High Seas Treaty: Challenges in Global Ocean Governance

High Seas Treaty

High Seas Treaty Latest News

  • The High Seas Treaty faces challenges in implementation as countries debate funding mechanisms, governance frameworks, and equitable benefit-sharing.

Background

  • The High Seas Treaty, also known as the Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ) Agreement, represents a landmark effort in global marine conservation. 
  • Ratified by over 60 countries in September 2025, the treaty will enter into force in January 2026. 
  • It seeks to protect marine biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction, the so-called high seas, by promoting sustainable use of ocean resources, addressing threats such as overfishing, pollution, and climate change, and ensuring equitable benefit-sharing of marine genetic resources (MGRs).
  • While hailed as a major breakthrough under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS, 1982), the treaty faces significant implementation challenges, ranging from definitional ambiguities to geopolitical resistance by major powers.

Understanding the High Seas Treaty

  • The treaty establishes an international framework for conserving marine biodiversity in areas that lie beyond national control. 
  • These waters, which cover nearly two-thirds of the global ocean surface, are crucial for climate regulation, carbon sequestration, and food security.
  • The treaty introduces several tools and mechanisms for sustainable governance:
  • Marine Genetic Resources (MGRs):
    • Recognised as the “common heritage of humankind,” MGRs include genetic material from marine plants, animals, and microorganisms that can be used for scientific and commercial purposes, including pharmaceuticals and biotechnology. 
  • Area-Based Management Tools (ABMTs):
    • The treaty allows for the creation of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) to conserve biodiversity hotspots and critical ecosystems. 
    • These zones will be identified using a mix of scientific data and traditional knowledge.
  • Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs):
    • Any activity likely to affect the marine environment, especially with cumulative or transboundary impacts, must undergo a mandatory EIA. 
    • This ensures preventive measures are taken before potential damage occurs.
  • Capacity Building and Technology Transfer:
    • Recognising the technological disparity between developed and developing nations, the treaty encourages capacity building to ensure equal participation in ocean research and governance.

Evolution of the Treaty

  • The treaty’s development was two decades in the making. 
  • In 2004, the UN General Assembly established an ad hoc working group to address gaps in UNCLOS, which lacked specific provisions on biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction. By 2011, states had agreed to negotiate four key areas: MGRs, ABMTs, EIAs, and capacity building.
  • Between 2018 and 2023, four Intergovernmental Conferences were held, culminating in an agreement in March 2023. 
  • The treaty was formally adopted in June 2023, setting the stage for a new era of cooperative ocean governance.

Major Challenges in Implementation

  • Ambiguity Between “Common Heritage” and “Freedom of the Seas”
    • The treaty attempts to balance two conflicting principles:
    • Common Heritage of Humankind - advocating for equitable sharing of ocean resources among all nations.
    • Freedom of the High Seas - guaranteeing states unrestricted navigation, research, and exploitation rights.
    • However, this dual approach has created legal and operational ambiguities. While the common heritage principle is applied to MGRs, it remains only partially enforceable, leaving room for exploitation and unequal benefit-sharing.
  • Governance of Marine Genetic Resources
    • Before the treaty, there were no clear global norms on the extraction and commercialisation of MGRs. 
    • This led to concerns about biopiracy, where developed nations and private corporations could exploit resources without compensating developing countries. 
    • Although the treaty mandates monetary and non-monetary benefit-sharing, it lacks clarity on the mechanisms for calculating and distributing these benefits.
  • Limited Participation from Major Powers
    • Despite global support, the treaty faces a setback due to the absence of major maritime powers like the United States, China, and Russia, which have yet to ratify it. 
    • Their non-participation undermines the treaty’s universality and weakens enforcement capacity.
  • Coordination with Existing International Bodies
    • The treaty must align with existing institutions such as the International Seabed Authority (ISA) and Regional Fisheries Management Organisations (RFMOs) to prevent jurisdictional overlap. 
    • Without coherent coordination, there is a risk of fragmented ocean governance and conflicting mandates.
  • Implementation and Monitoring Mechanisms
    • Effective implementation will require regular monitoring, dynamic management of MPAs, and transparent data sharing among nations. 
    • Developing countries also need technological and financial support to fulfil treaty obligations, particularly in research and enforcement.

Way Forward

  • The High Seas Treaty marks a pivotal moment for ocean conservation under international law. Its success will depend on:
    • Finalising operational guidelines for benefit-sharing and environmental assessments.
    • Strengthening institutional cooperation between the BBNJ framework and existing global maritime bodies.
    • Encouraging universal ratification, especially by key maritime nations.
    • Linking ocean governance with broader climate and biodiversity frameworks to enhance global resilience.
  • By ensuring fair access and sustainable use of ocean resources, the treaty can bridge the gap between conservation and development, if backed by a genuine global commitment.

Source: TH

High Seas Treaty FAQs

Q1: When will the High Seas Treaty come into force?

Ans: The treaty will be enforced in January 2026 after being ratified by over 60 countries.

Q2: What is the main objective of the High Seas Treaty?

Ans: It aims to conserve and ensure the sustainable use of marine biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction.

Q3: Why is the “common heritage of humankind” principle controversial?

Ans: It conflicts with the “freedom of the high seas” principle, leading to ambiguity over rights and benefit sharing.

Q4: Which countries have not ratified the treaty yet?

Ans: Major powers such as the United States, China, and Russia have not ratified the treaty so far.

Q5: What are Marine Genetic Resources (MGRs)?

Ans: MGRs are genetic materials from marine organisms used in scientific or commercial research, recognized under the treaty as the common heritage of humankind.

ESTIC 2025 – Building a Future-Ready India through Research, Innovation and Inclusivity

ESTIC 2025

ESTIC 2025 Latest News

  • Recently, the Indian PM addressed the Emerging Science, Technology and Innovation Conclave (ESTIC) 2025 conclave at Bharat Mandapam, New Delhi.
  • It aims to shape India’s science, technology, and innovation (STI) landscape to align with the nation’s goal of becoming a Viksit Bharat by 2047. 
  • The event replaces the Indian Science Congress, the oldest congregation of scientists in India (which had gone into oblivion, with its last session held in 2023), marking a significant milestone in India’s R&D journey.

Key Highlights of the Prime Minister’s Address

  • Inspiration and national pride:
    • Congratulated India’s women’s cricket team on winning the ICC Women’s World Cup 2025, calling it an inspiration for millions.
    • Celebrated the successful launch of India’s heaviest communication satellite (GSAT-7R/CMS-03), reflecting India’s growing technological prowess.
  • 21st century as the age of innovation:
    • Described the century as one of “exponential transformation”, emphasizing the need for global collaboration in emerging technologies.
    • Highlighted that the idea of ESTIC emerged from the need for international cooperation in STI.

Strengthening India’s Research and Innovation Framework

  • Research funding and institutional reforms:
    • Anusandhan National Research Foundation (ANRF): Set up to boost research in universities.
    • ₹1 Lakh Crore Research, Development and Innovation (RDI) Fund: To promote a private sector–driven R&D ecosystem, enabling funding for high-risk, high-impact projects.
    • Focus on ease of doing research: Reforms in financial rules, procurement policies, and regulatory frameworks to accelerate lab-to-market transition.
  • Indicators of India’s R&D growth:
    • India’s R&D expenditure has doubled in the last decade, and the number of registered patents has increased 17 times.
    • India now ranks as the world’s 3rd largest startup ecosystem, with over 6,000 deep-tech startups working in clean energy, advanced materials, and semiconductors.
    • India’s bio-economy grew from $10 billion (2014) to $140 billion (2025).

Focus on Emerging and Sunrise Sectors

  • Key domains of progress:
    • India is advancing in green hydrogen, quantum computing, deep-sea research, and critical minerals.
    • Emphasis on inclusive technological transformation—“When science is scaled, innovation becomes inclusive, and technology drives transformation.”
  • Digital public infrastructure (DPI):
    • Optical fibre connectivity to over 2 lakh gram panchayats; widespread access to mobile data and digital services.
    • DPI as the backbone for India’s large-scale policy implementation success.

Empowering Women in Science

  • In the field of patent filing, fewer than 100 patents were filed annually by women in India a decade ago, whereas today the number exceeds 5,000 per year. 
  • Women now constitute approximately 43% of STEM education enrolments in India, surpassing the global average. 
  • Women’s participation in space missions and scientific leadership cited as evidence of inclusivity.

Nurturing Scientific Temper

  • ATLs: Establishment of 10,000 Atal Tinkering Labs (ATLs), engaging over 1 crore students; plan to expand to 25,000 labs.
  • PM’s Research Fellowship: 10,000 new fellowships to be offered in the next five years.
  • NEP 2020: Enabled STEM education in local languages for wider access.
  • New institutions: Creation of hundreds of new universities, including 7 IITs and 16 IIITs.

AI for All - Artificial Intelligence and Ethical Technology

  • Launch of the India AI Mission with ₹10,000 crore investment for democratizing AI.
  • India leading efforts toward a global framework for ethical and human-centric AI.
  • Announcement of the Global AI Summit 2026 to be hosted by India.

Future Vision - Key Focus Areas Proposed by PM

  • India’s scientists should generate ideas to -
    • Move from food security to nutrition security.
    • Create biofortified crops to address malnutrition.
    • Develop low-cost fertilizers, bio-fertilisers and soil health enhancers as sustainable alternatives. 
    • Better map India’s genomic biodiversity for personalised medicine.
    • Arrive at new and cheap innovation in clean battery storage. 
    • Achieve Atmanirbharta (self-reliance) in critical inputs and technologies.

Way Forward - Toward a Developed India through STI

  • Foster collaboration among government, academia, industry, and startups.
  • Promote ethical, inclusive, and sustainable innovation.
  • Encourage young scientific talent and enhance global partnerships in frontier technologies.
  • Strengthen the link between research, application, and social impact.

Conclusion

  • The ESTIC 2025 conclave underscores India’s determination to lead the global discourse on ethical and inclusive science and innovation. 
  • By linking research with societal progress and empowering women and youth, India is moving from being a consumer of technology to a creator and exporter of innovation. 
  • The call of “Jai Vigyan, Jai Anusandhan” embodies India’s vision of a knowledge-driven, self-reliant, and technologically empowered nation.

Source: THPIB

ESTIC 2025 FAQs

Q1: How does the ₹1 Lakh Crore RDI Fund aim to transform India’s research ecosystem?

Ans: It seeks to build a private sector–driven R&D ecosystem by funding high-risk, high-impact projects and promoting industry–academia collaboration.

Q2: What is the significance of India’s progress in sunrise sectors for achieving the Viksit Bharat 2047 vision?

Ans: Advancements in these frontier technologies strengthen India’s technological self-reliance, sustainable growth, and global competitiveness.

Q3: In what ways has the government promoted inclusivity and gender balance in India’s science and technology ecosystem?

Ans: By increasing women’s participation in STEM to 43%, expanding Atal Tinkering Labs, and enabling education and patent access for women innovators.

Q4: What is the role of Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) in India?

Ans: DPI, through nationwide optical fibre connectivity and digital services, ensures inclusive access, real-time delivery, and data-driven innovation.

Q5: What are the key objectives of India’s AI governance framework and the India AI Mission?

Ans: To develop a global, ethical, and human-centric AI ecosystem with ₹10,000 crore investment, promoting innovation, safety, and inclusivity.

Supreme Court Rules on Summons to Lawyers: Protecting Client Privilege

Lawyer Summons

Lawyer Summons Latest News

  • Recently, the Supreme Court ruled that police and investigating agencies cannot summon advocates to disclose client communications shared during legal advice. 
  • The Court examined whether lawyers acting solely in a professional capacity can be summoned and, if their role extends beyond that, whether such summons should face judicial scrutiny.

Background: From Gujarat Loan Dispute to Nationwide Concern

  • The case originated from a Special Leave Petition (SLP) in a loan dispute, where an advocate representing an accused in a bail plea was summoned by the investigating officer.
  • When the lawyer challenged the summons, the Gujarat High Court upheld it, ruling that the advocate’s non-cooperation had stalled the investigation and finding no violation of fundamental rights, as the officer acted within legal authority.
  • The issue escalated nationally after the Enforcement Directorate (ED) issued summons to Supreme Court senior advocates Arvind Datar and Pratap Venugopal.
    • This was issued in a probe related to ESOP allotments by Care Health Insurance Ltd to Rashmi Saluja, former Religare Enterprises chairperson.
  • Though the ED later withdrew the summons, the action drew strong condemnation from legal bodies, as the move threatened the independence of the legal profession and the right to fair legal representation.

Attorney-Client Communication Under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), 2023

  • The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), 2023, which replaced the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, upholds the confidentiality of communications between advocates and their clients.
  • Such communications are privileged and cannot be disclosed to third parties, ensuring clients receive free and fair legal advice.

Exceptions to Privilege (Section 132)

  • An advocate cannot reveal client communications, even after professional engagement ends, except in three specific cases:
    • Client consent to disclosure.
    • The communication is made for an illegal purpose.
    • The advocate witnesses a crime being committed during the period of employment.

Scope of Protection

  • The privilege covers oral, written, and electronic communications between lawyer and client.
  • An advocate is also exempt from testifying about such exchanges in court or to investigative agencies.
  • The Supreme Court clarified that this protection exists to safeguard a client’s right to effective legal representation, not to grant immunity to lawyers from legitimate investigation when unlawful acts are involved.

Contentions Before the Supreme Court on Summons to Lawyers

  • The Bar associations contended that issuing summons to advocates violates their fundamental rights under Articles 19(1)(g) (right to practise any profession) and 21 (right to life and personal liberty).
  • They argued that Section 132 of the BSA, 2023 protects client communications, but lacks a corresponding safeguard for advocates against being coerced into disclosure.
  • Such forced revelation, they said, could amount to professional misconduct and undermine client confidentiality.

Bar’s Proposed Safeguards

  • The Bar suggested a two-tier mechanism to prevent arbitrary summons:
    • Judicial Oversight: Summons to advocates must first receive approval from a magistrate.
    • Peer Review: Thereafter, it should be examined by a committee of lawyers at the district, state, or national level to assess whether the communication falls within the exceptions under Section 132.
  • They also recommended applying the “dominant purpose test” — determining whether the communication’s main intent was seeking legal advice (privileged) or furthering illegal acts (not privileged).

Supreme Court’s Directions on Summoning Lawyers

  • The Supreme Court firmly ruled that lawyers cannot be summoned merely to disclose client communications, reaffirming the protection under Section 132 of the BSA 2023.
  • Such privilege, the court said, exists to ensure free and fair legal representation, not to shield illegality.
  • An advocate may only be summoned if the communication is used to commit or conceal a crime, and such summons must:
    • Specify the facts justifying the exception, and
    • Have written approval from a superior officer (not below the rank of Superintendent of Police).

Protecting Constitutional and Professional Rights

  • The bench agreed with the Bar’s contention that breaching confidentiality violates Articles 19(1)(g) (right to practise profession) and 21 (right to personal liberty).
  • It also observed that Section 132 aligns with Article 20(3) of the Constitution, which protects against self-incrimination, extending this principle to the lawyer–client relationship.

No New Guidelines — Existing Safeguards Are Sufficient

  • Rejecting calls for additional judicial oversight, the Court said Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) already allows anyone, including advocates, to challenge summons before a court.
  • The bench held that investigative powers cannot be fettered, as constitutional safeguards already exist to prevent misuse.

Distinction Between Communication and Evidence

  • The Court clarified that Section 132 protects communications, not physical or digital materials.
  • Under Section 94 of the BNSS, investigators may seek documents or devices believed relevant, but only through the court — not directly.
  • Both lawyer and client must be notified, allowed to raise objections, and any examination must occur under judicial supervision, ensuring that unrelated client data remains sealed and protected.

Limited Privilege for In-House Counsels

  • The Court held that in-house legal advisers are not covered by full privilege under Section 132 since they are salaried employees and lack professional independence required under the Advocates Act, 1961.
  • They have limited protection — confidentiality applies to client communications received as legal advisers, but not to internal company exchanges or communications driven by business interests.

Source: IE | ABCL

Lawyer Summons FAQs

Q1: What did the Supreme Court rule about summoning lawyers?

Ans: The Court barred police and agencies from summoning advocates to reveal client communications, except when used to commit or conceal a crime.

Q2: Which law governs attorney-client privilege in India?

Ans: Section 132 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), 2023 protects confidential legal communications from disclosure, even after a lawyer’s engagement ends.

Q3: What constitutional rights did the Court cite?

Ans: The bench said breaching confidentiality violates Articles 19(1)(g) and 21, and that Section 132 aligns with Article 20(3) protecting against self-incrimination.

Q4: Can investigators access a lawyer’s documents or devices?

Ans: Yes, but only through the court under Section 94 of the BNSS, ensuring judicial supervision and protection of unrelated client data.

Q5: Do in-house counsels have the same privilege?

Ans: No. In-house lawyers get limited protection since they’re salaried employees and not independent advocates under the Advocates Act, 1961.

Magnitude 6.3 Earthquake Hits Northern Afghanistan Near Mazar-e-Sharif

Afghanistan Earthquake

Afghanistan Earthquake Latest News

  • Recently, a 6.3-magnitude earthquake struck near Mazar-e-Sharif in northern Afghanistan, killing at least 10 people and injuring around 260.
  • The tremor follows a series of deadly quakes in August that claimed over 2,200 lives, highlighting the region’s continuing vulnerability to seismic disasters.

Geographical Location of Mazar-e-Sharif

  • Mazar-e-Sharif, the capital of Balkh province, lies in northern Afghanistan, close to the borders with Uzbekistan and Tajikistan.
  • It sits at an elevation of about 380 metres (1,250 ft) in a broad alluvial plain of the Amu Darya basin, making it a key urban and economic centre in the region.

Geophysical Characteristics

  • Mazar-e-Sharif lies near the boundary zone between the Eurasian and Indian tectonic plates, an area of intense crustal compression caused by the northward movement of the Indian plate.
  • This collision zone creates active fault lines running through northern and northeastern Afghanistan, where seismic stress accumulates and releases through frequent earthquakes.
  • The recent quake near Mazar-e-Sharif is linked to shallow crustal faults within this convergence zone, where compressional forces generate strike-slip and thrust faulting — common mechanisms for strong tremors in the region.

Afghanistan’s High Earthquake Risk

  • Afghanistan, surrounded by rugged mountain ranges, is highly prone to earthquakes, which are its deadliest natural disasters.
  • On average, around 560 people die each year, and annual damages exceed $80 million.
  • Since 1990, the country has experienced over 355 earthquakes with magnitudes above 5.0, underscoring its extreme seismic vulnerability.

Afghanistan’s Deadliest Earthquakes

  • Afghanistan has experienced around 100 damaging earthquakes since 1900, making it one of the world’s most seismically active countries.
    • In 2022, a magnitude 6 quake killed about 1,000 people.
    • In 2023, multiple quakes in one month claimed another 1,000 lives and flattened entire villages.
    • A 7.5-magnitude earthquake in 2015 killed 399 people across Afghanistan, Pakistan, and India.
    • The 1998 quakes were the deadliest, with two major shocks just three months apart — the first killing 2,300 and the second 4,700, causing massive destruction across the north.
  • These events highlight Afghanistan’s chronic seismic vulnerability and the repeated human toll from major tremors.

Afghanistan Is Prone to Earthquakes

  • Afghanistan lies at the junction of three major tectonic plates — the Eurasian, Indian, and Arabian plates.
  • The northward movement of the Indian plate and its collision with the Eurasian plate, combined with pressure from the Arabian plate in the south, makes this one of the most seismically active regions on Earth.
  • The constant pushing, twisting, and grinding of these plates generates frequent and powerful earthquakes across the region.

Most High-Risk Areas

  • The eastern and northeastern regions of Afghanistan — along borders with Pakistan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan — are most vulnerable to major tremors.
  • Kabul, the capital, faces the highest financial losses, averaging about $17 million annually from earthquake damage.

Added Threat of Landslides

  • In Afghanistan’s mountainous terrain, earthquakes often trigger landslides, which can bury entire villages, block vital roads, and delay rescue and relief operations, worsening the human and economic toll.

Building Earthquake Resilience in Afghanistan

  • Experts recommend that new buildings follow earthquake-resistant designs and existing structures be retrofitted to prevent collapses during tremors.
  • They also stress the need for better monitoring and early warning systems to issue timely alerts.
  • There is need for mapping fault lines through geospatial and remote sensing technologies to help relocate vulnerable populations and improve disaster preparedness.

Source: IE | BBC | NYT

Afghanistan Earthquake FAQs

Q1: Where did the 6.3 earthquake strike in Afghanistan?

Ans: It struck near Mazar-e-Sharif, the capital of Balkh province in northern Afghanistan, close to the borders with Uzbekistan and Tajikistan.

Q2: Why is Afghanistan prone to earthquakes?

Ans: The country sits at the collision zone of the Indian, Eurasian, and Arabian plates, creating one of the most seismically active regions on Earth.

Q3: Which were Afghanistan’s deadliest earthquakes?

Ans: Major quakes include 1998 (7,000 deaths), 2015 (7.5 magnitude), and 2022–2023 series, each killing over 1,000 people and devastating northern provinces.

Q4: What regions face the highest quake risk?

Ans: Eastern and northeastern Afghanistan, bordering Pakistan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan, face the strongest tremors, along with Kabul, which suffers high financial losses.

Q5: How can Afghanistan build earthquake resilience?

Ans: Experts urge earthquake-resistant construction, retrofitting older buildings, real-time monitoring, and geospatial fault-line mapping to protect vulnerable communities.

Enquire Now