Article 340 of Indian Constitution, Provisions, Significance

Article 340 of the Constitution of India establishes a constitutional mechanism to investigate the conditions of socially and educationally backward classes and recommend measures for their advancement. The provision empowers the President to appoint a commission to study the social, educational, and economic challenges faced by disadvantaged communities across the country. 

The objective of this article is to identify structural inequalities and suggest practical steps that governments may adopt to reduce these disadvantages. By mandating investigation, recommendations, and parliamentary scrutiny of reports, Article 340 creates an institutional framework for evidence based policymaking aimed at improving the living conditions and opportunities of historically marginalized groups in India.

Article 340 of Indian Constitution Provisions

Article 340 of Indian Constitution empowers the President to appoint a commission to examine backward classes’ conditions and recommend measures to remove social and educational disadvantages.

Article 340(1)

• It authorizes the President of India to appoint a commission consisting of suitable persons to investigate the condition of socially and educationally backward classes across the entire territory of India and examine the difficulties faced by them in social and economic life.
• The commission appointed under this article studies the educational status, social position, and structural barriers experienced by disadvantaged communities, enabling the government to understand the nature and extent of backwardness affecting various groups.
• After studying the conditions of these communities, the commission recommends steps that the Union or State governments should take to remove barriers and improve opportunities, including educational support, employment access, and broader welfare initiatives.
• Article 340 specifically empowers the commission to recommend grants or financial assistance that may be provided by the Union or State governments to improve the condition of socially and educationally backward classes.
• The commission may also recommend the conditions under which such financial grants should be distributed so that resources are utilized effectively for educational, social, and economic upliftment.
• The order issued by the President while constituting the commission defines its procedure, composition, scope of inquiry, and operational method, ensuring clarity in the functioning of the investigative body.

Article 340(2)

• Under it, the commission must conduct detailed inquiries and prepare a report describing the factual findings discovered during its investigation of backward classes and their difficulties.
• The report submitted by the commission includes policy suggestions, welfare measures, and practical recommendations considered necessary for improving the status of disadvantaged communities.

Article 340(3)

• It requires the President to place the commission’s report before each House of Parliament, ensuring transparency and legislative awareness of findings and recommendations.
• Along with the report, a memorandum describing the action taken or proposed by the government must also be presented before Parliament, enabling evaluation of policy responses to the commission’s recommendations.

Article 340 of Indian Constitution Case Laws

Judicial interpretations and commissions under Article 340 of Indian Constitution shaped reservation policies, clarified identification of backward classes, and strengthened constitutional social justice mechanisms.

• Kaka Kalelkar Commission (1953): The first Backward Classes Commission was established on 29 January 1953 under Article 340 and chaired by Kaka Kalelkar. It examined criteria for identifying backward classes and recommended reservations, scholarships, and social welfare programs, though the report submitted in 1955 was not implemented due to insufficient statistical support.
• Mandal Commission (1979): The Second Backward Classes Commission was constituted on 1 January 1979 under the chairmanship of B. P. Mandal. It identified Other Backward Classes using eleven social, educational, and economic indicators and recommended 27 percent reservation in government jobs and educational institutions.
• Implementation of Mandal Recommendations (1990): In 1990, the Union Government implemented the Mandal Commission’s recommendations, expanding reservation benefits to Other Backward Classes in central government employment and public sector opportunities, leading to major political and social debates across India.
• Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992): In this landmark judgment, the Supreme Court upheld the validity of 27 percent reservation for OBCs based on the Mandal Commission report and confirmed that identification of backward classes must primarily rely on social and educational criteria.
• Creamy Layer Principle: The Supreme Court in the Indra Sawhney case introduced the concept of excluding the “creamy layer,” meaning economically advanced individuals among backward classes should not receive reservation benefits meant for disadvantaged sections.
• Reservation Ceiling Doctrine: The same judgment also introduced a general ceiling of 50 percent on total reservations in public employment to maintain balance between affirmative action and equality of opportunity.
• Janki Prasad Parimoo v. State of Jammu and Kashmir (1973): The Supreme Court observed that identification of socially and educationally backward groups should rely on expert investigation and commissions similar to those constituted under Article 340.
• Ashoka Kumar Thakur v. Union of India (2008): The Court upheld reservations for Other Backward Classes in higher educational institutions and emphasized the importance of reliable data collected through expert commissions to justify identification of backward groups.
• Jarnail Singh v. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (2018): The Supreme Court reaffirmed that determination of backwardness must rely primarily on social and educational factors and reiterated principles earlier recognized in the Indra Sawhney judgment.
• Rohini Commission (2017): The Government constituted the Rohini Commission to study sub-categorization within OBC groups so that reservation benefits could be distributed more equitably among the most disadvantaged communities.

‹ ›

Article 340 of Indian Constitution Significance

Article 340 of Indian Constitution plays a major role in identifying disadvantaged communities and guiding government policies aimed at reducing social inequality.

• Institutional Framework for Social Justice: Article 340 creates a formal mechanism through which the government can scientifically study the conditions of socially and educationally backward classes and design targeted policies based on evidence rather than assumptions.
• Constitutional Support for Affirmative Action: The commissions established under Article 340 provide factual data that support reservation policies and welfare programs aimed at increasing representation of marginalized communities in education and employment.
• Evidence-Based Policy Formulation: Investigations conducted by these commissions generate detailed socio-economic data, enabling governments to formulate informed policies for addressing inequality in education, employment, and public services.
• Identification of Backward Communities: The provision helps determine which groups qualify as socially and educationally backward classes through systematic studies rather than arbitrary political decisions.
• Strengthening Welfare Schemes: Recommendations regarding grants and financial assistance allow governments to create scholarships, development programs, and support mechanisms aimed specifically at disadvantaged communities.
• Parliamentary Oversight and Transparency: By requiring reports and government responses to be placed before Parliament, Article 340 ensures democratic scrutiny and accountability in decisions affecting backward class welfare.
• Foundation of Reservation Policy Development: Major commissions constituted under Article 340, particularly the Mandal Commission, significantly shaped India’s reservation system and representation policies.
• Addressing Historical Inequalities: The provision acknowledges that certain communities have faced long-term social exclusion and requires the State to examine structural barriers affecting their progress.
• Adaptive Constitutional Mechanism: Article 340 allows the government to appoint new commissions whenever required, enabling periodic reassessment of backwardness and adjustment of welfare policies.
• Promotion of Inclusive Governance: By recommending measures to improve access to education, employment, and resources, Article 340 contributes to building a more inclusive social and administrative structure in India.