SC Seeks Implementation of Women’s Reservation Law

Reservation Law

Reservation Law Latest News

  • The Supreme Court has described women as the “largest minority” and sought the Centre’s response on enforcing the Women’s Reservation Act, 2023, which remains unimplemented pending the next Census and delimitation.

Political Representation of Women in India

  • Women constitute 48.4% of India’s population (Census 2011), yet their political representation remains disproportionately low.
  • Currently, women hold only 14.94% of seats in the Lok Sabha and 13% in State Assemblies, a figure far below the global average of 26.5%. 
  • At the local governance level, women’s representation is significantly higher, about 46% in Panchayati Raj Institutions, owing to the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments (1993) mandating one-third reservation for women.
  • India ranks 141st out of 186 countries in the Inter-Parliamentary Union’s 2024 ranking on women’s representation in national parliaments.

Women’s Reservation Act, 2023

  • The Women’s Reservation Act received Presidential assent in 2023, thereby becoming the Constitution (106th Amendment) Act, 2023.
  • The amendment inserted Article 334A into the Constitution, which provides for 33% reservation of seats for women in the Lok Sabha, State Legislative Assemblies, and the Delhi Assembly
  • However, the implementation of this reservation is tied to the completion of the next Census and the subsequent delimitation process, the redrawing of constituencies based on updated population data.
  • The petitioner has challenged this condition, calling it “unjustified and dilatory.” 
  • She contends that the Act should be implemented immediately, arguing that other constitutional amendments, such as the 73rd and 74th Amendments, which introduced one-third reservation for women in Panchayati Raj and urban local bodies, were enforced without linking them to Census data.

Supreme Court’s Observations

  • During the hearing, Justice Nagarathna observed that women, despite constituting nearly half of India’s population, remain underrepresented in legislative bodies
  • She described them as the “largest minority”, invoking the Preamble’s guarantee of political and social equality and citing Article 15(3) of the Constitution, which empowers the State to make special provisions for women’s advancement.
  • “Who is the largest minority in this country? It is the woman, almost 48 per cent. This is about political equality of the woman,” Justice Nagarathna remarked.
  • The Bench questioned the rationale behind delaying implementation, especially since political justice, along with social and economic justice, is a core principle of the Constitution’s preamble
  • It also noted that the underrepresentation of women in Parliament and Assemblies continues even after 75 years of independence.
  • The advocate representing the petitioner argued that the government should not defer the reservation until the Census and delimitation are completed, as no timeline for these exercises has been defined.

Case for Immediate Implementation

  • The petition urged the court to declare the words “after an exercise of delimitation is undertaken for this purpose after the relevant figures for the first census are published” in Article 334A as void ab initio, allowing immediate implementation of the reservation.
  • The petitioner also drew parallels with other constitutional amendments that were implemented without preconditions:
    • 73rd & 74th Amendments (1993): Introduced one-third reservation for women in local governance.
    • 77th Amendment (1995): Provided reservation in promotions for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes.
    • 103rd Amendment (2019): Enabled 10% reservation for the Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) in education and employment.
  • The petitioner argued that the delay in women’s representation in Parliament and Assemblies was contrary to the constitutional principles of equality and justice.
  • Justice Nagarathna underscored that Article 15(3) and Article 39(a) of the Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSPs) empower the State to ensure equal participation of women in public life. 
  • Political representation, she noted, is integral to women’s empowerment and a precondition for achieving genuine democracy.
  • She further emphasised that political justice, as envisioned by the framers of the Constitution, is incomplete without equal representation for women in lawmaking bodies.

Way Ahead

  • While the Supreme Court refrained from issuing directions that could override the executive’s domain, it urged the Centre to clarify its stance and timeline for implementation.
  • The Union government has maintained that the reservation will take effect only after the next Census and delimitation exercise, which have been pending since 2021. 
  • However, no definitive schedule has been announced for these processes, leading to concerns that the law could be indefinitely delayed.
  • Experts suggest that an interim framework, such as the temporary allocation of reserved constituencies, could be introduced to operationalise the law before the next general election. 
  • Political analysts also note that early implementation would not only enhance women’s participation but could also reshape the political landscape, fostering more inclusive policymaking.

Source: TH | PRS

Reservation Law FAQs

Q1: What does the Women’s Reservation Act, 2023 mandate?

Ans: The Act reserves one-third of seats in the Lok Sabha, State Legislative Assemblies, and Delhi Assembly for women.

Q2: When will the reservation for women be implemented?

Ans: It will take effect only after the next Census and subsequent delimitation exercise are completed.

Q3: What did the Supreme Court observe about women’s representation?

Ans: The Court termed women the “largest minority” in India and highlighted their declining representation in Parliament.

Q4: What was the petitioner’s plea in the Supreme Court?

Ans: The petitioner sought immediate implementation of the Act without waiting for delimitation, arguing the delay was unjustified.

Q5: What constitutional provisions support women’s political empowerment?

Ans: Articles 15(3) and 39(a) empower the State to promote equality and ensure women’s participation in governance.

Tropical Forest Forever Facility: Brazil’s $125 Billion Fund to Protect Forests

Tropical Forest Forever Facility

Tropical Forest Forever Facility Latest News

  • At the COP30 climate summit in Belém, Brazil unveiled the Tropical Forest Forever Facility (TFFF) — a new $125 billion fund to reward developing countries for conserving tropical forests.
  • President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva called it an “unprecedented initiative”, emphasising that it gives Global South nations a leading role in forest conservation efforts.
  • While the TFFF is expected to reshape global environmental policy, experts remain uncertain about its implementation mechanisms and how funds will be distributed and managed in practice.

Tropical Forest Forever Facility: A Global Investment for Conservation

  • The Tropical Forest Forever Facility (TFFF) is a self-sustaining investment fund aimed at rewarding up to 74 developing countries for preserving old-growth tropical forests.
  • The fund seeks to raise $125 billion — including $25 billion from governments and philanthropists and $100 billion in private investments. 
  • The money will be invested in public and corporate bonds, with the annual returns distributed as payments to forest nations based on satellite-tracked canopy data.
  • Initial contributions include $1 billion each from Brazil and Indonesia, $250 million from Colombia, $3 billion over a decade from Norway, $5 million from the Netherlands, and €1 million from Portugal.

TFFF Aims to Make Forest Conservation More Valuable

  • The Tropical Forest Forever Facility (TFFF) was launched to reverse the economic incentives driving deforestation, where forests are often worth more dead than alive.
  • By rewarding countries and landowners for keeping forests intact, the fund seeks to make conservation financially competitive with deforestation-based activities like soy and timber production.
  • The TFFF marks a turning point in tropical forest protection, as it creates a global, permanent incentive mechanism recognising the true value of forest ecosystem services, including carbon storage and climate regulation.

Concerns Over Financial Stability and Accountability of the TFFF

  • Vulnerability to Market Fluctuations
    • Critics warn that the Tropical Forest Forever Facility (TFFF) is highly exposed to financial market volatility, as it relies on bond investments—including in developing nations prone to instability.
    • A major market crash, like during COVID-19 or the 2008–09 financial crisis, could jeopardise returns and disrupt payments to forest-conserving countries.
  • Weakening of Developed Nations’ Obligations
    • Experts argue that the TFFF could dilute the legal responsibility of developed countries to provide climate finance.
    • Since the fund is not part of the UNFCCC framework, it is not bound by international accountability standards governing climate finance commitments.
  • Risk of Undermining UN Climate Mechanisms
    • According to the climate finance experts, the TFFF might undermine existing global climate finance systems under the UNFCCC and Paris Agreement, by shifting focus away from public funding obligations toward market-based mechanisms.

Source: IE | TH

Tropical Forest Forever Facility FAQs

Q1: What is the Tropical Forest Forever Facility (TFFF)?

Ans: The TFFF is a $125 billion global investment fund rewarding developing countries for preserving tropical forests through annual payments based on satellite-tracked canopy data.

Q2: Who launched the TFFF and where?

Ans: Brazil launched the TFFF during the COP30 summit in Belém to promote forest conservation and give Global South nations a leading role in climate protection.

Q3: How will the TFFF raise and use funds?

Ans: The fund seeks $25 billion from governments and philanthropists and $100 billion from private investors, investing in bonds to generate returns for forest rewards.

Q4: What problem is the TFFF addressing?

Ans: It aims to make forest conservation financially more rewarding than deforestation, compensating countries for preserving carbon-rich, biodiversity-rich tropical ecosystems.

Q5: What concerns have experts raised about the TFFF?

Ans: Critics warn of financial instability due to market risks and fear it may weaken developed nations’ climate finance obligations under the UNFCCC and Paris Agreement.

How Quality Control Orders Hurt India’s MSMEs and Export Competitiveness

Quality Control Orders

Quality Control Orders Latest News

  • Industry representatives have cautioned that Quality Control Orders (QCOs), originally intended to improve product quality and curb substandard imports, are increasingly being used as protectionist tools. 
  • Experts noted that QCOs have become non-tariff barriers, raising compliance costs and regulatory burdens for Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises (MSMEs), especially as India faces added pressure from U.S. trade tariffs.

About Quality Control Orders

  • Quality Control Orders (QCOs), issued under the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) Act, 2016, mandate that no product can be manufactured, imported, or sold without a BIS certification once notified.
  • Originally meant to enhance product quality and restrict substandard imports, QCOs have been aggressively expanded since 2019 to reduce import dependence and boost domestic manufacturing under the self-reliance agenda.
  • Their number has surged from 88 in 2019 to 765 by December 2024, with metals, machinery, and electronics together accounting for over 60% of all QCOs issued between 1987 and 2025.

Quality Control Orders: A Costly Misstep for India’s MSMEs and Export Competitiveness

  • While India opens its markets through new Free Trade Agreements (FTAs), its parallel drive to impose Quality Control Orders (QCOs) has backfired. 
  • Instead of improving product quality, the move has hurt MSMEs and weakened export competitiveness by increasing costs and regulatory hurdles.

NITI Aayog’s Findings on QCOs

  • A NITI Aayog report by the High-Level Committee on Non-Financial Regulatory Reforms found that most QCOs target raw materials and intermediate products, not finished goods.
  • It also noted that many standards are misaligned with global benchmarks, leading to higher input costs, production delays, and limited access to accredited testing facilities.
  • These bottlenecks have eroded cost competitiveness for downstream manufacturers.

CSEP Study: No Long-Term Export Gains

  • A Centre for Social and Economic Progress (CSEP) study revealed that imports fell sharply after QCO implementation — down 13% in the first year and 24% over the long term.
  • While exports briefly rose by 10.6%, they fell by 12.8% in the following year, showing no sustained benefits.
  • For intermediate goods, imports plunged by 30% in the long run, undermining domestic production capacity and challenging QCOs’ effectiveness as a competitiveness tool.

Quality Norms Hurt Export Sectors and Boost Market Concentration

  • NITI Aayog has warned that QCOs have hurt export-oriented and labour-intensive sectors like footwear and electronics, which employ around 4.5 million people. 
  • These industries depend on imported intermediate materials crucial for product quality and design flexibility.
  • QCOs on such inputs have restricted access to globally sourced materials, as foreign suppliers struggle to obtain BIS certification, leading to market concentration among a few domestic producers. 
  • This has allowed them to raise prices by 15–30% above global benchmarks for products like polyester yarn and steel, reducing India’s cost competitiveness in global markets — notably in apparel exports.
  • According to CSEP, MSMEs face heavy compliance costs (₹10,000–₹15,000 per consignment) and approval delays, while limited testing infrastructure and non-alignment with global standards worsen trade frictions. 
  • Larger firms, better equipped to absorb these costs, often gain at the expense of smaller players, deepening market inequality and export inefficiency.

MSMEs Bear the Brunt of Quality Control Compliance Burden

  • According to NITI Aayog, Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) are the worst hit by the implementation of Quality Control Orders (QCOs) due to high certification costs, testing delays, and stringent inspection requirements.
  • Testing backlogs at BIS-approved labs often stretch for months, while the expense of obtaining and renewing licences is prohibitive for small firms with tight margins. 
  • Unlike exporters in Special Economic Zones (SEZs), MSMEs in the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) lack access to duty-free import channels, reducing their competitiveness in both domestic and global markets.
  • The report also urged the government to revoke the Steel Import Monitoring System (SIMS) and No Objection Certificate (NOC) process for non-BIS steel grades, noting that the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) already has systems to effectively monitor imports and exports.

Source: IE | TP

Quality Control Orders FAQs

Q1: What are Quality Control Orders (QCOs)?

Ans: QCOs are government directives under the BIS Act, 2016, requiring manufacturers and importers to meet BIS-certified quality standards before selling products in India.

Q2: How have QCOs expanded in recent years?

Ans: The number of QCOs rose from 88 in 2019 to 765 by 2024, mainly targeting metals, machinery, and electronics to promote self-reliant manufacturing.

Q3: What has been their impact on exports?

Ans: Studies show QCOs reduce imports but fail to boost exports, instead increasing production costs and reducing competitiveness in sectors like footwear and electronics.

Q4: Why are MSMEs most affected by QCOs?

Ans: MSMEs face high certification costs, long testing delays, and limited access to BIS-approved labs, making compliance financially and logistically burdensome.

Q5: What reforms have been suggested?

Ans: Experts recommend aligning QCOs with global standards, easing compliance for MSMEs, and revoking overlapping monitoring systems like SIMS and redundant NOC requirements.

India AI Governance Guidelines 2025 – Towards Safe, Inclusive and Accountable AI Ecosystem

India AI Governance Guidelines

India AI Governance Guidelines 2025 Latest News

  • The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) released the India AI Governance Guidelines 2025, a comprehensive document aimed at regulating, promoting, and governing the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in India.
  • The guidelines mark a major step in India’s preparation for hosting the AI Impact Summit 2026 in New Delhi and align with global AI governance trends emerging from summits at Bletchley Park (U.K.), Seoul, and Paris.

Objectives of the Guidelines

  • Harnessing AI for inclusive growth:
    • India’s goal is to leverage AI for inclusive development and global competitiveness, while mitigating risks to individuals and society.
    • India is now the world’s 2nd-largest user of Large Language Models (LLMs) after the U.S.
  • Establishing a consistent regulatory framework:
    • The guidelines aim to provide a coherent policy mechanism for AI governance across government, industry, and academia.
    • The framework was finalized by a MeitY committee led by Prof. Balaraman Ravindran, head of the Centre for Responsible AI (CeRAI), IIT Madras.

Key Recommendations

  • Foundational principles:
    • The framework is built on people-centricity, accountability, fairness, and explainability of AI systems.
    • It stresses transparency, ethical AI deployment, and risk-based oversight.
  • Institutional mechanisms: Establishment of an AI Governance Group as an inter-ministerial body to coordinate between -
    • Ministries and sectoral regulators
    • NITI Aayog and Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS)
    • Regulatory agencies like RBI (which has already released the FREE-AI Committee report for the financial sector).
  • Role of private sector: Firms are encouraged to -
    • Ensure compliance with Indian laws
    • Adopt voluntary ethical AI frameworks
    • Publish transparency reports and establish grievance redressal systems
    • Implement techno-legal risk mitigation tools
  • AI Safety Institute (AISI):
    • While no physical institute exists yet, an online AISI under the IndiaAI Mission will oversee safety standards and risk management.
    • Similar institutes operate in other countries to ensure responsible AI deployment.

Unique India-specific Features

  • Infrastructure and accessibility:
    • State governments are advised to expand AI infrastructure, enhance data and compute access, and promote AI adoption at local levels.
    • This aligns with the IndiaAI Mission’s (Graphics Processing Unit) GPU procurement initiative to provide shared computing resources.
  • Cultural and linguistic representation: The guidelines advocate development of AI models in Indian languages using locally relevant datasets, to ensure cultural inclusivity and regional relevance.
  • Intellectual property and legal reforms: Calls for copyright law amendments to address AI-generated content and intellectual property disputes.

Alignment with Broader Government Initiatives

  • Complementing ongoing programs:
    • Deepfake regulation: MeitY has proposed mandatory labelling of AI-generated images/videos for authenticity.
    • Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) integration: Recommends linking AI with Aadhaar, UPI, and other DPI for enhanced public service delivery.
    • Institutional coordination: Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) has already formed a committee to integrate AI capabilities with Aadhaar systems.
  • Policy flexibility: The government will act swiftly if the evolving AI landscape demands legislative intervention beyond the framework.

Way Forward

  • Establish legal backing: Enact a comprehensive AI regulation law ensuring accountability, privacy, and data security.
  • Promote research collaboration: Strengthen ties between academia, startups, and government to advance ethical AI innovations.
  • Capacity building: Upskill public and private sector personnel to understand AI governance, risk, and compliance.
  • Public awareness: Launch campaigns to educate citizens about AI usage, risks, and grievance mechanisms.

Conclusion

  • The India AI Governance Guidelines 2025 represent a balanced approach between innovation and regulation. 
  • By focusing on ethical use, risk management, and inclusion, India aims to emerge as a global leader in responsible AI governance.
  • The document lays the foundation for safe, equitable, and transparent AI integration into governance and the economy — reflecting the government’s vision of “AI for All” in the spirit of Digital India.

Source: TH

India AI Governance Guidelines 2025 FAQs

Q1: What are the primary objectives of the India AI Governance Guidelines 2025?

Ans: The guidelines aim to harness AI for inclusive development and global competitiveness, while ensuring accountability, fairness, and risk mitigation.

Q2: What institutional mechanism has been proposed under the AI Governance Guidelines?

Ans: An overarching AI Governance Group has been proposed to coordinate among Ministries, regulators like RBI, NITI Aayog, etc.

Q3: How do the India AI Governance Guidelines differ from similar global frameworks?

Ans: India’s guidelines emphasize AI infrastructure development, data access, and culturally representative AI models in Indian languages.

Q4: What role does the AI Safety Institute (AISI) play in India’s AI governance?

Ans: The AISI, established virtually under the IndiaAI Mission, is tasked with promoting AI safety research, risk classification, etc.

Q5: How are the AI Governance Guidelines aligned with India’s broader digital initiatives?

Ans: They complement initiatives like Digital Public Infrastructure (Aadhaar, UPI), deepfake regulation, and AI-enabled governance.

Enquire Now