Aurangzeb and Fall of Mughals

Aurangzeb 

Aurangzeb Alamgir (“World Conqueror”) ascended the throne in 1658 after eliminating all competitors, including Dara Shukoh, Shuja, and Murad, in a war of succession.

• Two parts: His reign of fifty years can be divided into two equal parts.
  • During the first twenty-five years, he resided in the north, primarily in Delhi, and personally handled the affairs of northern India while delegating control of the Deccan to his viceroys.
  • In around 1681, prompted by the rebellion of his son, Prince Akbar, he went to the Deccan. He never returned to Delhi and died disheartened in Ahmad Nagar in 1707.

Aurangzeb’s Religious Policy

Aurangzeb’s religious policy was characterised by his strong commitment to orthodox Sunni Islam and his attempts to enforce Islamic law and customs throughout the Mughal Empire.

• Islamic Orthodoxy: Aurangzeb was profoundly religious and sought to uphold what he considered a puritanical interpretation of Sunni Islam.
  • He emphasised enforcing Islamic law and promoted religious scholars who supported his conservative views.
  • He was known for his piety and observed strict religious practices.
• Imposition of Jizya: This tax was reinstated during his reign and was considered discriminatory against Hindus and other religious minorities.
• Persecution of Religious Leaders: He executed Guru Tegh Bahadur (the ninth Sikh Guru) when he refused to convert to Islam. This religious persecution contributed to the subsequent Sikh rebellion against Mughal rule.

Aurangzeb’s Deccan Policy

Aurangzeb’s Deccan policy aimed to extend Mughal control over the Deccan Sultanates, particularly Bijapur and Golconda, and bring them under direct Mughal rule. Aurangzeb saw the Deccan as a crucial region, both politically and economically.

• Annexation of Bijapur and Golconda: He launched military campaigns and besieged these Sultanates for several years. Eventually, in 1686, he successfully captured Bijapur, followed by the fall of Golconda in 1687, bringing them under Mughal rule.
• Maratha Resistance: Under leaders like Shivaji and later his son Sambhaji, the Marathas resisted Aurangzeb’s expansionist plans and forced him to divert significant resources to counter their activities.
• Economic Drain: Aurangzeb’s prolonged military campaigns in the Deccan significantly drained the empire’s resources. The cost of maintaining a large army and administering the newly acquired territories put a strain on the Mughal treasury.
• Impact on Stability: Aurangzeb’s focus on the Deccan campaigns diverted attention from other parts of the empire, leading to the neglect of governance in regions like Bengal and Punjab.
  • The prolonged military engagements, coupled with the suppression of local rulers and communities, eventually contributed to the decline of the Mughal Empire after Aurangzeb’s death.

Role of Aurangzeb’s Policies in the Fall of the Mughal Empire

Aurangzeb’s reign is often associated with the decline of the Mughal Empire due to several factors. While multiple factors influenced it, Aurangzeb’s policies and actions played a significant role.

• Religious Policies: He implemented measures favouring Islam over other religions, such as imposing jizya (tax on non-Muslims).
  • This policy alienated non-Muslim subjects, leading to widespread discontent and resistance.
• Deccan Campaigns: The Deccan wars drained the treasury, stretched the military, and diverted attention from other pressing issues within the empire. The prolonged conflicts in the south weakened the central authority and exacerbated regional tensions.
• Financial Mismanagement: He faced financial difficulties due to increased military spending, a lack of revenue reforms, and inadequate revenue collection mechanisms.
  • The empire faced a persistent fiscal crisis, leading to inflation, economic instability, and the inability to sustain its vast territorial holdings.
• Rebellion and Regional Fragmentation: The Jats, Sikhs, Rajputs, and Marathas, among others, challenged Mughal authority and sought to establish their own independent kingdoms.
  • These rebellions drained the empire’s resources, weakened its control over provinces, and contributed to the fragmentation of the empire.
• Administrative Centralization: Aurangzeb’s strong centralisation of power and autocratic rule led to administrative inefficiencies.
  • This centralised approach hindered the empire’s ability to respond to local challenges and led to an increased administrative burden.
• Succession Crisis: Aurangzeb’s long reign and the tensions caused by his policies resulted in a succession crisis after his death.
  • The subsequent Mughal rulers were often weak and inexperienced and faced challenges from rival claimants to the throne.

Later Mughals

After Aurangzeb, the Mughal dynasty witnessed a galaxy of weak rulers, which resulted in the decline of the empire and, ultimately, its end.

Table – Mughals after Aurangzeb

Decline of Mughal Empire

The Mughal Empire experienced a significant decline in power and prestige, leading to the emergence of independent principalities and the decline and disappearance of the Mughal Empire.

Shifting allegiance of Zamindars

The Zamindars played a crucial role in the empire as they assisted in revenue collection and local administration, maintaining their soldiers.

• Powerful Zamindars: Although the Mughals attempted to limit the power of the Zamindars and establish direct contact with the peasants, they were only partially successful in their endeavours.
• Support for Nobles: Many local zamindars supported the nobility, the other powerful class within the empire, in exploiting the weakened state of the empire to establish independent kingdoms for themselves.

Jagirdari Crisis

The nobility in the Mughal Empire consisted of individuals who held large jagirs (land assignments) and mansabs (ranks) or were appointed as subahdars (governors) of Mughal provinces, with the responsibility of maintaining them.

• Factions Of Nobles: Despite the well-organized structure provided by Akbar, divisiveness within the nobility emerged based on factors such as religion, homeland, and tribe, leading to the formation of distinct groups.
• Undermined the central power: During the later Mughal period, in the absence of strong central leadership, mutual rivalry, jealousy, and power struggles among these various groups undermined the emperor’s prestige and contributed to the empire’s decline.

Rise of regional aspirations

During Aurangzeb’s reign, powerful regional groups such as the Jats, Sikhs, and Marathas emerged and challenged the authority of the Mughal state in their pursuit of establishing their own kingdoms.

• Persistent struggle: Their continuous struggle against the Mughal Empire for political dominance weakened the empire.
• Rajputs: Aurangzeb’s policies, particularly his attempts to suppress the Rajputs, inadvertently provoked them to rise against the Mughals.
• Marathas: 
  • The Marathas emerged as a formidable enemy, with their initial goal being the regain control over the region of Maharashtra.
  • However, their ambitions quickly expanded, and they sought legal sanction from the Mughal emperor to collect Sardeshmukhi (levy on land) and Chauth (tribute) throughout India.
  • They expanded their influence northwards and, by 1740, had successfully extended their power over the provinces of Gujarat, Malwa, and Bundelkhand.

Political and administrative problems

Over time, the number of amirs (nobles) in the Mughal Empire increased significantly, resulting in a scarcity of land available to be distributed among them as jagirs (land assignments).

• Aurangzeb inflated the recorded income from the jagirs to address the acute shortage of jagirs.
  • This proved to be a short-sighted solution as the amirs, in turn, pressured the peasantry to recover the inflated income from their jagirs.
    • Consequently, both the amirs and the peasantry became antagonised.
• Lagged development in Science and Technology: Moreover, there were no significant scientific or technological advancements that could have propelled the stagnant economy forward.
• Failure to reap trade benefits: Despite the growth of trade, particularly with the increasing presence of European traders along the coastal regions of India, the empire did not benefit significantly from this flourishing trade.
• Death of Aurangzeb: Following the death of Aurangzeb, these economic and administrative problems only multiplied. The empire had become too vast to be efficiently governed under a centralised system, especially during periods of weak and incompetent rulers.