Daily Editorial Analysis 20 August 2025

A Tribute to M.S. Swaminathan, ‘The Man Who Fed India’

Context

• The vision of Viksit Bharat, a developed India, rests heavily on building robust scientific capabilities, especially in the rapidly expanding digital economy.
• Achieving this aspiration will require self-reliance (aatmanirbharta) in key sectors, just as India achieved food self-sufficiency during the Green Revolution of the 1960s.
• At the heart of that transformative moment stood M.S. Swaminathan, a scientist whose work changed India’s destiny.
• As Priyambada Jayakumar’s recent biography, M.S. Swaminathan: The Man Who Fed India, highlights, his career offers timeless lessons not only for agriculture but also for the future of scientific advancement in India.

The Central Theme of Swaminathan’s Journey: Science as a Collaborative Endeavour

• A central insight from Swaminathan’s journey is that science thrives on collaboration, not isolation.
• The breakthrough that launched the Green Revolution did not come solely from laboratory research but from openness to international exchange of ideas.
• Swaminathan’s engagement with Norman Borlaug in Mexico, and his willingness to adapt foreign innovations to Indian conditions, exemplify how progress emerges from global scientific networks.
• However, his struggles with bureaucratic delays in securing Borlaug’s visit to India also expose the pitfalls of excessive administrative control.
• If the Green Revolution had begun even two years earlier, India could have avoided deeper food crises.
• The lesson for Viksit Bharat is clear: Indian scientists must have greater freedom to interact internationally, attend conferences, and build personal collaborations without being hampered by red tape.

Factors Contributed to Green Revolution’s Success

• Political Leadership and Scientific Listening

  • Another crucial factor in the Green Revolution’s success was political leadership that valued scientific expertise.
  • Leaders like Lal Bahadur Shastri and C. Subramaniam created the enabling environment for Swaminathan’s work.
  • Subramaniam, with his own scientific training, recognised the importance of providing resources for field trials when bureaucrats were hesitant.
  • This highlights a broader principle: in complex technical domains, politicians must listen directly to scientists rather than relying solely on bureaucratic intermediaries.
  • Countries such as China, where many ministers are technically trained, illustrate the value of scientifically literate leadership.
  • For India to achieve Viksit Bharat, it must cultivate decision-makers who understand and prioritise science, both at the central and state levels.

• Balancing Innovation with Scepticism

  • The rollout of the Green Revolution required bold political decisions amidst scepticism.
  • The massive import of 18,000 tonnes of seeds was opposed by the Finance Ministry, the Planning Commission, and ideological critics wary of U.S. influence.
  • Shastri resolved these conflicts not by waiting for consensus but by personally examining the scientific evidence.
  • This underlines the importance of leadership willing to take risks on innovative ideas while ensuring accountability through independent monitoring.
  • The eventual success of the Green Revolution demonstrated how decisive backing of new technologies can yield transformative outcomes.

Sustainability and Future Challenges

• While the Green Revolution solved India’s food crisis, it also produced unintended consequences, overuse of water, fertilizers, and environmental degradation.
• Swaminathan himself warned of these risks and advocated for evergreen revolution approaches to make agriculture sustainable.
• Unfortunately, many of these corrective measures remain unimplemented. Today, the challenge of climate change threatens to reverse gains in agricultural productivity.
• Science, once again, will be central to solutions, but India lags in agricultural research. While China has eight institutions among the world’s top ten, India has none in the top 200.
• Inadequate funding, limited institutional autonomy, and weak governance structures undermine India’s research capacity.
• Bridging these gaps is essential if India is to confront the agricultural challenges of the future.

The Broader Relevance of Swaminathan’s Story: Extending the Lessons Beyond Agriculture

• Reduced bureaucratic barriers so that scientists can collaborate globally.
• Scientifically informed leadership that listens to experts and supports research with resources.
• Courageous decision-making that embraces innovation despite risks, coupled with mechanisms for accountability.
• Sustainable practices that balance short-term gains with long-term resilience.
• Strengthening research ecosystems through funding, autonomy, and recognition of merit.

Conclusion

• S. Swaminathan’s life reminds us that science, politics, and leadership must work hand in hand to achieve national transformation.
• Just as his vision of food self-sufficiency reshaped India’s destiny in the 1960s, today’s vision of Viksit Bharat will depend on harbouring a culture of scientific excellence, collaboration, and sustainability.
• Honouring Swaminathan’s legacy means more than celebrating his past achievements, it means applying his lessons to secure India’s future.

A Tribute to M.S. Swaminathan, ‘The Man Who Fed India’ FAQs

Q1. What was the key factor behind the success of the Green Revolution in India?
Ans. The success of the Green Revolution came from scientific collaboration, particularly M.S. Swaminathan’s engagement with Norman Borlaug and the adaptation of Mexican wheat varieties to Indian conditions.

Q2. How did political leadership contribute to the Green Revolution?
Ans. Leaders like Lal Bahadur Shastri and C. Subramaniam supported scientific ideas, provided resources, and made bold decisions despite bureaucratic resistance.

Q3. What lesson does Swaminathan’s experience teach about bureaucracy?
Ans. It shows that excessive bureaucratic control delays progress, and scientists need greater freedom to collaborate internationally.

Q4. What were some negative consequences of the Green Revolution?
Ans. Overuse of water and fertilizers led to environmental problems, highlighting the need for more sustainable farming practices.

Q5. Why is strengthening research institutions important for Viksit Bharat?
Ans. Stronger research institutions with adequate funding and autonomy are essential to develop scientific solutions for future challenges like climate change.

Source: The Hindu

India’s Climate Taxonomy: From Policy to Practice

Context:

• In May 2025, the Ministry of Finance released India’s draft Climate Finance Taxonomy for consultation.
• The taxonomy aims to channel climate-aligned investments, reduce greenwashing, and guide investors on which sectors and technologies support mitigation, adaptation, or transition.
• It positions itself as a “living” framework, meant to evolve with India’s shifting priorities and global obligations.
• However, its effectiveness as a governance tool will depend on how well this adaptability is translated into practice.
• In this context, this article explores the need for a review architecture, the substantive aspects of ensuring legal and content clarity and institutional mechanisms for accountability.

Review Architecture for India’s Climate Finance Taxonomy

• A structured review system is essential for India’s climate finance taxonomy to ensure investor confidence, legal clarity, and global alignment.
• Drawing inspiration from the Paris Agreement’s Article 6.4 Supervisory Body, the framework should function on two levels.
  • Annual Reviews
    • These would address short-term implementation gaps, evolving obligations, policy changes, and stakeholder feedback.
    • They must follow a predictable process with fixed timelines, documentation standards, and mandatory public consultations.
  • Five-Year Reviews
    • A deeper reassessment every five years would evaluate the taxonomy against global carbon market trends, evolving definitions of climate finance, and India’s sectoral transitions.
    • This aligns with India’s Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC) cycle and the global stocktake under the UNFCCC.
  • Together, these periodic and recurring reviews would make the taxonomy both responsive in the short term and resilient in the long run.

Substantive Aspects of Reviewing India’s Climate Taxonomy

• A meaningful review of India’s climate finance taxonomy must focus on legal coherence and substantive clarity.
• Legal Coherence
  • The review should ensure alignment with Indian laws like the Energy Conservation Act, SEBI regulations, and the Carbon Credit Trading Scheme, while harmonising with international obligations.
  • It must address enforceability, remove redundancies, clarify overlaps, and synchronise with related fiscal tools such as green bonds, blended finance, and risk disclosures.
• Content Clarity
  • The taxonomy should remain clear, readable, and technically accurate.
  • Definitions must evolve with market standards and be accessible to both experts and non-experts.
  • Quantitative thresholds like emission reduction targets or efficiency benchmarks should be updated using data and stakeholder feedback.
• The review should also focus on inclusivity by ensuring accessibility for MSMEs, the informal sector, and vulnerable communities, with simplified entry points, phased compliance, and realistic expectations — particularly in agriculture and small manufacturing — to support India’s net-zero pathway.

Institutionalising Accountability in India’s Climate Taxonomy

• To ensure effective and transparent reviews, the Ministry of Finance should establish a dedicated unit within the Department of Economic Affairs.
• Public dashboards can be introduced to collect inputs, record implementation challenges, and publish review reports, ensuring both predictability and transparency.
• Annual summaries and five-year revision proposals should be made public in a consolidated format to enhance investor confidence and accessibility.
• This will also enable better alignment with parallel frameworks like India’s carbon market, green bond mechanisms, and disclosure obligations.

Conclusion

• The taxonomy rollout coincides with key shifts in India’s climate finance ecosystem.
• This includes – the operationalisation of the Carbon Credit Trading Scheme, mainstreaming of green bonds, and rising demand to align public investments with long-term climate goals.
• A weak or opaque taxonomy risks undermining these developments.
• Ultimately, the taxonomy must function as a true “living document” — kept relevant through active review, transparent revision, and structured engagement — if it is to succeed as a credible governance tool for India’s climate finance future.

India’s Climate Taxonomy: From Policy to Practice FAQs

Q1. What is the primary objective of India’s draft Climate Finance Taxonomy?

Ans. The taxonomy aims to channel climate-aligned investments, prevent greenwashing, and guide investors on sectors and technologies supporting mitigation, adaptation, and transition.

Q2. How does the review architecture strengthen India’s climate taxonomy?

Ans. It introduces annual reviews for quick course correction and five-year reviews for deeper reassessment, ensuring both short-term responsiveness and long-term resilience.

Q3. Why is legal coherence important in reviewing the taxonomy?

Ans. Legal coherence ensures alignment with Indian laws, international obligations, and financial tools, avoiding redundancy and improving enforceability for climate finance instruments.

Q4. How does the taxonomy plan to address inclusivity concerns?

Ans. It proposes simplified entry points, staggered compliance timelines, and realistic expectations for MSMEs, the informal sector, and vulnerable communities, especially in agriculture and manufacturing.

Q5. Why is accountability critical for India’s taxonomy to succeed?

Ans. Institutional mechanisms like a standing expert unit and public dashboards ensure transparent reviews, investor confidence, and alignment with carbon markets and green bonds.

Source: TH

‹ ›