FATF Highlights Digital Platforms in Terror Financing: Pulwama & Gorakhnath Attacks

FATF Terror Financing Report

FATF Terror Financing Report Latest News

  • The Financial Action Task Force (FATF), in a report, highlighted that digital platforms—including online payments, VPNs, social media, and e-commerce—were misused in the Pulwama (2019) and Gorakhnath Temple (2022) terror attacks.
  • The report, titled ‘Comprehensive Update on Terrorist Financing Risks’, serves as a global alert on the evolving and increasingly complex methods of terrorist financing. 
  • It warned that such platforms are increasingly being exploited for terror financing.

Financial Action Task Force (FATF)

  • FATF is an intergovernmental policy-making body established in 1989 at the G7 Summit in Paris. 
  • Its primary objective is to develop policies to combat money laundering (ML), terrorist financing (TF), and other related threats to the integrity of the international financial system.
  • Headquarters - FATF is headquartered in Paris, France, and functions out of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) headquarters.
  • Members
    • FATF comprises 39 members, including 37 jurisdictions and 2 regional organizations (European Commission and Gulf Cooperation Council).
    • India became a full member of the FATF in 2010, which enhanced its global financial credibility.
  • Key Functions & Roles
    • Setting International Standards for combating Money Laundering and Terror Financing through its famous 40 Recommendations.
    • Monitoring Compliance of member and non-member countries with those standards.
    • Conducting Mutual Evaluations to assess effectiveness of anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures.
    • Issuing Public Statements to identify high-risk and non-cooperative jurisdictions (also known as the FATF Grey List and Black List).
    • Encouraging Legal, Regulatory, and Operational Reforms in financial systems globally.

FATF Flags Rising Misuse of Digital Platforms for Terror Financing

  • The FATF report highlights how terrorists involved in the Pulwama (2019) and Gorakhnath Temple (2022) attacks used online payment services, VPNs, and e-commerce platforms. 
  • It warns that social media, messaging apps, and crowdfunding sites are increasingly being exploited for financing terrorism.

State-Sponsored Terror Financing

  • Without naming countries, the report notes that some national governments continue to financially and materially support terrorist organisations. 
  • This includes direct funding, logistical support, training, and sanctions circumvention via trade and smuggling.

Complex Financial Schemes

  • The FATF also points to commodity-based schemes, such as oil-to-gold-to-cash transactions involving multiple jurisdictions, used to move terror funds while evading detection.

Decentralisation of Terror Networks

  • The FATF report flags a global shift in terror operations towards decentralised structures, with regional financial hubs and self-financed cells adapting to local contexts. 
  • These cells use criminal proceeds, business investments, and local resources to sustain activities.

Pahalgam Attack and FATF's Prior Warning

  • The FATF condemned the April 22 Pahalgam attack, stating that such terror acts are not possible without financial support and money transfer mechanisms. 
  • It had announced plans for a detailed analysis on terrorist financing.

Storage and Trade-Based Terror Financing

  • FATF also noted gold and jewellery being used for storing small funds by ISIL or Al-Qaeda-inspired individuals in India. 
  • Trade-based financing schemes and decentralised decision-making—like Al-Qaeda in the Indian subcontinent (AQIS) managing operations independently—reflect an evolving strategy in terror financing globally.

Other Channels of Terror Financing

  • The report identified various other funding methods:
    • Human trafficking, wildlife smuggling, drugs, and virtual assets.
    • Donations, shell entities, shell accounts, and mobile apps.
    • Hawala routes, crowdfunding, extortion, and ransom collection.
    • Misuse of non-profit organisations.

Pulwama Attack: E-Commerce Misuse

  • In the 2019 Pulwama attack, aluminum powder—a key component of the IED—was procured via Amazon, revealing how e-commerce platforms can be exploited for acquiring materials used in terror attacks. 
  • Authorities attributed the attack to Jaish-i-Mohammed, with evidence of cross-border movement of explosives.

Gorakhnath Attack: VPNs and Online Payments

  • The 2022 Gorakhnath Temple attacker, influenced by ISIL ideology, used VPNs to hide his identity and PayPal to transfer ₹6.69 lakh ($7,736) internationally. 
  • He also received foreign funds and sent money to ISIL-linked individuals abroad. PayPal later suspended the account due to suspicious activity.

Conclusion: Exploitation of Digital Infrastructure

  • The report underscores a growing trend of misusing digital tools—e-commerce, VPNs, and online payment systems—for planning, funding, and executing terrorist acts.
  • This highlights the urgent need for regulatory oversight and monitoring.

Source: IE | TH | HT

FATF Terror Financing Report FAQs

Q1: What is FATF’s role in terror financing?

Ans: It monitors global financial systems, issuing warnings on terror financing risks and compliance among member countries.

Q2: Which Indian attacks were cited by FATF?

Ans: Pulwama (2019) and Gorakhnath Temple (2022) attacks highlighted misuse of digital platforms for terror-related transactions.

Q3: How were digital tools misused in Pulwama?

Ans: Aluminum powder for IEDs was bought via Amazon, showing how e-commerce aids terror equipment procurement.

Q4: What did FATF reveal about Gorakhnath attacker?

Ans: He transferred ₹6.69 lakh via PayPal using VPNs to fund ISIL-linked terror activities and hide digital identity.

Q5: What other methods does FATF mention?

Ans: Terrorists use gold storage, smuggling, crowdfunding, wildlife trafficking, and virtual assets to fund decentralized operations.

Kerala HC Arrests Ship Over ₹9,531 Crore Oil Spill Claim Under Admiralty Law

Kerala Ship Oil Spill Case

Kerala Ship Oil Spill Case Latest News

  • The Kerala High Court has conditionally arrested the Liberian container ship MSC Akiteta II, docked at Vizhinjam port, following an admiralty suit filed by the Kerala government. 
  • The action seeks Rs 9,531 crore in compensation for environmental damage caused by the sinking of MSC Elsa III on May 25 near Alappuzha. 
  • The sunken vessel, also linked to the Mediterranean Shipping Company, reportedly carried over 600 containers with hazardous materials, including plastic pellets and diesel, polluting Kerala’s marine ecosystem.

Law Governing Maritime Disputes in India

  • The Admiralty (Jurisdiction and Settlement of Maritime Claims) Act, 2017 governs maritime disputes in India. 
  • It allows admiralty suits for claims involving ship damage, ownership, wage disputes, environmental harm, and loss of life. 
  • This Act replaced outdated colonial laws — the Admiralty Court Act, 1861 and the Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890.
  • While earlier jurisdiction was limited to the High Courts of Bombay, Calcutta, and Madras, the 2017 law extends it to the High Courts of Kerala, Karnataka, Odisha, Telangana, and Andhra Pradesh
  • These courts have authority over maritime disputes within 12 nautical miles from the coast, including the seabed, subsoil, and airspace above.

Legal Provisions for Environmental Damage Claims from Ships

  • Under Section 4 of the Admiralty Act, 2017, High Courts can hear maritime claims for environmental damage caused by vessels, including claims for compensation and damage removal measures.
  • In addition to the Admiralty Act:
    • The Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 holds shipowners liable for oil pollution due to leaks.
    • The Environment Protection Act, 1986 empowers authorities to act against environmental polluters.
    • The National Green Tribunal (NGT) also addresses such claims. 
      • In 2016, it ordered a Panama-based firm to pay ₹100 crore for an oil spill after M V Rak sank near Mumbai.

Kerala's Admiralty Suit and Ship Arrest

  • The Kerala government filed an admiralty suit seeking the arrest of the vessel MSC Akiteta II to secure a compensation claim of ₹9,531 crore over environmental and economic damages caused by the sinking of MSC Elsa III.
  • Allegations of Corporate Structuring to Evade Claims
    • The state alleged that MSC Elsa 3 and MSC Akiteta II are “sister vessels” under the Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC), despite being registered under different shell companies, all operating from the same Geneva address. 
    • This corporate setup, it claimed, is a fraudulent device to frustrate genuine maritime claims.

Court Order and Justification

  • The Kerala High Court ordered the detention of MSC Akiteta II until the vessel’s owners either deposit the compensation amount or furnish adequate security. 
  • The court found merit in Kerala’s maritime claims, which include oil and cargo pollution.

Breakdown of Compensation Sought

  • ₹8,626.12 crore: Environmental damage due to the shipwreck.
  • ₹378.48 crore: Cost of remediation and pollution control.
  • ₹526.51 crore: Economic loss suffered by Kerala’s fishermen.
  • The compensation was calculated as per Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) guidelines, according to the government’s plaint.

Legal Grounds and Representation

  • Citing Section 5 of the Admiralty Act, 2017, the petition argued the High Court’s authority to arrest the ship even if MSC is a demise charterer.
    • A demise charterer, also known as a bareboat charterer, is a party that leases a vessel from its owner and assumes full control and responsibility for its operation, including crew, maintenance, and insurance, for a specific period. 
    • Effectively, the demise charterer becomes the "owner for the time being," though the legal title remains with the original owner.

Source: IE | HT | ToI

Kerala Ship Oil Spill Case FAQs

Q1: Why was MSC Akiteta II arrested?

Ans: Kerala HC ordered its arrest in a ₹9,531 crore environmental damage suit after MSC Elsa III sank.

Q2: What law governs the arrest?

Ans: The Admiralty Act, 2017 allows arrest of vessels for maritime claims including environmental harm and compensation.

Q3: What compensation is Kerala seeking?

Ans: ₹9,531 crore—₹8,626.12 crore for pollution, ₹526.51 crore for fishermen’s losses, ₹378.48 crore for restoration work.

Q4: What are 'sister vessels'?

Ans: Ships operated by the same company under different registrations, alleged to evade liability for maritime claims.

Q5: Which other laws apply here?

Ans: Merchant Shipping Act, Environment Protection Act, and NGT rulings support environmental damage compensation claims.

PARAKH RS Survey – India’s Learning Gaps in School Education

PARAKH RS Survey

PARAKH RS Survey Latest News

  • The 2025 PARAKH Rashtriya Sarvekshan (RS) survey has revealed significant learning deficits among students in Grades 3, 6, and 9 across India, prompting urgent calls for reforms in foundational education and subject-wise learning outcomes.

Introduction

  • The recently released findings of the PARAKH Rashtriya Sarvekshan (PARAKH RS) have revealed critical insights into student learning outcomes across India’s school system. 
  • Conducted across 781 districts and involving over 21 lakh students in Grades 3, 6, and 9, the national survey sheds light on learning levels in core subjects like language, mathematics, science, and social science.
  • The survey results indicate significant deficits in basic competencies, particularly in mathematics and science, among students in higher grades. 
  • States like Punjab, Kerala, and Himachal Pradesh emerged as top performers, while several districts in Jharkhand, Jammu & Kashmir, and Meghalaya lagged behind.

About PARAKH RS

  • PARAKH RS, formerly known as the National Achievement Survey (NAS), is administered by the Performance Assessment, Review, and Analysis of Knowledge for Holistic Development (PARAKH), an autonomous institution under the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT).
  • The 2025 edition of PARAKH RS covered:
    • 21,15,022 students
    • 74,229 schools
    • 781 districts
  • Subjects tested included:
    • Grades 3, 6, and 9: Language and Mathematics
    • Grades 3 and 6: Environmental Studies
    • Grade 9: Science and Social Science
  • In addition, 2.7 lakh teachers and school leaders participated through questionnaires to provide contextual data.

Key Findings: Grade-wise Performance

  • Grade 3 Highlights
    • Language:
      • 67% of students could effectively use and guess new words.
      • 60% could comprehend short stories independently.
      • 61% could read news, instructions, and basic materials.
    • Mathematics:
      • 68% could classify objects based on multiple properties.
      • 55% could arrange numbers up to 99 in order.
      • Only 54% understood multiplication as repeated addition.
      • Half of the students struggled with basic geometry and simple financial transactions.
  • Grade 6 Highlights
    • Mathematics:
      • Only 54% could use the place value structure accurately.
      • Just 29% could understand and represent common fractions.
      • Only 38% could solve real-life puzzles involving operations on whole numbers.
    • Environmental Studies:
      • 44% could identify elements in their immediate surroundings.
      • Just 38% asked questions and made predictions about observable patterns in nature.
      • 56% could explain the functioning of local institutions like markets, schools, and panchayats.
  • Grade 9 Highlights
    • Social Science:
      • 45% understood constitutional principles and national movement ideals.
      • Only 54% could identify key points in news reports or editorials.
    • Mathematics:
      • 31% understood number sets like integers and fractions.
      • Only 28% could apply percentage calculations effectively.
    • Science:
      • 37% could explain natural phenomena like winds or pressure differences.
      • One-third could demonstrate understanding of simple circuits and electricity.
      • 34% could distinguish between characteristics of living and non-living things.

State-wise Performance Trends

  • Top Performers:
    • Grade 3: Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, Kerala
    • Grade 6: Kerala, Punjab, Dadra Nagar Haveli & Daman and Diu
    • Grade 9: Punjab, Kerala, Chandigarh
  • Low Performing Districts:
    • Grade 3: Sahebganj (Jharkhand), Reasi and Rajouri (J&K)
    • Grade 6 & 9: Multiple districts in Meghalaya, including North and South Garo Hills
  • Interestingly, Kendriya Vidyalayas recorded low performance in Grade 3 Mathematics but were the best performing in Grade 9 Language, indicating intra-institutional disparities.

Policy Implications and Concerns

  • The PARAKH RS results underline a serious concern: learning deficits are widening as students progress to higher grades, especially in conceptual subjects like mathematics and science. These findings suggest the urgent need to:
    • Strengthen foundational literacy and numeracy in primary education.
    • Improve pedagogy and teacher training, particularly in underperforming regions.
    • Integrate formative assessment tools for early detection of learning gaps.
    • Reorient school curricula to foster critical thinking and contextual understanding.

Source: TH

PARAKH RS Survey FAQs

Q1: What is PARAKH RS?

Ans: PARAKH RS is a national learning assessment survey conducted by NCERT to evaluate student performance in Grades 3, 6, and 9.

Q2: Which states performed best in the 2025 PARAKH RS?

Ans: Punjab, Kerala, Himachal Pradesh, Chandigarh, and Dadra Nagar Haveli & Daman and Diu ranked among the top performers.

Q3: What subjects were assessed in the survey?

Ans: The survey tested students in language and mathematics (Grades 3, 6, 9), environmental studies (Grades 3, 6), and science and social science (Grade 9).

Q4: What were the major learning deficits identified?

Ans: Students showed weak understanding in fractions, percentage, electricity, geometry, and scientific reasoning across Grades 6 and 9.

Q5: What is the significance of the survey findings?

Ans: The results highlight the need to improve foundational learning and support evidence-based education reforms to bridge critical knowledge gaps.

Enquire Now