India’s Power Sector – Transitioning From Coal Backbone to Renewable Dominance For Net Zero

India’s Power Sector - Transitioning From Coal Backbone to Renewable Dominance For Net Zero

India’s Power Sector Latest News

  • A new study by NITI Aayog titled “Scenarios Towards Viksit Bharat and Net Zero” outlines possible pathways for India’s electricity transition up to 2070.
  • While coal currently dominates India’s electricity generation, the report projects a long-term structural shift toward renewable energy (RE).
  • This shift will be supported by nuclear expansion, storage technologies, and possible decarbonisation of coal through Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage (CCUS).
  • The study examines two pathways: Current Policy Scenario (CPS) – Continuation of existing policies, and Net Zero Scenario (NZS) – Accelerated pathway aligned with India’s 2070 net-zero target.

Present Electricity Landscape - Coal Still the Backbone

  • Coal accounts for about 74% of electricity generation, providing low-cost base-load power, grid stability, and round-the-clock reliability.
  • Installed capacity (December 2025):
    • Total: 513 GW
    • Fossil-based: 48%
    • Renewable: 50%
    • Nuclear: 1.7%
  • However, despite renewables constituting 50% of installed capacity, their contribution to actual electricity generation remains only about 22% (2024-25).

Structural Constraints in Renewable Energy

  • The gap between renewable capacity and actual generation is due to following structural challenges -
    • Low capacity utilisation factor (CUF): Solar and wind operate below maximum potential output.
    • Intermittency and variability: Solar and wind are weather-dependent, leading to curtailment, dispatch challenges, and grid instability risks.
    • Grid constraints: Limited transmission capacity, and inadequate system flexibility.
    • Storage deficit: Lack of large-scale long-duration energy storage. 
  • Because of these constraints, coal continues to provide essential balancing power.

Electricity Mix Projections up to 2070

  • Under CPS:
    • Renewable share in generation is expected to increase from 20% (2024-25) to over 80% (2070). The respective share of coal and nuclear will be coal share [74% → 6–10%], and nuclear [3% → 5–8%].
    • Coal capacity may rise from 268 GW (2025) to peak at 450–470 GW by 2050, and gradually decline afterward.
  • Under NZS:
    • Coal-based generation could fall to zero by 2070, and coal capacity may peak earlier at 420–435 GW by 2045, and decline sharply thereafter.
    • Renewables become the dominant backbone of the grid.

Massive Storage Expansion Required

  • A renewables-heavy grid demands unprecedented storage capacity.
  • Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) to scale up from less than 50 GW in 2030 to about 1,300-1,400 GW under CPS and up to 2,500-3,000 GW under NZS by 2070.
  • Pumped Storage Plants are also expected to play a crucial role in providing long-duration storage and grid stability, growing from 13-19 GW in 2030 to about 110 GW in CPS and 150-165 GW in NZS.
  • Storage becomes central to grid reliability, load balancing, and round-the-clock power supply.

Nuclear Power as Strategic Pillar

  • Targets:
    • The study identifies nuclear energy as crucial in a renewable-dominated grid.
    • It projects nuclear power capacity to grow from the current 8.18 GW in 2025 to 90-135 GW by 2070 under CPS — an increase of 10 to 15 times.
    • Under the NZS, nuclear capacity could touch 295-320 GW. 
  • Key roles of nuclear energy:
    • Firm low-carbon base-load power
    • Industrial high-temperature heat
    • Power supply for green hydrogen electrolyzers
    • Grid balancing support
  • The report recommends:
    • Advanced reactors
    • Small Modular Reactors (SMRs)
    • Transition of captive coal plants to SMRs. This helps reuse existing land, transmission connectivity, and industrial infrastructure.

Coal’s Continuing Role in Transition

  • Despite the clean energy push, coal remains indispensable in the near to medium term because storage remains expensive; nuclear projects have high capital cost, long gestation period; and renewables face land and clearance challenges.
  • In some pathways, coal continues even in 2070 with deep decarbonisation via:
    • CCUS: Captures CO₂ from coal plants. Stores underground or reuses it. Prevents atmospheric emissions.
    • This pathway becomes relevant if nuclear expansion slows, renewable deployment faces cost or grid barriers.

Alternative Pathway Risks

  • If nuclear growth remains limited, solar capacity may need to exceed 5,500 GW, storage requirements would rise dramatically, and grid stability risks would intensify.
  • This creates financial stress, infrastructure bottlenecks, and land acquisition challenges.

Challenges and Way Forward

  • Intermittency of renewables: Rapid scale-up of BESS and Pumped Storage. Improve market mechanisms for flexible dispatch.
  • High storage costs: Develop domestic manufacturing ecosystem for storage technologies. Promote CCUS research and pilot deployment.
  • Grid infrastructure inadequacy: Accelerate grid modernization and transmission expansion.
  • Nuclear capital intensity: Fast-track nuclear expansion including SMRs. Encourage industrial shift to nuclear-based captive power.
  • Managing stranded coal assets: Strategic planning to avoid stranded coal assets.

Conclusion

  • India’s electricity transition will not be a simple coal-to-solar swap. It will require a carefully calibrated mix of renewables, storage, nuclear expansion, grid reform, and transitional coal support.
  • Coal may remain the backbone in the medium term, but by 2070, renewables — supported by large-scale storage and nuclear power — could decisively reshape India’s energy architecture.
  • The real challenge lies not in installing capacity, but in ensuring reliability, flexibility, affordability, and system stability in a net-zero compatible electricity grid.

Source: IE

India’s Power Sector FAQs

Q1: Why has installed renewable capacity share in actual electricity generation remained modest in India?

Ans: Due to low CUF, intermittency, grid constraints, variability-driven curtailment, and inadequate storage capacity.

Q2: What projections are made under the Current Policy Scenario (CPS) and Net Zero Scenario (NZS) by 2070?

Ans: Under CPS, renewables exceed 80% and coal declines to 6–10%, while under NZS coal-based generation may fall to zero.

Q3: Why is nuclear energy considered a strategic pillar in India’s renewable-dominated electricity grid?

Ans: Because nuclear provides firm, low-carbon base-load power and grid stability, crucial for balancing intermittent renewables.

Q4: What is the role of energy storage in India’s long-term electricity transition?

Ans: Massive scaling of BESS and Pumped Storage Plants is essential to ensure grid reliability, load balancing, etc.

Q5: What is the continuing relevance of coal in India’s energy transition towards Net Zero?

Ans: Coal remains critical in the near-to-medium term for energy security and grid stability, with possible long-term decarbonisation through CCUS.

Enquire Now