12-11-2024
08:04 AM
Prelims: Indian Polity & Governance – Constitution, Political System, Panchayati Raj, Public Policy, Rights Issues, etc.
Mains: Indian Constitution—historical underpinnings, evolution, features, amendments, significant provisions, and basic structure.
The 44th Constitutional Amendment Act, which was enacted in 1978, is one of the most significant amendments to the Indian Constitution. It was enacted during the tenure of Prime Minister Morarji Desai, in response to the controversial 42nd Amendment, which was implemented under Prime Minister Indira Gandhi's administration during the 1975–1977 Emergency era.
The 44th Amendment aimed to reverse many provisions that granted excessive powers to the executive and undermined fundamental rights, restoring the democratic balance of the Indian Constitution after the Emergency.
The 44th Constitutional Amendment's primary objectives were to limit executive power, particularly in the context of declaring a National Emergency, strengthen judicial independence by reversing provisions that curtailed its authority, and restore democratic governance by undoing changes that disrupted the balance of power between the executive, legislature, and judiciary. These reforms were aimed at safeguarding citizens' rights and ensuring the protection of India's democratic framework.
The 44th Constitutional Amendment Act introduced extensive changes across various constitutional provisions. It amended features related to fundamental rights, emergency provisions, the powers of the President, and judicial review. The Amendment also deleted several controversial provisions, like Article 329A, which restricted judicial review of electoral disputes involving the Prime Minister.
The 44th Amendment brought significant revisions to the provisions concerning Fundamental Rights, aiming to enhance individual liberties and provide stronger protections against arbitrary state actions. The following key changes were made:
The 44th Amendment made significant changes to the powers of the President, particularly through the substitution of Article 71. It established that all disputes regarding the election of the President or Vice-President would be decided by the Supreme Court, with its decision being final. The amendment also clarified that the President has the authority to ask the Council of Ministers to reconsider its advice. However, after such reconsideration, the advice of the Council of Ministers becomes binding on the President.
The 44th Amendment restored the powers of the High Courts and the Supreme Court, reinstating their authority to adjudicate on various matters. It eliminated provisions that had previously stripped the courts of their ability to resolve election disputes involving the President, Vice-President, Prime Minister, and Speaker of the Lok Sabha. This restoration of judicial review reinforced the judiciary's role in maintaining the rule of law and upholding democratic processes.
The 44th Amendment reinstated the standard tenure of the Lok Sabha and state legislative assemblies to five years, reversing the six-year extension imposed by the 42nd Amendment. This change was made by amending Articles 83 and 172 of the Constitution. Additionally, Article 361A was introduced to protect individuals from civil or criminal liability for publishing substantially true reports of proceedings from either House of Parliament or a state legislature, except when it involves the disclosure of secret proceedings.
The 44th Amendment introduced significant changes to the provisions governing the imposition of a National Emergency, aiming to prevent arbitrary declarations and safeguard civil rights. These amendments were designed to ensure greater accountability and restrict the circumstances under which an emergency could be declared, thereby enhancing the protection of individual liberties.
The 44th Amendment addressed disqualifications of Parliament members, specifying that if a question arises about a member's disqualification under Article 102(1), it must be referred to the President for a final decision. Before deciding, the President must consult the Election Commission and act according to its advice.
The 44th Constitutional Amendment Act of 1978 is considered a vital corrective measure that restored democracy in India after the Emergency. It reversed several controversial provisions of the 42nd Amendment, enhancing civil liberties and judicial independence. By curtailing the arbitrary powers of the executive, it aimed to establish a better balance among government branches. However, Critics argue that while it strengthened democratic principles, issues of political accountability remained inadequately addressed.
Q1. Consider the following statements : (UPSC Prelims 2019)
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a) 1 only (b) 2 only
(c) Both 1 and 2 (b) Neither 1 nor 2
Ans: (b)
Q1.What was abolished by the 44th Amendment Act?
Ans. The 44th Amendment abolished the provisions of Article 19(1)(f), which protected the right to property, and removed Article 31, which provided for compensation in property acquisition.
Q2. What is the difference between the 42nd and 44th amendment?
Ans. The 42nd Amendment significantly expanded executive powers and restricted civil liberties, while the 44th Amendment aimed to restore democratic principles, limit executive authority, and safeguard Fundamental Rights.
Q3. Which PM passed the 44th Amendment of the Indian Constitution?
Ans. The 44th Amendment was passed during the tenure of Prime Minister Morarji Desai.
Q4. Which fundamental right was deleted by the 44th Amendment?
Ans. The right to property was deleted as a Fundamental Right under Article 19(1)(f) and reclassified as a legal right under Article 300A.
Q5. What was the effect of the 44th Amendment on Emergency?
Ans. The 44th Amendment made it more difficult to declare a National Emergency by requiring a Cabinet recommendation in writing and limited the grounds for such a declaration.
© 2024 Vajiram & Ravi. All rights reserved