Bureau of Port Security – Strengthening India’s Coastal Security

Port Security

Port Security Latest News

  • The Union government has constituted the Bureau of Port Security as a statutory body under the Merchant Shipping Act, 2025, to strengthen port and maritime security governance.

India’s Maritime and Coastal Landscape

  • India has a long coastline of over 7,500 km and a rapidly expanding maritime economy. 
  • As of 2025, the country has 12 major ports and 217 non-major ports, of which 66 are cargo-handling ports, while the rest largely serve fishing and coastal activities. 
  • Major ports, administered by the Union government, handle more than half of India’s maritime cargo traffic. 
  • In recent years, India has witnessed a sharp rise in port capacity, coastal shipping, and inland waterway cargo movement.
  • This growth has significantly enhanced India’s trade connectivity and logistics efficiency, but it has also increased exposure to security threats such as smuggling, terrorism, cyber intrusions, and illegal migration through maritime routes. 
  • Ensuring secure ports and vessels has therefore emerged as a key national security priority.

Need for a Dedicated Port Security Authority

  • Until recently, India’s coastal and port security responsibilities were distributed across multiple agencies, including the Indian Navy, Coast Guard, CISF, State maritime police, and port authorities. 
  • While operational agencies remain crucial, the absence of a single statutory body for regulatory oversight and coordination often leads to gaps in communication, duplication of efforts, and uneven implementation of security standards.
  • Recognising these challenges, the government decided to establish a specialised institution that could function as the nodal regulator for port and ship security, similar to how aviation security is governed in India.

Bureau of Port Security: Mandate and Structure

  • The Bureau of Port Security (BoPS) has been constituted under Section 13 of the Merchant Shipping Act, 2025, as a statutory body. 
  • It functions under the Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways and is modelled on the Bureau of Civil Aviation Security (BCAS).
  • The BoPS is responsible for regulatory oversight relating to the security of ships, port facilities, and maritime infrastructure. 
  • Its role is not operational in nature but focuses on standard-setting, compliance, coordination, and supervision across both major and non-major ports.

Key Functions of the Bureau of Port Security

  • The BoPS addresses a wide range of maritime security concerns. 
  • These include maritime terrorism, arms and drug trafficking, human trafficking, illegal migration, piracy, poaching, and other illicit activities carried out through sea routes.
  • A notable feature of the BoPS is its emphasis on cybersecurity. 
  • With ports increasingly dependent on digital systems, the Bureau is expected to monitor and protect port IT infrastructure from cyber threats, in coordination with national cybersecurity agencies.
  • The BoPS has the legal authority to ensure compliance with international obligations such as the International Ship and Port Facility Security (ISPS) Code, which mandates minimum security standards for ports and vessels engaged in international trade.

Role of CISF and Security Implementation

  • Under the BoPS framework, the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) has been designated as a recognised security organisation. 
  • The CISF will prepare standardised security plans, conduct security assessments, and train private security agencies deployed at ports.
  • Security measures are to be implemented in a graded and risk-based manner, taking into account factors such as vulnerability, trade volume, location, and threat perception. This approach aims to balance security needs with ease of doing business.

Maritime Growth and Strategic Context

  • India’s maritime sector has expanded rapidly over the last decade. Cargo handled at ports increased from 974 million tonnes in 2014 to nearly 1,600 million tonnes by 2025. 
  • Ship turnaround time has halved, and coastal shipping volumes have more than doubled. Inland waterway cargo movement has increased eightfold during the same period.
  • The creation of the BoPS aligns with the Maritime India Vision 2030, which seeks to develop world-class port infrastructure, promote green shipping, and ensure a safe and secure maritime ecosystem.

Concerns and Criticism

  • Some coastal States have expressed concerns that recent port legislation, including the Indian Ports Act, 2025, increases Union government control over non-major ports, raising questions related to maritime federalism. 
  • There are also criticisms regarding wide inspection powers granted to port officials under the new legal framework, though these concerns relate to legislation as a whole rather than the BoPS specifically.

Source: TH

Port Security FAQs

Q1: What is the Bureau of Port Security?

Ans: It is a statutory body established under the Merchant Shipping Act, 2025 for regulatory oversight of port and ship security.

Q2: Which ministry oversees the BoPS?

Ans: The Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways.

Q3: What international standard does the BoPS enforce?

Ans: The International Ship and Port Facility Security (ISPS) Code.

Q4: Which force supports BoPS in port security planning?

Ans: The Central Industrial Security Force (CISF).

Q5: Why is cybersecurity important for ports?

Ans: Modern ports rely heavily on digital systems, making them vulnerable to cyber threats.

Tunnel Safety Guidelines – Lessons from the Silkyara Collapse

Tunnel Safety Guidelines

Tunnel Safety Guidelines Latest News

  • On November 12, 2023, the Silkyara Bend–Barkot Tunnel on NH-134 (Char Dham Mahamarg Pariyojana) collapsed, trapping 41 workers for 17 days. 
  • Though all were rescued safely, the incident exposed systemic weaknesses in tunnel planning, geological assessment, and emergency preparedness, especially in fragile Himalayan terrain.
  • In response, the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH) issued comprehensive guidelines to prevent and mitigate road tunnel collapses, particularly relevant for strategic and border area connectivity projects.

Why Tunnel Safety Matters

  • Tunnels enable seamless connectivity in mountainous, snow-bound, eco-sensitive, congested and border areas.
  • India’s expanding highway network under strategic and Char Dham projects has increased tunnelling activity, raising geological and safety risks.

Key Provisions of the New Guidelines

  • Strengthening planning (DPR, GBR and risk register):
    • Issues identified: Many Detailed Project Reports (DPRs) reduced to procedural formalities. Inadequate geological and geotechnical investigations.
  • Guidelines: 
    • Project authority responsible for verifying correctness of geological investigations.
    • Mandatory preparation of Geotechnical Baseline Report (GBR), risk register (hazards, risks, mitigation measures).
    • Principle of risk allocation: “Risk shall be borne by the party best equipped to manage it.”
    • GBR and risk register to be shared with bidders to ensure transparency and realistic costing.
  • Geological realities and design challenges:
    • Issues:
      • Tunnel design is critical as ground itself acts as a support system.
      • Predicting ground properties from limited tests is an oversimplification, especially in the Himalayas.
      • Poor investigations lead to time overruns, cost escalation, and safety failures.
    • Special conditions to be assessed: Squeezing and swelling ground, rock bursts, shallow cover zones, tunnels below perennial streams/nalas, hot water ingress, and toxic/flammable gases (long tunnels).
  • Tunnelling technologies (NATM vs TBM):
    • NATM (New Austrian Tunnelling Method): “Design-as-you-go” approach, suitable for non-uniform rock conditions, controlled blasting, and mandatory excavation and support sheet for each round.
    • TBM (Tunnel Boring Machine): Used in uniform geological stretches, requires vigilance against roof collapse and water ingress.
  • Collapse risk zoning and safety infrastructure: Tunnels to be classified into collapse-risk zones. High-risk zones must include Np-4 escape pipe (minimum 0.9 m diameter), mobile rescue containers, fixed rescue containers, minimum 24-hour survival capacity.
  • Emergency response and human capacity:
    • Shift managers must be trained as first responders.
    • Emergency Response Plan (ERP): Prepared in advance, updated weekly based on site conditions.

India’s Tunnel Infrastructure Snapshot

  • According to MoRTH’s reply in Parliament (December 12, 2024), a total of 42 tunnels covering 60.37 km in length in 27 projects of National Highways have been completed to date. 
  • Apart from this, 57 tunnels covering 93.96 km in length are currently under implementation in 37 projects on NHs in the country.
  • 3 tunnels covering 9.68 km in length have been approved for construction in 3 projects at an estimated cost of Rs 1,962 crore. 
  • One 6-lane project in Maharashtra costing Rs 4501 crore, including the construction of 2 tunnels having a total length of 3.47 km, has been apprised by Public Private Partnership Appraisal Committee (PPPAC).

Challenges and Way Forward

  • Weak DPR quality: Institutionalise scientific, data-driven DPRs.
  • Complex Himalayan geology: Integrate real-time geological monitoring.
  • Inadequate on-site emergency preparedness: Strengthen capacity-building of site managers. Periodic independent safety audits. 
  • Coordination gaps during rescue operations: Clear role definition for -
    • Incident commander (District Magistrate)
    • Construction agencies
    • Local administration
    • NDRF/SDRF commanders
    • The Armed Forces must ensure coordination, technical support, and responder safety.
  • Use guidelines as a template: For other infrastructure sectors (metros, hydropower).

Conclusion

  • The Silkyara tunnel collapse was a watershed moment in India’s infrastructure journey. 
  • MoRTH’s new guidelines mark a shift from procedural compliance to risk-based engineering, emphasising geological realism, accountability, and human safety. 
  • Effective implementation will be crucial to ensuring that India’s push for strategic connectivity and infrastructure-led growth does not come at the cost of lives and sustainability.

Source: IE

Tunnel Safety Guidelines FAQs

Q1: How did the Silkyara tunnel collapse influence India’s approach to road tunnel safety?

Ans: It exposed systemic flaws in DPR preparation and risk management, prompting MoRTH to issue comprehensive guidelines.

Q2: What is the significance of the Geotechnical Baseline Report (GBR) in tunnel projects?

Ans: GBR provides a realistic reference of ground conditions, improves risk allocation, and reduces disputes, cost overruns, and safety failures.

Q3: Why is tunnelling in the Himalayas particularly challenging compared to other regions?

Ans: Due to complex and unpredictable geology involving squeezing ground, rock bursts, water ingress, and shallow cover zones.

Q4: What is the difference between NATM and TBM as per MoRTH guidelines?

Ans: NATM follows a “design-as-you-go” approach for variable geology, while TBM is suited for long stretches of uniform rock formations.

Q5: How do MoRTH’s new guidelines strengthen emergency preparedness in tunnel projects?

Ans: By mandating risk zoning, escape pipes, rescue containers, trained shift managers, and regularly updated Emergency Response Plans.

Enquire Now