Karnataka Hate Speech Bill Explained: Key Features, Legal Gaps & Supreme Court’s Role

Karnataka Hate Speech Bill

Karnataka Hate Speech Bill Latest News

  • The Karnataka Hate Speech and Hate Crimes (Prevention) Bill, 2025 proposes 2–10 years’ imprisonment for offenders and introduces collective liability for organisations involved in hate-related offences.
  • The Karnataka govt argued that the Bill is required because no existing Indian law explicitly defines or addresses hate speech, exposing a long-standing gap in the country’s criminal framework despite frequent public debates on the issue.

How Hate Speech Is Currently Regulated in India

  • India lacks a standalone statute defining or penalising hate speech.
  • Instead, police rely on scattered provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which are designed mainly to preserve public order, not address hate speech as a distinct offence.

Section 196 BNS: The Most Commonly Invoked Provision

  • A successor to IPC Section 153A, Section 196 penalises:
    • Promoting enmity between groups
    • Acts prejudicial to harmony
  • Although arrests under this section are frequent, convictions remain rare — barely 20.2% in 2020, as per NCRB data.

Section 299 BNS: Protecting Religious Feelings

  • This provision (equivalent to IPC Section 295A) punishes deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious sentiments.
  • It is often invoked in cases involving religious insult or provocation.

Section 353 BNS: Incitement Creating Public Disorder

  • Section 353 criminalises:
    • Statements or misinformation that incite offences
    • Material disturbing public order or targeting communities
  • All these offences are cognisable, allowing police to arrest without a warrant, and carry penalties of up to three years.

Online Hate Speech and the Fall of Section 66A IT Act

  • For years, Section 66A of the IT Act was used to prosecute online hate speech.
  • In 2015, the Supreme Court struck it down for being vague and unconstitutional, leaving a gap in digital regulation.

Supreme Court’s Evolving Stance on Hate Speech Enforcement

  • The Supreme Court has adopted a proactive yet shifting approach to combating hate speech in recent years.
  • In October 2022, the apex court stated that a “climate of hate prevails in the country” and directed police chiefs in Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, and Uttarakhand to take suo motu action against hate speech without waiting for complaints — warning that inaction would amount to contempt. 
    • The directive was extended to all states and union territories in April 2023. However, implementation challenges soon became evident. 
  • In August 2023, SC Judges acknowledged that defining hate speech is inherently complex and that enforcement failures, not legal gaps, were the main obstacle.
  • More recently, in November 2025, a SC bench held that the apex Court was “not inclined to monitor every incident of hate speech”, pointing out that police and High Courts are competent to act. 
  • The bench referred to the 2018 Tehseen Poonawalla judgment, which requires nodal officers to prevent mob violence and lynching, reaffirming that the existing framework must be followed.

Past Efforts to Formally Define Hate Speech in India

  • Efforts to create a clear legal definition of hate speech have been ongoing for years.
  • In 2017, the Law Commission’s 267th Report recommended adding Sections 153C and 505A to the IPC to criminalise incitement to hatred and provocation of violence, offering a more precise framework than existing public-order provisions.
  • In 2022, a Private Member’s Bill titled The Hate Speech and Hate Crimes (Prevention) Bill was introduced in the Rajya Sabha. 
  • However, the Bill was never passed, and India still lacks a statutory definition of hate speech.

Karnataka’s Proposed Hate Speech Bill

  • Karnataka has become the first state in India to introduce legislation specifically targeting hate speech.
  • It draws inspiration from the Law Commission’s recommendations and the 2022 Private Member’s Bill.

Key Features of The Karnataka Hate Speech and Hate Crimes (Prevention) Bill, 2025

  • The Bill defines hate speech as any expression that causes injury or disharmony against individuals or groups based on religion, race, caste, gender, sexual orientation, place of birth, or disability. 
  • Notably, it expands protected categories to include gender and sexual orientation, going beyond what the IPC and BNS currently safeguard.
  • A defining element is the introduction of “collective liability” — if hate speech is committed through an organisation, individuals holding positions of responsibility in that organisation may also be held guilty.
  • Additionally, the Bill authorises the state government to block or remove online content deemed hateful, giving it regulatory power over digital speech in a way not explicitly provided under national law.
  • The Bill prescribes strict penalties:
    • 1 to 7 years imprisonment and a ₹50,000 fine for first offences
    • 2 to 10 years imprisonment and a ₹1 lakh fine for repeat offences
  • Offences are cognisable, non-bailable, and triable by a Judicial Magistrate First Class.
  • The Bill mandates adequate compensation for victims. It also exempts material (books, pamphlets, artworks, etc.) proven to be published in the interest of public good.

Source: IE | TH

Karnataka Hate Speech Bill FAQs

Q1: What is the Karnataka Hate Speech Bill?

Ans: It is India’s first state-level law defining and criminalising hate speech, prescribing strict penalties, collective organisational liability, and powers to block online hate content.

Q2: How is hate speech currently regulated in India?

Ans: India relies on scattered BNS sections like 196 and 299, meant for public order, not explicit hate speech offences, leading to frequent arrests but very low conviction rates.

Q3: What has the Supreme Court said on hate speech?

Ans: The Court urged suo motu action against hate speech, acknowledged enforcement gaps, and later clarified it cannot monitor every incident, stressing implementation of existing frameworks.

Q4: What earlier attempts were made to define hate speech?

Ans: The Law Commission proposed adding new IPC sections, and a 2022 Private Member’s Bill sought clear definitions, but neither proposal was enacted into law.

Q5: What are the key features of Karnataka’s proposed law?

Ans: It defines hate speech broadly, expands protected groups, introduces collective liability for organisations, prescribes 1–10 years’ imprisonment, empowers content blocking, and mandates victim compensation.

Concerns Mount Over Draft Indian Statistical Institute Bill, 2025

Indian Statistical Institute

Indian Statistical Institute Latest News

  • The Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation has released the draft Indian Statistical Institute (ISI) Bill, 2025, to repeal the Indian Statistical Institute Act, 1959. 

Evolution and Significance of the Indian Statistical Institute

  • Founded in 1931 by P.C. Mahalanobis, the Indian Statistical Institute has grown into one of India’s most respected centres for statistical research and interdisciplinary studies. 
  • Registered initially as a society under the Societies Registration Act of 1860 and later under the West Bengal Societies Registration Act, 1961, the ISI obtained the status of an Institution of National Importance (INI) through the Indian Statistical Institute Act, 1959
  • The institution’s historical contributions include the development of the National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO), which laid the foundation for India’s official statistical system. 
  • ISI has produced global stalwarts in statistics and mathematics, such as C.R. Rao and S.R.S. Varadhan
  • With six centres across India and nearly 1,200 students, ISI offers high-level education and research in Statistics, Mathematics, Quantitative Economics, Computer Science, Cryptology, Library and Information Science, and Operations Research. 

Key Features of the Draft ISI Bill, 2025

  • The proposed Bill seeks to transform ISI from a registered society into a statutory body corporate. 
  • This structural shift is framed by the government as a step toward modernising and strengthening ISI as it approaches its centenary in 2031. 
  • A press release cited by MoSPI states that multiple review committees, including the Mashelkar Committee (2020), recommended governance reforms and expansion of academic programmes for global competitiveness. 
  • The Bill introduces:
    • A new Board of Governors (BoG), empowered to make key administrative and academic decisions.
    • Provisions for ISI to significantly expand revenue generation through student fees, consultancy services, and sponsored research projects (Section 29). 
    • Centralised control over faculty selection, recruitment, and appointments.

Concerns Raised by Academicians and Students

  • The strongest criticism relates to the erosion of institutional autonomy. 
  • Academicians argue that converting ISI into a statutory body corporate undermines the original agreement under which the ISI society was formed. 
  • A letter signed by 1,500 academicians stated that the Bill violates the spirit of the Societies Registration Act and undermines cooperative federalism. 
  • Governance Structure Overhaul
    • Under the 1959 Act, ISI’s governance rested with a council that included significant academic representation, including 10 members from within ISI. 
    • The draft Bill’s new BoG is heavily dominated by government nominees, leaving no elected representatives from among faculty or researchers. 
    • This raises concerns of political interference, especially in appointments and academic decision-making. 
  • Threat to Academic Freedom and Long-term Research
    • Experts fear that increased focus on revenue generation may shift ISI away from basic research, which often lacks immediate commercial value. 
    • Critics highlighted that essential long-term research could suffer under a corporate-style funding model. 
  • Jurisdictional Conflict and Legal Ambiguity
    • Opponents argue that bypassing the existing society registered under state law infringes on state jurisdiction and risks undermining the established legal framework that has guided ISI for decades. 

Government’s Defence of the Proposed Legislation

  • The government maintains that the Bill aims to globalise ISI, strengthen accountability, modernise governance, and expand research programmes. 
  • It argues that the reforms are necessary to align ISI with global standards and to support its growth over the next decade. 
  • The Mashelkar Committee’s recommendations, cited as the foundation for the reforms, emphasise enhanced governance, restructuring, and institutional expansion.

Conclusion

  • The draft Bill remains open for stakeholder consultation. 
  • Opposition parties have signalled they will challenge the Bill if tabled in Parliament. 
  • Whether the government revises the governance structure, clarifies autonomy provisions, or addresses federalism concerns will determine the future relationship between ISI and the Union government. 
  • As India’s premier statistical institute, the outcome carries significant implications for academic freedom, research independence, and the integrity of the national statistical system.

Source: TH

Indian Statistical Institute FAQs

Q1: What is the draft ISI Bill, 2025?

Ans: It is a proposed law to replace the ISI Act, 1959 and restructure ISI as a statutory body corporate.

Q2: Why are stakeholders protesting?

Ans: They fear the Bill undermines ISI’s academic autonomy and increases central government control.

Q3: What changes does the Bill propose in governance?

Ans: It replaces the academic council with a government-heavy Board of Governors.

Q4: How might the Bill affect ISI’s funding model?

Ans: It encourages greater revenue generation through fees, consultancy, and sponsored research.

Q5: What justification has the government provided?

Ans: The government argues that the reforms will make ISI globally competitive ahead of its centenary.

Enquire Now