Budget 2026: Three Big Macro Challenges for India

Budget 2026

Budget 2026 Latest News

  • The Union Budget for 2026–27, to be presented by Nirmala Sitharaman, will outline three core aspects: 
    • the government’s expectations for economic growth and planned spending across schemes and departments; 
    • projected revenues from tax and non-tax sources; and 
    • the level of borrowing required to bridge the gap between income and expenditure, known as the fiscal deficit.
  • While the Budget formally marks a fresh financial year, it is rarely a blank-slate exercise. 
  • In practice, fiscal realities and policy commitments from previous years significantly limit the scope for major shifts, leaving only constrained room for fundamental change.

Why a New Budget Has Limited Room for Change

  • A Union Budget is constrained by committed expenditures and policy continuity. 
  • Salaries, pensions, and many subsidies cannot be easily altered year to year, nor can tax rates be frequently changed. 
  • Crucially, the Finance Minister’s choices are shaped by the state of government finances in the ongoing year. 
  • Shocks or stresses—such as exports hit by US tariffs—often carry over, setting priorities for the next Budget. 
  • As a result, reviewing the year just ended offers key clues to what the Budget can realistically address.

What Current-Year Data Signals: Three Key Macro Concerns

  • Current-year economic data point to several issues, but at the macroeconomic level, three broad concerns stand out as especially relevant for the upcoming Budget.

1. Weak Nominal GDP Growth: A Key Budget Worry

  • While India’s real GDP growth often makes headlines, it is nominal GDP—the total value of goods and services at current prices—that matters most for Budget-making. 
  • Nominal GDP is the base on which tax revenues, spending plans, and borrowing needs are calculated.

The Budget Arithmetic Problem

  • If nominal GDP grows slower than expected, government revenues fall short. 
  • For example, lower-than-anticipated nominal growth means less tax collection, forcing the government to either:
    • Borrow more, which can crowd out private borrowers and push up interest rates, or
    • Cut spending, potentially reducing funds for R&D, infrastructure, or welfare.

A Sustained Slowdown

  • India’s nominal GDP growth has been decelerating for years. For the current year, it is expected to grow by just 8%, markedly lower than the levels seen over the past two decades. 
  • This is below the 10.1% growth assumed in last year’s Budget and reflects a recent secular slowdown.

Implications for Budget 2026

  • The First Advance Estimates now peg nominal GDP growth at 8%, tightening fiscal space. 
  • The foremost challenge for the Finance Minister is to devise a strategy to lift nominal GDP growth in the coming year to stabilise revenues and avoid difficult trade-offs between borrowing and spending.

2. Weak Tax Buoyancy: Revenues Falling Short of Expectations

  • Tax buoyancy measures how tax revenues respond to economic growth. 
  • A buoyancy of 1 means tax collections rise in line with GDP. If GDP grows 10%, taxes grow 10%. Budgets often assume buoyancy above 1 to fund spending.
  • If nominal GDP grows less than expected and tax buoyancy is lower, revenue shortfalls multiply. 
  • For instance, slower GDP growth combined with a buoyancy of 0.5 can slash expected additional revenues sharply.

What’s Happening This Year

  • Actual tax collections are lagging Budget assumptions across categories. 
  • Year-to-date growth in taxes trails the government’s targets—and is even below the weak nominal GDP growth rate (around 8%).
  • Data show that while the Budget assumed tax buoyancy of 1.1, the actual buoyancy is closer to 0.6. 
  • In other words, tax revenues are growing at barely half the pace anticipated relative to GDP.

Implications for the Budget

  • Weak tax buoyancy tightens fiscal space. 
  • With revenues underperforming, the government faces tougher choices between higher borrowing and spending restraint, complicating Budget 2026 planning.

3. Weak Private Corporate Investment: A Persistent Growth Challenge

  • A central policy objective of the government has been to expand the role of the private sector under the idea of “Minimum Government”. 
  • Since 2019, this has translated into sharp corporate tax cuts, higher public capital expenditure, and targeted incentives like the Production Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme to lower costs and crowd in private investment.
  • When investment did not respond as expected, the government shifted focus to boosting demand—raising income tax exemptions and cutting GST rates—to improve sales prospects and create a stronger business case for private investment.

Investment Still Below Pre-Pandemic Levels

  • Despite these measures and strong headline GDP growth, data show that private corporate investment remains below pre-pandemic (2019) levels. 
  • Firms are hesitant to invest widely, largely because sales growth has not been strong enough to justify fresh capacity creation.
  • Adding to concerns, foreign investors have also reduced exposure to India in recent periods. 
  • This has put pressure on the rupee, creating economic and political challenges for Nirmala Sitharaman.

The Budget Dilemma

  • The key question for the upcoming Budget is how to revive private investment—what additional incentives or reforms can restore confidence, lift demand, and persuade both domestic and global investors to commit capital more decisively.

Source: IE | HT

Budget 2026 FAQs

Q1: Why is Budget 2026 not a blank-slate exercise?

Ans: Budget 2026 is constrained by committed spending, fixed tax structures, and ongoing fiscal realities, leaving limited scope for sharp policy shifts despite the start of a new financial year.

Q2: Why does nominal GDP matter more for Budget 2026?

Ans: For Budget 2026, nominal GDP determines tax revenues, spending capacity, and borrowing needs; slower nominal growth directly reduces fiscal space even if real GDP growth appears strong.

Q3: How does weak tax buoyancy affect Budget 2026?

Ans: Weak tax buoyancy means tax collections grow slower than GDP, worsening revenue shortfalls in Budget 2026 and forcing tougher choices between higher borrowing and spending cuts.

Q4: Why is private investment a concern for Budget 2026?

Ans: Despite tax cuts, capex push, and PLI schemes, private corporate investment remains below pre-pandemic levels, limiting growth momentum and complicating Budget 2026 objectives.

Q5: What is the key dilemma facing Budget 2026?

Ans: The central dilemma in Budget 2026 is how to revive growth amid weak revenues, slowing nominal GDP, low tax buoyancy, and hesitant domestic and foreign private investors.

Economic Survey Raises Potential Growth to 7%

Economic Survey Raises Potential Growth to 7%

Potential Growth Latest News

  • The latest Economic Survey, led by V Anantha Nageswaran, has reassessed India’s long-term economic prospects and raised the country’s potential growth rate from 6.5% to 7%. 
  • This reassessment comes amid an active debate on India’s current GDP growth trajectory and reflects the Survey’s view of improved structural and medium-term growth capacity of the economy.

What Is Potential Economic Growth and Why It Matters

  • A country’s potential growth rate differs from its annual GDP growth. 
  • While GDP growth measures how fast the economy expands in a given year, potential growth shows the pace at which it can grow without causing high inflation. 
  • If growth exceeds this level, demand outstrips supply and prices rise; if it falls below, resources remain underused. 
  • Therefore, to achieve sustainably higher growth, governments must focus on raising the economy’s potential growth rate, not just boosting short-term demand.

What Determines a Country’s Potential Growth Rate

  • Capital Stock - Potential growth depends on the size and quality of physical assets—such as roads, bridges, ports, factories, and machinery—that support production and expansion in the economy.
  • Labour Input - This includes not just the number of workers, but also their skills, productivity, and capacity, which directly influence how much an economy can produce.
  • Total Factor Productivity (TFP) - TFP reflects how efficiently labour and capital are used together. Higher efficiency allows faster growth without inflationary pressure.

India’s Declining Potential Growth: The Trend

  • Research by the Reserve Bank of India shows that India’s potential growth rate has declined over time:
    • 2003–2008: around 8%, India’s highest growth phase
    • 2009–2015: fell to 7%
    • Around the Covid-19 period: declined further to 6.5%, as acknowledged by the Chief Economic Adviser.
  • This decline underscores the need for sustained reforms to rebuild long-term growth capacity.

Why the Economic Survey Sees Higher Potential Growth

  • Reforms Lifting Medium-Term Growth - The Chief Economic Adviser notes that the cumulative impact of recent policy reforms has raised India’s medium-term potential growth to around 7%, reversing earlier declines.
  • Manufacturing and Supply-Side Push - Key reforms over the past three years—PLI schemes, FDI liberalisation, and logistics improvements—have strengthened manufacturing capacity and boosted the economy’s ability to expand supply.
  • Labour Market Improvements - Measures such as labour law consolidation, lower regulatory compliance, and state-level reforms, along with investments in education, skilling, and apprenticeships, have reduced labour market frictions and improved employability.
  • Conditions for Sustained Gains - The Survey stresses that credible increases in potential growth require persistent reforms and macroeconomic stability—conditions it says India currently meets.
  • The Caveat: External Risks - Despite domestic strengths, the Survey cautions that geopolitical conflicts and global disruptions could still constrain India’s ability to fully realise its growth potential.

Source: IE

Potential Growth FAQs

Q1: What does potential growth mean in the Economic Survey?

Ans: Potential growth refers to the maximum sustainable growth rate an economy can achieve without triggering high inflation, unlike annual GDP growth which fluctuates year to year.

Q2: Why did India’s potential growth decline earlier?

Ans: India’s potential growth fell from 8% to 6.5% over two decades due to weaker productivity gains, slowing investment, labour market frictions, and efficiency losses highlighted by RBI research.

Q3: Why has potential growth been raised to 7% now?

Ans: The Economic Survey says cumulative reforms over recent years have strengthened supply capacity, lifting India’s medium-term potential growth closer to 7%.

Q4: Which reforms contributed to higher potential growth?

Ans: Manufacturing-focused reforms like PLI schemes, FDI liberalisation, logistics improvements, and labour law consolidation have boosted India’s productive capacity and potential growth.

Q5: What risks could limit India’s potential growth?

Ans: Despite domestic reforms and stability, geopolitical conflicts, global disruptions, and external shocks could prevent India from fully realising its higher potential growth.

Jal Jeevan Mission – Coverage Versus Functionality in Water Supply

Jal Jeevan Mission

Jal Jeevan Mission Latest News

  • A 2024 government-commissioned survey revealed that while nearly 98% of rural households have tap connections under the Jal Jeevan Mission, only about three-fourths receive a reliable and safe water supply. 

Overview of Jal Jeevan Mission

  • The Jal Jeevan Mission (JJM), launched in 2019, is a flagship programme of the Government of India aimed at providing Functional Household Tap Connections (FHTCs) to all rural households. 
  • The scheme seeks to ensure 55 litres of potable water per person per day on a regular basis, with an emphasis on water quality, sustainability of sources, and community participation.
  • Unlike earlier water supply programmes that focused primarily on infrastructure creation, JJM adopts a service delivery approach, where functionality, water quality, and regularity are central performance indicators. 
  • The mission is implemented in partnership with States, with funding shared between the Centre and States.

Current Status of Rural Tap Water Coverage

  • According to official data, the Jal Jeevan Mission has expanded tap water coverage at an unprecedented scale. 
  • From less than 20% rural coverage in 2019, India has reached close to universal household tap connectivity by 2024-25.
  • States such as Goa, Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh, and several Union Territories report over 97% tap availability. 
  • As of early 2026, more than 2.7 lakh villages have been certified as “Har Ghar Jal” villages, indicating that all households and public institutions in these villages have tap connections.
  • However, coverage certification is largely based on infrastructure availability and does not always reflect actual water delivery or quality.

Functionality and Water Quality Concerns

  • The core objective of the Jal Jeevan Mission is not merely tap installation but a functional and safe water supply. 
  • The recent Functionality Assessment of Household Tap Connections highlights significant gaps in this regard.
  • Only 83% of surveyed households reported receiving water through taps at least once in the previous seven days. 
  • Even fewer households consistently received the prescribed 55 litres per capita per day, with just 80% meeting the quantity norm.
  • Water quality emerged as a critical concern. Tests for E. coli, faecal coliform, and pH levels showed that only 76% of households received water meeting basic safety standards. When availability, regularity, and quality were assessed together, only three-fourths of households were found to be benefiting from the scheme as intended. 

Regional Variations in Performance

  • The survey revealed sharp inter-State variations. While coastal and better-performing States recorded high functionality, States such as Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Nagaland, and Sikkim lagged behind on water availability and quantity benchmarks.
  • For instance, Bihar reported water flow in only about 61% of households, while Sikkim showed particularly low compliance with per capita water supply norms. 
  • These disparities underline differences in source sustainability, groundwater availability, terrain, and institutional capacity at the State and district levels.

Financial and Implementation Challenges

  • The Jal Jeevan Mission is among the most resource-intensive welfare programmes undertaken by India. 
  • Since 2019, over Rs. 3.6 lakh crore has been spent on rural water infrastructure. 
  • However, recent budgetary trends indicate underutilisation of allocated funds, with actual expenditure falling significantly short of provisions in some years.
  • The original target of achieving 100% functional coverage by 2024 has now been extended to 2028, acknowledging the complexity of last-mile delivery, operation and maintenance, and source sustainability challenges. 
  • Estimates suggest that the remaining uncovered and non-functional households may require nearly Rs. 4 lakh crore in additional investment.

Institutional and Monitoring Framework

  • To address implementation gaps, the Jal Jeevan Mission relies on multiple monitoring tools, including third-party surveys, village-level water committees, and real-time dashboards. 
  • The functionality assessment survey conducted in 2024 covered over 2.3 lakh households across certified Har Ghar Jal villages, offering a more nuanced picture beyond official coverage figures.
  • However, the Ministry has cautioned that results are not directly comparable with earlier assessments due to changes in methodology and survey scope.

Way Forward for Sustainable Rural Water Supply

  • Ensuring the long-term success of the Jal Jeevan Mission requires a shift from infrastructure expansion to system sustainability. 
  • Key priorities include strengthening local operation and maintenance mechanisms, improving water source recharge, enhancing water quality surveillance, and empowering Panchayats and user committees.
  • Greater emphasis on climate-resilient water planning, especially in water-stressed regions, and integration of JJM with sanitation, groundwater management, and health programmes will be essential to translate tap coverage into real welfare gains.

Source: TH

Jal Jeevan Mission FAQs

Q1: What is the primary objective of the Jal Jeevan Mission?

Ans: To provide functional household tap connections with safe drinking water to all rural households.

Q2: What percentage of rural households currently have tap connections?

Ans: About 98% of rural households have tap connections under the scheme.

Q3: How many households receive water meeting quality standards?

Ans: Only around 76% receive water that meets basic quality parameters.

Q4: What is the prescribed water supply norm under JJM?

Ans: 55 litres of potable water per person per day.

Q5: By when has the Jal Jeevan Mission target been extended?

Ans: The target for full functional coverage has been extended to 2028.

Enquire Now