Great Indian Bustard Latest News
- Recently, the Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment to strengthen conservation of the Great Indian Bustard, focusing on preventing bird deaths caused by collisions with overhead power lines linked to renewable energy projects.
- Acting on recommendations from an expert committee, the Court demarcated priority conservation areas for the critically endangered species and laid down a mechanism to reroute or manage overhead power lines in these zones.
Background: What the Supreme Court Was Examining
- A retired bureaucrat and environmentalist approached the Supreme Court of India seeking urgent protection for the Great Indian Bustard (GIB).
- The petition flagged rising fatal collisions with renewable energy transmission lines in Rajasthan and Gujarat.
- Poor frontal vision and heavy body make GIBs highly vulnerable to overhead wires.
Key Supreme Court Directions (2021–2024)
- 2021 order - Ban on new overhead power lines across ~99,000 sq km of GIB habitat; Assessment of undergrounding high-voltage lines; Mandatory bird diverters
- March 2024 modification - Withdrawal of blanket ban on overhead lines; Following concerns raised by the Ministry of Power, MNRE, and MoEFCC over feasibility and sector-wide impact.
Balancing Conservation and Clean Energy
- Court acknowledged the need to balance:
- Climate commitments and renewable energy expansion, and
- Protection of a critically endangered species
- Held that undergrounding alone is insufficient for conservation.
- It constituted an expert committee of wildlife and power-sector specialists.
Basis of the Final Judgment
- Expert committee recommendations guided the Court’s latest ruling.
- The judgment introduced targeted safeguards for the GIB while accommodating India’s renewable energy goals.
Measures Ordered by the Supreme Court
- Acting on recommendations from an expert committee, the Supreme Court of India approved a package of measures across three pillars:
- redrawing conservation zones;
- voltage-based mitigation for power lines (rerouting or undergrounding);Â
- creation of dedicated powerline corridors to reduce collision risk.
Revised Priority Conservation Areas
- Rajasthan: Priority areas expanded from 13,163 sq km to 14,013 sq km.
- Gujarat: Priority areas increased from 500 sq km to 740 sq km.
- These zones represent core habitats and breeding areas identified by the Rajasthan Forest Department and the Wildlife Institute of India (WII).
- Contestation: Petitioners opposed the exclusion of 657 sq km (eastern Rasla–Degray Oran), arguing it is a vital wintering and stopover corridor between Pokhran and Desert National Park.
- Critical sites prioritised include: Desert National Park; Salkha–Kuchri; Sanu–Mokla–Parewar; Pokhran Field Firing Range (PFFR) and its buffer/eastern periphery; Dholiya; Khetolai; and Chacha.
Dedicated Powerline Corridors
- Rajasthan: New powerline corridors up to 5 km wide, placed ≥5 km south of Desert National Park, to carry rerouted overhead lines.
- Gujarat: Dedicated corridors of 1–2 km width to evacuate power from wind/solar projects in coastal Kutch.
- Route optimisation mandate: Where multiple green-energy pooling stations terminate at a common grid station, authorities must converge routes into a common stretch wherever feasible.
Project Restrictions in Priority Areas
- No new overhead power lines within revised priority areas except via designated corridors (lines ≤11 kV exempt).
- No new wind turbines in priority areas.
- No new solar parks/plants >2 MW, and no expansion of existing solar parks, within priority areas.
Voltage-Based Mitigation (Undergrounding & Timelines)
- Rajasthan:
- Immediate undergrounding of 80 km of 33 kV lines (of 104 km identified earlier).
- All burying/rerouting to start immediately and finish before 2028.
- Gujarat:
- Immediate undergrounding of 79.2 km of 33 kV lines in priority areas.
- 64.9 km of 66 kV lines earmarked for immediate undergrounding.
- WII-identified 250 km of critical lines to be buried within 2 years.
- Â
Bird Flight Diverters: Evidence-Based Pause
- The Court did not issue blanket directions on installing bird flight diverters.
- Instead, it directed the committee to assess their effectiveness in reducing collision mortality and submit findings to the Centre.
Conservation Measures Directed by the Supreme Court
- The apex court endorsed a mix of general and State-specific measures to strengthen conservation of the Great Indian Bustard (GIB), alongside the ongoing Project GIB.Â
Measures for Rajasthan
- Grassland Restoration and Consolidation - Priority on restoration, conservation, and consolidation of grassland ecosystems, the GIB’s primary habitat.
- In-situ Habitat Management
- To support survival in the wild, the Court directed:
- Enclosure improvements to secure breeding and foraging areas
- Predator management, including control of free-ranging dogs and reptiles that prey on eggs
- Food and water management to stabilise resources
- Community engagement to reduce human-wildlife conflict and support local stewardship
Measures for Gujarat
- ‘Jump-Start’ Breeding in the Wild
- Adoption of a ‘jump-start’ method: transferring fertile eggs from Rajasthan to Gujarat.
- Technique involves swapping an infertile egg with a fertile one, enabling the female to incubate and raise the chick in natural conditions.
- Technology-Enabled Monitoring
- GPS tagging of birds to track movements and support the jump-start breeding process and post-release monitoring.
Source: IE
Great Indian Bustard FAQs
Q1: Why did the Supreme Court intervene in Great Indian Bustard conservation?
Ans: The Supreme Court intervened due to rising deaths of the critically endangered Great Indian Bustard from collisions with overhead power lines linked to renewable energy projects.
Q2: What threat do power lines pose to the Great Indian Bustard?
Ans: The Great Indian Bustard has poor frontal vision and a heavy body, making it unable to detect overhead transmission lines, leading to frequent fatal collisions.
Q3: What key measures did the Supreme Court order for GIB protection?
Ans: The Court ordered revised priority conservation areas, undergrounding or rerouting of power lines, creation of powerline corridors, and restrictions on new energy projects.
Q4: How did the Court balance conservation with renewable energy goals?
Ans: The Court acknowledged climate commitments but held that conservation cannot be compromised, adopting expert-driven, targeted safeguards instead of a blanket ban on power lines.
Q5: What conservation actions were directed beyond power line mitigation?
Ans: The Court directed grassland restoration, predator control, community engagement, in-situ habitat management, jump-start breeding in Gujarat, and GPS tagging of birds.