New World Order, Features, Characteristics, India’s Place

The term New World Order refers to the system of international relations that emerged after the Second World War. It was based on the idea that global peace can be maintained through rules, institutions and cooperation instead of war and domination by powerful countries.

After 1945, countries created institutions like the United Nations, International Monetary Fund, World Bank and World Trade Organization. These institutions were meant to promote peace, economic stability and development. The idea was that if nations were economically integrated and disputes were resolved through dialogue and institutions, large-scale wars would become irrational and costly. The idea behind the New World Order was that all countries are sovereign and equal, and disputes should be solved through dialogue, not force.

Features of the Post-1945 New World Order

• Sovereign Equality of States: Every country, big or small, is considered legally equal.
• Non-Aggression Principle: Countries should not attack or interfere in the internal matters of others.
• Collective Security: If one country is attacked, the international community should respond collectively.
• Multilateralism: Global problems should be solved through international cooperation.

This arrangement, often described as a rules-based international order, was dominated by the United States and its Western allies. Over time, decolonisation, economic globalisation, and technological change expanded participation in this system. For many countries, especially middle powers like India, the New World Order offered stability, economic opportunities, and diplomatic space. Overall, this system helped prevent another world war, even though many regional conflicts took place.

Why is the New World Order Under Stress Today?

In recent years, the New World Order has been facing serious challenges.

• Rise of Power Politics: Major powers are increasingly acting according to their national interests rather than international rules.
• Weakening of Multilateral Institutions: The UN Security Council is often paralysed due to veto power. This reduces trust in global governance.
• Increasing Conflicts: Conflicts like the Russia-Ukraine war and tensions in Asia show that the principle of non-aggression is weakening.
• Weaponisation of Trade and Technology: Trade, sanctions and supply chains are being used as political tools. Economic interdependence is no longer purely cooperative.

Because of these trends, many scholars argue that the old New World Order based on liberal values is declining.

‹ ›

Characteristics of the Emerging New World Order

The world is moving toward a more multipolar system.  The United States is still powerful, but China has risen significantly. Countries like India are playing a larger global role. Groupings such as BRICS and the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue show flexible partnerships instead of rigid alliances. The emerging New World Order may not be fully rule-based. It may be shaped more by balance of power and strategic competition.

The most worrying feature of the evolving New World Order is the weakening of foundational norms:

• Sovereignty is increasingly violated through military interventions.
  • Example: Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 challenged the principle of territorial integrity.
• Collective security is paralysed by veto politics.
  • Example: In the United Nations Security Council, resolutions related to the Russia-Ukraine war have been blocked due to Russia’s veto power.
• Trade is becoming protectionist and politicised.
  • Example: Supply chain realignments such as “friend-shoring” are reshaping global trade along strategic lines.
• Human rights are often subordinated to strategic interests.
  • Example: Western countries continue arms and diplomatic support to partners despite human rights concerns in conflicts such as the war in Yemen.

India’s Place in the New World Order

The present New World Order is uncertain and constantly changing. Old alliances are weakening, and global institutions are losing influence. In such a situation, countries like India have to move carefully. As a major middle power, India depends on stable rules and international cooperation, but it must also deal with a world where power politics is becoming more important.

India’s position in the New World Order can be understood through the following points:

• Support for multilateralism: India continues to support international institutions because they protect the interests of middle and smaller countries. Without these rules, powerful nations could dominate the New World Order.
• Operating in a fluid global environment: Today, alliances are not fixed, and countries are constantly adjusting their strategies. India also has to remain flexible in this changing New World Order.
• Balancing ideals and national interest: India supports principles like sovereignty and peaceful cooperation. But at the same time, it must prepare for a New World Order where power and strategic interests often decide outcomes.
• Need for stable global rules: India’s trade, security, and diplomacy depend on predictable international norms. If these rules weaken, uncertainty will increase for countries like India in the New World Order.
• Role as a responsible middle power: Like other middle powers, India continues to support cooperation and global institutions. It understands that without a rules-based New World Order, smaller and developing countries would suffer the most.

India’s role in the New World Order is to protect its interests while supporting international cooperation. Its goal is to prevent the world from becoming a place where only power matters and rules have no meaning.

Conclusion

The New World Order created after 1945 was based on law, cooperation and multilateralism. Today, that system is under stress due to rising nationalism, geopolitical competition and weakening institutions.

However, the system has not collapsed. It is changing. The real question is whether the future New World Order will be based on cooperation and rules or on raw power and competition.