Central Administrative Tribunal – CAT, Composition, Mandate, Jurisdiction

The Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), established under the Administrative Tribunals Act of 1985, provides a specialised platform for resolving central and state government employees’ service-related grievances. Rooted in historical calls for administrative tribunals, CAT was set up based on recommendations from the Law Commission (1958) and the Administrative Reforms Commission (1969), under Article 323-A of the Indian Constitution.

CAT is a quasi-judicial body that handles cases on recruitment, service conditions, and grievances for over 215 central government bodies. Its 19 principal benches enable regional access, with the Principal Bench in New Delhi.

Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT)

The Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) is a quasi-judicial body in India established under the Administrative Tribunals Act of 1985. Its primary function is to resolve grievances of central and state government employees regarding their service matters, providing a mechanism for speedy and effective justice. The concept of administrative tribunals in India dates back to 1941 with the establishment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.

After independence, the need for a specialised forum for service-related disputes grew. The Law Commission (1958) and Administrative Reforms Commission (1969) recommended tribunals to reduce judicial caseloads, especially for government employment issues.

• Legislative Action: Based on these recommendations, the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 was enacted, effective from July 1, 1985, establishing a platform for public servants to address grievances related to recruitment and service conditions.
• Constitutional Basis: The CAT was founded under Article 323-A of the Indian Constitution (added by the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976), empowering Parliament to set up tribunals for adjudicating disputes concerning public services.

Central Administrative Tribunal Composition

The Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) comprises a Chairperson and Judicial and Administrative Members, appointed by the President of India based on recommendations from a selection committee, and each playing a distinct role in its operations. The Chairperson, as the highest authority, must be a sitting or retired High Court judge, appointed for a four-year term or until reaching the age of 70 years.

• Members: CAT benches consist of one Judicial Member and one Administrative Member, blending legal expertise with administrative insights. At present, it includes 69 members (34 Judicial and 35 Administrative).
  • Judicial Members are qualified similarly to High Court judges and focus on legal interpretation and fair justice.
  • Administrative Members, with significant public administration experience, address service-related issues in the government sector.
• Members are appointed by the President of India based on recommendations from a selection committee, which includes the Chief Justice of India or a nominee, a senior Supreme Court judge, and a Ministry representative, ensuring merit-based selection.

‹ ›

Central Administrative Tribunal Mandate

The Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), established under the Administrative Tribunals Act of 1985 as per Article 323-A of the Indian Constitution, provides a specialized forum for resolving disputes related to recruitment and service conditions for public sector employees.

• Objectives: Aiming for speedy and cost-effective justice, the Central Administrative Tribunal alleviates the burden on traditional courts, providing timely resolutions that are crucial for public servants.
• Functions: Its core functions include adjudicating issues like recruitment processes, promotions, transfers, disciplinary actions, and other service grievances for central government employees, including those in public sector undertakings (PSUs) notified under the Act.
• Natural justice: It operates on principles of natural justice, allowing flexibility in procedure by not adhering strictly to the Civil Procedure Code.
• Appeal: It possesses High Court-like powers in contempt proceedings and can establish its own procedural rules, with appeals from CAT orders directed to High Courts through a writ petition under Article 226/227.
  • Earlier, appeals were directed to the Supreme Court of India, but Supreme Court ruling in L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India (1997) allowed High Courts to review CAT decisions.
  • This process provides an additional layer of judicial oversight over CAT rulings.

Central Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction

The  Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) has jurisdiction over a wide range of service-related issues for central government employees, including All India Services, Union civil servants, and certain PSUs, as per Section 14(2) of the Administrative Tribunals Act. It currently covers over 200 central government organizations, ministries, and departments.

• This includes recruitment issues, conditions of service like pay, pensions, promotions, and disciplinary actions, ensuring a dedicated platform for grievance redressal at any employment stage.
• Exclusion: However, certain categories, like armed forces personnel, Supreme Court employees, and Parliament staff, are excluded from its purview.
• Benches: The Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) operates through 19 regular benches and 21 circuit benches across India, ensuring that public servants have regional accessibility to justice.
  • The Principal Bench of CAT is situated in New Delhi, which serves as the central hub for significant matters related to the Government of the National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi.

Central Administrative Tribunal UPSC PYQs

Q1: Comment on the need of administrative tribunals as compared to the court system. Assess the impact of the recent tribunal reforms through rationalization of tribunals made in 2021.  (UPSC Mains 2025)

Q2: The Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) which was established for redressal of grievances and complaints by or against central government employees nowadays is exercising its power as an independent judicial authority. Explain. (UPSC Mains 2019)

Q3: How far do you agree with the view that tribunals curtail the jurisdiction of ordinary courts? In view of the above, discuss the constitutional validity and competency of the tribunals in India. (UPSC Mains 2018)

Q4: Consider the following statements: (UPSC Prelims 2009)

1. Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) was set up during the Prime Ministership of Lal Bahadur Shastri.
2. The members of the CAT are drawn from both judicial and administrative streams.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

(a) 1 only

(b) 2 only

(c) Both 1 and 2

(d) Neither 1 nor 2

Ans: (b)