Prahaar Counter-Terrorism Policy: India’s First Comprehensive Anti-Terror Doctrine Explained

Prahaar Counter-Terrorism Policy

Prahaar Counter-Terrorism Policy Latest News

  • The Centre has launched ‘Prahaar’, India’s first comprehensive counter-terrorism policy. Built on a zero-tolerance approach, it emphasises intelligence-led prevention and coordinated responses to extremist violence. 
  • The framework aims to dismantle terror networks by cutting off access to funding, weapons, and safe havens, both within India and abroad, targeting not just terrorists but also their financiers and supporters.

India’s First Counter-Terrorism Policy: Prahaar

  • The Centre has unveiled India’s first comprehensive counter-terrorism policy, “Prahaar”, aimed at strengthening the country’s fight against extremist violence through a coordinated, intelligence-driven approach.

Core Objective

  • Prahaar aims to:
    • Criminalise all terrorist acts.
    • Starve terrorists, their financiers and supporters of funding, weapons, safe havens and cyber resources.
    • Strengthen coordinated action among central and state agencies.

Guiding Principles

  • Zero Tolerance: No justification for terrorism under any circumstances.
  • Victim-Centric Approach: India stands firmly with victims of terror.
  • No Religious Attribution: Terrorism is not associated with any religion, ethnicity, or civilisation.
  • Concern Over State Sponsorship: Notes that some countries in the region have used terrorism as an instrument of state policy.

Seven Key Pillars of Prahaar

  • Each letter of the acronym represents a strategic pillar:
  • Prevention
    • Intelligence-led, proactive measures to stop attacks before they occur.
    • Continuous disruption of overground worker networks and cyber activities.
  • Responses
    • Swift, proportionate, and graded counter-terror responses.
    • Uniform anti-terror structures and standard operating procedures across levels of governance.
  • Aggregating Internal Capacities
    • Whole-of-government approach.
    • Modernisation of law enforcement agencies (LEAs) with advanced tools, technology, and weaponry.
    • Enhanced coordination in intelligence collection and investigation.
  • Human Rights and Rule of Law
    • Safeguarding due process with multiple levels of redressal and appeal.
    • Legal reforms in the counter-terror framework as required.
  • Attenuating Enabling Conditions
    • Graded police response to radicalisation.
    • Legal action based on degree of radicalisation.
    • Addressing socio-economic vulnerabilities of youth through education, engagement and de-radicalisation programmes.
  • Aligning International Efforts
    • Strengthening global cooperation.
    • Use of treaties, extradition and deportation under UN norms.
    • Collaboration to counter misuse of ICT by terrorists.
  • Recovery and Resilience
    • Whole-of-society approach to rebuilding and strengthening community resilience after terror incidents.

Key Threat Perceptions

  • Cross-Border and State-Sponsored Terror
    • India has faced cross-border sponsored terrorism, including jihadist outfits and their frontal organisations.
    • Global terror groups like Al-Qaeda and ISIS have attempted to incite violence through sleeper cells.
    • Terror handlers abroad have used drones and advanced technologies to facilitate attacks, especially in Punjab and Jammu & Kashmir.
    • Terror groups increasingly collaborate with criminal networks for logistics and recruitment.
  • Technology-Driven Terrorism
    • Use of drones in Punjab and J&K.
    • Exploitation of encryption, dark web and cryptocurrencies for anonymity.
    • Use of social media and encrypted messaging apps for propaganda, recruitment, and funding.
    • Risks related to CBRNED materials (chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, explosive, digital).
    • Threats from misuse of drones, robotics, and cyberattacks by state and non-state actors.
  • Organised Crime Nexus
    • Terror groups leveraging criminal networks for logistics and recruitment.
    • Collaboration between foreign-based and local outfits for transnational attacks.

Counter-Measures and De-Radicalisation

  • Proactive disruption of online terror propaganda and recruitment networks.
  • Strengthening intelligence and counter-terror operations.
  • Community-based reintegration efforts involving doctors, psychologists, lawyers, NGOs, and religious leaders to prevent radicalisation and rehabilitate affected individuals.

Strategic Way Forward

  • Greater collaboration among intelligence and security agencies.
  • Continuous capacity-building at the state level.
  • Investment in technology and partnerships with private enterprises.
  • Uniform structures and standard procedures across central, state and district levels.

Conclusion

  • Prahaar institutionalises India’s counter-terror strategy as a doctrine rooted in proactive intelligence, coordinated governance, technological preparedness, legal safeguards and international cooperation, aimed at comprehensively dismantling terror networks and strengthening national security.


Source: IE | ToI | TH

[youtube url="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IiwlzRN6wyw" width="560" height="315"]

Prahaar Counter-Terrorism Policy FAQs

Q1: What is the Prahaar Counter-Terrorism Policy?

Ans: Prahaar Counter-Terrorism Policy is India’s first comprehensive anti-terror doctrine focused on zero tolerance, intelligence-led prevention, and coordinated national and international counter-terror strategies.

Q2: What are the seven pillars of the Prahaar Counter-Terrorism Policy?

Ans: The Prahaar Counter-Terrorism Policy rests on prevention, response, aggregating capacities, human rights compliance, counter-radicalisation, international alignment, and recovery through a whole-of-society approach.

Q3: How does the Prahaar Counter-Terrorism Policy address modern terror threats?

Ans: The Prahaar Counter-Terrorism Policy tackles encrypted communication, drones, cyberattacks, dark web funding, organised crime nexus, and CBRNED risks through technological modernisation and proactive intelligence operations.

Q4: Does the Prahaar Counter-Terrorism Policy safeguard human rights?

Ans: Yes, the Prahaar Counter-Terrorism Policy ensures due process, legal safeguards, multi-level appeals, and rule-of-law compliance while maintaining a strict zero-tolerance stance against terrorism.

Q5: Why is the Prahaar Counter-Terrorism Policy significant for India?

Ans: The Prahaar Counter-Terrorism Policy institutionalises India’s intelligence-driven doctrine, strengthens inter-agency coordination, modernises law enforcement, and enhances resilience against cross-border and technology-driven terrorism.

India IEA Membership: Why India’s Bid for Full IEA Membership Faces Legal Hurdles

India IEA Membership

India IEA Membership Latest News

  • At its recent ministerial meeting in Paris, the International Energy Agency (IEA) acknowledged progress on India’s request for full membership. 
  • India is currently an associate member of the Paris-based body, which focuses on energy security, global energy policy, climate change, and energy transitions.
  • However, India’s bid for full membership is complex because the IEA’s founding legal framework allows only OECD countries to become members. 
  • Granting India membership would therefore require amendments to these rules, making the process challenging rather than automatic.

The International Energy Agency (IEA): Origins and Role

  • The IEA was established in 1974 in response to the global oil crisis triggered by the Arab oil embargo during the Yom Kippur War. 
  • The embargo led to soaring oil prices and fuel shortages, exposing the vulnerability of major industrial economies dependent on imported oil.
  • In response, member countries of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) decided to collaborate to manage energy security and reduce dependence on imported oil. As a result, 17 OECD nations founded the IEA.

Core Mandate and Emergency Mechanism

  • The IEA’s primary objective was to safeguard stable oil supplies and anticipate future disruptions through coordinated action.
  • A key feature of its framework is the requirement that each member maintain minimum strategic oil stocks to cushion supply shocks.
  • This emergency mechanism has been activated multiple times, including during the 1991 Gulf War and after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

Membership Structure

  • Although more countries joined over time, full membership remained restricted to OECD members.
  • The IEA currently has 32 full members. At the recent ministerial meeting, Colombia became the 33rd member after joining the OECD in 2020, thereby qualifying for IEA membership.

Expansion of IEA Membership

  • In 2015, the IEA allowed non-OECD countries to join as associate members
  • While they participate in policy discussions and activities, they do not have decision-making powers. 
  • India became an associate member in 2017, and there are currently 13 associate members.

Evolving Role of the IEA

  • With diversification of energy sources, technological advances, and growing climate concerns, the IEA’s mandate has expanded beyond oil security.
  • The agency now works extensively on renewable energy, decarbonisation, and energy transition. 
  • It has also recently launched a critical minerals programme, reflecting the changing energy landscape.

Changing Global Energy Dynamics

  • Countries like China, India, and Brazil have emerged as major energy producers and consumers, reshaping global energy markets.
  • At its founding, IEA members accounted for over 60% of global energy demand. 
  • This share fell to about 40% a decade ago despite more members joining.
  • However, including associate members such as India, China, Brazil, South Africa, Indonesia, Egypt, and Thailand, the broader IEA family now represents about 80% of global energy demand, highlighting its expanded global relevance.

India’s Quest for Full IEA Membership

  • India has been pursuing full membership of the International Energy Agency (IEA) for several years and formally submitted its request in October 2023. 
  • The issue has also featured in India-US bilateral discussions.

Why India Seeks Full Membership

  • As an associate member, India participates in discussions but lacks voting rights.  Full membership would give India a voice in IEA’s decision-making processes.
  • The IEA plays a crucial role not only in energy security and emergency response but also as a leading knowledge platform on energy transition, climate change, and clean technologies. 
  • It maintains one of the world’s most comprehensive energy databases, increasing its global influence.

Legal and Structural Hurdles

  • IEA membership is currently limited to OECD countries. Since India does not intend to join the OECD, granting it full membership would require:
    • Amending the IEA’s founding charter, or
    • Making a special exception.
  • Discussions indicate that a legal amendment may be considered. Brazil, another non-OECD country, has also sought full membership.

IEA’s Support for India

  • The IEA has expressed strong support for India’s bid, highlighting:
    • India’s growing central role in global energy security.
    • Its expected leadership in inclusive energy transitions and climate action.
    • The projection that India will see the largest growth in energy demand over the next three decades.
  • At the recent ministerial meeting, delegates welcomed progress in discussions following India’s request.

Growing India-IEA Engagement

  • Expanded Cooperation - IEA’s engagement with India has deepened significantly, with multiple India-focused reports and data initiatives.
  • LiFE Initiative Collaboration - IEA prepared a special report on India’s LiFE (Lifestyle for Environment) initiative, estimating that widespread lifestyle changes could avoid up to 2 billion tonnes of global emissions by 2030.

Source: IE | ZN

India IEA Membership FAQs

Q1: Why is India IEA membership important?

Ans: India IEA membership would give India voting rights and influence in global energy security, climate policy, clean energy transitions, and international energy governance decision-making processes.

Q2: Why is India IEA membership not straightforward?

Ans: India IEA membership requires amendment of IEA’s founding charter, which currently restricts full membership to OECD countries, making India’s request legally complex.

Q3: What role does India currently play in the IEA?

Ans: Under India IEA membership as an associate member since 2017, India participates in discussions and activities but does not possess decision-making authority.

Q4: How has IEA’s role evolved globally?

Ans: The agency now focuses on renewables, decarbonisation, critical minerals, climate transition, and global energy databases, expanding beyond oil security to broader energy governance.

Q5: Does the IEA support India IEA membership?

Ans: Yes, the IEA has publicly supported India IEA membership, recognising India’s central role in future global energy demand growth and climate transition leadership.

Independence of the Election Commission – Explained

Election Commission

Election Commission Latest News

  • The Independence of the Election Commission has come under debate following allegations of irregularities in electoral roll revisions and a proposed motion to remove the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC).

Importance of Free and Fair Elections

  • Free and fair elections form part of the Basic Structure of the Constitution, as recognised by the Supreme Court in Indira Gandhi vs. Raj Narain (1975)
  • Adult franchise under Article 326 guarantees the right to vote to every citizen above 18 years of age, subject to reasonable restrictions.
  • Recent controversies have revolved around alleged “vote theft” and manipulation of electoral rolls during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise
  • It has been claimed that lakhs of names were deleted from voter lists in certain States, raising concerns about procedural fairness and the sanctity of electoral democracy.
  • Any perceived dilution in the electoral process directly impacts public trust in democratic institutions.

Constitutional Status of the Election Commission

  • Article 324 of the Constitution provides for a permanent Election Commission of India (ECI) with powers of superintendence, direction, and control over elections to Parliament, State Legislatures, and the offices of President and Vice-President.
  • This constitutional status ensures:
    • Institutional permanence
    • Autonomy from routine executive interference
    • Wide discretionary powers in conducting elections
  • The Election Commission may consist of a Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners. Since 1993, it has functioned as a multi-member body, a structure upheld by the Supreme Court in T.N. Seshan vs. Union of India (1995).
  • The CEC acts as the Chairperson of the Commission, and decisions are generally taken collectively.

Appointment of the Election Commissioners

  • The appointment process became controversial after the enactment of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Office and Terms of Office) Act, 2023.
  • Under the 2023 Act:
    • The CEC and Election Commissioners are appointed by the President.
    • A Selection Committee comprising the Prime Minister, a Union Minister, and the Leader of the Opposition recommends names.
  • Critics argue that the exclusion of the Chief Justice of India from the Selection Committee weakens institutional independence. 
  • This change followed the Supreme Court’s 2023 judgment in Anoop Baranwal vs. Union of India, which had temporarily mandated the inclusion of the CJI in the selection panel until Parliament enacted a law.
  • The validity of the 2023 Act is currently under judicial scrutiny.

Safeguards for Independence

  • The Constitution incorporates strong safeguards to protect the Election Commission from executive pressure.
  • Removal of the CEC
    • Article 324(5) provides that the CEC can be removed only in the same manner and on the same grounds as a Supreme Court judge under Article 124(4). The grounds are: 
      • Proved misbehaviour, Incapacity
    • The removal process is rigorous and quasi-judicial:
      • A motion must be signed by at least 100 Lok Sabha members or 50 Rajya Sabha members.
      • The Speaker or Chairman may admit the motion.
      • A three-member inquiry committee is constituted, comprising:
        • A Supreme Court judge
        • A Chief Justice of a High Court
        • A distinguished jurist
    • The CEC is given the opportunity to defend themselves, ensuring adherence to principles of natural justice.
    • Both Houses of Parliament must pass the motion by a special majority.
  • Removal of Other Election Commissioners
    • Other Election Commissioners can be removed by the President on the recommendation of the CEC. However, the Supreme Court in Vineet Narain vs. Union of India (1997) clarified that such advice should not be arbitrary.
    • These mechanisms create a balance between executive oversight and institutional independence.

Special Intensive Revision and Electoral Concerns

  • The recent controversy relates to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. Allegations include:
    • Large-scale deletion of names from voter lists
    • Targeting of specific demographic groups
    • Rushed revision processes
  • Since electoral rolls form the foundation of democratic participation, any irregularity in revision exercises can undermine public confidence. 
  • Challenges to such revisions have reached the Supreme Court.
  • The issue highlights the delicate balance between administrative efficiency and constitutional guarantees of universal adult suffrage.

Source: TH

Election Commission FAQs

Q1: Under which Article is the Election Commission established?

Ans: The Election Commission is established under Article 324 of the Constitution of India.

Q2: How can the Chief Election Commissioner be removed?

Ans: The CEC can be removed in the same manner as a Supreme Court judge, on grounds of proved misbehaviour or incapacity.

Q3: What is the Special Intensive Revision (SIR)?

Ans: It is a process undertaken to update and revise electoral rolls comprehensively.

Q4: What was the controversy regarding the 2023 Appointment Act?

Ans: The Act removed the Chief Justice of India from the selection committee for appointing Election Commissioners.

Q5: Why is the Election Commission’s independence important?

Ans: It ensures free and fair elections, which form part of the Basic Structure of the Constitution.

Enquire Now