Qualified MFN in Bilateral Investment Treaties – India’s Proposed Reforms

Qualified MFN

Qualified MFN Latest News

  • India is considering a Qualified Most Favoured Nation provision while remodelling its Bilateral Investment Treaty framework. 

Bilateral Investment Treaties

  • A Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) is an agreement between two countries that establishes rules for protecting investments made by investors of one country in the territory of the other.
  • BITs generally address issues such as:
    • Protection against discriminatory treatment
    • Expropriation of investments
    • Fair and equitable treatment
    • Transfer of funds
    • Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS)
  • India adopted a new Model BIT in 2015, partly in response to concerns arising from earlier investment disputes. 
  • The 2015 model adopted a more cautious approach towards investor protections, including not providing an open-ended MFN clause or a full Fair and Equitable Treatment (FET) standard.

About the MFN Principle

  • The Most Favoured Nation (MFN) principle generally requires a country to provide investors from one treaty partner treatment no less favourable than that provided to investors from another country.
  • For example, if Country A gives investors from Country B more favourable treatment under a later treaty, an MFN provision could potentially allow investors from Country C to seek similar treatment if their treaty with Country A contains an applicable MFN clause.
  • India moved away from an open-ended MFN provision in its 2015 Model BIT because of concerns that investors could use provisions from treaties with third countries to make broader claims than those expressly negotiated in their own treaty.

Qualified MFN

  • A Qualified MFN provision would retain the principle of non-discrimination but place specific limitations on its application.
  • Instead of allowing investors to automatically claim the most favourable provision available in any third-country treaty, the provision could include safeguards specifying:
    • Which treaty provisions can be imported?
    • Whether the provision can apply retrospectively?
    • Whether settled disputes can be reopened?
    • What categories of treatment are covered?
  • This approach attempts to balance investor protection with the regulatory autonomy of the State.

News Summary

  • The Union Government is considering a broader restructuring of its BIT framework. The proposed reforms include Qualified MFN treatment rather than restoring the open-ended MFN rule that was removed about a decade ago.
  • The objective is to address concerns of major trading partners such as the European Union, while avoiding the risks associated with allowing investors to import favourable provisions from unrelated third-country treaties.
  • The approach could also provide negotiating leverage for Indian companies seeking similar treatment in major overseas markets such as the US and EU.

Changes to ISDS

  • The proposed framework would reduce the domestic ISDS window from five years to one year.
  • Under such a system, investors would generally be expected to pursue domestic legal remedies for one year before moving towards international arbitration.
  • The proposal is intended to expedite dispute resolution, but experts have cautioned that shorter timelines would increase the importance of strengthening India’s domestic dispute-resolution institutions.

Longer Post-Treaty Protection

  • The draft proposal also seeks to double the period of investor protection after expiry of a BIT from five years to 10 years.
  • This could provide greater certainty to investments made under a treaty even after the treaty itself has expired.

Wider Definition of Investment

  • Another proposed change is to expand the definition of “investment” to include portfolio investments and other financial assets.
  • This could potentially bring certain shares and minority or portfolio holdings within the scope of treaty protection, depending on the final wording of the agreement.
  • The proposal also seeks to ban third-party funding of investment-related litigation.

India’s FDI Context

  • The proposed reforms come against a backdrop of declining net FDI inflows into India.
  • According to the report, average annual net FDI was close to US$40 billion during FY20-FY22, but fell to approximately US$7.65 billion in FY26, based on preliminary data.
  • At the same time, Indian companies have expanded their investments overseas. This combination has increased the policy focus on making India’s investment regime more predictable and competitive.

Strategic Balance

  • The proposed reforms attempt to balance two objectives: making India more attractive to foreign investors while preserving the policy flexibility sought under the 2015 Model BIT.
  • The EU itself has moved towards an Investment Court System model while retaining non-discrimination protections. 
  • India is also negotiating around a dozen BITs, making the design of its revised framework particularly important.

Conclusion

  • India's proposed BIT reforms represent an attempt to create a more predictable investment environment without returning to unrestricted treaty protections. 
  • A Qualified MFN clause could provide investors with greater protection while limiting the possibility of importing unrelated provisions from third-country treaties. 
  • The success of the proposed framework will depend on the precise safeguards adopted, the strength of domestic dispute-resolution institutions and India's ability to balance investor confidence with regulatory autonomy.

Source: IE

Qualified MFN FAQs

Q1: What is a Bilateral Investment Treaty?

Ans: A BIT is an agreement between two countries that establishes protections and dispute-resolution mechanisms for investors of the two countries.

Q2: What is a Qualified MFN provision?

Ans: It is an MFN provision subject to specific safeguards that limit when investors can claim more favourable treatment available under another treaty.

Q3: What change is proposed in the ISDS period?

Ans: The proposed reforms would reduce the domestic dispute-resolution period before international arbitration from five years to one year.

Q4: What is proposed regarding the definition of investment?

Ans: The proposed framework may expand the definition to cover portfolio investments and other financial assets.

Q5: Why is India revisiting its BIT framework?

Ans: The review aims to improve investment predictability and competitiveness amid declining net FDI while retaining safeguards introduced through the 2015 Model BIT.

India-Uzbekistan Relations – Towards a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership

India-Uzbekistan Relations

India-Uzbekistan Relations Latest News

  • India and Uzbekistan have elevated their bilateral relationship to a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership, marking a new phase in ties on the 15th anniversary of their Strategic Partnership. 
  • During the Indian PM’s visit to Tashkent, the two sides agreed to deepen cooperation in civil nuclear energy, trade, defence, critical minerals, connectivity, counter-terrorism, pharmaceuticals, technology and education.

Civil Nuclear Cooperation - Uranium Supply

  • A major new area of cooperation is the proposed long-term arrangement for uranium supplies from Uzbekistan to India.
  • India has been exploring uranium imports to support its expanding civilian nuclear energy programme and strengthen energy security. The agreement is reportedly close to being finalised.
  • For India, diversified uranium sourcing can reduce dependence on a limited number of suppliers and support the long-term expansion of nuclear power as a low-carbon baseload energy source.

Trade and Economic Partnership

  • The two countries set an ambitious target of raising annual bilateral trade from around USD 1 billion to USD 5 billion by 2030.
  • Key areas identified include trade and investment, agriculture and pharmaceuticals, energy and critical minerals, jewellery and mining, and infrastructure and connectivity.
  • To achieve the target, India and Uzbekistan intend to address market-access barriers, connectivity constraints, banking and payment mechanisms.
  • Significance: Uzbekistan is an important gateway to Central Asia, while India seeks greater economic engagement with the resource-rich and strategically located region.

Defence and Counter-Terrorism

  • Defence cooperation:
    • It is being expanded from traditional military exchanges towards defence-industrial collaboration.
    • Both sides will promote direct linkages between defence industries. Focus will be placed on co-development and co-production of military equipment.
    • The Joint Working Group on Military Cooperation is exploring new avenues in defence-industrial cooperation.
    • The Dustlik joint military exercise continues to strengthen operational cooperation.
  • Zero tolerance on terrorism:
    • The two countries unequivocally condemned terrorism, including cross-border terrorism, and rejected its justification on any grounds.
    • They agreed to strengthen -
      • Intelligence sharing
      • Law-enforcement cooperation
      • Countering violent extremism
      • Action against terrorist financing
      • Tackling safe havens and terrorist infrastructure
      • Combating organised crime and illicit drug trafficking
      • Cooperation against cyber threats
    • This has particular significance given the security uncertainties in Afghanistan and their implications for Central Asia.

Critical Minerals and Strategic Resources

  • Critical minerals and mining have emerged as important pillars of the relationship.
  • Uzbekistan possesses significant mineral resources, while India is seeking to diversify its sources of critical minerals essential for clean energy, electronics, advanced manufacturing and strategic technologies.
  • This cooperation can contribute to India's broader objective of building resilient and diversified global supply chains.

Connectivity and People-to-People Ties

  • Connectivity remains a key challenge in India–Central Asia relations because India lacks direct overland access to the region.
  • The partnership therefore assumes significance in the context of India's broader Connect Central Asia Policy and efforts to develop alternative connectivity corridors.
  • Other measures include -
    • Uzbekistan’s decision to remove visa requirements for Indian citizens for stays up to 30 days, facilitating tourism and business.
    • Expansion of digital payment connectivity, with UPI-enabled applications expected to become usable in Uzbekistan.
    • Cooperation in tourism, culture and education.
  • Strategic relevance: Improved connectivity and digital-payment integration can strengthen India's economic and societal presence in Central Asia.

Culture, Education and Heritage

  • The partnership also has a strong civilisational dimension.
  • A Letter of Intent was agreed for restoration and conservation of the Buddhist sites of Fayaz Tepa and Kara Tepa in Uzbekistan.
  • 100 Lal Bahadur Shastri Hindi scholarships were announced.
  • An ICCR Sanskrit Chair will be established at Tashkent State University of Oriental Studies.
  • Cooperation will also cover Ayurveda, education and culture.
  • These initiatives leverage the historical links between the Indian subcontinent and Central Asia.

Institutional Mechanism and Environmental Cooperation

  • The upgraded partnership will receive stronger institutional mechanisms -
    • A Foreign Minister-level Coordination Group will be established.
    • The existing Joint Commission will be elevated from the secretary level to the ministerial level.
  • Additionally, India announced a USD 1 million grant for afforestation in the Aral Sea region, linking bilateral cooperation with environmental restoration.

Strategic Significance for India

  • Uzbekistan occupies a pivotal position in Central Asia, a region increasingly shaped by competition and cooperation involving Russia, China, Türkiye, Iran and other powers. 
  • For India, deeper engagement can help -
    • Diversify energy and critical-mineral supplies.
    • Strengthen security cooperation amid instability surrounding Afghanistan.
    • Expand India's economic footprint in Central Asia.
    • Counterbalance growing Chinese economic and strategic influence.
    • Advance connectivity and India's wider Extended Neighbourhood Policy.
    • Promote India's technological and digital public infrastructure capabilities.

Conclusion

  • The elevation to a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership will be meaningful only if the announced targets translate into implementation
  • In essence, India–Uzbekistan ties are evolving from a predominantly diplomatic and security partnership into a multidimensional strategic relationship.

Source: IE | IE

India-Uzbekistan Relations FAQs

Q1: How does the proposed long-term uranium supply arrangement with Uzbekistan contribute to India’s energy security?

Ans: It diversifies India’s nuclear fuel sources, supports expansion of low-carbon nuclear power and strengthens long-term energy security.

Q2: What is the strategic significance of India–Uzbekistan Comprehensive Strategic Partnership for India?

Ans: It strengthens India’s economic, security and diplomatic footprint in Central Asia while helping diversify supply chains.

Q3: What is the significance of India–Uzbekistan cooperation in critical minerals?

Ans: It can diversify India’s sources of minerals vital for clean energy, electronics and strategic technologies.

Q4: How can enhanced defence cooperation between India and Uzbekistan contribute to regional security?

Ans: It can strengthen bilateral capabilities and promote stability in a strategically sensitive region.

Q5: What is the role of connectivity in deepening India–Uzbekistan relations?

Ans: Improved phygital connectivity can boost trade, tourism and people-to-people contacts, advancing India’s Connect Central Asia approach.

India’s Diaspora Dividend: From Remittances to Growth Capital

India's Diaspora Dividend

India's Diaspora Dividend Latest News

  • India's global diaspora, now numbering over 35 million, is evolving from a source of remittances into a long-term participant in the country's growth story. 
  • As India retains its position as the world's largest remittance recipient, the coming decade may witness a structural shift towards sustained diaspora investment in Indian markets.

Remittances Remain Robust, But the Story Is Changing

  • India received $143.6 billion in remittances in FY26, retaining its status as the world's largest remittance recipient. 
  • These inflows have historically supported household consumption and strengthened India's external sector. 
  • However, non-resident Indians (NRIs) are increasingly viewing India not merely as a source of emotional ties, but as a compelling long-term investment destination.

Strong Macroeconomic Fundamentals Underpin Investor Confidence

  • India remains the world's sixth-largest economy in dollar terms and continues to be the fastest-growing major economy. 
  • Key strengths include:

Financial Markets Have Matured Significantly

  • India's equity market capitalisation touched $5.18 trillion in July 2026, placing it among the world's largest equity markets. 
  • Mutual fund assets under management rose to ₹85.76 lakh crore, with monthly SIP inflows hitting a record ₹31,961 crore. 
  • Diaspora investment, once concentrated in real estate, gold and bank deposits, now spans equities, debt markets, REITs, InvITs, alternative investment funds, manufacturing and renewable energy.

Digital Public Infrastructure Is Reducing Distance for Investors

  • Institutions such as the RBI, SEBI and IFSCA have strengthened governance and market integrity, while GIFT IFSC is emerging as a globally competitive financial platform. 
  • Digital public infrastructure — Aadhaar, UPI, DigiLocker and the Account Aggregator framework — has simplified cross-border investment. 
  • UPI alone processed over 23.66 billion transactions in July 2026. 
  • Simplified digital onboarding and e-KYC have made investing in India more seamless for global investors, even as regulatory complexity and documentation requirements remain perception barriers.

Diaspora Capital Extends Beyond Financial Returns

  • The Indian diaspora today comprises global CEOs, entrepreneurs, professionals, technologists and investors. 
  • Their participation — through capital markets, enterprise creation, infrastructure financing, startups and innovation — brings not just capital but also networks, expertise and global experience. 
  • Tier II and III cities, representing the "aspirations of Bharat," are emerging as new frontiers for this diaspora-linked investment.

Conclusion

  • India's diaspora is transitioning from remittance-sending to long-term capital participation, driven by strengthened macroeconomic fundamentals, matured financial markets and robust digital infrastructure. 
  • Sustained reform in taxation, regulation and cross-border investment processes remains essential to fully unlock this diaspora capital for India's development journey.

Source: BL | TH

India's Diaspora Dividend FAQs

Q1: What is India's Diaspora Dividend?

Ans: India's Diaspora Dividend refers to the growing contribution of overseas Indians through investment, entrepreneurship, expertise, networks and capital beyond traditional remittance flows.

Q2: How are remittances contributing to India's Diaspora Dividend?

Ans: Remittances remain important to India's Diaspora Dividend, with India receiving $143.6 billion in FY26, while diaspora participation increasingly shifts toward long-term investments.

Q3: Why are Indian financial markets attracting diaspora capital?

Ans: India's Diaspora Dividend is supported by mature equity markets, expanding mutual funds, stronger banking institutions and investment opportunities across equities, debt, REITs and InvITs.

Q4: How is digital infrastructure supporting India's Diaspora Dividend?

Ans: Digital infrastructure supports India's Diaspora Dividend through Aadhaar, UPI, DigiLocker, Account Aggregators, digital onboarding and e-KYC, simplifying cross-border investment processes.

Q5: How can India's Diaspora Dividend support economic development?

Ans: India's Diaspora Dividend can provide capital alongside global expertise, business networks and entrepreneurship, supporting startups, infrastructure, manufacturing, renewable energy and investment beyond major cities.

AI and Financial Cybersecurity: How RBI and SEBI Are Tightening Rules

AI and Financial Cybersecurity

AI and Financial Cybersecurity Latest News

  • As Artificial Intelligence increasingly enables sophisticated fraud, deepfakes and attacks on critical financial infrastructure, India's key financial regulators — the RBI and SEBI — are overhauling cybersecurity frameworks to safeguard the financial ecosystem.

The Rising Threat Landscape

  • AI is transforming the nature of financial fraud. Deepfake voices are being used to bypass KYC norms, while more complex scams are infiltrating critical financial institutions. 
  • Several banks have already faced cybersecurity breaches in 2026. 
  • Unlike traditional threats built around identifiable vulnerabilities and periodic assessments, AI dramatically increases the speed, scale and sophistication of attacks — from automated vulnerability discovery to autonomous cyberattacks.

SEBI's IT Resilience Index (ITRI)

  • SEBI has introduced an IT Resilience Index for Market Infrastructure Institutions (MIIs) — entities like clearing corporations and exchanges that enable trading. 
  • Key features:
    • Quantifies cyber readiness across nine parameters.
    • Availability and security: 20% weightage each.
    • Integrity, governance, reliability and monitoring, modularity and flexibility, business continuity: 10% weightage each.
    • Scalability and miscellaneous ("others"): 5% weightage each.
    • MIIs must compute ITRI half-yearly, submit comparative analysis within 60 days, and outline corrective action.
    • Framework takes effect from early 2027.
    • Includes an "early warning system" for continuous risk monitoring.

Standardised Incident Reporting: The FIRE Format

  • SEBI has aligned its cyber incident reporting portal with a standardised "Format for Incident Reporting Exchange" (FIRE). 
  • This enables staged reporting — from initial disclosure through intermediate updates to final closure — while accommodating incomplete information at the time of first reporting.

RBI's Cybersecurity Framework

  • The RBI released a comprehensive cybersecurity framework for banks and financial institutions, mandating:
    • Board-level ownership of cyber risks.
    • Dedicated committees to monitor IT risks.
    • A strict six-hour window for reporting cyber incidents.
    • A revised fraud compensation mechanism (June 2026) expanding victim eligibility and covering newer digital scams.

The "Kill Switch" Mechanism

  • Both regulators are exploring a "kill switch":
    • RBI: Would allow users to halt all financial transactions during fraud
    • SEBI: Evaluating a similar mechanism as part of upcoming AI guidelines

SEBI's Forthcoming AI Guidelines

  • SEBI plans to "shortly" issue guidelines for the responsible use of AI and machine learning in markets. 
  • It already uses AI to flag suspicious trading patterns and has constituted a dedicated team to extend AI-based surveillance to corporate investigations, including scrutiny of quarterly filings.

Expert Recommendations

  • Legal experts suggest regulators should focus on:
    • AI-specific threat modelling
    • Continuous (not periodic) testing
    • Third-party and cloud concentration risks
    • Model and data integrity
    • Deepfake-enabled fraud and supply-chain vulnerabilities
    • Clear human accountability where AI influences critical decisions
    • Technology-neutral accountability backed by technology-specific safeguards, rather than an overly prescriptive code

Conclusion

  • AI has fundamentally altered the financial fraud threat matrix, prompting RBI and SEBI to modernise cybersecurity frameworks through tools like ITRI, FIRE reporting and kill-switch mechanisms. 
  • Sustained regulatory agility, technology-neutral accountability and AI-enabled defensive systems remain critical to securing India's financial infrastructure.

Source: IE

AI and Financial Cybersecurity FAQs

Q1: Why is AI and Financial Cybersecurity becoming a regulatory priority?

Ans: AI and Financial Cybersecurity has become crucial because artificial intelligence enables faster, larger and more sophisticated fraud, deepfakes and attacks against critical financial infrastructure.

Q2: What is SEBI's IT Resilience Index under AI and Financial Cybersecurity?

Ans: The IT Resilience Index measures cybersecurity readiness of Market Infrastructure Institutions across nine parameters, requiring half-yearly assessments, comparative analysis and corrective action.

Q3: What is FIRE reporting in AI and Financial Cybersecurity?

Ans: FIRE reporting standardises cyber-incident disclosures, enabling financial institutions to provide initial reports, subsequent updates and final closure information even when details remain incomplete.

Q4: How does RBI's cybersecurity framework address AI and Financial Cybersecurity?

Ans: RBI's framework requires board-level cyber-risk ownership, dedicated IT-risk committees, six-hour incident reporting and expanded compensation for victims of newer digital frauds.

Q5: What is the kill-switch mechanism in AI and Financial Cybersecurity?

Ans: The kill-switch mechanism would allow users to halt financial transactions during suspected fraud, with RBI exploring the facility and SEBI considering a similar mechanism.

Enquire Now