention & Action).
  • Key aspects:
    • Multi-state implementation research
    • Community empowerment and education
    • Improvement of pre-hospital and hospital care
    • Creation of a real-time digital dashboard for surveillance
    • Standardised data collection by appointed researchers and technical staff in each state
    • Research is scheduled to begin in January 2026.

About Demow Model

  • The selection of Assam’s Demow Model marks a significant recognition of grassroots innovation. 
  • The model has shown notable success in Assam’s Sivasagar district through strong community mobilisation and rapid referral systems.
  • Core Features of the Demow Model
    • High community participation with local volunteers acting as first responders
    • A robust referral network to ensure that patients reach health centres within the “golden hour”
    • Awareness campaigns on preventing snakebites and first-aid dos and don’ts
    • Training of ASHA workers, schoolteachers, and village leaders
    • Collaboration with local hospitals such as Demow Hospital 
  • Because of its strong outcomes, the model will now undergo scientific evaluation and may be scaled across multiple states.

Integration of Other State Models

  • ICMR aims to create a composite national-level model by integrating successful practices from different regions. The research will evaluate and merge the strengths of:
  • Maharashtra Model - Use of Protective Equipment
    • Distribution of gumboots and protective gear to high-risk agricultural communities.
  • Himachal Pradesh Model - Pre-hospital Anti-Snake Venom (ASV)
    • Administration of ASV in ambulances during transport is a breakthrough in early treatment. 
  • Kerala Model - Digital Coordination Platforms
    • Use of real-time digital tools to track cases, guide referrals, and coordinate health services.
  • Together with the Demow Model, these elements form the backbone of a potential national strategy.

Project Objectives

  • Primary Objective
    • Develop, pilot, and implement a nationally replicable community engagement model to prevent and manage snakebite envenoming. 
  • Secondary Objectives
    • Increase awareness and capacity among community members, health workers, and doctors.
    • Improve early referral and treatment-seeking behaviour.
    • Establish a digital snakebite dashboard for high-quality surveillance.
    • Generate evidence to support national policies on snakebite management.

Public Health Significance

  • Snakebite was officially recognised by the WHO as a high-priority neglected tropical disease, and India carries the largest global burden. 
  • A national framework can help the country:
    • Reduce preventable deaths
    • Improve rural health systems
    • Strengthen emergency preparedness
    • Enhance community resilience
  • Given India's varied ecosystems and agricultural practices, a multi-state, adaptable model is essential for long-term mitigation.

Source : TH | NENOW

Snakebite Prevention FAQs

Q1: What is the ICMR’s new snakebite initiative?

Ans: It is a Rs. 13.5-crore, four-year multi-state project aimed at developing a national model to reduce snakebite deaths.

Q2: Why was the Demow Model selected for the project?

Ans: Because of its community-led success in rapid referrals and awareness, making it suitable for scientific evaluation and scaling.

Q3: Which states are included in the research?

Ans: Assam, West Bengal, Odisha, Kerala, Himachal Pradesh, Maharashtra, and Jharkhand.

Q4: What is SARPA?

Ans: SARPA stands for Snakebite Awareness, Response, Prevention & Action, ICMR’s framework for coordinated snakebite management.

Q5: When will the research begin?

Ans: State-level implementation and data collection will begin in January 2026.

Enquire Now