Orientalist-Anglicist Controversy, Lord Macaulay’s Minute, Significance

The British East India Company’s arrival in India marked a profound shift not only in politics but also in society and culture. In the first half of the 19th century, the Company officials initially followed a policy of neutrality in religion and culture, refraining from interfering in the spiritual or intellectual life of the Indian population.

However, as British influence expanded, constant pressures from various quarters, Missionaries, Liberals, Orientalists, and Utilitarians, pushed the Company to reconsider its stance.

The debate intensified over whether the Company should promote Western or Oriental education, giving rise to the historic Orientalist-Anglicist controversy, which shaped the trajectory of modern Indian education.

Orientalist-Anglicist Controversy

The Orientalist-Anglicist Controversy was a major debate in early 19th century India about the kind of education the British should promote. Orientalists supported teaching Indian classical languages and traditions like Sanskrit, Arabic, and Persian. Anglicists, on the other hand, favored Western education through English to spread modern science and ideas. This debate shaped the foundation of India’s modern education system.

The Orientalist Approach to Education

The Orientalists believed in preserving and promoting India’s classical learning traditions. Scholars like Dr. H.H. Wilson and H.T. Princep argued for Sanskrit, Arabic, and Persian as the mediums of instruction. Initially, the East India Company also supported this approach.

Some key initiatives under Orientalist guidance included:

• Calcutta Madrasa (1781): It was established by Warren Hastings to provide education in Islamic law and culture.
• Benaras Sanskrit College (1791): It was founded by Jonathan Duncan to promote Sanskrit learning and classical Indian knowledge.
• Asiatic Society of Bengal (1784): It was set up by William Jones, this institution aimed at research in Indian languages, literature, and culture.

The motivations behind the Orientalist approach were largely practical and political:

• Administrative efficiency: Teaching British officials local languages and culture improved governance.
• Building alliances: Understanding Indian elites and their traditions helped maintain stability.
• Cultural preservation: Promoting classical education ensured the survival of India’s rich intellectual heritage.

The Port William College (1800) in Calcutta exemplifies this approach, training civil servants in local languages to better administer the colonies.

‹ ›

The Anglicist Perspective

Contrasting the Orientalists, the Anglicists argued for Western education through English. Prominent advocates included Charles Trevelyan, Mountstuart Elphinstone, and progressive Indian reformers like Raja Ram Mohan Roy.

Beliefs of the Anglicists included:

• Western education was essential to access modern scientific, political, and social knowledge.
• English as the medium would help diffuse Western ideas more effectively.
• Indian classical learning alone could not equip Indians to understand or implement modern democratic and scientific concepts.

The Anglicists sought to utilize the entire educational grant to promote Western education, creating a class of Indians who could bridge the gap between the British rulers and the Indian population.

Lord Macaulay’s Minute of 1835

The Orientalist-Anglicist Controversy culminated in Lord Macaulay’s Minute of 1835 on Indian Education. Lord Macaulay, the Law Member of the Supreme Council of Calcutta, argued decisively in favor of Western education through English.

• Indian learning was considered inferior to European learning, especially in the physical and social sciences.
• Limited resources should focus on educating a small section of the upper and middle classes.
• The aim was to create a class “Indian in blood and color but English in taste, opinions, morals, and intellect.”
• Mass education was neglected, as the focus was on producing interpreters who could connect the British administration with the Indian masses.

Macaulay’s system, based on the “infiltration theory,” intended to gradually spread modern ideas and Western sciences through educated intermediaries.

Wood’s Despatch of 1854

Following Macaulay, Sir Charles Wood, President of the Board of Control, issued the Wood’s Despatch of 1854, a comprehensive plan to reorganize education in India. It is regarded as the Magna Carta of English education in India.

Recommendations included are:

• Establishment of Anglo-Vernacular Schools throughout the districts.
• Creation of Government Colleges in important towns.
• Formation of a University in each of the three Presidencies (Calcutta, Bombay, Madras).
• Encouragement of Western sciences and literature, while also nurturing vernacular education.

Significance of the Orientalist-Anglicist Controversy

The Orientalist-Anglicist Controversy was more than a debate over curriculum; it reflected deeper questions about culture, identity, and colonial power.

• It determined the medium of instruction, which shaped India’s intellectual future.
• The controversy influenced the emergence of a Western-educated Indian elite, pivotal in social reform and the freedom movement.
• It created a dual system of education that combined Western scientific knowledge with vernacular learning, impacting generations of Indians.